Ana səhifə

International union for the protection of new varieties of plants


Yüklə 0.51 Mb.
səhifə5/5
tarix25.06.2016
ölçüsü0.51 Mb.
1   2   3   4   5

9.Literature

Dracup, M. and Thomson, B.: Narrow-leafed lupins with restricted branching. Annals of Botany 85: 29-35, 2000


Eggebrecht, H.: Methodenbuch Band V. Die Untersuchung von Saatgut, Radebeul und Berlin. 1949
IBPGR Secretariat: Lupin Descriptor, Rome 1981
Julier, B.: Etude génétique et physiologique de l’architecture déterminée chez le Lupin blanc d’hiver. Conséquences agronomiques et en sélection. Thése. 1994
Juliwe, B., Huyghe, C., Papineau, J., Billot, C. and Deroo, C.: Genetic and environmental variation in architecture and yield components in determinate white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Euphytica 81: 171-179, 1995

10.Technical Questionnaire

TECHNICAL QUESTIONNAIRE


Page {x} of {y}


Reference Number:

















Application date:









(not to be filled in by the applicant)

TECHNICAL QUESTIONNAIRE

to be completed in connection with an application for plant breeders’ rights

1. Subject of the Technical Questionnaire












1.1.1 Latin Name

Lupinus albus L.













1.1.2 Common Name

White Lupin

[ ]










1.2.1 Latin Name

Lupinus angustifolius L.













1.2.2 Common Name

Narrow Leaf Lupin/Blue Lupin

[ ]










1.3.1 Latin Name

Lupinus luteus L.













1.3.2 Common Name

Yellow Lupin

[ ]













2. Applicant










Name
















Address














Telephone No.
















Fax No.
















E-mail address
















Breeder (if different from applicant)































3. Proposed denomination and breeder’s reference










Proposed denomination







(if available)








Breeder’s reference















4. Information on the breeding scheme and propagation of the variety


4.1 Breeding scheme
Variety resulting from:
4.1.1 Crossing
(a) controlled cross [ ]

(please state parent varieties)

(b) partially known cross [ ]

(please state known parent variety(ies))

(c) totally unknown cross [ ]
4.1.2 Discovery and development [ ]

(please state where and when discovered

and how developed)
………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………….
4.1.3 Other [ ]

(please provide details)


……………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………
4.2 Method of propagating the variety

5. Characteristics of the variety to be indicated (the number in brackets refers to the corresponding characteristic in Test Guidelines; please mark the note which best corresponds).







Characteristics

Example Varieties

Note

5.1
(1)


Grain: bitter principle










absent

Nelly (Lal),
Bordako (Lan),
Borselfa (Llu)

1[ ]




present

Feli (Lal),
Azuro (Lan),
Trebisa (Llu)

9[ ]

5.2
(4)


Stem: anthocyanin coloration prior to bud emergence










absent or very weak

Minori (Lal),
Bolivio (Lan)

1[ ]




weak

Juno (Llu)

3[ ]




medium

Nelly (Lal),
Boltensia (Lan)

5[ ]




strong

Sonet (Lan)

7[ ]

5.3
(5)


Time of flowering (quote date of flowering of variety as well as of two well-known comparable varieties)











…………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………..








5.4
(9)


Flower: color of wings










white

Minori (Lal)

1[ ]




bluish white

Nelly (Lal)

2[ ]




blue

Azuro (Lan)

3[ ]




violet

Bordako (Lan)

4[ ]




pink

Rubine (Lan)

5[ ]




light yellow

Teo (Llu)

6[ ]




dark yellow

Juno (Llu)

7[ ]




Characteristics

Example Varieties

Note

5.5
(11)


Plant: growth type










determinate

Borweta (Lan),
Borselfa (Llu)

1[ ]




indeterminate

Nelly (Lal),
Azuro (Lan),
Juno (Llu)

2[ ]

6. Similar varieties and differences from these varieties


Please use the table, and space provided for comments, below to provide information on how your candidate variety differs from the variety (or varieties) which, to the best of your knowledge, is (or are) most similar. This information may help the examination authority to conduct its examination of distinctness in a more efficient way.


Denomination(s) of variety(ies) similar to your candidate variety

Characteristic(s) in which your candidate variety differs from the similar variety(ies)

Describe the expression of the characteristic(s) for the similar variety(ies)

Describe the expression of the characteristic(s) for your candidate variety




































Comments:





7. Additional information which may help in the examination of the variety
7.1 In addition to the information provided in sections 5 and 6, are there any additional characteristics which may help to distinguish the variety?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
(If yes, please provide details)

7.2 Special conditions for the examination of the variety


7.2.1 Group
Spring type ……………………………[ ]
Winter type ……………………………[ ]

7.2.2 Are there any special conditions for growing the variety or conducting the examination?


Yes [ ] No [ ]
7.2.3 If yes, please give details:
…………………………………………………………………………………………

7.3 Other information


A representative color photograph of the variety should accompany the Technical Questionnaire.



8. Authorization for release
(a) Does the variety require prior authorization for release under legislation concerning the protection of the environment, human and animal health?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
(b) Has such authorization been obtained?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
If the answer to (b) is yes, please attach a copy of the authorization.

9. Information on plant material to be examined.


9.1 The expression of a characteristic or several characteristics of a variety may be affected by factors, such as pests and disease, chemical treatment (e.g. growth retardants or pesticides), effects of tissue culture, different rootstocks, scions taken from different growth phases of a tree, etc.
9.2 The plant material should not have undergone any treatment which would affect the expression of the characteristics of the variety, unless the competent authorities allow or request such treatment. If the plant material has undergone such treatment, full details of the treatment must be given. In this respect, please indicate below, to the best of your knowledge, if the plant material to be examined has been subjected to:
(a) Microorganisms (e.g. virus, bacteria, phytoplasma) Yes [ ] No [ ]
(b) Chemical treatment (e.g. growth retardant or pesticide) Yes [ ] No [ ]
(c) Tissue culture Yes [ ] No [ ]
(d) Other factors Yes [ ] No [ ]
Please provide details of where you have indicated “yes”.
…………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………….




10. I hereby declare that, to the best of my knowledge, the information provided in this form is correct:


Applicant’s name

Signature Date




[End of document]



* These names were correct at the time of the introduction of these Test Guidelines but may be revised or updated. [Readers are advised to consult the UPOV Code, which can be found on the UPOV Website (www.upov.int), for the latest information.]

1   2   3   4   5


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət