Ana səhifə

Mappa guidance 2012 4th edition part 2 – appendices and forms table of contents


Yüklə 2.11 Mb.
səhifə6/13
tarix25.06.2016
ölçüsü2.11 Mb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   13






NOTES FOR COMPLETION

MAPPA A




  • The MAPPA Area should be identified at the top of the form

  • The referrer should identify the Level being referred to (2 or 3)

  • The agency that should complete the sections is identified on the right hand side of the field



1. CATEGORY OF OFFENDER

This section identifies which category brings the offender into MAPPA, and therefore avoids wrong identification from the outset. The offender can only fall into one category.




2. OFFENDER INFORMATION




  • Nicknames have been included as this is relevant for a number of reasons including gang membership

  • Where the offender was NFA prior to imprisonment that should be stated, and then the area to which the offender has closest links indentified

  • The proposed release address should be that which has been approved

  • State the actual ethnicity, not the code.

  • ViSOR reference should be included when a ViSOR record has been created e.g. sexual offenders

  • Agency unique identifier should be included (e.g. PNC ID, CRAMS/Delius reference number)




3. CONVICTION / CAUTION INFORMATION




  • The index offences or caution [for category 3] is the offence/s or caution which has brought

the offender into MAPPA

  • Sentence - outcome of Court proceedings

  • Brief details of offence. Information must not be cut and pasted from the Pre-Sentence Report or any other document. Use bullet points

  • There may or may not be additional information the referring agency wishes to add

  • Relevant dates are those which relate to the current sentence or mental health review dates (input dates where known)

  • Previous related offences should be included.




4. DETAINED IN HOSPITAL

This section should be completed by Mental Health and provides relevant information regarding the patient.




5. RISK ASSESSMENT

  • The agency required to complete the fields for the assessment tools in this section are identified the on the right hand side of the field. The information in the header line indicates the type of offender the tool should be completed for. It is important to include the date the tool was completed.

  • Lead Agency Risk Assessment Summary - For Probation referrals, this information can be copied and pasted directly form the answers to these questions in OASys. For other agencies, these fields must be completed

  • Lead Agency Risk Management Plan - these fields must be completed


Restrictive Interventions

These are strategies aimed at controlling and reducing opportunities for harmful behaviour, for example, by restricting access to particular venues like schools, leisure facilities or access to previous victims.


Examples of Restrictive Interventions


  • Restrictions on residence, for example, residing at Approved Premises

  • The use of restrictive licence conditions

  • Use of Restrictive Orders – see below for details

  • Home visits (by police and probation) and other regular visits to the offender’s premises

  • Restrictions on associations, activities and movements

  • Interventions which include police surveillance and electronic monitoring

  • Enforcement of non-compliance on reporting instructions

  • Disclosure of information to third parties

  • Contingency plans in case of risk management failure and rapid response arrangements to changing situations or deterioration in the circumstances/behaviours


Restrictive orders
Where offenders pose a continuing risk of serious harm, the police will consider whether the risks posed by such an offender are sufficiently high to justify applying for one of the following orders:

  • Notification Order (Sexual Offences Act 2003 (“SOA 2003”) – sections 97–101)

  • Risk of Sexual Harm Order (SOA 2003 – sections 123–129)

  • Sexual Offences Prevention Order (SOA 2003 – sections 104, 106, 107, 108, 110 and 113)

  • Foreign Travel order (SOA 2003 – sections 114–122)

  • Violent Offender Orders (Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 – Chapter 4 Part 8)







Rehabilitative interventions

These are strategies that focus more on developing the offenders own ability to avoid and manage risk situations and will include accredited programmes.


Examples of Rehabilitative Interventions


  • Attendance at cognitive-behavioural programmes, which address the causes of offending behaviour

  • Interventions that emphasise self-risk management and which promote the use of internal controls over the longer term

  • Office-based supervision

  • Provision of suitable diversion activities, for example, employment

  • Interventions which combine intensive supervision with the appropriate use of sanctions and enforcement of non-compliance

  • Supportive and integrative approaches where risk assessments indicate their usefulness, for example, “Circles of Support and Accountability”


Protective interventions

These are strategies with a strength based approach, supported by the assumption that offenders want better lives, not simply the promise of less harmful ones. Self-risk management is promoted through programmes of intervention that seek to address the offenders’ readiness to change and to help them develop skills and strategies.


Examples of Protective Interventions


  • Avoidance of activities or environments which could precipitate offending

  • Active commitment to change and is engaged in change related work

  • Pro-social network which provides practical and emotional support and disapproves of criminal activity

  • Stable and intimate relationships with adults that provide emotional support

  • Involvement in other activities to divert away from offending such as employment or voluntary work

  • Understanding consequences of behaviour, identifying reasons not to offend or cause serious harm






6. RELEVANT INFORMATION


Reason for referral

The reasons why the referral has been made may include concerns about:




  • Behaviour and attitudes

  • Previous offences and patterns of offending

  • Information gathered from other agencies

  • The offenders pattern of cooperation

  • Gang involvement

  • TACT involvement

  • Relevant psychiatric history

  • Diagnosed personality disorder

  • What the risk of reconviction tool used indicates


What interagency work has been undertaken so far?

Should include the outcomes of:




  • Care Plan Approach Meetings

  • Child Protection Conferences

  • Professionals’ Meetings

  • Which agencies have been contacted and what they have contributed to the risk

management plan?

  • MARAC


How will active Level 2 or 3 management add value to the case over and above what is already being achieved? Key words are active and add value.
Describe what additional resources etc the agencies involved in MAPPA can add to how the risk of the serious harm the offender poses can be managed more effectively.
Diversity considerations linked to risk of serious harm – only comment on diversity issues that could impact upon risk management, e.g. is the offender a vulnerable adult, does he/she have learning disabilities, etc.


7. VICTIM CONCERNS

This section should outline any known or suspected concerns regarding the victim of the index offence(s), previous offences or potential victims e.g. children, partners, vulnerable adults etc, and why the referring agency thinks those identified are at risk of serious harm.




8. SAFEGUARDING




  • Children’s services keep records according to the child. To assist this agency the information should be fully provided as well as to enable the Co-ordination unit to invite the correct person to the meeting.

  • Where the concerns relate to children in general, these should be specified

  • Vulnerable Adult concerns should be noted. If in doubt, contact the local Safeguarding Adults Unit




9. REFERRING AGENCY INFORMATION




  • Must be fully completed

  • The line manager must endorse the referral (this ensures that the line manager is fully aware of the case and the reason for the referral to MAPPA). If the referral is being completed by a line manager, the referral does not require endorsement if agreed by local agency protocol.




10. ADDITIONAL MAPPA INVITEES




  • Invite 1 must be completed by the referring agency identifying themselves.

  • Complete for invitations to be sent for the meeting when the case is to be discussed

  • If there are more than 6, complete this on a separate sheet and attach to the referral




11. MAPPA CO-ORDINATION UNIT DECISION

This section should be complete by whoever has this responsibility in the MAPPA area.








MEETING MINUTES – LEVEL 2/3


MAPPA B

1. CATEGORY OF OFFENDER

Category (please tick):

1

2

3

Level (proposed if new):

2

3

2. OFFENDER INFORMATION

Last name:




First name:




Date of birth:




Aliases
(including nicknames):




Prison:




Prison number:




Last known address before sentence:




Proposed release address:




Current address if in community:




Gender:




Ethnicity:




PNC ID:




ViSOR Reference
(must be completed for all Registered Sexual Offenders):




Agency unique identifier:




3. CONVICTION / CAUTION INFORMATION

Index offence / Relevant caution:




Date of conviction / caution:




Sentence:




Brief offence(s) details:




Relevant previous convictions and pattern of offending:




Other relevant information:




Relevant dates

Automatic Conditional Release Date:




Parole Eligibility Date:




Non-Parole Date:




Licence Expiry Date:




Sentence Expiry Date:




Home Detention Curfew:




Community Order end date:




Disqualification Order:

YES / NO

Imprisonment for Public Protection:

YES / NO

Extended Sentence for Public Protection:

YES / NO

Lifer:

YES / NO

Mental Health review date(s):




Sexual Offences Prevention Order:

YES / NO

Registered Sex Offender Notification end date:




Violent Offender Order:

YES / NO

4. DETAINED IN HOSPITAL

Mental Health

Name of responsible clinician:




Hospital:




Earliest possible discharge date:




Proposed release address:




Name / contact details of Forensic Social Worker:




Date of next tribunal:




Please indicate the basis for detention from the options below

Guardianship order – s.7/s.37 MHA 1983

YES / NO

Hospital order –
s.37 MHA 1983

YES / NO

Restriction order –
s.41 MHA 1983

YES / NO

Transfer from prison –
s.47 MHA 1983

YES / NO

5. RISK ASSESSMENT

RM 2000 Risk of Reconviction [complete for all sexual offenders]




Level

Date of assessment

RM 2000 Sexual:







RM 2000 Violent:







RM 2000 Combined:







OASys Risk of Reconviction




1 year %

2 year %

Band

Date completed

OGP:













OVP:













OGRS3:













OASys Risk of Serious Harm – (1) Risk in the Community




V High

High

Medium

Low

Date completed

Children:
















Public:
















Known adult:
















Staff:
















Prisoners:
















OASys Risk of Serious Harm – (2) Risk in Custody




V High

High

Medium

Low

Date completed

Children:
















Public:
















Known adult:
















Staff:
















Prisoners:
















SARA Assessment [complete for all domestic abuse offenders]




High

Medium

Low

Date completed

Risk to partner:













Risk to others:














ASSET Risk of Serious Harm [complete for all offenders under 18]




V High

High

Medium

Low

Date completed

Risk of serious harm:
















ASSET risk of reconviction




Date completed




Mental Health / Psychological Risk Tool

Date completed







6. RELEVANT INFORMATION (at time of referral)

Reason for referral




Add any other relevant information (e.g. media handling, disclosure, medical issues etc)




7. SAFEGUARDING (at time of referral)

Child Protection Concerns (continue on additional sheet if required)

Are there any child protection concerns? If YES, answer a to c below

YES / NO / NOT APPLICABLE / NOT KNOWN

a. What are they?




b. Is there an allocated social worker? If so, please give details




c. Is the child or children currently subject to a Child Protection Plan?

YES / NO / NOT APPLICABLE / NOT KNOWN

Child 1

Last name:




First name:




Date of birth:




Gender:




Relationship to offender:




Child 2

Last name:




First name:




Date of birth:




Gender:




Relationship to offender:




Child 3

Last name:




First name:




Date of birth:




Gender:




Relationship to offender:




Vulnerable Adult Concerns (continue on additional sheet if required)

Name:




Date of birth:




Gender:




Does this person live with the offender?

YES / NO

Relationship to offender:




Name of social worker (if relevant):




RECORD OF MAPPA MEETING

Name of offender:




Date / Time of meeting:




Lead Agency:




8. MAPPA ACTIONS REVIEW

No.

Action

Owner

Was action completed?

Reason if not completed



















































































































































































































9. INFORMATION FROM AGENCIES

Name / Agency

Update







10. CURRENT VICTIM CONCERNS

Outline any concerns about the victim of the index offence or potential victims:




Has the victim taken up the Victim Liaison Service?

YES / NO / NOT APPLICABLE / NOT KNOWN

If YES, give contact details of VLO




Are there any domestic abuse concerns? If YES, answer a to e below

YES / NO / NOT APPLICABLE / NOT KNOWN

a. What are they?




b. Has the victim been referred to MARAC?

YES / NO / NOT APPLICABLE / NOT KNOWN

c. Has a meeting been held / Is a meeting due to be held?

YES / NO / NOT APPLICABLE / NOT KNOWN

d. Date of meeting (if known)




e. Actions from MARAC




11. RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN

11a. Agreed Risk Assessment Summary

Who is at risk?




What is the nature of the risk?




When is the risk likely to be greatest?




What circumstances are likely to increase risk?




What factors are likely to reduce risk?




11b. Agreed Risk Management Plan

Restrictive factors / interventions




Rehabilitative factors / interventions




Protective factors / interventions




12. MAPPA VIEW OF RISK OF SERIOUS HARM

From the information shared at the meeting, what is the revised view of the risk of serious harm the offender poses at the current time?

Very High

High

Medium

Low













13. DISCLOSURE

a. Are you going to make disclosure?

YES: Please explain why then go to b1 below

NO: Please explain why not

b1. What will be disclosed and by when?




b2. Who will make disclosure?




b3. Who will receive disclosure?




14. PRESS AND MEDIA HANDLING

Does this need to be considered?

YES / NO

If YES, what is the issue the media would be interested in?




Has the media handling person been alerted to the need to prepare a strategy?

YES / NO

If YES, by whom?




If NO, who will do this?




15. MAPPA ACTIONS

No.

Action

Agency and Owner

Deadline (specified date)





































































































































16. CONCLUSION

What level of MAPPA management is recommended in this case and why?




17. HUMAN RIGHTS ACT VALIDATION

It was agreed that the actions decided upon were necessary and proportionate with particular reference to:

  • Public safety

  • The prevention of crime and disorder

  • The protection of health and morals

  • The protection of the rights and freedoms of others

18. MAPPA ADMINISTRATION

Date of next MAPPA meeting:




Time of next MAPPA meeting:




Location of next MAPPA meeting:




Minutes prepared by:




Date minutes prepared:




Minutes checked by:




Date minutes checked:




Minutes distributed by:




Date minutes distributed:









NOTES FOR COMPLETION OF

MEETING MINUTES – LEVEL 2/3

MAPPA B

Sections 1-7 of the MAPPA B will be automatically populated via the web-based referral process. For areas not using the web-based referral, sections 1–7 should be copied and pasted directly from the original MAPPA A. Where sections of the MAPPA A were not applicable, these will or should be collapsed before transfer to the B.


This is so that the Chair and the other MAPPA agencies are aware, from the first time the offender is discussed and at every subsequent meeting, of the information which led to the offender being referred to Level 2 or Level 3.

An agency attendance sheet should be kept according to the area’s practice.
The record of the MAPPA Meeting commences from Section 8 of the MAPPA B.



8. MAPPA ACTIONS REVIEW

This can only be completed from the second meeting when the offender is discussed. For the second meeting, and then for subsequent meetings the administrator will cut and paste the actions from the previous meeting into this section. It is envisaged that this is used to record whether an action was completed, the date this was undertaken, and if it wasn’t, why it wasn’t. Any additional information from those undertaking actions should be recorded in Section 9.

9. INFORMATION FROM AGENCIES

The name of the person providing updated information and their agency should be recorded in the left hand column. Initials should not be used. It is for areas to decide how any report information is shared with the meeting (e.g. Chair/Lead Agency could provide a précis). Copying and pasting reports into the MAPPA B should be avoided due to the resulting significant increase in size of the document.

10. CURRENT VICTIM CONCERNS

The meeting should review the victim section from either the MAPPA A (if first meeting) or the previous MAPPA B minutes (section 10). Any new information should be recorded here.

11. RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN

11a. Agreed Risk Assessment Summary

The meeting should review the Risk Assessment Summary section from either the MAPPA A (if first meeting) or the previous MAPPA B minutes (section 10). Any new information should be recorded here.




11b. Agreed Risk Management Plan

The meeting should review the Risk Assessment Summary section from either the MAPPA A (if first meeting) or the previous MAPPA B minutes (section 10). Any new information should be recorded here.

Restrictive Interventions

These are strategies aimed at controlling and reducing opportunities for harmful behaviour, for example, by restricting access to particular venues like schools, leisure facilities or access to previous victims.

Examples of Restrictive Interventions


  • Restrictions on residence, for example, residing at Approved Premises

  • The use of restrictive licence conditions

  • Use of Restrictive Orders – see below for details

  • Home visits (by police and probation) and other regular visits to the offender’s premises

  • Restrictions on associations, activities and movements

  • Interventions which include police surveillance and electronic monitoring

  • Enforcement of non-compliance on reporting instructions

  • Disclosure of information to third parties

  • Contingency plans in case of risk management failure and rapid response arrangements to changing situations or deterioration in the circumstances/behaviours

Restrictive orders

Where offenders pose a continuing risk of serious harm, the police will consider whether the risks posed by such an offender are sufficiently high to justify applying for one of the following orders:



  • Notification Order (Sexual Offences Act 2003 (“SOA 2003”) – sections 97–101)

  • Risk of Sexual Harm Order (SOA 2003 – sections 123–129)

  • Sexual Offences Prevention Order (SOA 2003 – sections 104, 106, 107, 108, 110 and 113)

  • Foreign Travel order (SOA 2003 – sections 114–122)

  • Violent Offender Orders (Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 – Chapter 4 Part 8)





Rehabilitative interventions

These are strategies that focus more on developing the offender’s own ability to avoid and manage risk situations and will include accredited programmes.


Examples of Rehabilitative Interventions

  • Attendance at cognitive-behavioural programmes, which address the causes of offending behaviour

  • Interventions that emphasise self-risk management and which promote the use of internal controls over the longer term

  • Office-based supervision

  • Provision of suitable diversion activities, for example, employment

  • Interventions which combine intensive supervision with the appropriate use of sanctions and enforcement of non-compliance

  • Supportive and integrative approaches where risk assessments indicate their usefulness, for example, “Circles of Support and Accountability”


Protective interventions

These are strategies with a strength based approach, supported by the assumption that offenders want better lives, not simply the promise of less harmful ones. Self-risk management is promoted through programmes of intervention that seek to address the offenders’ readiness to change and to help them develop skills and strategies.



Examples of Protective Interventions

  • Avoidance of activities or environments which could precipitate offending

  • Active commitment to change and is engaged in change related work

  • Pro-social network which provides practical and emotional support and disapproves of criminal activity

  • Stable and intimate relationships with adults that provide emotional support

  • Involvement in other activities to divert away from offending such as employment or voluntary work

  • Understanding consequences of behaviour, identifying reasons not to offend or cause serious harm.

12. MAPPA VIEW OF RISK OF SERIOUS HARM

A MAPPA view should be formed from the information shared at the meeting. It may require the Lead Agency, and other agencies present to update their current assessment of risk.

13. DISCLOSURE

Disclosure must be considered at every meeting. If disclosure is to be made the details of what will be disclosed, by whom and when should be recorded. If a decision is made not to make disclosure, full reasons for this decision should be recorded.

14. PRESS AND MEDIA HANDLING

Whether this needs to be considered should be recorded, and when appropriate, who will prepare the media handling strategy.


15. MAPPA ACTIONS

All agreed actions should be recorded and given a number, the action described together with the name of the agency and who within that agency will carry out that action, and when that must be completed by which should be specified (the term ”as soon as possible” should be avoided).

16. CONCLUSION

The agreed level of MAPPA management should be agreed by the meeting, and the reasons recorded, together with the date and location of the next meeting. Where the case is to be managed at Level 1 (or outside of MAPPA for Category 3 cases) in future, and actions have been set, it will be the responsibility of the lead agency to ensure that they are carried out via normal inter-agency liaison.

17. HUMAN RIGHTS ACT VALIDATION

The Chair of the meeting should ensure that all present are satisfied that the decisions taken at the meeting comply with Human Rights Act requirements.

18. MAPPA ADMINISTRATION

The Chair should ensure that all present at the meeting are aware, if appropriate, of the date and location of the next meeting.

The MAPPA Co-ordination Unit is responsible for ensuring that the remainder of this section is completed.


1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   13


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət