Republic of Belarus Proposed Energy Efficiency Project Environmental Assessment

səhifə	9/10
tarix	25.06.2016
ölçüsü	2.11 Mb.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Participants^³

##	Name	Title	Organization
1	Babushkin, Viktor I.	Chief Power Engineer	UE “Borisov Bread-Making Combine”
2	Golubev, Dmitri D.	Chief Engineer	UE “UE “Borisov Bread-Making Combine”
3	Volkovets, Alexander M.	Head of Electric Laboratory	JSC “Borisovdrev”
4	Starpovich, Svetlana O.	Engineer, Industrial Engineering Department	UE “Zhilye”
5	Barnatovich, Nikolai A.	Foreman, TsT and KKh (… and Public Utilities)	UE “Zhilye”
6	Yarosh, Mikhail S.	Foreman, TsT and KKh (… and Public Utilities)	UE “Zhilye”
7	Bakun, Alexander B.	Chief Power Engineer	BZPI
8	Bernst, Valeri V.	Chief Engineer, TsT and KKh (… and Public Utilities)	UE “Zhilye”
9	Babitskaya, Inessa A.	Head of Industrial Engineering Department	UE “Zhilye”
10	Balashevich, Valeri A.	Deputy Chief Power Engineer	RUE “Agregaty”
11	Petrova, Viktoria V.	Deputy Head of TsT and KKh (… and Public Utilities)	UE “Zhilye”
12	Vetoshkina, Marina G.	Engineer, Boiler Plant No. 1	UE “Zhilye”
13	Nestrakhov, Sergei V.	Head of Boiler Plant No. 1	UE “Zhilye”
14	Lokis, Natalia V.	Foreman, ZhEU-1	UE “Zhilye”
15	Voronin, Sergei Yu.	Electrician, ZhEU-4	UE “Zhilye”
16	Oliniychuk, Mikhail S.	Chief Engineer	UE “Zhilye”
17	Povarov, Ivan I.	Foreman, ZhEU-4	UE “Zhilye”
18	Kutsevich, Vladimir M.	Foreman, ZhEU-3	UE “Zhilye”
19	Kosova, Tamara N.	Senior Specialist	UE “Zhilye”
20	Butenas, Tatyana G.	Head of Lease Department	UE “Zhilye”
21	Kravchenko, Yulia S.	Engineer, Lease Department	UE “Zhilye”
22	Zhiznevskaya, Tatyana A.	Computer operator, SAKh	UE “Zhilye”
23	Zakharova, Yekaterina S.	Dispatch Operator, SAKh	UE “Zhilye”
24	Bachilo, Vyacheslav F.	Foreman, SAKh	UE “Zhilye”
25	Karpenko, Vladimir V.	Senior Specialist, SAKh	UE “Zhilye”
26	Sadovski, Nikolai N.	Medical Assistant, SAKh	UE “Zhilye”
27	Popkov, Anatoly A.	Foreman, Boiler Plant No. 5	UE “Zhilye”
28	Ermolovich, Igor V.	Chief of Operations	UE “Zhilye”
29	Shchigelski, Valentin I.	Section Foreman, Plant No. 2	UE “Zhilye”
30	Shchigelski, Sergei V.	Foreman, Boiler Plant No. 2	UE “Zhilye”

(II) Article published in a local newspaper “Adzinstva” in Borisov on August 30, 2008

Article – English translation

Energy Efficiency Project

The Government of the Republic of Belarus and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development plan to implement a project to retrofit the national energy sector in Belarus in 2009 – 2012. The project will convert existing heat-only-boiler plants to combined heat and power plants with high-performance co-generation equipment in cities and towns of Belarus. The introduction of combined heat and power generation will improve energy efficiency in Belarus and provide for generation of heat and electric energy and reduce specific reference fuel consumption.
It has been proposed that the loan size for the project will be US$125 million. The estimated total cost of the planned project for conversion of the existing heat-only-boiler plants in Borisov, Mogilev, Rechitsa, Oshmyany, and Ruba will be about US$175 million. The project will retrofit UE “Zhilye” Boiler Plant # 1 at 60, Dneprovskaya Street with a 1 MW combined heat and power (CHP) unit.
To discuss with public findings of the project environmental assessment, public hearings will be held in Borisov on September 4 at 6 Chapaeva Street, 4^th floor.

B. Mogilev

(I) MINUTES OF PUBLIC HEARINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Date:		September 11, 2008
Time:	From	14.00
	Till	14.45
Place:		Assembly hall of RUE “Mogilevenergo”, 3 Bonch-Bruevicha Street
Number of participants		38 (the list iof participants is enclosed)

Contents

Report by L. V. Rumberg, Chief Engineer of RUE “Mogilevenergo”

At the beginning of his report, Mr. Rumberg explained to the attendees the principles of heat supply organization in Mogilev and informed them of the heat supply sources.

Mr. Rumberg provided more details on the subject of the public hearings:

The proposed project, which is to be partially funded by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, will retrofit District Boiler Plant # 3 at 11a Kulibina Street. As part of the boiler plant conversion to CHP, a gas combined cycle (GCCT) unit with a capacity of 15.5 MW will be installed, to include:

two gas turbines, with the capacity of 6 MW each, a heat recovery boiler with the capacity of 12.5 tons of steam per hour, and a steam turbine with the capacity of 3.5 MW.

District Boiler Plant #3 (RK-3) of the Mogilev heating network system is designed for supplying thermal energy for the heating of dwelling houses, industrial enterprises and office buildings located in the northern part of Mogilev. Thermal rating of the boiler plant: 210 GCal/hr. Year of construction: 1983.

The water-heating part of the boiler plant has three hot-water boilers KVGM-50 ##1, 2 and 3, with a thermal output of 50 GCal/hr each. The steam end of the boiler plant has two steam-boilers GM-50-14 st. ##4, 5, with a steam capacity of 50 ton/hr (each). All the boilers are designed to operate on natural gas and furnace fuel oil.

As of today, the carbon oxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from the existing boilers GM-50-14 and KVGM-50 is as follows: NO_x - 168 mg/Nm³; СО - 230 mg/Nm³
For the proposed gas turbines to be installed, emission levels at the rated load and 6% oxygen content in the combustion gases will be as follows:

- NO_x - 125 mg/Nm³;

- СО - 200 mg/Nm³;

According to the results of the designers’ estimates for boiler plant conversion, atmospheric pollution by emissions of all substances will not exceed permissible limits over the entire area of influence.

To minimize the noise load on the residents of neighboring houses, the works at the construction site will be performed between 8am and 10pm.
By means of using equipment that is manufactured in noise-attenuating casing, the noise exposure of the adjacent territory will not exceed permissible limits for the residents of neighboring houses.
It is envisaged that, due to an improved effluent treatment system, the project will produce a positive effect on the quality of water. At that, ground and surface water may be contaminated as a result of accidental discharges of insufficiently treated effluents.

In order to avoid pollution and ensure prompt and effective response in the event of such discharges, the project will envisage an automatic effluent control system.

Questions asked during the public hearings:
Question 1:

Why did the World Bank take an interest in financing a boiler plant of RUE “Mogilevenergo”?

Response given by L. V. Rumberg, Chief Engineer of RUE “Mogilevenergo”:

The World Bank finances projects all over the world. In the Republic of Belarus, the World Bank participated in implementing the Post-Chernobyl Recovery Project. The RB Government proposed to the World Bank a number of projects for retrofitting of the national energy sector. Projects for conversion to CHP of heat-only-boilers of the Ministry of Energy and the Ministry of Housing and Utilities were submitted for review, of which the World Bank specialists selected several, including the one for conversion to CHP of District Boiler Plant #3 in Mogilev.

Question 2:

What will RUE “Mogilevenergo” gain by means of investing US$ 20 million?

Response given by L. V. Rumberg, Chief Engineer of RUE “Mogilevenergo”:

Retroffiting of District Boiler Plant #3 and installation of a GCCT unit will provide for additional generation of electric energy by means of more efficient recovery of the CHP-generated heat, thus reducing air emissions on a national scale as a result of a reduction of burnt fuel volumes.

Question 3:

Why is RUE “Mogilevenergo” attracting World Bank investments? Is it possible that such a strong enterprise lacks funds of its own?

Response given by L. V. Rumberg, Chief Engineer of RUE “Mogilevenergo”:

In the established international practice, attraction of investments is a normal economic process, and, at present, RUE “Mogilevenergo” indeed cannot do without attracting the World Bank investments.

The hearings participants were proposed to forward their comments and proposals, if any, on amending and supplementing the developed environmental management plan for the project to the Energy Efficiency Department of the Committee of State Standardization or the PMU (RUE “Belinvestenergosberezhenie”) not later than September 20, 2008. Received comments were fully incorporated in this EMP.

Secretary: __________________________________ Date ______________

Name and Signature

Chairperson: ________________________________ Date ______________

Name and Signature

List oа participants

	Name	Organization
1	Bulai А.А.	UZ “OblUGEiOZ”
2	Sokolova О.А.	JSC “Belremstroysvyaz”
3	Svirena M.N.	JSC «Mogoteks»
4	Trukhachev M. M.	Mogilev Heating Networks
5	Liubomirova S. M.	Mogilev Heating Networks
6	Khortov V. N.	JSC “MogilevTransmash”
7	Brilev V. N.	JSC “MogilevTransmash”
8	Kuznetsov L. N.	Machine-Building Secondary Education College
9	Buevich M. I.	JSC “Voskhod”
10	Osipova L. N.	JSC “Voskhod”
11	Komashko G. P.	JSC “Arma”
12	Sergeyeva R. K.	JSC “Arma”
13	Kashpur M. P.	JSC “Liftmash”
14	Shibeko S. S.	JSC “Liftmash”
15	Osipovich A. P.	CJSC “Krynitsa”
16	Nikitina N. N.	Plant “Zenit”
17	Gorkunov V. N.	CJSC JV “ Sopoteks”
18	Skurina N. I.	CJSC JV “ Sopoteks”
19	Kovaleva V. N.	Steel Works
20	Solovyev A. A.	ZhREU (Housing Maintenance Office)
21	Sychikov V. S.	KSI
22	Stepanenko V. I.	Mogilev Electric Networks
23	Shashkevich V. I.	Medical Diagnostic Center
24	Dublevski I. I.	Medical Diagnostic Center
25	Ryabtsev V. M.	Gorvodokanal (City Water Supply and Sanitation Enterprise)
26	Ponasyuk V. A.	Gorvodokanal (City Water Supply and Sanitation Enterprise)
27	Zaytsev A. V.	JSC “Strommashina”
28	Pishcheva N. G.	Emergency Medical Aid Station
29	Zvonorev A. V.	Emergency Medical Aid Station
30	Kovalev V. V.	RUE “Mogilevenergo”
31	Stankevich A. V.	RUE “Mogilevenergo”
32	Pukhart A. A.	RUE “Mogilevenergo”
33	Malykhin A. A.	RUE “Mogilevenergo”
34	Shumyantseva O. V.	RUE “Mogilevenergo”
35	Rumberg L. V.	Administration of RUE “Mogilevenergo”
36	Novik A. A.	Administration of RUE “Mogilevenergo”
37	Kononov S. S.	Administration of RUE “Mogilevenergo”
38	Pisareva E. M.	Administration of RUE “Mogilevenergo”

(II) Article published in a local newspaper in “Mogileuskiya Vedamasty” in Mogilev on 9 September 2008.

Translation of the Newspaper Article

“Mahileuskiya Vedamastsi” Newspaper # 176 (2879)

THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS AND THE INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT

plan to implement a project to retrofit the national energy sector in Belarus in 2009 – 2014. The project will convert existing heat-only-boiler plants to combined heat and power plants in cities and towns of Belarus, replacing obsolete equipment with high-performance co-generation equipment, which will provide for additional generation of electric energy by means of more efficient recovery of the CHP-generated heat.

In Mogilev, the project will retrofit District Boiler Plant # 3 at 11a Kulibina Street. As part of the boiler plant conversion to a CHP, a 15.5 MW gas combined cycle (GCCT) unit will be installed, to include: two gas turbines, with the capacity of 6 MW each, a heat recovery boiler with the capacity of 12.5 tons of steam per hour, and a steam turbine with the capacity of 3.5 MW.

The boiler plant conversion will reduce fuel consumption, thus reducing atmospheric pollution in the area of the boiler plant influence.

According to the results of the performed estimates for boiler plant conversion, atmospheric pollution by emissions of all substances will not exceed permissible limits over the entire area of influence. The proposed project will produce an overall positive environmental effect by reducing emissions on the national level due to reduced fuel consumption.

To discuss with public the project implementation results, public hearings will be held in Mogilev in the assembly hall of RUE “Mogilevenergo” at 3 Bonch-Bruevicha Street at 2pm on September 11.

Additional materials on this topic are available at 3 Bonch-Bruevicha Street (tel. 293-127) or at the website of RUE “Mogilevenergo” www.mogilev.energo.by

Appendix 5

Emissions Modeling Exercise: Borisov CHP

1. Fuel Supply

Qualitative composition of fuels, as used in the calculations, is presented in Table 3.1

Table 3.1- Qualitative composition of fuels

Fuel type

Combustion value, Qph,

kCal/kg, kCal/nm3

Sulfur content,

Sp, %

Ash content,

Ap, %

Fuel oil

9,726

2.2

0.04

Natural gas

7,977

The fuel oil and gas specifications are based on the data provided by Minskenergo. Sulfur content in fuel oil is assumed as the average value of the provided reported data.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10