Ana səhifə

Table A1 Species and descriptions by functional groups for the Lake Taihu model


Yüklə 0.58 Mb.
səhifə1/3
tarix25.06.2016
ölçüsü0.58 Mb.
  1   2   3
Appendix
Table A1 Species and descriptions by functional groups for the Lake Taihu model

Functional groups

Species

Description

Large culters

Erythroculter mongolicus

67.5% of the total biomass of large culters




Erythroculter ilishaeformis

32.5% of the total biomass of large culters

Other piscivorous

Cultrichthys erythropterus







Pelteobagrus fulvidraco







Channa argus







S.chuatsi and S.kneri







Odontobutis obscurus




Large icefish

Protosalanx chineniss

Main economic fishery species in Lake Taihu

Tapertail anchovy

Coilia ectenes taihuensis

Coilia ectenes taihuensis has a wide distribution in Lake Taihu. It is the most productive species (Zhang 2001; Yang 2003) that accounts for nearly 46% of the total annual catch in the lake (Zhang and Zhu 2004)

Black carp

Mylopharyngodon piceus

Traditional species in the Taihu fisheries

Common carp

Cyprinus carpio

Goldfish

Carassius auratus

Bighead carp

Aristichthys nobilis

Silver carp

Hypophthalmichthys molitrix

Iicefish

Neosalanx taihuensis

A total of 95% of the icefish biomass was from Neosalanx taihuensis that inhabits the whole lake. Other species in this group are Neosalanx ologodontis and Reganisalanx branchyrostralis.




Neosalanx ologodontis




Reganisalanx branchyrostralis

Other fishes

Toxabramis swinhonis

Together these make up of 80% of the biomass of ‘other fishes’, according to the bottom trawl surveys (Deng et al., 1997)




Hemirhamphus kurumeus




Xenocypris argentea




Ctenogobius giurinus




Macropodus chinensis




Oryzias latipes




Toxabramis swinhonis




Hemirhamphus kurumeus

Herbivorous fishes

Ctenopharyngodon idella







Megalobrama amblycephala




Macrocrustaceans

Palaemon modestus







Erocheir sinensis




Mollusks

Corbicula fluminea




Benthos

Nephthy sp.




Microzooplankton

Vorticella aequilata







Polyathra trigla




Cladocera

Ceriodaphima cornuta







Daphina longispina







Diaphanosoma sarsi




Copepoda

Sinocalanus dorrii







Limnothora sinensis




Macrophyte

Potamogeton maackianus, Zizaniz latifolia and Nymphoides peltata




Phytoplankton

Cyanophyta, Bacillariophyta ,Cryptophyta, Chlorophyta, Pyrrophyta, Euglenophyta, and Chrysophyta

In Lake Taihu, there exist about 228 species of phytoplankton. Cyanophyta, Bacillariophyta ,Cryptophyta, Chlorophyta, Pyrrophyta, Euglenophyta, and Chrysophyta biomasses accounted for 42.75%, 18.78%, 18.08%, 11.09%, 8.59%, 0.4%, and 0.1% of total phytoplankton biomass, respectively (Sun 1993)

Table A2. Input data and references by functional groups for the Lake Taihu model.



Decades

Functional group

Reference

Observations




Submerged macrophyte







1960s

Biomass

Geography Department of Chinese Academy of Science 1965; School of Life Sciences East China Normal University 1959

By Geography Department of Chinese Academy of Science (Jun 15th –Aug 25th 1960), 33 sampling points, covering the whole lake.

By School of Life Sciences East China Normal University (July 18th-24th 1959), 6 sampling sections, covering the whole lake (sampling area covered 6.8%of the total area of the lake).



1980s

Biomass

Sun 1993

11 sampling sections, 42 sampling points, covering the whole lake, carried out in 1981(Sun and Huang 1993)

1990s

Biomass

Bao 1991; Yang 1998




1960s

P/B







1980s

P/B







1990s

P/B

Liu 1992







Catch

Yang 1998







Other macrophyte







1960s

Biomass

Geography Department of Chinese Academy of Science 1965; School of Life Sciences East China Normal University 1959

By Geography Department of Chinese Academy of Science (Jun 15th –Aug 25th 1960), 33 sampling points, covering the whole lake.

By School of Life Sciences East China Normal University (July 18th-24th 1959), 6 sampling sections, covering the whole lake (sampling area covered 6.8%of the total area of the lake).



1980s

Biomass

Sun 1993

11 sampling sections, 42 sampling points, covering the whole lake, carried out in 1981(Sun and Huang 1993)

1990s

Biomass

Bao 1991; Yang 1998




1960s

P/B







1980s

P/B







1990s

P/B

Liu 1992







Catch

Yang 1998







Phytoplankton







1960s

Biomass

Geography Department of Chinese Academy of Science 1965; School of Life Sciences East China Normal University 1959

By Geography Department of Chinese Academy of Science (Jun 15th –Aug 25th 1960), 33 sampling points, covering the whole lake.

By School of Life Sciences East China Normal University (July 18th-24th 1959), 6 sampling sections, covering the whole lake (sampling area covered 6.8%of the total area of the lake).



1980s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

1980-1981, 30 sampling points, covering the whole lake, sampled seasonally

1990s

Biomass

Tang 1995




1960s

P/B

Sun and Huang 1993




1980s

P/B

Sun and Huang 1993




1990s

P/B

Sun and Huang 1993







Detritus










Biomass

State Environmental Protection Administration of China 2000

Used conversion factor that estimated the biomass of bacteria as 17.5% of that for phytoplankton (Heymans et al., (2004)). The biomass of DOC and POC was estimated by the Ecoempire in the EwE model (Christensen and Pauly 1992; 1993; Christensen et al.,, 2004)




Zooplankton










Microzooplankton







1960s

Biomass

Geography Department of Chinese Academy of Science 1965; School of Life Sciences East China Normal University 1959

By Geography Department of Chinese Academy of Science (Jun 15th –Aug 25th 1960), 33 sampling points, covering the whole lake.

By School of Life Sciences East China Normal University (July 18th-24th 1959), 6 sampling sections, covering the whole lake (sampling area covered 6.8%of the total area of the lake).



1980s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

1980-1981, 30 sampling points, covering the whole lake, sampled seasonally

1990s

Biomass

Yan 1995

Used conversion factor from dry weight to wet weight of 16.7% (Gong et al., 2001)




U/Q

Park et al., 1974




1960s

P/B

Estimated by Ecopath

EE was assumed to be 0.95 (Christensen et al., 2004)

1980s

P/B

Estimated by Ecopath

EE was assumed to be 0.95 (Christensen et al., 2004)

1990s

P/B

Estimated by Ecopath

EE was assumed to be 0.95 (Christensen et al., 2004)

1960s

Q/B




P/Q ratio of 0.05 was adopted for zooplankton (Park et al., 1974; Scavia et al., 1974; Yang 2003), which could then be converted into consumption/biomass ratio (Q/B) using Q/B= (P/B)/ (P/Q)

1980s

Q/B




P/Q ratio of 0.05 was adopted for zooplankton (Park et al., 1974; Scavia et al., 1974; Yang 2003), which could then be converted into consumption/biomass ratio (Q/B) using Q/B= (P/B)/ (P/Q)

1990s

Q/B




P/Q ratio of 0.05 was adopted for zooplankton (Park et al., 1974; Scavia et al., 1974; Yang 2003), which could then be converted into consumption/biomass ratio (Q/B) using Q/B= (P/B)/ (P/Q)




Cladocera







1960s

Biomass

Geography Department of Chinese Academy of Science 1965; School of Life Sciences East China Normal University 1959

By Geography Department of Chinese Academy of Science (Jun 15th –Aug 25th 1960), 33 sampling points, covering the whole lake.

By School of Life Sciences East China Normal University (July 18th-24th 1959), 6 sampling sections, covering the whole lake (sampling area covered 6.8%of the total area of the lake).



1980s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

1980-1981, 30 sampling points, covering the whole lake, sampled seasonally

1990s

Biomass

Yan 1995

Used conversion factor from dry weight to wet weight of 16.7% (Gong et al., 2001)

1960s

P/B

Estimated by Ecopath




1980s

P/B

Estimated by Ecopath




1990s

P/B

Estimated by Ecopath




1960s

Q/B




P/Q ratio of 0.05 was adopted for zooplankton (Park et al., 1974; Scavia et al., 1974; Yang 2003), which could then be converted into consumption/biomass ratio (Q/B) using Q/B= (P/B)/ (P/Q)

1980s

Q/B




P/Q ratio of 0.05 was adopted for zooplankton (Park et al., 1974; Scavia et al., 1974; Yang 2003), which could then be converted into consumption/biomass ratio (Q/B) using Q/B= (P/B)/ (P/Q)

1990s

Q/B




P/Q ratio of 0.05 was adopted for zooplankton (Park et al., 1974; Scavia et al., 1974; Yang 2003), which could then be converted into consumption/biomass ratio (Q/B) using Q/B= (P/B)/ (P/Q)




Copepoda







1960s

Biomass

Geography Department of Chinese Academy of Science 1965; School of Life Sciences East China Normal University 1959

By Geography Department of Chinese Academy of Science (Jun 15th –Aug 25th 1960), 33 sampling points, covering the whole lake.

By School of Life Sciences East China Normal University (July 18th-24th 1959), 6 sampling sections, covering the whole lake (sampling area covered 6.8%of the total area of the lake).



1980s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

1980-1981, 30 sampling points, covering the whole lake, sampled seasonally

1990s

Biomass

Yan 1995

Used conversion factor from dry weight to wet weight of 16.7% (Gong et al., 2001)

1960s

P/B

Estimated by Ecopath




1980s

P/B

Estimated by Ecopath




1990s

P/B

Estimated by Ecopath




1960s

Q/B




P/Q ratio of 0.05 was adopted for zooplankton (Park et al., 1974; Scavia et al., 1974; Yang 2003), which could then be converted into consumption/biomass ratio (Q/B) using Q/B= (P/B)/ (P/Q)

1980s

Q/B




P/Q ratio of 0.05 was adopted for zooplankton (Park et al., 1974; Scavia et al., 1974; Yang 2003), which could then be converted into consumption/biomass ratio (Q/B) using Q/B= (P/B)/ (P/Q)

1990s

Q/B




P/Q ratio of 0.05 was adopted for zooplankton (Park et al., 1974; Scavia et al., 1974; Yang 2003), which could then be converted into consumption/biomass ratio (Q/B) using Q/B= (P/B)/ (P/Q)




Trophic data

Liu 1999







Benthos







1960s

Biomass

Geography Department of Chinese Academy of Science 1965; School of Life Sciences East China Normal University 1959

By Geography Department of Chinese Academy of Science (Jun 15th –Aug 25th 1960), 33 sampling points, covering the whole lake.

By School of Life Sciences East China Normal University (July 18th-24th 1959), 6 sampling sections, covering the whole lake (sampling area covered 6.8%of the total area of the lake).



1980s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

1980-1981, 30 sampling points, covering the whole lake, sampled seasonally

1990s

Biomass







1960s

P/B

Empirical equation from Brey 1999

Used conversion factor from dry weight to wet weight of 16.7% (Gong et al., 2001)

1980s

P/B

Empirical equation from Brey 1999

Used conversion factor from dry weight to wet weight of 16.7% (Gong et al., 2001)

1990s

P/B

Empirical equation from Brey 1999

Used conversion factor from dry weight to wet weight of 16.7% (Gong et al., 2001)

1960s

Q/B

Estimated by Ecopath

P/Q ratio of 0.05 was adopted for zooplankton (Park et al., 1974; Scavia et al., 1974; Yang 2003), which could then be converted into consumption/biomass ratio (Q/B) using Q/B= (P/B)/ (P/Q)

1980s

Q/B

Estimated by Ecopath

P/Q ratio of 0.05 was adopted for zooplankton (Park et al., 1974; Scavia et al., 1974; Yang 2003), which could then be converted into consumption/biomass ratio (Q/B) using Q/B= (P/B)/ (P/Q)

1990s

Q/B

Estimated by Ecopath

P/Q ratio of 0.05 was adopted for zooplankton (Park et al., 1974; Scavia et al., 1974; Yang 2003), which could then be converted into consumption/biomass ratio (Q/B) using Q/B= (P/B)/ (P/Q)




U/N

Yan 2003







Trophic data

Liu 1999







Mollucs







1960s

Biomass

Geography Department of Chinese Academy of Science 1965; School of Life Sciences East China Normal University 1959

By Geography Department of Chinese Academy of Science (Jun 15th –Aug 25th 1960), 33 sampling points, covering the whole lake.

By School of Life Sciences East China Normal University (July 18th-24th 1959), 6 sampling sections, covering the whole lake (sampling area covered 6.8%of the total area of the lake).



1980s

Biomass







1990s

Biomass

Deng et al., 1997




1960s

P/B

Yang 2003




1980s

P/B

Yang 2003




1990s

P/B

Yang 2003




1960s

Q/B

Estimated by Ecopath

P/Q ratio of 0.05 was adopted for zooplankton (Park et al., 1974; Scavia et al., 1974; Yang 2003), which could then be converted into consumption/biomass ratio (Q/B) using Q/B= (P/B)/ (P/Q)

1980s

Q/B

Estimated by Ecopath

P/Q ratio of 0.05 was adopted for zooplankton (Park et al., 1974; Scavia et al., 1974; Yang 2003), which could then be converted into consumption/biomass ratio (Q/B) using Q/B= (P/B)/ (P/Q)

1990s

Q/B

Estimated by Ecopath

P/Q ratio of 0.05 was adopted for zooplankton (Park et al., 1974; Scavia et al., 1974; Yang 2003), which could then be converted into consumption/biomass ratio (Q/B) using Q/B= (P/B)/ (P/Q)




U/N

Scavia et al., 1974







Catch

Zhu 1998







Trophic data

Liu 1999







Macrocrustacean







1960s

Biomass

Zhu 2003




1980s

Biomass

Zhu 2003




1990s

Biomass

Zhu 2003




1960s

P/B

Estimated by Ecopath




1980s

P/B

Estimated by Ecopath




1990s

P/B

Estimated by Ecopath




1960s

Q/B

Estimated by Ecopath




1980s

Q/B

Estimated by Ecopath




1990s

Q/B

Estimated by Ecopath







U/Q

Halfon et al., 1996







Catch

Zhu 1998







Trophic data

Shi 1995







Herbivorous fishes







1960s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1980s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1990s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1960s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1980s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1990s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1960s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1980s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1990s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998







U/N

Winberg 1956; Brett 1979







Catch

Zhu 1998







Trophic data

Liu 1992







Other fishes







1960s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1980s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1990s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1960s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1980s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1990s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1960s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1980s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1990s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998







U/Q

Winberg 1956; Brett 1979







Catch

Zhu 1999; Zhu 2003







Trophic data

Zhu 1999







Icefish







1960s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1980s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1990s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1960s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1980s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1990s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1960s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1980s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1990s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998







U/Q

Winberg 1956; Brett 1979







Catch

Zhu 1999; Zhu 2003







Trophic data

Bing 1995







Black carp







1960s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1980s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1990s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1960s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1980s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1990s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1960s

Q/B

P/Q was assumed to be 0.079




1980s

Q/B

P/Q was assumed to be 0.079




1990s

Q/B

P/Q was assumed to be 0.079







U/Q

Winberg 1956; Brett 1979







Catch

Zhu 1999; Zhu 2003







Trophic data

Liu 1992







Common carp







1960s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1980s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1990s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1960s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1980s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1990s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1960s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1980s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1990s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998







U/Q

Winberg 1956; Brett 1979







Catch

Zhu 2003







Trophic data

Liu 1992







Goldfish










Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1960s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1980s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1990s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1960s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1980s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1990s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998







U/Q

Winberg 1956; Brett 1979







Catch










Trophic data

Liu 1992







Bighead carp







1960s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1980s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1990s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1960s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1980s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1990s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1960s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1980s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1990s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998







U/Q

Winberg 1956; Brett 1979







Catch

Zhu 1999; Zhu 2003







Trophic data

Liu 1992







Silver carp







1960s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1980s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1990s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1960s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1980s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1990s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1960s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1980s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1990s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998







U/Q

Winberg 1956; Brett 1979







Catch

Zhu 1999; Zhu 2003







Trophic data

Liu 1992







Tapertail anchovy







1960s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1980s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1990s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1960s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1980s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1990s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1960s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1980s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1990s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998







U/Q

Winberg 1956; Brett 1979







Catch

Zhu 1999; Zhu 2003







Trophic data

Tang 1995







Large Icefish







1960s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1980s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1990s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1960s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1980s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1990s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1960s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1980s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1990s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998







U/Q

Winberg 1956; Brett 1979







Catch

Zhu 1999; Zhu 2003







Trophic data

Zhu 1985







Other priscivorous







1960s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1980s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1990s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu

1960s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1980s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1990s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1960s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1980s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998




1990s

Q/B

Empirical equation from Palomares and Pauly 1998







U/Q

Winberg 1956; Brett 1979







Catch

Zhu 1999; Zhu 2003







Trophic data

Tan 1997b







Large culers







1960s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu.

1980s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu.

1990s

Biomass

Zhu 2003

Biomass estimated from the trawling surveys (1991-1998) in the Lake Taihu.

1960s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1980s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1990s

P/B

F=C/B and Z=F+M=P/B, M=empirical equation from Pauly 1980




1960s

Q/B

Fishbase 2004




1980s

Q/B

Fishbase 2004




1990s

Q/B

Fishbase 2004







U/Q

Winberg 1956; Brett 1979







Catch

Zhu 2003







Trophic data

Xu, 1984




Table A3. The input diet composition data in proportions for the Lake Taihu ecosystem.



Prey/Predator

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

1

LarC

0.020

0.004

















































2

OthP

0.008

0.021

















































3

LarI

0.007




0.040














































4

TapA

0.510




0.360

0.005











































5

BlaC

0.001




















































6

ComC

0.001

0.007

















































7

GolF

0.001

0.052

















































8

BigC

0.013




















































9

Icef

0.047




0.165

0.005











































10

OthF

0.306

0.281

0.248














































11

SilC

0.005




















































12

HerF

0.001




















































13

MacC

0.013

0.448

0.074




0.025

0.080





































14

Moll




0.092




0.040

0.950

0.600










0.001

























15

OthB




0.076







0.025

0.157

0.159







0.186













0.001










16

Micz







0.009

0.001




0.001

0.010

0.115

0.007

0.002

0.003

0.001

0.141










0.016

0.016

17

Clad







0.047

0.506







0.039

0.31

0.433

0.338

0.097




0.38
















18

Cope







0.057

0.400







0.050

0.375

0.560

0.253

0.100




0.459
















19

SubM

0.067













0.009

0.515







0.002




0.998







0.001










20

OthM


































0.001



















21

Phyt




0.004




0.043










0.18




0.129

0.800







0.800

0.100

0.333

0.474

0.474

22

Detr




0.016










0.153

0.227

0.02




0.091







0.02

0.200

0.898

0.667

0.510

0.51




Sum

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1
  1   2   3


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət