Appendix B3 Project Logical Framework
|
Overall objective
|
To begin establishing wetland biodiversity conservation as a routine consideration in national, provincial and local government decision making and action.
|
Indicator
|
Baseline
|
Target
|
Means of verification
|
Assumptions
|
Eleventh National Five Year Plan incorporates specific actions to enhance wetland biodiversity conservation
|
Plan under preparation
|
Specific actions included
|
The plan
|
A. Wetlands and wetland biodiversity conservation remain priorities of the Government of China
L Provincial and local governments apply the project results at provincial and local levels to their own decision making and action.
|
Eleventh National Five Year Plan is in conformity with criteria for wetland biodiversity conservation
|
Plan under preparation
|
Meets at least 50% of the criteria for wetland biodiversity conservation prepared under the project
|
The plan
The criteria
|
Number of provinces that hold routine cross-sectoral meetings on wetlands, including wetland biodiversity, under the relevant Provincial Vice Governor
|
To be determined during the inception phase
|
All five provinces with project demonstration sites, plus at least one other province hold such meetings routinely by June 2007
|
Minutes of meetings
|
Number of provinces that have passed wetland conservation regulations
|
Two (Heilongjiang and Gansu)
|
All five provinces with project demonstration sites, plus at least one other province by June 2007
|
Copies of regulations
|
Number of provinces that have wetland conservation regulations that are in conformity with criteria for wetland biodiversity conservation
|
To be determined during the inception phase
|
At least 80% of the provinces with wetland regulations
|
Copies of regulations
The criteria
|
Percentage of natural wetlands under effective protection
|
Establishment of criteria for effectiveness of protection, and assessment for baseline to be made during inception phase
|
Increase to 60% by 2020 and to 90% by 2030 (current targets of the China National Wetland Conservation Programme 2002-2030).
|
Reports of China National Wetland Conservation Programme
Independent reports
|
Score for effectiveness in wetland biodiversity conservation, of the most recent revision of the China National Wetland Conservation Programme (2002-2030)
|
To be determined during the inception phase
|
100% conformity with criteria by June 2007
|
Periodic revisions of the programme
The criteria
|
Number of the 192 wetland sites listed as of international importance under the criteria of the the Ramsar Convention (including the 21 registered sites) that are damaged or will be damaged by decisions and actions each year that do not satisfy the criteria for wetland biodiversity conservation
|
Number of development decisions and actions taken in 2004
|
Annual decreases
|
Expert assessment
The criteria
|
Outcome A
|
Wetland biodiversity conservation is a routine consideration in government decision making and action at national level
|
Indicator
|
Baseline
|
Target
|
Means of verification
|
Assumptions
|
Number of national level government agencies with policy that is in conformity with criteria for wetland biodiversity conservation
|
To be determined during inception phase through initial sectoral analyses
|
90% by end of project
|
Annual Plans from each agency
Annual Reports from each agency
|
D. Government authorities and commercial and not for profit organizations have the necessary will to review and change fundamental policy, development plans, and management approaches in response to wetland biodiversity conservation considerations
E. Genuine involvement of all relevant government agencies in efforts to collaborate, build capacities and change processes that outlast the project
F. Implementing parties willing to recruit and commit good staff
H UNDP and SFA willing to work together smoothly to solve problems and to think beyond narrowly defined institutional targets
|
Number of examples per year of decisions and actions by national level government agencies that do not conform with criteria for wetland biodiversity conservation
|
To be determined during inception phase through initial sectoral analyses
|
Decrease each year
|
Annual Plans from each agency
Annual Reports from each agency
|
Percentage of relevant (ie with potential impact on wetland biodiversity) laws, regulations, rules circulars and “decisions” issued or amended each year that conform with criteria on wetland biodiversity conservation. Break down by class of legislation
|
To be determined during inception phase through initial sectoral analyses
|
90% by end of project
|
Official lists of legislation from National Peoples Congress, State Council, and national level government agencies
Copies of the legislation
|
Percentage of all current laws, regulations, rules, “decisions”, and circulars that do not satisfy the criteria for wetland biodiversity conservation. Break down by sector
|
To be determined during inception phase through initial sectoral analyses
|
Decrease each year
|
Official lists of legislation from National Peoples Congress, State Council, and national level government agencies
Copies of the legislation
|
Number of agencies with personnel specifically assigned to deal with wetland biodiversity conservation matters
|
To be determined during inception phase through initial sectoral analyses
|
80% by the end of the project
|
Sectoral Annual Reports
Letters from the agencies
Meetings with the people appointed
|
Steps >>>>
| -
Criteria developed and adopted
-
Sectoral analyses prepared
-
Partnerships built
-
Workshops to facilitate exchange of information and ideas
-
Contact points built up in all major sectoral agencies
-
Inaccurate data excluded and accurate data assembled and summarized well
-
Data shared by relevant agencies
-
Data used in decision making
-
Public well informed about wetland biodiversity and willing and able to start to hold government to account, so providing pressure for good decision making on behalf of government
-
Use made of all existing mechanisms for government agencies to consult and coordinate activities with potential effects on wetland biodiversity
-
Technical advice and on-the-job and formal training
-
Recommendations for policy framework and revisions of legislation to incorporate wetland biodiversity conservation.
-
Lessons from project at sites and provincial level applied to decision making at national level
-
Periodic revisions to China National Wetland Conservation Programme (2002-2030)
|
Outcome B
|
Heilongjiang provincial level government agencies routinely consider wetland biodiversity conservation in decision making and action.
|
Indicator
|
Baseline
|
Target
|
Means of verification
|
Assumptions
|
Number of Heilongjiang provincial level government agencies with policy that is in conformity with criteria for wetland biodiversity conservation
|
To be determined during inception phase through initial sectoral analyses
|
90% by end of project
|
Sectoral and Multisectoral Five Year Plans
Sectoral and Multisectoral Annual Plans
Sectoral and Multisectoral Annual Reports
|
D. Government authorities and commercial and not for profit organizations have the necessary will to review and change fundamental policy, development plans, and management approaches in response to wetland biodiversity conservation considerations
E. Genuine involvement of all relevant government agencies in efforts to collaborate, build capacities and change processes that outlast the project
F. Implementing parties willing to recruit and commit good staff
G. Maps and other information required for project implementation are obtained on time
H UNDP and SFA willing to work together smoothly to solve problems and to think beyond narrowly defined institutional targets
J Achieving necessary cooperation with Russian agencies does not delay project progress
|
Number of examples per year of decisions and actions by Heilongjiang provincial level government agencies that do not conform with criteria for wetland biodiversity conservation
|
To be determined during inception phase through initial sectoral analyses
|
Annual decreases
|
Sectoral and Multisectoral Annual Plans
Sectoral and Multisectoral Annual Reports
|
Percentage of relevant (ie with potential impact on wetland biodiversity) provincial laws, regulations, rules circulars and “decisions” issued or amended each year that conform with criteria on wetland biodiversity. Break down by class of legislation
|
To be determined during inception phase through initial sectoral analyses
|
90% by end of project
|
Official lists of legislation from Provincial Peoples Congress, and provincial level government agencies
Copies of the legislation
|
Percentage of all current regulations, rules, “decisions” and circulars that do not satisfy the criteria for wetland biodiversity conservation. Break down by sector
|
To be determined during inception phase through initial sectoral analyses
|
Annual decreases
|
Official lists of legislation from Provincial Peoples Congress, and provincial level government agencies
Copies of the legislation
|
Number of agencies with personnel specifically assigned to deal with wetland biodiversity conservation matters
|
To be determined during inception phase through initial sectoral analyses
|
90% by end of project
|
Sectoral Annual Reports
Letters from the agencies
Meetings with the people appointed
|
Steps >>>>
| -
Criteria developed and adopted
-
Sectoral analyses prepared
-
Partnerships built
-
Contact points built up in all major sectoral agencies
-
Inaccurate data excluded and accurate data assembled and summarized well
-
Data shared by relevant agencies
-
Data used in decision making
-
Public well informed about wetland biodiversity and willing and able to start to hold government to account, so providing pressure for good decision making on behalf of government
-
Use made of all existing mechanisms for government agencies to consult and coordinate activities with potential effects on wetland biodiversity
-
Technical advice and on-the-job and formal training
-
Recommendations for policy framework and revisions of legislation to incorporate wetland biodiversity conservation.
-
Lessons from project at sites and provincial level applied to decision making at national level
-
Periodic revisions to China National Wetland Conservation Programme (2002-2030)Criteria adopted
-
Workshops to facilitate exchange of information and ideas
-
Demonstrations of wetland biodiversity conservation considerations in international transboundary decisions and action
-
Lessons from project at sites and national level applied to decision making at provincial level
|
Outcome C
|
Government agencies at local levels routinely take into account wetland biodiversity conservation in decision making and action at four wetland sites
|
Indicator
|
Baseline
|
Target
|
Means of verification
|
Assumptions
|
For each site, the number of local (municipal, prefectural and county) level government agencies with policy that is in conformity with criteria for wetland biodiversity conservation
|
To be determined during inception phase through initial sectoral analyses
|
90% by end of project
|
Sectoral and Multisectoral Five Year Plans
Sectoral and Multisectoral Annual Plans
Sectoral and Multisectoral Annual Reports
|
B. National funds available for routine activities during the project, and for later recurrent costs (eg for surveys, monitoring, consultations, visits, equipment maintenance, database services, public information displays, outreach programmes and newsletter publication)
C Joint work planning for expenditure of government and GEF funds so as to complement each other well and not to cause any delays or conflicting actions
D. Government authorities and commercial and not for profit organizations have the necessary will to review and change fundamental policy, development plans, and management approaches in response to wetland biodiversity conservation considerations
E. Genuine involvement of all relevant government agencies in efforts to collaborate, build capacities and change processes that outlast the project
F. Implementing parties willing to recruit and commit good staff
G. Maps and other information required for project implementation are obtained on time
H UNDP and SFA willing to work together smoothly to solve problems and to think beyond narrowly defined institutional targets
J Achieving necessary cooperation with Russian agencies does not delay project progress
K Achieving necessary cooperation between Gansu and Sichuan authorities does not delay project progress
|
Number of examples per year of decisions and actions by local (municipal, prefectural and county) level government agencies that do not conform with criteria for wetland biodiversity conservation
|
To be determined during inception phase through initial sectoral analyses and land use audits
|
Annual decrease
|
Sectoral and Multisectoral Annual Plans
Sectoral and Multisectoral Annual Reports
|
Percentage of relevant (ie with potential impact on wetland biodiversity) local (municipal/prefectural and county) laws, regulations, rules circulars and “decisions” issued or amended each year that conform with criteria on wetland biodiversity. Break down by class of legislation and level of administration
|
To be determined during inception phase through initial sectoral analyses
|
90% by end of project
|
Official lists of legislation from local Peoples Congresses, , and local level government agencies
Copies of the legislation
|
Percentage of all current local (municipal/prefectural and county) regulations, rules, “decisions” and circulars that do not satisfy the criteria for wetland biodiversity conservation. Break down by sector
|
To be determined during inception phase through initial sectoral analyses
|
Annual decreases
|
Official lists of legislation from local Peoples Congresses, , and local level government agencies
Copies of the legislation
|
Number of agencies with personnel specifically assigned to deal with wetland biodiversity conservation matters
|
To be determined during inception phase through initial sectoral analyses
|
90% by end of project
|
Sectoral Annual Reports
Interviews and official documents
|
Number of people or local economic entities contributing data used in nature reserve based environmental education displays at the Yancheng Coastal Marshes site
|
None
|
Begun by June 2005 and at least 10 examples showing cumulative data collection by January 2007
|
Original reports from the public
Displays
Expert opinion
|
Number of nature reserves and local government environmental protection departments with staff able to design and implement appropriate public involvement and environmental education programmes based on new themes at the Yancheng Coastal Marshes site
|
Zero
|
Two nature reserves and two government departments by June 2006
|
Interviews
Project reports
Demonstrations of work
|
Number of government agencies at the Dongting Lake site routinely sharing data on wetland biodiversity collected under monitoring programme
|
Relevant agencies, and criteria for routine sharing of data to be defined during the inception phase
|
To increase to 100% of relevant agencies by January 2007
|
Distribution lists
Interviews
Website records
|
Routine use of maps and information on wetland biodiversity in day to day planning work in government offices at the Ruoergai Marshes site
|
To be established by observation within three months of the restart of the project
|
All government offices in the Ruoergai Marshes have useful maps on the wall and planners and decision makers use maps on daily basis and information on wetland biodiversity when required
|
Project reports
The maps and observations of use
|
Number of examples per year of poisoning programmes for pikas and zokors at the Ruoergai Marshes site
|
Low already
To be determined during inception phase
|
Zero
|
Official documents
Interviews
|
Percentage of farms under the Jiansanjiang State Farm Bureau with personnel appointed, and trained, as wetland biodiversity conservation officers (probably in addition to normal duties)
|
Zero
|
90% by June 2007
|
Official documents
Meetings with the officers
|
Steps >>>>
| -
Develop site specific approaches
-
Criteria developed and adopted
-
Sectoral analyses prepared
-
Economic frameworks for wetland conservation produced
-
Partnerships built
-
Contact points built up in all major sectoral agencies including nature reserves
-
Inaccurate data excluded and accurate data assembled and summarized well (simple systems built up slowly as demand develops)
-
Data shared by relevant agencies
-
Data used in decision making
-
Public well informed about wetland biodiversity and willing and able to start to hold government to account, so providing pressure for good decision making on behalf of government
-
Use made of all existing mechanisms for government agencies to consult and coordinate activities with potential effects on wetland biodiversity
-
Technical advice and on-the-job and formal training
-
Recommendations for policy framework and revisions of legislation to incorporate wetland biodiversity conservation.
-
Workshops to facilitate exchange of information and ideas
-
Demonstrations of wetland biodiversity conservation considerations in transboundary interactions (intercounty, interprefectural, interprovincial and international)
-
Lessons from project at provincial and national levels applied to decision making at site level and at site provinces too
|
Outcome D
|
Improved processes of monitoring and evaluation, and the collection, analysis, use and sharing of information, knowledge and experience in wetland biodiversity conservation
|
Indicator
|
Baseline
|
Target
|
Means of verification
|
Assumptions
|
Percentage of project activities (as defined in annual work plans) for which useful (for dissemination) summaries and analyses of performance are produced
|
Zero
|
Annual increases to 70% by June 2007
|
Expert assessments
|
F. Implementing parties willing to recruit and commit good staff
|
Percentage of TAG recommendations used to increase effectiveness of project
|
Zero
|
Annual increases to 80% by June 2007
|
Subsequent TAG reports
|
Percentage of partners at each project site with good knowledge of project activities at the other sites
|
To be determined during inception phase
|
Annual increases to 80% by June 2007
|
Surveys
Expert assessments
|
Number of examples per year of project results used at another level or at another project site
|
Zero
|
Annual increases
|
TAG reports
|
Score on assessment of project website by expert
|
To be determined during the inception phase
|
Reach 95% by June 2007
|
Expert assessment
The website
|
Public opinion on seminar series held in Beijing, Harbin and at project sites
|
Zero
|
Increase to high by June 2007 at all levels
|
Attendance figures
Opinion surveys
|
Score on content of seminar series
|
Zero
|
Increase to high by June 2007
|
Expert opinion
|
Steps >>>>
| -
Reports from TAG used to improve project performance
-
Strong technical oversight of project plans, inputs and results
-
Communication within the project through exchanges of experience between sites, between sites and province, between provinces and between sites, provinces and national level: meetings, website, project newsletters, distribution of progress reports, feedback to project planning, intranet for downloading data
-
International exchange of information, particularly with neighbours
-
Monthly seminars related to wetland biodiversity conservation in Beijing, Harbin, and at project sites
|
|
Yüklə 1.47 Mb.