Ana səhifə

Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds


Yüklə 9 Mb.
səhifə6/17
tarix25.06.2016
ölçüsü9 Mb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   17

Table 7 Action Plan Results


Result


Objectively Verifiable Indicator


Means of Verification

Priority

Timescale

Result 1: Mortality rates are reduced

A 5-year moving average of the number of individuals at regularly monitored spring staging sites


Counts of flocks at Hortobágy/Hungary, at Matsalu Bay/Estonia, at Porsangerfjord/Norway, in the Evros Delta/Greece and in Kustanay oblast/Kazakhstan in spring.


Essential

Medium/long

Result 2: Further habitat loss and degradation is prevented

All Important Bird Areas and other key sites for Lesser White-fronted Goose are protected and managed with the aim of achieving ‘Favourable Conser-vation Status’.

Natura 2000 database up-dated with monitoring data.
National government reports to the European Commission, CMS, CBD, AEWA, Ramsar Convention and Bern Convention.
Periodic independent assessments to be carried out by national BirdLife partners as part of their IBA Monitoring Programme.

High

Long

Result 3: Reproductive success is maximised


Five-year running mean of juveniles reaches 35% for both Fennoscandian and Western main populations.

Counts of autumn flocks at Matsalu Bay, Estonia and north-west Kazakhstan in October.

Medium

Long

Result 4: No introgression of DNA from other goose species into the wild population occurs as a result of further releases and DNA introgression from already released birds from captive breeding programmes is minimised


Any future release of captive-bred birds involves only individuals reared from wild-caught stock.

Apparent hybrid geese are removed from existing free-flying introduced flock, subject to findings of a feasibility study.





National reports from governments.

Reports from International LWfG Working Group (and captive-breeding Sub-group)

Papers published in peer-reviewed scientific journals

Review and evaluation of existing studies of LWfG genetics is conducted by independent scientific expert.

Long-term future of all captive breeding programmes is reviewed by a specialist Sub-group of the International LWfG Working Group.


High

Short

Result 5: Key knowledge gaps filled


Knowledge gaps filled by 2015



Monitoring & expedition reports

Papers published in peer-reviewed scientific journals





Essential

Medium

Result 6: International cooperation maximised


All Lesser White-fronted Goose Range States are parties to the key international conservation agreements

The International Lesser White-fronted Goose Working Group (and sub-group on reintroduction) is established and operating effectively

National Action Plans, based on this SSAP, are established, implemented and progress shared with other Range States via the International Working Group


Status of Contracting Party lists issued by relevant agreements

Progress reports by the AEWA Secretariat

Reports and assessments issued by the International Working Group (once established)


Essential

Short/Ongoing



6. Activities

Result 1: Mortality rates are reduced
The most important and most urgent activities under this Action Plan are those aimed at halting the currently unsustainable (and mostly illegal) hunting pressure on Lesser White-fronted Geese:


  1. Ensure that, in principle, hunting legislation affords adequate protection to Lesser White-fronted Goose;

  2. Ensure that sufficient human and financial resources are allocated for enforcement of hunting legislation, and that these resources are deployed to control and manage hunting effectively and sustainably;

  3. Ensure that sufficient human and financial resources are allocated for identifying the traditional flyway and stop-over sites, and making that flyway safe for the geese.

  4. Ban goose hunting at all key sites for Lesser White-fronted Goose (as listed in Annex 3 to this Action Plan) during the period when Lesser White-fronts are usually present, given the difficulty of reliably distinguishing goose species in flight (especially the near impossibility of separating Greater and Lesser White-fronts, even from relatively close range and in good light);

  5. Plant lure crops to direct Lesser White-fronted Goose away from areas where hunting pressure is known to be high and towards refuge zones;

  6. As far as possible, redirect hunting from adults to juveniles in areas where Greater White-fronts and Lesser White-fronts occur together away from key sites.

  7. Implement obligatory training as outlined by the Hunting Charter of the Bern Convention (Nov 2007) for hunters particularly in Eastern European countries.

  8. Carry out an information campaign to engage local and European hunting organisations and nature protection NGOs.

  9. Upgrade level of protection from illegal hunting within existing protected areas through training and improved enforcement.

These actions are applicable in all Range States, but especially in those countries of the staging and wintering range where hunting pressure is known to be particularly high, e.g. Kazakhstan, Russian Federation, Ukraine.


In addition to these measures, it has been suggested that efforts should continue to establish a safer migration route, while giving the highest possible priority to the protection needs of the existing wild population (see Result 4 below). However, the November 2005 recommendation of the Scientific Council of the Convention on Migratory Species, combined with the conclusions of the January 2007 AEWA Secretariat negotation mission (see pages 34–37 for details), mean that proposals have been deferred for at least three years (i.e. 2010 or later) to enable sufficient captive-reared stock derived exclusively from wild-caught birds to be built up.
Result 2: Further habitat loss and degradation is prevented
Measures to halt and reverse habitat loss and degradation, and to maximise positive site management, will serve to underpin increased survival of full-grown birds achieved through the hunting-control measures outlined above.


  1. Ensure that all key sites for Lesser White-fronted Goose (breeding, staging and wintering) are afforded appropriate protected area status at national and international levels, including classification as Special Protection Areas in EU Member States;

  2. Ensure that all key sites for Lesser White-fronted Goose have a management plan that addresses the conservation requirements of Lesser White-fronted Goose and that is resourced, implemented, monitored and periodically updated;

  3. Monitor habitat quality in the breeding range to ensure that any anthropogenic pressures, including the potential impacts of climate change, are identified as early as possible;

  4. Take measures to restore and/or rehabilitate Lesser White-fronted Goose roosting and feeding habitat in the staging and/or wintering range.

These actions are applicable in all of the Range States.


Result 3: Reproductive success is maximised


  1. Avoid infrastructure development and other sources of human disturbance, including recreation/tourism liable to have an adverse impact on the know core breeding areas;

  2. Take measures to avoid overgrazing and nest trampling if/where this is known to be a problem;

  3. Take measures, where feasible, to minimise predation, where this is shown to be a significant limiting factor;

  4. Take measures to eliminate waterbird hunting on the breeding grounds (Russian Federation and Norway) and in all staging areas close to the breeding grounds (Fennoscandia, Russian Federation).

These actions are applicable in the few Range States that share the species’ entire breeding range, namely Finland, Norway, Sweden and Russian Federation.


Result 4: No introgression of DNA from other goose species into the wild population occurs as a result of further releases and introgression from already released birds from captive breeding programmes is minimised.
As set out in Chapter 3, there has been a lack of consensus among Lesser White-fronted Goose stakeholders on the use of captive breeding, reintroduction/restocking, and flyway modification as valid conservation tools to be integrated with measures directed at conservation of the surviving wild population. Proponents have argued that all efforts to date have failed to stop or reverse the decline of the Lesser White-fronted Goose and that reintroduction/restocking is the only assured means of securing the species’ survival, citing the high adult survival rates achieved through diverting the flyway through ‘safe’ countries. Opponents have argued that introduction in areas that do not form part of the species’ natural range is scientifically and ethically unsound and believe that efforts and resources should be devoted to conservation of the wild Fennoscandian population as long as it continues to exist, with reintroduction remaining an option if all other measures fail. They also highlight the risk of introgression of DNA from other goose species into the wild population, following the discovery of such DNA among the captive breeding stock.
As detailed in Chapter 3 (pages 34–35), the Scientific Council of the Convention on Migratory Species presented a series of conclusions and recommendations on these issues in November 2005. The full text of the Scientific Council’s statement, together with relevant comments made by Dr Robert C. Lacy, can be found in Annexes 9a and 9b, respectively.

The Scientific Council’s findings proved controversial and the AEWA Secretariat conducted a series of consultations with the key Range States in 2007 resulting in an agreement between the parties concerned. The conclusions set out in this agreement form the basis of the Single Species Action Plan’s approach to this issue. They are detailed on pages 35-37 and in Annex 10. The following is a summary only of the key points agreed by the parties:




  • The main priority for the conservation of the Lesser White-fronted Goose is the preservation of the wild populations breeding in Fennoscandia and Russia and that the work on the SSAP and any decisions should follow the code of transparency and accountability so that they can be subject to scientific scrutiny at any time. Particular attention shall be paid to mortality due to hunting and urgent targeted measures should be implemented to reduce the magnitude of this threat, the success of which shall be promptly and regularly reviewed and evaluated.




  • An International LWfG Working Group should be established, consisting of governmental representatives of all Range States, who would be free to bring in their own experts and use their support. The group will be chaired by the AEWA Secretariat.




  • A Committee for LWfG captive breeding, reintroduction and supplementation in Fennoscandia should be established under the auspices of the International Lesser White-fronted Goose Working Group.




  • The long-term future of all captive breeding programmes will be reviewed by the Committee for LWfG captive breeding, reintroduction and supplementation in Fennoscandia.

In the meantime:




  • A captive stock of wild Fennoscandian birds should be established, subject to the conclusions of a feasibility study.




  • The Swedish captive breeding programme should continue as long as it is based on wild birds only.




  • The current free-flying flock, breeding in Sweden and wintering in the Netherlands, will remain in the wild, subject to genetic screening and refinement.




  • The implementation of the pilot experimental project of the NGO ‘Aktion Zwerggans’ will be postponed.




  • A review and evaluation of relevant and published studies on LWfG genetics should be undertaken by an independent expert with adequate scientific expertise and experience.


Result 5: Key knowledge gaps filled
Knowledge gaps represent a significant constraint. The following activities are priorities for further research:


  1. Locate sources of possible financial support for further conservation-oriented research;

  2. Use a combination of satellite tracking and field surveys to locate the key breeding grounds for the bulk of the Western main population;

  3. Assess the hunting pressure at key sites and identify any factors that may make Lesser White-fronted Geese more vulnerable to being shot than other goose species;

  4. Use a combination of satellite tracking and field surveys to locate the key breeding, staging and wintering sites for the Fennoscandian population;

  5. Conduct a Population Viability Assessment (PVA) for the remaining wild Fennoscandian population;

  6. Use a combination of satellite tracking and field surveys to locate the key staging and wintering grounds for the bulk of the Central Asian population;

  7. Undertake further field surveys of suitable breeding habitat and staging areas on the Kola Peninsula to update the estimate for the Fennoscandian subpopulation;

  8. Establish an effective network of coordinated counts in the wintering grounds (or main staging areas if wintering areas are not known), to monitor overall population trends as accurately as possible;

  9. Evaluate spatial use patterns at the habitat level to identify areas where hunting directly threatens Lesser White-fronts and to direct local conservation efforts (e.g. planting of ‘lure’ crops) to hunting-free refuges and corridors;

  10. Conduct diet and habitat use studies particularly for LWfG wintering sites

  11. Continue to refine genetic knowledge and the techniques deployed for genetic assessments;

  12. Develop a strategy for genetic management of the species both in the wild and in captivity based on previous agreements such as the 2007 AEWA negotiation mission and the findings of the CMS Scientific Council in 2005;

  13. Assess the current status of key sites for Lesser White-fronted Goose with regard to the species’ ecological requirements, taking into account protected area status, habitat quality, conservation management and active threats.

  14. Increase knowledge of breeding site fidelity for males and females and exchange with other populations;

  15. Undertake studies on predation by White-tailed Eagle;

  16. Investigate the importance of small mammal cycles on reproduction of Lesser White-fronted Goose.

These activities apply to all Range States and non-Range States, since international cooperation, including financial and technical support, will not be limited to the countries where additional research is actually conducted.


Result 6: International cooperation maximised
Table 4 shows the current applicability of key international cooperation instruments to Lesser Whitefront Range States. There are currently significant gaps. These gaps should be rectified in order to maximise international cooperation for the effective implementation of this Action Plan and wider measures that are likely to benefit Lesser Whitefron conservation.
This activity is addressed to the following Range States:


  • AEWA: Azerbaijan, Greece (signatory but entry-into-force is pending ratification), Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Kazakhstan24, Russian Federation, Turkey, Turkmenistan

  • Bern Convention: Russian Federation

  • CBD: Iraq

  • Ramsar Convention: Turkmenistan (joining in Oct 2008)

(Note: under the current provisions of this Convention, there is no mechanism for the EU/EC to become a Contracting Party)
Table 8. National activities by Range States required to deliver each Action Plan Result


Result

National activities and applicable Principal Range States25

Responsibility for implementation

Result 1: Mortality rates reduced

  • Ensure by 2010 that, in principle, hunting legislation affords adequate protection to Lesser White-fronted Goose (ALL26);

  • Ensure that sufficient human and financial resources are allocated for enforcement of hunting legislation and that these resources are deployed to control hunting effectively (ALL);

  • Ensure that sufficient human and financial resources are allocated for identifying the traditional flyway and stop-over sites, and making that flyway safe for the geese (ALL);

  • By 2010, ban goose hunting at all key sites for Lesser White-fronted Goose (as listed in Annex 3 to this Action Plan) during the period when Lesser White-fronts are usually present, given the difficulty of reliably distinguishing goose species in flight (ALL);

  • By 2010 establish no hunting zones (covering both roosting and feeding sites) at all Lesser White-fronted Goose IBAs, SPAs and Ramsar sites (ALL);

  • Plant lure crops to direct Lesser White-fronted Goose away from areas where hunting pressure is known to be high and towards refuge zones (ALL);

  • Redirect hunting from adults to juveniles in areas where Greater White-fronts and Lesser White-fronts occur together away from key sites (Russia, Kazakhstan).

  • Implement obligatory training as outlined by the Hunting Charter of the Bern Convention (Nov 2007) for hunters particularly in Eastern European countries (signatories to the Bern Convention, European Commission);

  • Carry out an information campaign to engage local and European hunting organisations and nature protection NGOs (Norway, EU member states)

  • Upgrade level of protection from illegal hunting within existing protected areas through training and improved enforcement (European Commission, ALL)

Column to be completed by Range States

Result 2: Further habitat loss and degradation is prevented

  • Ensure that all key sites for Lesser White-fronted Goose (breeding, staging and wintering) are afforded appropriate protected area status at national and international levels, including classification as Special Protection Areas in EU Member States (ALL);

  • Ensure that all key sites for Lesser White-fronted Goose have a management plan that: (a) addresses the conservation requirements of Lesser White-fronted Goose and (b) is resourced, implemented, monitored and periodically updated (ALL);

  • Monitor habitat quality in the breeding range to ensure that any anthropogenic pressures, including the potential impacts of climate change, are identified as early as possible (Finland, Norway, Russia, Sweden);

  • Take measures to restore and/or rehabilitate Lesser White-fronted Goose roosting and feeding habitat in the staging and/or wintering range (ALL).



1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   17


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət