Once section 9 has been completed, send this form to the SMB Chair and MAPPA Co-ordinator within 5 days.
|
MAPPA SERIOUS CASE REVIEW:
REPORT TEMPLATE
|
MAPPA O
|
Not for publication or wider circulation without the prior approval of the MAPPA Strategic Management Board.
Name of offender:
|
|
Offence:
|
|
1. Why a MAPPA Serious Case Review?
2. Case background
3. The Review process
4. List and role of the relevant agencies
5. Chronology of events
6. Findings – including assessment of practice against MAPPA Guidance and relevant legislation
7. Conclusion, Learning Points and Best Practice identified
8. Action Plan
Action 1:
|
|
How will it be taken forward?
|
|
By whom? (Grade, rank, role):
|
|
Timescale (include dates):
|
|
Action 2:
|
|
How will it be taken forward?
|
|
By whom? (Grade, rank, role):
|
|
Timescale (include dates):
|
|
Action 3:
|
|
How will it be taken forward?
|
|
By whom? (Grade, rank, role):
|
|
Timescale (include dates):
|
|
Action 4:
|
|
How will it be taken forward?
|
|
By whom? (Grade, rank, role):
|
|
Timescale (include dates):
|
|
Action 5:
|
|
How will it be taken forward?
|
|
By whom? (Grade, rank, role):
|
|
Timescale (include dates):
|
|
Action 6:
|
|
How will it be taken forward?
|
|
By whom? (Grade, rank, role):
|
|
Timescale (include dates):
|
|
Action 7:
|
|
How will it be taken forward?
|
|
By whom? (Grade, rank, role):
|
|
Timescale (include dates):
|
|
Action 8:
|
|
How will it be taken forward?
|
|
By whom? (Grade, rank, role):
|
|
Timescale (include dates):
|
|
Action 9:
|
|
How will it be taken forward?
|
|
By whom? (Grade, rank, role):
|
|
Timescale (include dates):
|
|
Action 10:
|
|
How will it be taken forward?
|
|
By whom? (Grade, rank, role):
|
|
Timescale (include dates):
|
|
9. Serious Case Review Lead
NB: Any action recommended for agencies not involved in the Review, including recommendations with national implications e.g. for NOMS or ACPO, must be discussed with those agencies before appearing in the Action Plan.
|
NOTIFICATION TO HOUSING BENEFIT SPOC
|
MAPPA P
|
To be completed by the lead agency (see below) and sent via secure email to the identified Single Point of Contact (SPOC) for housing benefit in the area.
-
The person below is being managed at MAPPA level 2 or level 3 and is aged 25 to 34 and is therefore exempt from the shared accommodation rate.
1. THE BENEFIT CLAIMANT
|
Last name:
|
|
First name:
|
|
Middle name:
|
|
Date of birth:
|
|
Current address:
|
|
Postcode:
|
|
This person will be subject to MAPPA until:
|
|
2. NOTIFYING AGENCY
|
Notifying agency:
|
Probation / Police
|
Name:
|
|
Grade:
|
|
Office:
|
|
Telephone number(s):
|
(w)
|
|
(m)
|
|
Email address:
|
|
3. HOUSING BENEFIT
|
Date Housing Benefit team sent acknowledgement of MAPPA P to lead agency
(by secure email):
|
|
Signed:
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
Role and agency:
|
|
* “Lead agency” is the agency with the statutory authority and responsibility to manage a MAPPA offender. This management will involve appropriate information-sharing in order to properly identify risk. The lead agency will have primary responsibility for referring the offender to level 2 or level 3 MAPPA management or for continuing management at level 1.
|
MAPPA Screening
|
MAPPA Q
|
Name of Offender:
Date of Birth:
|
Step 1: Legality
|
Is the nominal a MAPPA Offender?
|
(Please note that offenders can only be identified in one of the three Categories at a time. Offenders can only be considered for Category 3 if they do not meet the criteria for Category 1 or Category 2. Offenders only fall into Category 2 if they do not meet the criteria for Category 1. However, an offender who ceases to meet the criteria of one Category can be identified in a different category if they meet the relevant criteria.)
C
ategory 1. Registered Sex Offender (RSO) (W/M marker shown on PNC)
Schedule 3 SOA 2003:
C
ategory 2. Violent Offender (and ‘other sexual offenders’)
Murder or Schedule 15 of CJA 2003:
sentenced to custody for 12 months or more (including indeterminate and suspended sentences)and on licence*, or
s37/41 restricted hospital order patient conditionally discharged from hospital, or s37 unrestricted hospital order patient discharged from hospital on a community treatment order
Subject of a Disqualification Order
*This includes persons sentenced to 12 months or more who are also the subject of a s47 transfer to hospital or a s45A hospital direction who have been discharged from hospital (such persons may be subject to a Community Treatment Order while also on licence. MAPPA eligibility as a Cat 2 ends when the sentence expires).
C
ategory 3. Other ‘dangerous’ offender
The offender:
-
must have been convicted/cautioned for an offence that indicated they are capable of causing serious harm to the public, and
-
poses a current risk of serious harm to the public that requires multi-agency management at Level 2 or 3
None of these categories apply: the offender is not a MAPPA nominal.
One of the three categories applies: proceed to step 2
|
Step 2:
|
Do two or more agencies need to meet and actively collaborate to develop and implement a Multi-Agency Risk Management Plan? (If Police and Probation are involved, then three or more agencies – unless extra police resources need to be committed and/or actively co-ordinated)
For Mental Health patients: as above and/or does the Care Programme Approach (CPA) process need to be reinforced in order to manage the risk?
Level 2 or 3 (Active Multi-Agency Management) should ‘add value’ to the management of the offender (i.e. Answer the question, “what is it that the increased level of management will additionally provide to the effective management of this case?”)
Issues and questions to be considered regarding L2 or L3 include:
-
does the offender/patient pose a current, active risk of serious harm to others?
-
is the amount and level of information available within different agencies such that a discussion will facilitate a better understanding?;
-
is there a need to explore and reach a consensus (or record a formal difference) between agencies about the level of risk or risk management?;
-
does the complexity of the case need a more co-ordinated approach to ensure agencies are clear about their respective roles and responsibilities?;
-
would active multi-agency management assist in brokering the engagement of other agencies and services in developing a risk management plan?;
-
for mental heath patients;
-
is the nature of the risk such that it cannot be effectively managed through the CPA process?
-
is it likely that a tribunal might lead to discharge against the recommendation of the treating team?
-
Would multi-agency management improve or expedite referrals for services under other agencies’ procedures?;
-
would it support priority access to limited or specialist resources?;
-
it is necessary to plan more complex third party disclosure (e.g. where there may be personal or community repercussions?;
-
is there a need to plan for media or community impact/interest?;
-
does the case require middle/senior management oversight outside normal processes?;
-
are there any other issues that warrant a multi-agency approach?
In light of these considerations does this case require active Multi-Agency Management at MAPPA Level 2 or 3?
Yes: proceed to step 3.
No: the case can be managed at Level 1 (Ordinary Agency Management).
This decision should be endorsed by your line manager (or representative)
– see step 4.
|
Step 3:
|
Is the case likely to attract a high level of media scrutiny and/or public interest in the management of the case and is there a risk of public confidence being damaged?
If ‘yes’: consider referral to Level 3
If ‘no’: does the case
-
require input from a senior manager due to complexities (e.g. cross border issues)?, or
-
does the likely seriousness and the imminence of the risk or the complexity of the case require input from special or higher level resources, perhaps at short notice, that can only be committed by senior managers?
Yes: consider referral to Level 3.
No: refer to Level 2.
|
Step 4:
|
Discuss this case with your line manager.
D
ecision not agreed:
Reason/s ……………………………………
Decision endorsed by line manager
Retain at Level 1, Ordinary agency management.
R
efer into MAPPA (Level 2 or 3). Offender manager should complete the MAPPA referral form and send it to the MAPPA Administrator.
Offender Manager …………………..................... Date ………………….
Line manager …..…………………………………. Date …………………..
| |
For more comprehensive information, refer to:
-
‘MAPPA Guidance 2012 (Version 4)’, Sections 6.1 – 6.14 and Section 7, for
details of MAPPA Categories and Management Levels
-
NOMS Guidance, March 2011. ‘MAPPA Level 1 – Ordinary Agency Management Best Practice’
| |
Yüklə 2.11 Mb.