9.Literature
Dracup, M. and Thomson, B.: Narrow-leafed lupins with restricted branching. Annals of Botany 85: 29-35, 2000
Eggebrecht, H.: Methodenbuch Band V. Die Untersuchung von Saatgut, Radebeul und Berlin. 1949
IBPGR Secretariat: Lupin Descriptor, Rome 1981
Julier, B.: Etude génétique et physiologique de l’architecture déterminée chez le Lupin blanc d’hiver. Conséquences agronomiques et en sélection. Thése. 1994
Juliwe, B., Huyghe, C., Papineau, J., Billot, C. and Deroo, C.: Genetic and environmental variation in architecture and yield components in determinate white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Euphytica 81: 171-179, 1995
TECHNICAL QUESTIONNAIRE
|
Page {x} of {y}
|
Reference Number:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application date:
|
|
|
(not to be filled in by the applicant)
|
TECHNICAL QUESTIONNAIRE
to be completed in connection with an application for plant breeders’ rights
|
1. Subject of the Technical Questionnaire
|
|
|
|
1.1.1 Latin Name
|
Lupinus albus L.
|
|
|
|
|
1.1.2 Common Name
|
White Lupin
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
1.2.1 Latin Name
|
Lupinus angustifolius L.
|
|
|
|
|
1.2.2 Common Name
|
Narrow Leaf Lupin/Blue Lupin
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
1.3.1 Latin Name
|
Lupinus luteus L.
|
|
|
|
|
1.3.2 Common Name
|
Yellow Lupin
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
|
2. Applicant
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
Address
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone No.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fax No.
|
|
|
|
|
|
E-mail address
|
|
|
|
|
|
Breeder (if different from applicant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Proposed denomination and breeder’s reference
|
|
|
|
Proposed denomination
|
|
|
(if available)
|
|
|
Breeder’s reference
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Information on the breeding scheme and propagation of the variety
4.1 Breeding scheme
Variety resulting from:
4.1.1 Crossing
(a) controlled cross [ ]
(please state parent varieties)
(b) partially known cross [ ]
(please state known parent variety(ies))
(c) totally unknown cross [ ]
4.1.2 Discovery and development [ ]
(please state where and when discovered
and how developed)
………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………….
4.1.3 Other [ ]
(please provide details)
……………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………
4.2 Method of propagating the variety
|
5. Characteristics of the variety to be indicated (the number in brackets refers to the corresponding characteristic in Test Guidelines; please mark the note which best corresponds).
|
|
Characteristics
|
Example Varieties
|
Note
|
5.1
(1)
|
Grain: bitter principle
|
|
|
|
absent
|
Nelly (Lal),
Bordako (Lan),
Borselfa (Llu)
|
1[ ]
|
|
present
|
Feli (Lal),
Azuro (Lan),
Trebisa (Llu)
|
9[ ]
|
5.2
(4)
|
Stem: anthocyanin coloration prior to bud emergence
|
|
|
|
absent or very weak
|
Minori (Lal),
Bolivio (Lan)
|
1[ ]
|
|
weak
|
Juno (Llu)
|
3[ ]
|
|
medium
|
Nelly (Lal),
Boltensia (Lan)
|
5[ ]
|
|
strong
|
Sonet (Lan)
|
7[ ]
|
5.3
(5)
|
Time of flowering (quote date of flowering of variety as well as of two well-known comparable varieties)
|
|
|
|
…………………………………………………………………….
……………………………………………………………………..
|
|
|
5.4
(9)
|
Flower: color of wings
|
|
|
|
white
|
Minori (Lal)
|
1[ ]
|
|
bluish white
|
Nelly (Lal)
|
2[ ]
|
|
blue
|
Azuro (Lan)
|
3[ ]
|
|
violet
|
Bordako (Lan)
|
4[ ]
|
|
pink
|
Rubine (Lan)
|
5[ ]
|
|
light yellow
|
Teo (Llu)
|
6[ ]
|
|
dark yellow
|
Juno (Llu)
|
7[ ]
|
|
Characteristics
|
Example Varieties
|
Note
|
5.5
(11)
|
Plant: growth type
|
|
|
|
determinate
|
Borweta (Lan),
Borselfa (Llu)
|
1[ ]
|
|
indeterminate
|
Nelly (Lal),
Azuro (Lan),
Juno (Llu)
|
2[ ]
|
6. Similar varieties and differences from these varieties
Please use the table, and space provided for comments, below to provide information on how your candidate variety differs from the variety (or varieties) which, to the best of your knowledge, is (or are) most similar. This information may help the examination authority to conduct its examination of distinctness in a more efficient way.
|
Denomination(s) of variety(ies) similar to your candidate variety
|
Characteristic(s) in which your candidate variety differs from the similar variety(ies)
|
Describe the expression of the characteristic(s) for the similar variety(ies)
|
Describe the expression of the characteristic(s) for your candidate variety
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
7. Additional information which may help in the examination of the variety
7.1 In addition to the information provided in sections 5 and 6, are there any additional characteristics which may help to distinguish the variety?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
(If yes, please provide details)
7.2 Special conditions for the examination of the variety
7.2.1 Group
Spring type ……………………………[ ]
Winter type ……………………………[ ]
7.2.2 Are there any special conditions for growing the variety or conducting the examination?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
7.2.3 If yes, please give details:
…………………………………………………………………………………………
7.3 Other information
A representative color photograph of the variety should accompany the Technical Questionnaire.
|
8. Authorization for release
(a) Does the variety require prior authorization for release under legislation concerning the protection of the environment, human and animal health?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
(b) Has such authorization been obtained?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
If the answer to (b) is yes, please attach a copy of the authorization.
|
9. Information on plant material to be examined.
9.1 The expression of a characteristic or several characteristics of a variety may be affected by factors, such as pests and disease, chemical treatment (e.g. growth retardants or pesticides), effects of tissue culture, different rootstocks, scions taken from different growth phases of a tree, etc.
9.2 The plant material should not have undergone any treatment which would affect the expression of the characteristics of the variety, unless the competent authorities allow or request such treatment. If the plant material has undergone such treatment, full details of the treatment must be given. In this respect, please indicate below, to the best of your knowledge, if the plant material to be examined has been subjected to:
(a) Microorganisms (e.g. virus, bacteria, phytoplasma) Yes [ ] No [ ]
(b) Chemical treatment (e.g. growth retardant or pesticide) Yes [ ] No [ ]
(c) Tissue culture Yes [ ] No [ ]
(d) Other factors Yes [ ] No [ ]
Please provide details of where you have indicated “yes”.
…………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………….
|
10. I hereby declare that, to the best of my knowledge, the information provided in this form is correct:
Applicant’s name
Signature Date
|
[End of document]
|