Ana səhifə

Federal Republic of Nigeria Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Staple Crop Processing Zones Support Project (scpz)


Yüklə 11.44 Mb.
səhifə20/40
tarix26.06.2016
ölçüsü11.44 Mb.
1   ...   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   ...   40


6.3.6 Chance Find Protocols


In the event of chance finds of items of cultural significance, all forms of excavation in and around the site will be stopped. Subsequently, experienced archaeologists and anthropologist would be recruited to carry out an investigation and proposed plans for the preservation of such cultural artefacts (Annex..).

During the project site induction meeting, all contractors will be made aware of the presence of an on-site archaeologist who will monitor earthmoving and excavation activities.

The following procedure is to be executed in the event that archaeological material is discovered. Annex 14 describes the procedure in detail:


  • All construction activity in the vicinity of the find/feature/site will cease immediately;

  • Delineate the discovered find/ feature/ site will be delineated;

  • Record the find location, and all remains are to be left in place;

  • Secure the area to prevent any damage or loss of removable objects;

  • The on-site archaeologist will assess, record and photograph the find/feature/ site;

  • The on-site archaeologist will undertake the inspection process in accordance with all project health and safety protocols under direction of the Health and Safety Officer; and

  • In consultation with the statutory authorities the on-site and Project Archaeologist will determine the appropriate course of action to take.



CHAPTER SEVEN PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT /CONSULTATION



7.0 Introduction

One key factor that exists in all successful approaches to project development and implementation is participation by all stakeholders. The more direct involvement of the local level people in the planning and management processes, the greater the likelihood that resource use and protection problems will be solved as well as the likelihood of development opportunities occurring in a balanced way and to the broad benefit of all communities in the project.


Thus in line with the requirements of the World Bank Safeguard for all category A and B projects for IBRD or IDA financing, the preparation of this ESMF included consultations of relevant government agencies, communities and social groups within the SCPZ and ABIR. The consultation process which is a continuum began on 13th August 2014 and continued till 27th August for the first phase which covered the stakeholder government agencies and the communities within the SCPZ core zone.

The second phase was the combined World Bank and FMARD mission which took place from October 13th to October 17th 2014, and provided a platform to validate earlier data and deepened discussions and engagement with the relevant stakeholders, especially Federal Ministry of Environment, Forestry Dept, etc. on essentially safeguard concerns of the project.

The third phase of the consultation at this stage captured four other LGAs and affected groups and communities within the 280,000Ha of ABIR catchment from 27th to 3rd November 2014. These communities and LGAs visited are Iwaa and Oshokosho in Lokoja LGA, Iresuare/Osara-Gada in Adavi LGA, Ohu and Irukura in Okehi LGA and Iyara in Ijumu LGA.
7.1 Objectives of Public Involvement/Consultations

Specifically, the objectives included:


  1. Canvass stakeholders’ inputs, views and concerns; and take account of the information and views of the public in the project design and in decision making.

  2. Obtain local and traditional knowledge that may be useful for decision-making;

  3. Facilitate consideration of alternatives, mitigation measures and tradeoffs;

  4. Ensure that important impacts are not overlooked and benefits maximized;

  5. Reduce conflict through the early identification of contentious issues;

  6. Provide an opportunity for the public to influence the designs and implementation in a positive manner;

  7. Improve transparency and accountability in decision-making; and

  8. Increase public confidence in the project.



7.2 Mechanism for Consultation and Participation

Public involvement/consultation was considered a fundamental tool for:

  1. Managing two-way communication between the project proponent and the public.

  2. Building understanding and improving decision-making by actively involving individuals, groups and organizations with a stake

In this regard it makes sense, at this juncture in this ESMF, to understand the following concepts: public involvement, consultation and communication that are frequently confused with each other and that should be kept separate.

.


  • Public involvement here includes public consultation (or dialogue) and public participation, which is a more interactive and intensive process of stakeholder engagement.

  • Consultation is basically a two-way process in which the ideas and concerns of stakeholders and the subproject designers are shared and considered.

  • Communication involves dissemination of information from the subproject proponents to the concerned public.

For this ESMF and subsequent safeguard instruments to be prepared, public participation strategy for the project revolves around the provision of a full opportunity for involvement of all stakeholders, especially the direct stakeholders. Therefore, as a matter of strategy, public consultation will be an on-going activity taking place throughout the entire project cycle. The consultation process will ensure that all those identified as stakeholders are consulted.


Subject to PMU‟s approval, information about the project will be shared with the public, to enable meaningful contribution, and enhance the success of the project. There are many vehicles that could be used for communication and consultation such as listed below:


  • Meetings, filling in of questionnaires/ application forms, public readings and explanations of project ideas and requirements making public documents available at the national, local and community levels at suitable locations like the official residences/offices of local elders, announcement

  • In various media, newspaper announcements placement in more than one paper, preferably all local papers , notice board near project site, posters located in strategic locations and many public places frequented by community and radio and local television

Any of these means to use must take into account the low literacy levels prevalent in the rural communities by allowing enough time for responses and feedback and putting messages in the language readily understood by such people. Ideas and complaints coming from the population must be documented and utilised in decision making.


In fact the PMU should as a matter of reaching the relevant public engage directly with stakeholders and taking their concerns into account. In other words, for effective consultation, the PMUs should hold specific events (preferably community-level meetings) at which affected people will feel comfortable expressing their views. Such events should be carefully documented by written minutes, recordings, video recordings, etc. and the minutes of these meetings together with attendance lists should be included in the prepared instrument whether ESMP or ESIA to demonstrate that consultation has taken place. ESMP/ESIA will explicitly show how ideas from public were taken into account.
Generally, the PMUs are not required to accept every suggestion or demand made, but they should take each reasonable suggestion into account as a matter of good faith.
7.3 Identifying Stakeholders

Stakeholders for the purpose of this project shall be defined as all those people and institutions that have an interest in the planning and execution of the project, farmers, potentially affected communities; traditional rulers/ Religious leaders; NGOs/CBOs; Local Government officials; State MDAs; Local social and professional groups e.g., farmers, market women, etc. Below an outline is indicated of the key stakeholders identified at present which will be updated during project execution: Stakeholders for the purpose of this project shall be defined as all those people and institutions that have an interest in the planning and execution of the project, potentially affected communities; traditional rulers/ Religious leaders; NGOs/CBOs; Local Government officials; State MDAs; Local social and professional groups e.g., farmers, market women, road transport workers, International organization such as the World Band, FAO etc. While the ESMF consultations and stakeholders engagement provide stakeholders, the general understanding of the whole project and the opportunity to contribute to the process as well as expressing the community concerns and issues on the project, the future ESIAs/ ESMPs consultation and stakeholders engagement on the other hand addresses same issues in detail with respect to individual sub-projects and ancillary facilities. Below an outline is indicated of the key stakeholders identified for ESMF and the list will be updated for ESIAs/ESMPs sub-projects during project execution:




Who?


How to identify them

People living in the vicinity of the proposed works.

  • Field Survey

  • Identify the local government area(s) that the proposed corridor of work falls within.

  • Review available data to determine the stakeholder profile of the whole stakeholder or relevant group.

  • Use identified groups and individuals to tap into stakeholder networks to identify others.

Special interest groups.

  • Identify key individuals or groups through organised groups, local clubs, community halls and religious places.

  • Organisations such as environmental groups will be aware of similar local groups or individuals.

Individual people who own properties that will be directly or indirectly affected.



  • Advertise in local newspapers, telling people that they may be affected and asking them to register interest in attending meetings or receiving further information.




Business (owners and employees).

  • Field Survey

  • Council lists or property registers.

MDAs

International organisations




  • Constitutional Responsibility/ministerial mandate

  • Financial and technical supports.

7.4 This ESMF and Public Involvement

In the course of the preparation of this ESMF relevant stakeholders considered as key were met and consulted. The record of consultation is outlined in Table 7.1 and Annex 7 contains Plates of some of the stakeholders met with the highlight of meetings. It is considered the public involvement initiated will be built upon at the various sub-project levels in the SCPZ and ABIR.



Table 7.1: Record of Consultations













Kabba-Bunu

Odo-Ape, Kabba, Agbadu, Eshi, Ilegun, Oyo

Community leaders, women farmers, Fulani settlement, Ebira settlement, Hunters group, youths

11th -16th August 2014, 14th -15th October 2014,

Lokoja

Obajana, Oshokosho, Iwaa

As in above

7th -10th August 2014, 27th October 2014


Adavi

Iresuare/Osara Ngada

Community leaders, Fadama farmers group, women, Fulani settlement, Youths

28th October -3rd November 2014

Ijumu

Ayegunle and Aiye

Community leaders, Chairman Ijumu LGA, Fadama farmers group, women, Fulani settlement, Youths

28th October -3rd November 2014

Okehi

Irukuochakoko, Irukura, Ohu

Community leaders, Fadama farmers group, women, Fulani settlement, Youths

28th October -3rd November 2014




Through this, the PMUs will be able to:



  • clarify the project's objectives in terms of stakeholders‟ needs and concerns

  • identify feasible alternatives (in particular alternative locations) and examine their relative merits in terms of environmental, social and economic factors

  • identify and prioritise environmental and social issues and establish the scope of future studies and/or site specific management plan

  • Identify processes for continued stakeholders‟ involvement.

Generally, with regard to perceptions about the project, there was a general acceptance and buy-in to the project across the locations and groups visited. The farmers, youths, women and Fulani herdsmen were appreciative of being consulted and expressed optimism that the project will positively impact their livelihoods. In Alape, Kabba-Bunu and Oshokosho, Lokoja the traditional council were satisfied with the process of consultations and stated that they have never seen it in that extensive manner before, and were convinced that the proponent will fulfil its covenant of compensating for their lost assets. Other areas such as Adavi, Okehi and Ijumu knew little about the project before now but were happy to embrace the project which they said will make a difference.


Based on the project development objectives, scope and safeguard concerns which were extensively described to all the stakeholders and communities across the visited locations to ensure good participation and inputs, a number of concerns with raised. These are highlighted in Table 7.2.
Concern and Outcome of Public Consultation


Table 7.2: Concerns voiced by stakeholders and measures taken to address them in the ESMF

MDAs

Environmental and Social Concerns

ESMF Measures

FMARD

The ministry is aware that the project will create some environmental and social challenges. The ministry is however, willing to abide by all international, national, state and local laws and best practices with respect to agriculture business and provision of the ancillary services to the region.


The ESMF provides the necessary guidelines for mainstreaming environmental and social issues into the totality of the ABIR / SCPZ.

Waste and effluents from the processing factory will be treated and disposed in line with the provisions of OP 4.01 and the Nigerian extant laws.

Ministry of Environment must be allowed to monitor and ensure compliance of environmental responsibility and sustainability


Kogi Agriculture Development Project

Integration of local famers into the ABIR / SCPZ projects.

Project has already taken care of integration of local farmers which will be strengthen by means of further consultations with relevant stakeholders. This aspect is also already being supported by FADAMA III AF

Kogi State Ministry of Agriculture

The ministry has 100% support for the project. It also admits numerous environmental and social challenges but is willing to provide technical and personnel support for project implementation in a sustainable manner as it does not want local farmers to be out of job

This sub-component is being supported by FADAMA III AF. An area where attention of the Ministry is needed is training of farmers in pesticide use.

Kogi State Ministry of Lands

Land acquisition from indigenous owners. Kogi State is already working with both national agencies and international donors to ensure proper land title registration and ensure proper resettlement plan in line with best practices

The RPF being prepared at the same time with this ESMF takes care of land issue.

Kogi State Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources

Concerns about the issue of deforestation, pollution during construction, operation and decommissioning, soil degradation and the use of banned chemicals.

The department of forestry in the ministry noted that there are four forests reserves within the ABIR. These forests are still functional though they have suffered neglect over the years and have been encroached by illegal loggers, settlers and Fulani herdsmen.



Adequate buffer zone around all the game reservs shall be ensured.

Also, an agenda to revegetate the deforested forest reserve shall be developed

The ESMF shall ensure sustainable agricultural practices through appropriate measures for all phases of project implementation. A separate report, Integrated Pest Management Plan is being developed to handle the use of chemicals.


LGAs (Kabba-Bunnu, Adavi, Lokoja, Ijumu and Okehi )

The environmental and social concerns of the LGAs include: youth employment, women empowerments, and infrastructural developments due to cumulative impacts that may arise from increase in population. They however, want to be institutionally involved in mainstreaming environmental and social issues during project implementation.

Integration of youths and women into the project are part of the essence of the project development. Thus contributions shall always be welcomed as to how this can work effectively.

Adequate screening of all sub-project shall assist in determining negative environmental and social impacts and appropriate mitigation measures. It is expected that contributions from the community members shall enrich the process. .Appropriate safeguards instrument will be prepared and adhered to during project implementation. ESMF institutional framework for mainstreaming environmental and social issues integrates the LGAs.



Other MDAs

All the MDAs contacted show full support for the project but only raise caution on the issues of deforestation, water supply and displacement of local people from their livelihoods. The Nigeria Hydrological Services Agency is already providing technical assistance to the proponent on the issue of water supply.

The forest reserves shall be avoided with adequate buffers around them and measure to assist in replanting the reserves where they have been deforested shall be advocated and supported in the SCPZ and ABIR. A separate report on RPF is looking into the issue of displacement from livelihood source(s).


KabbaBunu LGA

Agbadu Community


Deforestation

Appropriate screening of sub-projects must be carried out and where deforestation is identified the proponent must ensure Re-vegetation activities including planting of buffer trees around the project as well as around the infrastructures and along the lawns.

Also, sub-projects must avoid sensitive area so as to ensure preservation of bio-diversity and sustainable environment.



Youth employment

The ABIR / SCPZ concept emboldens an employment generation programme and the proponent will ensure active participation of youth especially the local youth.

Odo-Ape Community

Soil erosion.

Preventive measures shall be adopted for soil erosion and the relevant ESMF/ESMP developed shall take this on board on how to ensure erosion control measures


Location of the processing plant in the community.

Not known exactly at present, however, the FMARD and Kog State Government have developed a comprehensive master plan for the SCPZ zone. The plan is amendable.

General Public Consultation All Project Affected Communities and other Stakeholders

(Odo-Ape community;

Ape community;

Agbadu community;

Bassa camp; and

Ebira settlers)



The proximity of the processing plant to the community and the need for buffer zone.

Strict compliance to final master plan when all the activities are known must be ensured and all safeguard instruments must be adhered to even in near and farther future development

The need for afforestation after clearing the forest at the project site

Appropriate screening of sub-projects must be carried out and where deforestation is identified the proponent must ensure Re-vegetation activities including planting of buffer trees around the project as well as around the infrastructures.

Also, sub-projects must avoid sensitive area so as to ensure preservation of bio-diversity and sustainable environment.



The perceived neglect of some communities in the location of essential components of the processing zone

The government is involved in this proposed development and would ensure essential amenities reach out to affected communities with stakeholder’s engagement at all levels

The need to use modern and environment friendly machines to guide against air and noise pollution

Best practices agronomic practices shall be preached and adopted in the SCPZ and ABIR

Proper disposal/management of waste during construction and operations

ESIA, EIA, ESMP and other safeguards instruments for sub-projects must contain waste management plan

The neglect by previous governments in terms of provision of infrastructure and social amenities; and

The government is involved in this proposed development and would ensure essential amenities reach out to affected communities with stakeholder’s engagement at all levels

Availability of adequate water resources throughout the hydrological year both in quality and quantity that will support the ABIR / SCPZ and the communities’ water requirements.

The proponent must ensure that project area water source is different from communities’ water supply sources. No interference is anticipated in community water source

ADAVI LGA

Iresuare farm settlement (Osara-Gada)

We are concerned about our farmlands

Farmers shall be integrated in the project


LOKOJA

IwaaAmogbe / Iwaa



Well informed about the project but are concerned about land acquisition

The RPF is dealing with this aspect of the project

Deforestation

Appropriate screening of sub-projects must be carried out and where deforestation is identified the proponent must ensure Re-vegetation activities including planting of buffer trees around the forest reserves, and leaving vegetation around infrastructures.

Also, sub-projects must avoid sensitive area so as to ensure preservation of bio-diversity and sustainable environment.



Traffic from Trailers from Obajana experience

A robust Traffic and Vehicle Management Plan (TVMP) for the processing plant within the SCPZ and ABIR would be developed.

Youth employment

The ABIR / SCPZ concept is an employment generation programme and the proponent must ensure active participation of youth especially the local youth.

Oshokoshoko

Land acquisition

The RPF is dealing with this aspect of the project

Deforestation

Appropriate screening of sub-projects must be carried out and where deforestation is identified the proponent must ensure Re-vegetation activities including planting of buffer trees around the forest reserves, and leaving vegetation around infrastructures.

Also, sub-projects must avoid sensitive area so as to ensure preservation of bio-diversity and sustainable environment.



Traffic from Trailers from Obajana experience

A robust Traffic and Vehicle Management Plan (TVMP) for the processing plant within the SCPZ and ABIR shall be developed

Infrastructural Development we are concerned about the poor state of the road.

The rehabilitation of this road is already being taken care of by the Government.

Fulani settlement

Loss of grazing land and source of livelihood

Appropriate resettlement to a government approved grazing zone. Integration of settled herdsmen into ABIR / SCPZ activities to provide support services such as security.

IJUMU LGA

Ayegunle


We are concerned about land acquisition

A second instrument, the RPF, being developed alongside this ESMF takes care of this.

Loss of grazing land and source of livelihood for herdsmen

Appropriate resettlement to government approved grazing zone. Integration of settled herdsmen into ABIR / SCPZ activities to provide support services such as security

Want infrastructural Development (Road & water) as part of benefit to the community

Appropriate mechanism for community support shall be developed in subsequent safeguard instruments

Aiye


We are concerned about land acquisition

A second instrument, the RPF, being developed alongside this ESMF takes care of this

Youth and women employment

The ABIR / SCPZ concept is an employment generation programme and the proponent must ensure active participation of youth and women.

Want infrastructure Development (Road in particular) as benefit from SCPZ and ABIR

Proponent in conjunction with the affected communities must develop a robust corporate social responsibility programe including but not limited to water supply and provision of primary healthcare centers and schools.

OKEHI LGA

Obombom

Had limited information about the ABIR and SCPZ project but are concerned about land acquisition

Appropriate mechanism for community support shall be developed in subsequent safeguard instruments

Loss of grazing land and source of livelihood for herdsmen

Appropriate resettlement to a government approved grazing zone. Integration of settled herdsmen into ABIR / SCPZ activities to provide support services such as security are recommended.

Want infrastructural Development (Road in particular) as part of benefit to community

Appropriate mechanism for community support shall be developed in subsequent safeguard instruments


7.5 ESMF Communication Plan

The ESMF Communication Plan refers to specific guidelines and protocols consistent with the principles of participation that will govern the project and which will be reflected in the Communication Plans, including the Communication Plans of the Social Safeguard Frameworks of the Project.

They are:


  1. establishment of feasible participation mechanisms ,

  2. establishment of participation mechanisms prepared with the basic objectives of transparency, responsibility of delivery of public service and an anti-corruption approach;

  3. promotion of arenas of dialogue based on realistic and objective data avoiding the creation of expectations that cannot be met;

  4. Non-discrimination for the most vulnerable groups, such as women, young persons, older persons and indigenous communities.



1   ...   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   ...   40


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət