Ana səhifə

The Rufford Foundation Final Report


Yüklə 1.24 Mb.
səhifə2/4
tarix24.06.2016
ölçüsü1.24 Mb.
1   2   3   4

Table 3: Perception on natural and anthropogenic damages caused to coral reefs


Damages

Rank 1

Rank 2

Rank 3

Rank 4

Rank 5

Coral mining

34.98

45.74

16.24

3.04

-

Harmful fishing

50.74

36.81

11.31

1.41

-

Tourism

-

1.28

1.04

8.04

89.64

Natural disasters

11.21

2.39

23.23

57.02

6.15

Others

3.34

13.78

48.19

30.49

4.22


Table 4: Top five benefits acknowledged by the coastal fishermen from the coral reef areas


Damages

Rank 1

Rank 2

Rank 3

Rank 4

Rank 5

Protection from storms

2.31

3.38

13.45

16.63

64.22

Prevention of soil erosion

26.19

37.54

22.88

8.56

4.72

Aesthetic value

0.31

4.10

20.24

50.98

24.37

Economic value

3.33

26.84

39.56

23.38

7.11

Fisheries production

67.86

28.15

3.88

0.34

-


Table 5: Attitudes of coastal fishermen towards Gulf of Mannar Marine National Park and its conservation


Attitudes

Answers (%)

Yes

No

unresponsive

Are you aware that Gulf of Mannar is declared as Marine National Park

96.7

3.3

0

Do you feel that you have any responsibility in protecting the biodiversity of GMNP

89.2

2.1

8.7

Do you think that you have free access to the GMNP for fishing and other activities

93.4

0.8

5.8

Do you think that your rights are violated due to any policies or act in the GMNP

15.6

81.8

2.6

Are you facing any problems because of the park

8.6

78.4

13

Are you willing to work with forest department to undertake sustainable fishing methods

93.2

4.4

2.4

Would like to cooperate with forest departments in habitat restoration to enhance the fisheries production

97.8

0.5

1.7


Table 5: Methods adopted for collecting marine ornamentals


Name of village

Seines

Trawl

Bamboo cage

Bamboo cage + Diving

Diving

Thondi

25

5

0

0

0

Devipatinam

25

0

0

0

0

Olaikuda

0

0

20

10

0

Sangumal

0

0

25

0

0

Gundhukaal

0

0

0

0

5

Mandapam

0

0

4

2

0

Vedhalai

0

0

18

0

9

Keezhakarai

0

0

5

0

1

Ervadi

0

0

3

0

2

Vaalinokkam

0

0

0

0

7

Theracepuram

10

3

0

0

3

Tharuveykulam

0

0

8

0

4

Tuticorin

0

21

0

0

0

TOTAL

60

29

83

12

31

Percentage (%)

27.91

13.49

38.60

5.58

14.42


Table 6: Alternative livelihoods adopted by coastal fishermen


Name of village

CCD

SECU

SECO

OS

TA

LF

AU

NAL

Thondi

9

13

0

0

0

0

0

8

Devipatinam

9

9

0

1

0

0

0

6

Olaikuda

0

18

0

0

0

0

0

12

Sangumal

0

4

0

2

0

0

1

18

Gundhukaal

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

Mandapam

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6

Vedhalai

0

7

0

0

2

1

0

17

Keezhakarai

0

0

4

0

0

0

0

2

Ervadi

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

2

Vaalinokkam

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

4

Theracepuram

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

16

Tharuveykulam

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

12

Tuticorin

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

21

TOTAL

18

51

10

3

2

1

1

129

Percentage (%)

8.37

23.72

4.65

1.40

0.93

0.47

0.47

60
1   2   3   4


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət