Supplemental Table 1

tarix	27.06.2016
ölçüsü	84.5 Kb.

Online Supplemental Materials

Supplemental Table 1. To determine whether the hormone solution affected fitness measures, we compared the progeny of cross-fertilizations from dioecious lineages in which the individuals to which the focal plants were outcrossed were either treated with hormone (males changed into females) or not treated with hormone (females left as females). A logit model was used to determine the effect of hormone treatment (a fixed effect) and lineage (a random effect) on whether a seed germinated and survived as a seedling (SAS Institute, 2004). We used mixed-model ANOVAs to test how the remaining fitness measures were affected by hormone treatment (a fixed effect) and lineage (a random effect). Proportion survival was analyzed on a per lineage basis, as it was for the analysis of cross type. For the ANOVA analyses, all fitness measures were log-transformed (Johnston and Schoen, 1994). Interaction terms with lineage were not included in these models, unlike in the models analyzing cross type, because only one hormone comparison was made per lineage.


trait	hormone	lineage	error


Proportion Germination & Early Survival	df = 1	df = 10
	Χ² = 0.12	Χ² = 48.5
	P = 0.73	P < 0.0001

Proportion Late Survival	df = 1	df = 12	df = 21
	MS = 0.02	MS = 0.11	MS = 0.02
	F = 0.95	F = 0.56
	P = 0.34	P = 0.85

Plant Mass	df = 1	df = 12	df = 273
	MS = 0.43	MS = 1.53	MS = 0.59
	F = 0.73	F = 2.61
	P = 0.39	P = 0.003

Proportion Pollen Viability	df = 1	df = 11	df = 144
	MS = 0.27	MS = 0.17	MS = 0.19
	F = 1.44	F = 0.90
	P = 0.23	P = 0.55

Seed Mass	df = 1	df = 10	df = 69
	MS = 0.07	MS = 2.56	MS = 1.23
	F = 0.06	F = 2.10
	P = 0.81	P = 0.036