Ana səhifə

Project document


Yüklə 2.65 Mb.
səhifə24/24
tarix25.06.2016
ölçüsü2.65 Mb.
1   ...   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24

11.5Stakeholder Involvement Plan

11.5.1Introduction


  1. The Stakeholder Involvement Plan specifies goals and objectives for stakeholder involvement, identifies key stakeholders and their interests relative to the project, and describes how stakeholders will be involved in the implementation of each project outcome.

  2. This project is based upon a partnership approach both at the national and site level, as shown in the project activities. The involvement of stakeholders in the development and implementation of all project activities, continued dialogue and commitment will help to ensure the sustainability of the project.

  3. The development of this project was participatory and involved a wide range of stakeholders from government, private sector, research and academic organizations and civil society organizations. The stakeholder analysis was done through brainstorming at taskforce meetings and also during the site level consultations.

  4. A national workshop was organized to discuss the project document. The workshop was attended by all key government and non-government institutions and all provided their input and support for this initiative. Site consultations took place in Kakamega Forest, Cherangani Hills, the North Nandi and the South Nandi Hills. The programme implementation will be highly consultative and participatory and key stakeholders will take lead on their activities. Local communities will be involved at all site actions; government agencies will be involved in the implementation of activities within their mandate and the private sector will be involved where possible.

11.5.2Goal and Objectives for Stakeholder Involvement


  1. The goal for stakeholder involvement in the Project is: to ensure that all stakeholders who are affected by, have a role in, or are interested in project themes have the opportunity to be involved in and develop a sense of “ownership” of the project.

  2. Table 12 below describes the major stakeholders and their involvement in the project.

  1. Key Stakeholders and Roles and Responsibilities

Stakeholder Type

Roles and Responsibilities

Individual Households

Day to day monitoring of CFAs, maintaining support to forest management committees, benefitting from harvests of forest products, taking personal responsibilities for forests.

Forest Management Committees

Management and maintenance of CFAs, monitoring of quotas, management of harvests, provision of forest product benefits to communities.

Village Councils

Overall management and accountability of community managed areas to wider rural communities, coordination with District Authorities and outsiders.

District Government

Collection of forest revenues from district managed forests, monitor forest health and harvest quotas, monitor extraction levels, provide licenses, support local communities in the development of community areas and their proper management.

Provisional Government

Coordinate between District and Central Government on policy and management issues, across sectors of government.

Forest Product Dealers (private sector)

Support development of markets and economic growth. Provide financial incentives for best management of forests, work with government and villages to support good practice in forest management and forest product extraction.

Community Based Organisations

Develop civil society capacity on a local level to support land rights, social development, economic growth and sustainable forest management.

National nongovernmental organisations

Develop civil society capacity on a national level to support land rights, social development, economic growth and sustainable forest management, support supply chains and forest management processes.

International nongovernmental organisations

Develop civil society capacity on a regional level to support land rights, social development, economic growth and sustainable forest management, support supply chains and forest management processes. International advocacy.

Government Departments

Manage the processes of forest management on a national level, implementing forest management policies, linkages with other government departments.

Government Ministries

Support forest management and economic growth through sound policy guidance and implementation, linkages and overlap with other ministries.


11.5.3Principles of Stakeholder Participation


  1. The stakeholder participation plan has been developed based on the principles outlined in Table 13 below.

  1. Stakeholder participation principles

Principle

Stakeholder participation will:

Value Adding

be an essential means of adding value to the project

Inclusivity

include all relevant stakeholders

Accessibility and Access

be accessible and promote access to the process

Transparency

be based on transparency and fair access to information; main provisions of the project’s plans and results will be published in local mass-media

Fairness

ensure that all stakeholders are treated in a fair and unbiased way

Accountability

be based on a commitment to accountability by all stakeholders

Constructive

seek to manage conflict and promote the public interest

Redressing

seek to redress inequity and injustice

Capacitating

seek to develop the capacity of all stakeholders

Needs Based

be based on the needs of all stakeholders

Flexible

be flexibly designed and implemented

Rational and Coordinated

be rationally planned and coordinated, and not be ad hoc

Excellence

be subject to ongoing reflection and improvement

11.5.4 Long-term stakeholder participation


  1. The project will provide the following opportunities for long-term participation of all stakeholders, with a special emphasis on the active participation of local communities:

  2. Decision-making – through the management systems of the project. The establishment of the structure will follow a participatory and transparent process involving the confirmation of all stakeholders; conducting one-to-one consultations with all stakeholders; development of Terms of Reference and ground-rules; inception meeting to agree on the constitution, ToR and ground-rules for the committees.

  3. Capacity building – at systemic, institutional and individual level – is one of the key strategic interventions of the project and will target all stakeholders that have the potential to be involved in brokering, implementing and/or monitoring management agreements related to activities in and around the reserves. The project will target especially organizations operating at the community level to enable them to actively participate in developing and implementing management agreements.

  4. Communication - will include the participatory development of an integrated communication strategy.

  5. The communication strategy will be based on the following key principles:

  • providing information to all stakeholders;

  • promoting dialogue between all stakeholders;

  • promoting access to information.



  1. Crucially, the project will be launched by a well-publicized multi-stakeholder inception workshop. This workshop will provide an opportunity to provide all stakeholders with updated information on the project as well as a basis for further consultation during the project’s implementation, and will refine and confirm the work plan.

12.SIGNATURE PAGE


Country: Kenya

UNDAF Outcome(s)/Indicator(s):

UNDAF Outcome 3.2: Enhance environmental management for economic growth and equitable access to energy services and response to climate change



Expected Outcome(s):

3.2.1. Support to sustainable management of natural resources. Policies and capacities for sustainable management of environment and natural resources improved.



Expected Output(s): Development of pro-poor policies for sustainable management practices for utilization of living natural resources on a sustainable basis for socio-economic benefits, national and community capacity for sustainable management of natural resources with focus on women and youth for sustainable management and use of natural resources, capacity for enhancement and compliance of policies, laws, and guidelines and public institutions such as NEMA, Kenya Forest Service and other relevant private sector entities and CSOs to improve and develop new subsidiary legislation, tools and guidelines for sustainable use of natural resources.

Implementing partner: Ministry of Environment and Mineral Resources (MEMR)

Other Partners: Government of Kenya: Kenya Forest Service; Kenya Wildlife Service; Kenya Forest Research Institute. NGO Community: Nature Kenya


Total budget: $5,115,000

Allocated resources (GEF): $4,500,000

Other:

UNDP $500,000



Cash and in kind contributions

Government of Kenya: $10,470,000

NGO Co-finance: $1,500,000

Other Totals $12,470,000




Programme Period: 2009-2013

Programme Component: Environment and Energy

Project Title: Strengthening the Protected Area Network within the Eastern Montane Forest Hotspot of Kenya

Project ID: PIMS 4178

Atlas Project ID: TBD

ATLAS Award: TBD

GEFSEC Project ID: 3693

Business Unit: (KEN10)

Management Arrangement: NEX

United Nations Development Programme________________________________________________

Date

Ministry of Environment and Mineral Resources __________________________________________



Date

Ministry of Finance_______________________ __________________________________________



Date

Nature Kenya _____________________________________________________________________



Date

1 Hughes, R.H & Hughes, J.S 1992. A directory of African wetlands. Gland, Cambridge and Nairobi: IUCN/UNEP/WCMC

2 NBU 1992. The costs, benefits and unmet needs of biological diversity conservation in Kenya. A study prepared for the Government of Kenya and the United Nations Environment Programme. Nairobi: National Biodiversity Unit.

3 Dean, P.B & Trump E.C 1983. The biotic communities and natural regions of Kenya. Nairobi. Wildlife Planning Unit, Wildlife Conservation and Management Department.

4 Crafter et al, 1992

5 IUCN 1996. Forest cover and forest resources in Kenya: policy and practice. Nairobi: IUCN Eastern Africa Regional office.

6 ‘Biodiversity Hotspot’: using the Conservation International benchmark to describe hotspots.

7 See Wass (1995) for definitions of forest relative to canopy cover in indigenous forest.

8 Wass .P. (ed) 1995. Kenya’s indigenous forests: Status management and conservation. Gland: IUCN.

9 User rights are defined under the 2005 Forest Act. Management agreements may be entered into between Community Forest Associations and the Kenya Forest Service which incorporate access and user agreements.

10 Blackett, H. L. 1994g. Forestry inventory report No. 10: North Nandi, Kaptaroi and Taressia. Nairobi: Forest Department/Kenya Indigenous Forest Conservation Programme

11 Beentje H.J 1990. Forests of Kenya in Proceedings AETFAT 12th Symposium Hamburg pp 265-286.

12 Mabberley, 1975

13 Waiyaki, E.M 1998. An avifaunal survey of South Nandi Forest: Research reports of the centre for biodiversity, National Museums of Kenya: Ornithology, 30

14 Waiyaki, E.M 1998. An avifaunal survey of South Nandi Forest: Research reports of the centre for biodiversity, National Museums of Kenya: Ornithology,30

15 Zimmerman, D.A, Turner D,A & Pearson 1996. Birds of Kenya and northern Tanzania. Halfway House, South Africa: Russel Friedman Books.

16 Waiyaki, E.M 1998. An avifaunal survey of South Nandi Forest: Research reports of the centre for biodiversity, National Museums of Kenya: Ornithology,30

17 Larsen T.S, Kamugasha B. N., Karani I. 2008. Mid-Term Review of Mount Elgon Regional Ecosystem Conservation Programme (MERECP). Noragric Report No. 44, Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Noragric.

18 Ibid

19 Ibid

20 Beentje H.J 1990. Forests of Kenya in Proceedings AETFAT 12th Symposium Hamburg pp 265-286.

21 Wahome J.M. 1992. Kisere Forest; a land of rare species. EANHS Bulletin 22 (3): 39 – 40

22 Duff – Mackay A. 1980. Amphibia: conservation status report No.1 Nairobi; National Museums of Kenya.

23 Larsen T.S, Kamugasha B. N., Karani I. 2008. Mid-Term Review of Mount Elgon Regional Ecosystem Conservation Programme (MERECP). Noragric Report No. 44, Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Noragric.

24 IBA 58

25 IBA 55

26 Blackett, H. L. 1994g. Forestry inventory report No. 10: North Nandi, Kaptaroi and Taressia. Nairobi: Forest Department/Kenya Indigenous Forest Conservation Programme

27 Blackett, H. L. 1994g. Forestry inventory report No. 10: North Nandi, Kaptaroi and Taressia. Nairobi: Forest Department/Kenya Indigenous Forest Conservation Programme

28 Zimmerman, D.A, Turner D,A & Pearson 1996. Birds of Kenya and northern Tanzania. Halfway House, South Africa: Russel Friedman Books

29 Stattersfield A.J. Crosby M.J. Long AJ. and Wege D.C 1998. Endemic bird areas of the world: priorities for biodiversity conservation. Birdlife Conservation Series No.7. Cambridge Birdlife International.

30 Important Bird Areas (IBAs) in Kenya by Leon Bennun and Peter Njoroge, Ornithology Department, Natural Museums of Kenya.

31 Blackett, H. L. 1994g. Forestry inventory report No. 10: North Nandi, Kaptaroi and Taressia. Nairobi: Forest Department/Kenya Indigenous Forest Conservation Programme

32 Bennun, L., Dranzoa, C & Pomeroy, D. The forest birds of Kenya and Uganda. Journal of East African natural History.

33 Waiyaki, E.M 1998. An avifaunal survey of South Nandi Forest: Research reports of the centre for biodiversity, National Museums of Kenya: Ornithology,30

34 Kosgey D.K. 1998. Status and habitat of Turners Eremomela, Eremomela turneri (Van Someren 1920) in south Nandi Forest Reserve Kenya. Unpublished M.Phil thesis, Moi University.

35 Zimmerman, D.A, Turner D,A & Pearson 1996. Birds of Kenya and northern Tanzania. Halfway House, South Africa: Russel Friedman Books;Waiyaki, E.M 1998. An avifaunal survey of South Nandi Forest: Research reports of the centre for biodiversity, National Museums of Kenya: Ornithology,30

36 NRI 1996. Kenya renewable natural resources profile. Chatham. UK. Natural Resources Unit

37 Juma C. 1989. Biological Diversity and Innovation: conserving and utilizing genetic resources in Kenya. Nairobi

38 http://www.state.gov

39 http://www.usaid.gov/

40 http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/

  • 41 Government of Kenya (2000). The Environment and Coordination Act 1999 in Kenya Gazette Supplement No.3 (Act No.1) Government Printer

42 Government of Kenya (2005). Forest Act: Government Printer

43 A strategy for the integrated management of land, water and living resources that promotes conservation and sustainable use in an equitable way” as described by CBD

44 The Kenya National Environment Action Plan (NEAP) 1994. Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Nairobi, Kenya

45 Kenya Government Lands Act, Chapter 280. Government of Kenya, 1979

46 Njuguna, P. and Muriithi, S., 1995, Report on Game Damage Survey Mount Kenya/Aberdares, Kenya Forestry Development Project, Nairobi, Ochieng, D., 1993, Damage Cause by Forest Animals to Farms Adjacent to the South Western Side of Mount Kenya Forest Reserve, Kenya Indigenous Forest Conservation Project, Forest Department, Nairobi.

47 Emerton, L., 1997. An Economic Assessment of Mount Kenya Forest, report prepared for EU by African Wildlife Foundation, Nairobi.

48 Murray, M., Eriksson, H., Goransson, G., and Karani, I. (2006). Final Evaluation Report of the Biodiversity Conservation Programme funded by the European Union.

49 Ecotourism Kenya, May-June 2007 issue No.16.

50 Lambert, A., 2006. Payment for Environmental Services: Some thoughts!

51 Emerton, L., 1997. An Economic Assessment of Mount Kenya Forest, report prepared for EU by African Wildlife Foundation, Nairobi.

52 Republic of Kenya (2007b). Forest Policy. Nairobi, Kenya

53 The Kenya National Environment Action Plan (NEAP) 1994. Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Nairobi, Kenya

54 Waiyaki, E.M 1998. An avifaunal survey of South Nandi Forest: Research reports of the centre for biodiversity, National Museums of Kenya: Ornithology,30

55 Blackett, H. L. 1994g. Forestry inventory report No. 10: North Nandi, Kaptaroi and Taressia. Nairobi: Forest Department/Kenya Indigenous Forest Conservation Programme

56 Emerton, L., 1997. An Economic Assessment of Mount Kenya Forest, report prepared for EU by African Wildlife Foundation, Nairobi.

57 Oyugi J.O.1996. Kakamega Forest is dying. EANHS Bulletin 26 (3/4).

58 IBA 53

59 Waiyaki, E.M 1998. An avifaunal survey of South Nandi Forest: Research reports of the centre for biodiversity, National Museums of Kenya: Ornithology,30

60 Site designation has been be agreed during the PPG process.

61 Forest Again reforestation project is a multidisciplinary, multi-institutional, international effort involving Kenya’s leading organizations in forestry research, conservation, and management, community-based organizations at the local scale, and world-known organizations in rainforest research and conservation.

62 Gullison, R.E., Frumhoff, P., Canadell, J., Field, C.B., Nepstad, D.C., Hayhoe, K., Avissar, R., Curran, L.M., Friedlingstein, P., Jones, C.D. & Nobre, C. (2007). Tropical Forests and Climate Policy. Science 316, 985-986.

63 Brooks et al, 2006

1   ...   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət