1. CATEGORY OF OFFENDER
|
This section identifies which category brings the offender into MAPPA, and therefore avoids wrong identification from the outset. The offender can only fall into one category.
|
2. OFFENDER INFORMATION
|
-
Nicknames have been included as this is relevant for a number of reasons including gang membership
-
Where the offender was NFA prior to imprisonment that should be stated, and then the area to which the offender has closest links indentified
-
The proposed release address should be that which has been approved
-
State the actual ethnicity, not the code.
-
ViSOR reference should be included when a ViSOR record has been created e.g. sexual offenders
-
Agency unique identifier should be included (e.g. PNC ID, CRAMS/Delius reference number)
|
3. CONVICTION / CAUTION INFORMATION
|
-
The index offences or caution [for category 3] is the offence/s or caution which has brought
the offender into MAPPA
-
Sentence - outcome of Court proceedings
-
Brief details of offence. Information must not be cut and pasted from the Pre-Sentence Report or any other document. Use bullet points
-
There may or may not be additional information the referring agency wishes to add
-
Relevant dates are those which relate to the current sentence or mental health review dates (input dates where known)
-
Previous related offences should be included.
|
4. DETAINED IN HOSPITAL
|
This section should be completed by Mental Health and provides relevant information regarding the patient.
|
5. RISK ASSESSMENT
|
-
The agency required to complete the fields for the assessment tools in this section are identified the on the right hand side of the field. The information in the header line indicates the type of offender the tool should be completed for. It is important to include the date the tool was completed.
-
Lead Agency Risk Assessment Summary - For Probation referrals, this information can be copied and pasted directly form the answers to these questions in OASys. For other agencies, these fields must be completed
-
Lead Agency Risk Management Plan - these fields must be completed
Restrictive Interventions
These are strategies aimed at controlling and reducing opportunities for harmful behaviour, for example, by restricting access to particular venues like schools, leisure facilities or access to previous victims.
Examples of Restrictive Interventions
-
Restrictions on residence, for example, residing at Approved Premises
-
The use of restrictive licence conditions
-
Use of Restrictive Orders – see below for details
-
Home visits (by police and probation) and other regular visits to the offender’s premises
-
Restrictions on associations, activities and movements
-
Interventions which include police surveillance and electronic monitoring
-
Enforcement of non-compliance on reporting instructions
-
Disclosure of information to third parties
-
Contingency plans in case of risk management failure and rapid response arrangements to changing situations or deterioration in the circumstances/behaviours
Restrictive orders
Where offenders pose a continuing risk of serious harm, the police will consider whether the risks posed by such an offender are sufficiently high to justify applying for one of the following orders:
-
Notification Order (Sexual Offences Act 2003 (“SOA 2003”) – sections 97–101)
-
Risk of Sexual Harm Order (SOA 2003 – sections 123–129)
-
Sexual Offences Prevention Order (SOA 2003 – sections 104, 106, 107, 108, 110 and 113)
-
Foreign Travel order (SOA 2003 – sections 114–122)
-
Violent Offender Orders (Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 – Chapter 4 Part 8)
|
|
Rehabilitative interventions
These are strategies that focus more on developing the offenders own ability to avoid and manage risk situations and will include accredited programmes.
Examples of Rehabilitative Interventions
-
Attendance at cognitive-behavioural programmes, which address the causes of offending behaviour
-
Interventions that emphasise self-risk management and which promote the use of internal controls over the longer term
-
Office-based supervision
-
Provision of suitable diversion activities, for example, employment
-
Interventions which combine intensive supervision with the appropriate use of sanctions and enforcement of non-compliance
-
Supportive and integrative approaches where risk assessments indicate their usefulness, for example, “Circles of Support and Accountability”
Protective interventions
These are strategies with a strength based approach, supported by the assumption that offenders want better lives, not simply the promise of less harmful ones. Self-risk management is promoted through programmes of intervention that seek to address the offenders’ readiness to change and to help them develop skills and strategies.
Examples of Protective Interventions
-
Avoidance of activities or environments which could precipitate offending
-
Active commitment to change and is engaged in change related work
-
Pro-social network which provides practical and emotional support and disapproves of criminal activity
-
Stable and intimate relationships with adults that provide emotional support
-
Involvement in other activities to divert away from offending such as employment or voluntary work
-
Understanding consequences of behaviour, identifying reasons not to offend or cause serious harm
|
|
MEETING MINUTES – LEVEL 2/3
|
MAPPA B
|
1. CATEGORY OF OFFENDER
|
Category (please tick):
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Level (proposed if new):
|
2
|
3
|
2. OFFENDER INFORMATION
|
Last name:
|
|
First name:
|
|
Date of birth:
|
|
Aliases
(including nicknames):
|
|
Prison:
|
|
Prison number:
|
|
Last known address before sentence:
|
|
Proposed release address:
|
|
Current address if in community:
|
|
Gender:
|
|
Ethnicity:
|
|
PNC ID:
|
|
ViSOR Reference
(must be completed for all Registered Sexual Offenders):
|
|
Agency unique identifier:
|
|
3. CONVICTION / CAUTION INFORMATION
|
Index offence / Relevant caution:
|
|
Date of conviction / caution:
|
|
Sentence:
|
|
Brief offence(s) details:
|
|
Relevant previous convictions and pattern of offending:
|
|
Other relevant information:
|
|
Relevant dates
|
Automatic Conditional Release Date:
|
|
Parole Eligibility Date:
|
|
Non-Parole Date:
|
|
Licence Expiry Date:
|
|
Sentence Expiry Date:
|
|
Home Detention Curfew:
|
|
Community Order end date:
|
|
Disqualification Order:
|
YES / NO
|
Imprisonment for Public Protection:
|
YES / NO
|
Extended Sentence for Public Protection:
|
YES / NO
|
Lifer:
|
YES / NO
|
Mental Health review date(s):
|
|
Sexual Offences Prevention Order:
|
YES / NO
|
Registered Sex Offender Notification end date:
|
|
Violent Offender Order:
|
YES / NO
|
4. DETAINED IN HOSPITAL
|
Mental Health
|
Name of responsible clinician:
|
|
Hospital:
|
|
Earliest possible discharge date:
|
|
Proposed release address:
|
|
Name / contact details of Forensic Social Worker:
|
|
Date of next tribunal:
|
|
Please indicate the basis for detention from the options below
|
Guardianship order – s.7/s.37 MHA 1983
|
YES / NO
|
Hospital order –
s.37 MHA 1983
|
YES / NO
|
Restriction order –
s.41 MHA 1983
|
YES / NO
|
Transfer from prison –
s.47 MHA 1983
|
YES / NO
|
5. RISK ASSESSMENT
|
RM 2000 Risk of Reconviction [complete for all sexual offenders]
|
|
Level
|
Date of assessment
|
RM 2000 Sexual:
|
|
|
RM 2000 Violent:
|
|
|
RM 2000 Combined:
|
|
|
OASys Risk of Reconviction
|
|
1 year %
|
2 year %
|
Band
|
Date completed
|
OGP:
|
|
|
|
|
OVP:
|
|
|
|
|
OGRS3:
|
|
|
|
|
OASys Risk of Serious Harm – (1) Risk in the Community
|
|
V High
|
High
|
Medium
|
Low
|
Date completed
|
Children:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Known adult:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Staff:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prisoners:
|
|
|
|
|
|
OASys Risk of Serious Harm – (2) Risk in Custody
|
|
V High
|
High
|
Medium
|
Low
|
Date completed
|
Children:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Known adult:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Staff:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prisoners:
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARA Assessment [complete for all domestic abuse offenders]
|
|
High
|
Medium
|
Low
|
Date completed
|
Risk to partner:
|
|
|
|
|
Risk to others:
|
|
|
|
|
ASSET Risk of Serious Harm [complete for all offenders under 18]
|
|
V High
|
High
|
Medium
|
Low
|
Date completed
|
Risk of serious harm:
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSET risk of reconviction
|
|
Date completed
|
|
Mental Health / Psychological Risk Tool
|
Date completed
|
|
|
6. RELEVANT INFORMATION (at time of referral)
|
Reason for referral
|
|
Add any other relevant information (e.g. media handling, disclosure, medical issues etc)
|
|
7. SAFEGUARDING (at time of referral)
|
Child Protection Concerns (continue on additional sheet if required)
|
Are there any child protection concerns? If YES, answer a to c below
|
YES / NO / NOT APPLICABLE / NOT KNOWN
|
a. What are they?
|
|
b. Is there an allocated social worker? If so, please give details
|
|
c. Is the child or children currently subject to a Child Protection Plan?
|
YES / NO / NOT APPLICABLE / NOT KNOWN
|
Child 1
|
Last name:
|
|
First name:
|
|
Date of birth:
|
|
Gender:
|
|
Relationship to offender:
|
|
Child 2
|
Last name:
|
|
First name:
|
|
Date of birth:
|
|
Gender:
|
|
Relationship to offender:
|
|
Child 3
|
Last name:
|
|
First name:
|
|
Date of birth:
|
|
Gender:
|
|
Relationship to offender:
|
|
Vulnerable Adult Concerns (continue on additional sheet if required)
|
Name:
|
|
Date of birth:
|
|
Gender:
|
|
Does this person live with the offender?
|
YES / NO
|
Relationship to offender:
|
|
Name of social worker (if relevant):
|
|
RECORD OF MAPPA MEETING
|
Name of offender:
|
|
Date / Time of meeting:
|
|
Lead Agency:
|
|
8. MAPPA ACTIONS REVIEW
|
No.
|
Action
|
Owner
|
Was action completed?
|
Reason if not completed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. INFORMATION FROM AGENCIES
|
Name / Agency
|
Update
|
|
|
10. CURRENT VICTIM CONCERNS
|
Outline any concerns about the victim of the index offence or potential victims:
|
|
Has the victim taken up the Victim Liaison Service?
|
YES / NO / NOT APPLICABLE / NOT KNOWN
|
If YES, give contact details of VLO
|
|
Are there any domestic abuse concerns? If YES, answer a to e below
|
YES / NO / NOT APPLICABLE / NOT KNOWN
|
a. What are they?
|
|
b. Has the victim been referred to MARAC?
|
YES / NO / NOT APPLICABLE / NOT KNOWN
|
c. Has a meeting been held / Is a meeting due to be held?
|
YES / NO / NOT APPLICABLE / NOT KNOWN
|
d. Date of meeting (if known)
|
|
e. Actions from MARAC
|
|
11. RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN
|
11a. Agreed Risk Assessment Summary
|
Who is at risk?
|
|
What is the nature of the risk?
|
|
When is the risk likely to be greatest?
|
|
What circumstances are likely to increase risk?
|
|
What factors are likely to reduce risk?
|
|
11b. Agreed Risk Management Plan
|
Restrictive factors / interventions
|
|
Rehabilitative factors / interventions
|
|
Protective factors / interventions
|
|
12. MAPPA VIEW OF RISK OF SERIOUS HARM
|
From the information shared at the meeting, what is the revised view of the risk of serious harm the offender poses at the current time?
|
Very High
|
High
|
Medium
|
Low
|
|
|
|
|
13. DISCLOSURE
|
a. Are you going to make disclosure?
|
YES: Please explain why then go to b1 below
|
NO: Please explain why not
|
b1. What will be disclosed and by when?
|
|
b2. Who will make disclosure?
|
|
b3. Who will receive disclosure?
|
|
14. PRESS AND MEDIA HANDLING
|
Does this need to be considered?
|
YES / NO
|
If YES, what is the issue the media would be interested in?
|
|
Has the media handling person been alerted to the need to prepare a strategy?
|
YES / NO
|
If YES, by whom?
|
|
If NO, who will do this?
|
|
15. MAPPA ACTIONS
|
No.
|
Action
|
Agency and Owner
|
Deadline (specified date)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. CONCLUSION
|
What level of MAPPA management is recommended in this case and why?
|
|
17. HUMAN RIGHTS ACT VALIDATION
|
It was agreed that the actions decided upon were necessary and proportionate with particular reference to:
-
Public safety
-
The prevention of crime and disorder
-
The protection of health and morals
-
The protection of the rights and freedoms of others
|
18. MAPPA ADMINISTRATION
|
Date of next MAPPA meeting:
|
|
Time of next MAPPA meeting:
|
|
Location of next MAPPA meeting:
|
|
Minutes prepared by:
|
|
Date minutes prepared:
|
|
Minutes checked by:
|
|
Date minutes checked:
|
|
Minutes distributed by:
|
|
Date minutes distributed:
|
|
Sections 1-7 of the MAPPA B will be automatically populated via the web-based referral process. For areas not using the web-based referral, sections 1–7 should be copied and pasted directly from the original MAPPA A. Where sections of the MAPPA A were not applicable, these will or should be collapsed before transfer to the B.
11b. Agreed Risk Management Plan
|
The meeting should review the Risk Assessment Summary section from either the MAPPA A (if first meeting) or the previous MAPPA B minutes (section 10). Any new information should be recorded here.
Restrictive Interventions
These are strategies aimed at controlling and reducing opportunities for harmful behaviour, for example, by restricting access to particular venues like schools, leisure facilities or access to previous victims.
Examples of Restrictive Interventions
-
Restrictions on residence, for example, residing at Approved Premises
-
The use of restrictive licence conditions
-
Use of Restrictive Orders – see below for details
-
Home visits (by police and probation) and other regular visits to the offender’s premises
-
Restrictions on associations, activities and movements
-
Interventions which include police surveillance and electronic monitoring
-
Enforcement of non-compliance on reporting instructions
-
Disclosure of information to third parties
-
Contingency plans in case of risk management failure and rapid response arrangements to changing situations or deterioration in the circumstances/behaviours
Restrictive orders
Where offenders pose a continuing risk of serious harm, the police will consider whether the risks posed by such an offender are sufficiently high to justify applying for one of the following orders:
-
Notification Order (Sexual Offences Act 2003 (“SOA 2003”) – sections 97–101)
-
Risk of Sexual Harm Order (SOA 2003 – sections 123–129)
-
Sexual Offences Prevention Order (SOA 2003 – sections 104, 106, 107, 108, 110 and 113)
-
Foreign Travel order (SOA 2003 – sections 114–122)
-
Violent Offender Orders (Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 – Chapter 4 Part 8)
|
Rehabilitative interventions
These are strategies that focus more on developing the offender’s own ability to avoid and manage risk situations and will include accredited programmes.
Examples of Rehabilitative Interventions
-
Attendance at cognitive-behavioural programmes, which address the causes of offending behaviour
-
Interventions that emphasise self-risk management and which promote the use of internal controls over the longer term
-
Office-based supervision
-
Provision of suitable diversion activities, for example, employment
-
Interventions which combine intensive supervision with the appropriate use of sanctions and enforcement of non-compliance
-
Supportive and integrative approaches where risk assessments indicate their usefulness, for example, “Circles of Support and Accountability”
Protective interventions
These are strategies with a strength based approach, supported by the assumption that offenders want better lives, not simply the promise of less harmful ones. Self-risk management is promoted through programmes of intervention that seek to address the offenders’ readiness to change and to help them develop skills and strategies.
Examples of Protective Interventions
-
Avoidance of activities or environments which could precipitate offending
-
Active commitment to change and is engaged in change related work
-
Pro-social network which provides practical and emotional support and disapproves of criminal activity
-
Stable and intimate relationships with adults that provide emotional support
-
Involvement in other activities to divert away from offending such as employment or voluntary work
-
Understanding consequences of behaviour, identifying reasons not to offend or cause serious harm.
|
12. MAPPA VIEW OF RISK OF SERIOUS HARM
|
A MAPPA view should be formed from the information shared at the meeting. It may require the Lead Agency, and other agencies present to update their current assessment of risk.
|
13. DISCLOSURE
|
Disclosure must be considered at every meeting. If disclosure is to be made the details of what will be disclosed, by whom and when should be recorded. If a decision is made not to make disclosure, full reasons for this decision should be recorded.
|
14. PRESS AND MEDIA HANDLING
|
Whether this needs to be considered should be recorded, and when appropriate, who will prepare the media handling strategy.
|
15. MAPPA ACTIONS
|
All agreed actions should be recorded and given a number, the action described together with the name of the agency and who within that agency will carry out that action, and when that must be completed by which should be specified (the term ”as soon as possible” should be avoided).
|
16. CONCLUSION
|
The agreed level of MAPPA management should be agreed by the meeting, and the reasons recorded, together with the date and location of the next meeting. Where the case is to be managed at Level 1 (or outside of MAPPA for Category 3 cases) in future, and actions have been set, it will be the responsibility of the lead agency to ensure that they are carried out via normal inter-agency liaison.
|
17. HUMAN RIGHTS ACT VALIDATION
|
The Chair of the meeting should ensure that all present are satisfied that the decisions taken at the meeting comply with Human Rights Act requirements.
|
18. MAPPA ADMINISTRATION
|
The Chair should ensure that all present at the meeting are aware, if appropriate, of the date and location of the next meeting.
The MAPPA Co-ordination Unit is responsible for ensuring that the remainder of this section is completed.
|