Ana səhifə

Williams M. Finch Elementary School Title I schoolwide Plan 2011-2012


Yüklə 311.5 Kb.
səhifə1/3
tarix27.06.2016
ölçüsü311.5 Kb.
  1   2   3
Williams M. Finch Elementary School

Title I Schoolwide Plan

2011-2012

Signature: Date:_________________

Principal

____________________________ Date:_____________________

Executive Director

____________________________ Date: ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­_____________________

Education Specialist

____________________________ Date: _____________________

Interim Director of External Programs

Revised: June 10, 2011

TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PLAN ADDENDUM

SCHOOL NAME: William M. Finch DATE: 06/10/2011

Address all components of your Schoolwide Plan in the template below. Type your responses under each required component.



*Denotes required components as set forth in Section 1114 of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.

Components

*1. A comprehensive needs assessment of the entire school which addresses all academic areas and other factors that may affect achievement.



To begin the comprehensive needs assessment process the school evaluated itself using the following progress indicators: 2009-2010 AYP results (2010-2011 AYP results are pending); 2010-2011 GCRCT results; a2010-2011 Atlanta Public Schools Top Priority Student Performance Goals; well as the 2011 5th Grade Writing Assessment results. After completing the comprehensive assessment, the targeted population of students was identified as the current second through fifth grade students in reading, ELA, and math.

        • 2009-2010 AYP results indicated that William M. Finch met the AYP criteria for Test Preparation and the Second Indicator of attendance, but not for Academic Performance in mathematics, and the school is not in Needs Improvement status.



        • 2010-2011 Atlanta Pubic Schools Top Priority Student Performance Goals indicated that William M. Finch met 42% of it targets. The key areas of needed improvement being: (1) the percentage of students meeting and exceeding in reading in grades 3-5; (2) the percentage of students meeting and exceeding in language arts in grades 3-5; (3) the percentage of students meeting and exceeding in grades 3-5; (4) the percentage of students meeting and exceeding in science in grades 3-5; and (5) the percentage of students meeting and exceeding on the Grade 5 Writing assessment.




        • 2010-2011 5th Grade Writing Assessment data indicated that 67% of the students would meet or exceed the standard. Overall as a grade level, 61% of the regular education students met standards, 3% of the regular education students exceeded the standard, 37% did not meet standards, 3% were classified as gifted, 4% of PEC students met, 3% of PEC students did not meet, 57% were female, 43% were male, and 99% were black, and 1% were white.





        • 2010-2011 school GCRCT results indicated that William M. Finch areas of strength are: 5th graders exceeding the standard in writing; 3rd grades and 5th grades exceeding the standard in reading, 5th grade met the standard in decreasing the number of students in the does not meet category for reading. 3rd grade met the target for decreasing the number of students in does not meet in language arts. 3rd and 5th grade met the target for decreasing the number of students in does not meet for mathematics. 3rd and 4th grade met the target for increasing the number of students exceeding the target in mathematics. 3rd grade met the target for decreasing the number of students in science, and for exceeding the target in number of exceeds. 3rd grade met the target for decreasing the number of students in does not meet in social studies and increasing the number of students in exceeds in social studies.

        • 2008-2009 in fourth grade William M. Finch closed the achievement gap when comparing 2006 to 2010 in the following academic areas:

            1. Improved in Reading by 41%

            2. Improved in Mathematics by 32%

A comprehensive needs assessment at the school level is conducted on an ongoing manner to address all academic areas and other factors that may affect achievement. The targeted population of students has been identified as the current third through fifth grade students in reading, ELA, and math. Those persons involved on the comprehensive needs planning team are as follows




Name

& Signature

Position/Role*

Phone Number

For all participants

Degree of

Involvement**

Mr. Ennis C. Harvey

Principal

404 – 802-4000

100%

Ms. Aretha Ragland

Assistant Principal

404-802-4000

100%

Mrs. Terry

Cooper-Owens

Instructional Coach--SFA

404-802-4000

100%

Mrs. Walda Jefferson

Instructional Coach—Project GRAD Math

404-802-4000

100%

Mrs. Nakia La Guerre

CIS Coordinator

404-802-4000

100%

Mrs. Verble Alexander

Media Specialist

404-802-4000

100%

Ms. Charlotte Scott

Teacher

404-802-4000

100%

Ms. Naquisha Chavers

Special Education Lead Teacher

404-802-4000

100%

Ms. Barbara Heard

Teacher

404-802-4000

100%

Mr. Karl Fuller

Teacher

404-802-4000

100%

Ms. Nikea Hurt

SRT 1 Model Teacher Leader

404-802-3657

50%


Ms. Kassandra Holmes

Technology Leader

770-896-2290

25%

Ms. Brunetta Bolton

Title I Liaison

404-802-2788

25%

Ms. Regina Johnson

Parent

404-758-2813

50%

Ms. Kendra McGhee

Parent

404-802-4000

50%

Mr. Bill Selmon

Preferred Care

770-739-1462

25%

A comprehensive needs assessment allows the school to ensure that students who experience difficulties are identified in a timely manner. The first method of addressing student achievement is through the use of differentiation where students are grouped in various ways throughout the school day to provide instruction to meet their individual needs. Various assessments are utilized to group students. The Success for All assessments include: SRI (Scholastic Reading Inventory), Stepping Stone, Reading Roots Formal Assessment, Fast Track Phonics, SOLO Assessment, District Benchmarks, Common Assessments, teacher-made assessments, and GCRCT Data Analysis. A comprehensive needs assessment is conducted in all subject areas using various assessment tools:



        • Georgia Kindergarten Inventory of Developing Skills

        • Common Assessments

        • Georgia On-line Assessment System

District Benchmarks

School-wide Benchmarks



        • Teacher-made Assessments

During the second method of addressing student achievement, teachers and administrators analyze the aforementioned data to conduct strategic planning. During the data analysis process, data will be examined to chart where students’ scores place them: below standard, meeting standard, or exceeding standard. This compilation of information becomes the teachers’ basis for grouping students for prerequisite skills or acceleration. In addition to grouping students based on ability, students can be grouped by interests and/or choice. The grouping strategies selected to differentiate instruction will be based on students’ needs in regards to Finch’s current reform models.
The third method of addressing student achievement requires that teachers implement standards-based, integrated, product focused learning units for the Georgia Performance Standards in the areas of science, social studies, reading/ language arts and math. Grade specific Georgia State frameworks will be utilized to ensure that all Georgia Performance Standards are taught prior to GGCRCT testing. Teachers will use http://www.learningvillage.org to download current frameworks. A variety of grouping styles will produce activities/projects, which will be used to meet different learning modalities. Some instructional strategies that will be utilized to respond to students needs include:

  • Learning centers/ Technology Learning Centers

  • Cooperative grouping

  • Small group instruction

  • Homework

  • Cues

  • Higher order Questioning

  • Summarizing

  • Note taking

  • Peer tutoring

  • Project based instruction

  • Differentiation of instruction

In addition to the listed interventions, math Instruction will also include:

  • Math Expressions and Math Georgia Textbooks: Resources with assessments of learning,

  • Teacher Made assessments of learning.

  • Weekly review of data within collaboration meetings

  • Differentiated Instruction implemented during homework assignments and Weekly Focus part of the Project GRAD Math Lesson Cycle.

  • Identified Websites

  • Opportunities for students to construct their learning in mathematics

Teachers will utilize scoring rubrics to establish expectations for product focused learning units/ performance-based assessments. Students will utilize scoring rubrics as a means of achieving mastery on these assessments. The assessment tasks will be based on the three highest levels of Bloom’s taxonomy. The Design Team will assist in the planning, developing, and assessing of the curriculum and its correlation to the academic students’ progress.



Technology will incorporate the following intervention resources to be imploded during the fourth method to address student achievement:

  • www.discoveryeducation.com- Teachers will incorporate the closed captioning and image features in their lessons as these components will provide support to struggling readers and visual learners. The writing prompt feature and the image library will serve to ignite students’ imagination and build confidence in their writing skills. Teachers will be able to integrate all genres of writing in an effort to increase the writing scores of the 5th grade students. Teachers will be able to create a variety of assessments tailored to the individual learning needs of their students.

  • www.nettrekker.com- is a standards-based educational search tool dedicated to enhancing the education of today's youth with highly effective technologies that deliver rich educational content to every child in a safe, relevant, easy-to-use format.

  • Accelerated Reader- Teachers will be able to individualize their students’ reading choices based on student interest and ability, and use additional data within the program to monitor more aspects of the students’ learning.

  • www.thinkfinity.com- Teachers will use the educational search engine to make connections with differentiated instruction and find resources for every student’s learning needs.

  • ThinClient Machines- Teachers will use desktop machines to allow students to explore and engage in a variety of technology connected experiences in an effort to improve math performance. The Thin Client environment will allow self-paced tutorials, individualized assessments, drill and practice, re-teaching and remediation of skills.

  • Promethean Board Technology- Teachers will use Promethean technology in an effort to increase student engagement and provide differentiated learning experiences for students.

  • http: www.learningvillage.org-This website will be utilized to download current standards and frameworks in mathematics and English/Language Arts as mandated by the state.

  • http://www.firstinmath.com- First In Math (FIM) offers comprehensive content—ranging from single-step addition to complex algebra—in an engaging format. Students progress at their own pace to master basic and advanced mathematics skills. This dynamic online program encourages students to practice through IMMEDIATE FEEDBACK.

  • http://assessment.americaschoice.org- This website is utilized by the Accelerated Intervention Program for mathematics. Students are assessed weekly on the modules that they have completed.

  • http://www.communityoflearning.org- This is the Navigating Math program that was adopted by the district for the Accelerated Intervention Program.

  • www.georgiaoas.org- is an online test item bank aligned to the Georgia Performance Standards.

The fifth method of addressing student achievement is based on students’ assessment data, instruction will be delivered to accommodate students’ instructional needs as determined in Design Team, Collaborative Grade Level Planning Teams, and Component Meetings.

    • Above grade level: These students in grades 3-5 will receive pullout services with Mrs. McKnight in reading and mathematics, a gifted certified teacher. Independent study/research based projects, peer tutoring, exploratory field trips, math club, book studies, book drama club

    • On grade level: math and reading pullout instruction during the school day conducted by math and reading coaches, tutorial enrichment

    • Below grade level: peer tutoring, Hands on Atlanta tutoring partnerships, modified homework, Wednesday tutorial from 2:30-3:30, provision of additional time for completion of tasks, small group instruction, analysis of GCRCT/benchmark domain data to find specific areas of need which may include inclusion within the tentative 12-week Accelerated Intervention Program (AIP)

And

For students at all levels, and in all grouping situations, teachers will include:

    • Hands on projects/activities, graphic organizers, and manipulatives to motivate learning

    • Technology to teach, reinforce, enhance, or extend a particular skill or concept

    • Instructional materials that go beyond the text to strengthen students’ individual needs

    • Concept-based instruction to engage students in integrated activities across curriculum content and standards resulting in quality work displays

The PEC department will use data such as IEP goals and objectives, achievement tests, student work, observation, formal and informal assessments, and standardized tests results to guide classroom instruction and educational practices to maximize student achievement. Performance standards aligned with GPS standards will be communicated and observable in the classroom based on modifications according to the student’s disabilities. Student work will be scored and analyzed frequently to assess student achievement by IEP goals and objectives progress reports.

We have taken into account the needs of migrant children. Presently the district does not have a migrant population in need of service. If we receive migrant students, we will contact the district migrant liaison and follow the prescribed procedures.

The overall goal of Project GRAD Comprehensive reform is to promote supportive programs and community based services that encouraged student achievement and increase the graduation rate of high school students. Project GRAD bases its need to support at risk, low income, Title 1 schools on research that speaks to the fact that these kinds of schools tend to have students who demonstrate academic delays. The strategies utilized at William M. Finch in the Project GRAD Reform are scientifically based. These comprehensive reform components consist of: (1) Mathematics(Project GRAD Math Program a seventy-five minute block of time that focuses on reasoning and problem solving as the main thrust of students’ conceptual understanding and not memorizing mathematical facts); (2) Literacy (Success for All program a ninety minute uninterrupted reading block that ensure that students read at grade level or above); (3) Classroom Management (Consistency Management and Cooperative Discipline (CMCD) program geared at establishing a caring and respectful learning environment; and, (4) Family support Communities in Schools of Atlanta (CIS) which offers at risk students guidance, counseling and community outreach services).

In conclusion, the targeted population of students (current third through fifth grade students in reading, ELA, and math) will be addressed through the implementation of the five scientifically research based methods of monitoring.



*2. Schoolwide reform strategies that are scientifically researched based.

  1. Provide opportunities for all children in the school to meet or exceed Georgia’s

proficient and advanced levels of student performance.

2(a) Opportunities are provided at William M. Finch for all children in the school to meet or exceed Georgia’s proficient and advanced levels of student performance. In addition to the programs for students who may be performing below grade level, opportunities such as, the gifted program for students, the school storytelling partnership will assist the Success For All reading program by working with those students who are performing extremely well in reading. The Storytelling Club will assist students in learning new stories and writing their own stories. The Georgia Performance Standards for writing in grades 3, 4 and 5 writing will strongly be implemented. Students that have been identified as Gifted will travel to the Campbell Challenge Cluster weekly for enrichment instruction. The 12 Week Accelerated Intervention Program has been designed to assist students who are below grade-level standards in reading and math to acquire the knowledge necessary to meet those standards. Students in the Early Intervention Program (EIP) who scored below 800 on the GCRCT in reading and math will receive 2 hours of instruction. This includes the 90 minute reading block for Success For All (SFA) with an additional 45 minutes of reading services. In addition, Project GRAD (MIM) Math instruction will be implemented for 75 minutes with an additional 45 minutes of math instruction.

Legal Lives program is offered by the assistant district attorney’s office to collaborate with teachers to present a specialized, law-related curriculum every other week. Technology will incorporate the following intervention resources for the gifted academically advanced students:


  • Accelerated Reader- Teachers will be able to individualize their students’ reading choices based on student interest and ability, and use additional data within the program to monitor more aspects of the students’ learning.

  • Promethean Board Technology- Teachers will use Promethean technology in an effort to increase student engagement and provide differentiated learning experiences for students.

For those students that are pulled-out from grade level instruction during the instructional block, the teachers will assign a peer to record all notes related to subject. Then upon students arrival a peer student will redeliver the lesson to student, and the student will be given the opportunity to complete any unfinished assigned task(s) as homework.

  1. Are based upon effective means of raising student achievement

2 (b) The Six Elements of an Effective Lesson will be utilized to raise student achievement. The components of the Six Elements of an Effective Lesson are researched based and have consistently presented evidence resulting in the raising of student achievement. The following components address the requirements for each instructional lesson:



        • Appropriate and effectively communicated instructional objectives (not standards)

        • Instructional activities that are aligned with the appropriate level of complexity of the academic standards and objectives.

        • A mix of instructional activities that include meaningful amounts of active student learning.

        • Questioning that goes beyond simple recall, causing students to think, synthesize, evaluate, and conclude.

        • A variety of assessment data to document student performance and monitor instructional effectiveness.

        • Students will reflect on their learning during the lesson closure which will revisit the instructional objective, assesses students’ contextual understanding, and preview the next lesson.

During first quarter, staff will be engaged in professional development that will address how to effectively incorporate the six elements of a lesson and implement the GPS standards. Professional development will address CLASS KEYS, effective teaching, and teacher evaluation. A template will be provided for each core subject area for lesson planning.

  • Every lesson must begin with a warm up linked to learning.

  • Every lesson must be accompanied by appropriate and easily communicated S.M.A.R.T. instructional objectives that are specific.

  • All activities that are taught will be aligned to the objective at the appropriate level of complexity.

  • Differentiation of instruction will be used to address different learning styles of students.

  • A variety of assessment procedures will be used to measure student progress.

  • Questioning beyond simple recall that causes students to synthesize, evaluate and draw conclusions will be the dominant mode of questioning.

  • Students will reflect on their learning during the lesson closure which will revisit the instructional objective, assesses students’ contextual understanding, and preview the next lesson.

The Administrative staff will review all lesson plans to ensure that the elements are present. A lesson plan feedback form will be used to inform teachers of the lessons proficiency level. Collaborative planning will occur weekly to ensure grade level consistency and discuss students’ instructional needs based on diagnostic data.
In addition, to the teacher training related to the Six Elements of an Effective Lesson professional development will occur during collaborative planning time and additional professional development will be provided for teachers who still need assistance implementing the six elements of a lesson. William M. Finch does recognize that no single research based strategy works, therefore the following research based strategies are provided in teacher training sessions for teacher to select from to assure the success of every student:

  • Four core strategies( quality questioning, clarification, prediction, and summarization)

  • Reinforcing effort and providing recognition

  • Cooperative problem solving in the math classroom

  • Graphic organizers

  • Building a relationship with students

  • The use of the ATEP/CLASS Keys effective teacher self-evaluation


  1   2   3


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət