Ana səhifə

Weeds of national significance


Yüklə 1.69 Mb.
səhifə7/8
tarix25.06.2016
ölçüsü1.69 Mb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8

MONITORING EVALUATION REPORTING AND IMPROVEMENT (MERI)


MERI is the Australian Government based system for monitoring, evaluation, reporting and improvement in natural resource management. Weeds of National Significance (WoNS) national coordinators draft an annual MERI plan. Coordinators create work plans guided by their MERI plan, and report to the Australian Government against their MERI plan.
A priority action spreadsheet is developed and updated annually by WoNS coordinators. This outlines priorities for each WoNS by natural resource management (NRM) / catchment management authority (CMA) region. The spreadsheet guides prioritisation within work plans, along with decision-making on funding allocations under the Australian Government’s Caring for Our Country.

1.8Targets and Measures





Strategic Plan Goals

Key Evaluation Questions

Data/Evidence Required

Consider

1. New infestations are prevented from establishing.

To what extent have new infestations been prevented from establishing?



1.1National distribution data

  • Has the national distribution map been reviewed and/or updated?

  • Has the Priority Management Action spreadsheet been updated?

  • Are these documents publicly available?

  • Have stakeholders been advised of any changes?

  • Where is this data/info stored?

  • Do they capture national priorities?

1.2 New infestations

  • Number of new outlier infestations¹ recorded.

  • Percentage of known infestations actively controlled.

¹ New infestations should be an outlier, outside existing distribution of WoNS



  • Are any new outlier infestations occurring in areas identified as a high priority in the national strategy?

  • How were infestations detected (passive or active surveillance, community reporting etc)?

  • Have high risk pathways been adequately identified? And threats minimised?

1.3 Eradication & containment programs

  • Percentage of eradication and/or containment programs being maintained

  • What percentage of programs identified in the strategic plan or by the management group are being actively managed?

  • Is there a plan in place for ongoing management?

  • How is progress being monitored and reported to stakeholders?

  • Can include examples using case studies.

1.4 Legislation

  • Have there been any legislation or policy changes for this species?

  • Has a need for legislative change been identified by stakeholders?

  • Are minimum requirements being maintained (e.g. ban on sale, trade, movement?

  • Is control required throughout or in part of jurisdiction?

  • Is compliance actively enforced?







Overall progress rating



2. Existing infestations are under strategic management.

To what extent is integrated weed management effectively managing core infestations? 

2.1 Integrated Weed Management

  • How effective are IWM programs?



  • Are existing tools providing adequate control of WoNS?

  • Have new advances/technologies been developed and are they incorporated into BPM information?

  • Are there barriers to adoption of best practice management?

  • Are research programs addressing any observed gaps (e.g. herbicide trials, biocontrol, restoration requirements post control)?

To what extent are assets being protected through strategic management?

  


2.2 Asset protection

  • Number of priority assets identified as ‘at risk’ from WoNS?

  • Percentage of priority assets being protected (eg assessed against relevant Threat Abatement Plans or jurisdictional equivalents)?

  • Percentage of state/regional invasive species plans that identify priority assets at risk from WoNS?

  • Response should include status report on progress towards asset protection programs.

  • Methods by which assets are being protected (e.g. targeted annual spray programs, high risk pathway surveillance, and strategic plans).

  • Are long term monitoring programs in place to detect change (e.g. using a similar format to “Monitoring Manual for Bitou Bush Control and Native Plant Recovery”)?

  • To what extent is management leading to an improvement in asset condition?







Overall progress rating



3. Greater capability and commitment to manage WoNS.

To what extent has the capability and commitment to manage WoNS increased?

 

 



 

 


3.1 Community engagement & awareness

  • What is the status of best practice information?

  • Are partnerships being maintained to ensure collaboration on WoNS?

  • Number and type of media activities.

  • Is best practice information up to date and readily available?

  • Is this information and/or advice being targeted to priority regions.

  • Is training being delivered to meet the needs of weed managers (including the community)?

  • Are networks/groups being supported (e.g. through dissemination of research outcomes, funding opportunities, control options etc)?

  • Has awareness and engagement in WoNS management been raised effectively?

3.2 Resourcing

  • From what sources are programs being funded?

  • Number of projects funded by Commonwealth, jurisdictions, industry, etc




3.3 Policy & Planning

  • Are the objectives of the strategy being integrated into commonwealth/state/regional plans, policies and programs?

  • Has cross border collaboration occurred?

  • How are priorities reflected in planning and policy approaches? E.g. WRA, invasive species plans, asset protection plans, district plans, weed spread prevention activities, management programs, incentive programs, state working groups.




  • How are national priorities being maintained? E.g. containment lines, eradication targets, training & awareness raising, research projects.







Overall progress rating



Continuous improvement

Are there any unexpected outcomes that have been identified through implementation of strategy?

4.1 Barriers

  • Have any other management issues or impediments been identified?

 


How to score progress rating

1- Insufficient evidence to score

2- No progress against goal

3- Limited progress is being made against this goal

4- Reasonable progress is being made against this goal

5- Excellent progress is being made against this goal


1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət