Ana səhifə

Section I: Surgical Biology Chapter 1: Inflammatory Response references

Yüklə 3.38 Mb.
ölçüsü3.38 Mb.
1   ...   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   ...   55

Chapter 17: Suture Material, Tissue Staplers, Ligation Devices, and Closure Methods


  1. 3M: 3M Precise Vista Disposable Skin Stapler. Accessed 1/25/10.

  2. Ahn LC, Towler MA, McGregor W, et al: Biomechanical performance of laser-drilled and channel taper point needles. J Emerg Med 10:601, 1992. PUBMED Abstract

  3. Allison DC, Ahlmann ER, Xiang AH, et al: The linear cutting stapler may reduce surgical time and blood loss with muscle transection: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:2859, 2009. PUBMED Abstract

  4. Allman AJ, McPherson TB, Badylak SF, et al: Xenogeneic extracellular matrix grafts elicit a TH2-restricted immune response. Transplantation 71:1631, 2001. PUBMED Abstract

  5. An G, Walter RJ, Nagy K: Closure of abdominal wall defects using acellular dermal matrix. J Trauma 56:1266, 2004. PUBMED Abstract

  6. Ang BK, Cheong D, Teh E, et al: Skin stapled bowel anastomosis in a canine model. Singapore Med J 40:81, 1999. PUBMED Abstract

  7. Arnold GA, Mathews KG, Roe S, et al: Biomechanical comparison of four soft tissue replacement materials: an in vitro evaluation of single and multilaminate porcine small intestinal submucosa, canine fascia lata, and polypropylene mesh. Vet Surg 38:834, 2009. PUBMED Abstract

  8. Aron DN, Gorse MJ: Clinical use of N-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate for stabilization of osteochondral fragments: preliminary report. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 27:203, 1991.

  9. Autosuture: Covidien Autosuture. Product Webpage. Accessed January 25, 2011.

  10. Badylak S, Kokini K, Tullius B, et al: Morphologic study of small intestinal submucosa as a body wall repair device. J Surg Res 103:190, 2002. PUBMED Abstract

  11. Badylak S, Kokini K, Tullius B, et al: Strength over time of a resorbable bioscaffold for body wall repair in a dog model. J Surg Res 99:282, 2001. PUBMED Abstract

  12. Badylak SF, Tullius R, Kokini K, et al: The use of xenogeneic small intestinal submucosa as a biomaterial for Achilles tendon repair in a dog model. J Biomed Mater Res 29:977, 1995. PUBMED Abstract

  13. Barber FA, Gurwitz GS: Inflammatory synovial fluid and absorbable suture strength. Arthroscopy 4:272, 1988. PUBMED Abstract

  14. Bastiaanse J, Borst C, van der Helm YJ, et al: Arteriotomy closure by glued patch in the porcine carotid artery. Ann Thorac Surg 70:1384, 2000. PUBMED Abstract

  15. Bellenger CR: Sutures Part II. The use of sutures and alternative methods of closure. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 4:587, 1982.

  16. Bellenger CR: Sutures. I. The purpose of sutures and available suture materials. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 4:507, 1982.

  17. Bezwada RS, Jamiolkowski DD, Lee IY, et al: Monocryl suture, a new ultra-pliable absorbable monofilament suture. Biomaterials 16:1141, 1995. PUBMED Abstract

  18. Boccaccini AR, Stamboulis AG, Rashid A, et al: Composite surgical sutures with bioactive glass coating. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 67:618, 2003. PUBMED Abstract

  19. Bordelon JT, Rochat MC: Use of a titanium mesh for cranioplasty following radical rostrotentorial craniectomy to remove an ossifying fibroma in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 231:1692, 2007. PUBMED Abstract

  20. Bowman MR, King RM: Comparison of staples and sutures for cardiorrhaphy in traumatic puncture wounds of the heart. J Emerg Med 14:615, 1996. PUBMED Abstract

  21. Bromberg NM: Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive for treatment of refractory corneal ulceration. Vet Ophthalmol 5:55, 2002. PUBMED Abstract

  22. Chen QZ, Blaker JJ, Boccaccini AR: Bioactive and mechanically strong Bioglass-poly(D,L-lactic acid) composite coatings on surgical sutures. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 76:354, 2006. PUBMED Abstract

  23. Chu CC: Biodegradation properties. In Chu CC, von Fraunhofer JA, Greisler HP, editors: Wound closure biomaterials and devices, New York, 1997, CRC Press, p 131.

  24. Chu CC: Chemical structure and manufacturing process. In Chu CC, von Fraunhofer JA, Greisler HP, editors: Wound closure biomaterials and devices, New York, 1997, CRC Press, p 65.

  25. Chu CC: Classification and general characteristics of suture materials. In Chu CC, von Franhofer JA, Greisler HP, editors: Wound closure biomaterials and devices, New York, 1997, CRC Press, p 39.

  26. Chu CC: A comparison of the effect of pH on the biodegradation of two synthetic absorbable sutures. Ann Surg 195:55, 1982. PUBMED Abstract

  27. Chu CC: Mechanical properties of suture materials: an important characterization. Ann Surg 193:365, 1981. PUBMED Abstract

  28. Chung RS: Blood flow in colonic anastomoses: effect of stapling and suturing. Ann Surg 206:335, 1987. PUBMED Abstract

  29. Clark GN, Pavletic MM: Partial gastrectomy with an automatic stapling instrument for treatment of gastric necrosis secondary to gastric dilatation-volvulus. Vet Surg 20:61, 1991. PUBMED Abstract

  30. Cobb WS, Peindl RM, Zerey M, et al: Mesh terminology 101. Hernia 13:1, 2009. PUBMED Abstract

  31. Cohen EL, Kirschenbaum A, Glenn JF: Preclinical evaluation of PDS (polydioxanone) synthetic absorbable suture vs chromic surgical gut in urologic surgery. Urology 30:369, 1987. PUBMED Abstract

  32. Coolman BR, Ehrhart N, Pijanowski G, et al: Comparison of skin staples with sutures for anastomosis of the small intestine in dogs. Vet Surg 29:293, 2000. PUBMED Abstract

  33. Coolman BR, Manfra Marretta S, Pijanowski GJ, et al: Evaluation of a skin stapler for belt-loop gastropexy in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 35:440, 1999. PUBMED Abstract

  34. Surgidac, Covidien: Syneture, Product Webpage, January 25, 2011.

  35. TiCron, Covidien: Syneture, Product Webpage, Accessed January 25, 2011.

  36. Dalla Vecchia L, Engum S, Kogon B, et al: Evaluation of small intestine submucosa and acellular dermis as diaphragmatic prostheses. J Pediatr Surg 34:167, 1999. PUBMED Abstract

  37. Dewey CW, Marino DJ, Bailey KS, et al: Foramen magnum decompression with cranioplasty for treatment of caudal occipital malformation syndrome in dogs. Vet Surg 36:406, 2007. PUBMED Abstract

  38. Dines JS, Weber L, Razzano P, et al: The effect of growth differentiation factor-5-coated sutures on tendon repair in a rat model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:S215, 2007. PUBMED Abstract

  39. Disa JJ, Klein MH, Goldberg NH: Advantages of autologous fascia versus synthetic patch abdominal reconstruction in experimental animal defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:801, 1996. PUBMED Abstract

  40. Duprez K, Bilweis J, Duprez A, et al: Experimental and clinical study of fast absorption cutaneous suture material. Ann Chir Main 7:91, 1988. PUBMED Abstract

  41. el-Mahrouky A, McElhaney J, Bartone FF, et al: In vitro comparison of the properties of polydioxanone, polyglycolic acid and catgut sutures in sterile and infected urine. J Urol 138:913, 1987. PUBMED Abstract

  42. Elefteriades JA: “How I do it: utilization of high-pressure sealants in aortic reconstruction.” J Cardiothorac Surg 4:27, 2009.PUBMED Abstract

  43. Ethicon: Sutures: Nonabsorbable/Ethibond Excel Suture. Product Website. http://www.ecatalog.ethicon. com/sutures-non-absorbable/view/ethibond-excel-suture. Accessed January 25, 2011.

  44. Faria MCF, Almeida FMD, Serrão ML, et al: Use of cyanoacrylate in skin closure for ovariohysterectomy in a population control programme. J Feline Med Surg 7:71, 2005. PUBMED Abstract

  45. Feil W, Lippert H, Lozac’h P, et al: Mechanical stapling and other surgical devices. In Feil W, Lippert H, Lozac’h P, et al, editors: Atlas of surgical stapling, Heidelberg, 2000, Johan Ambrosius Barth, p 1.

  46. Ferrand BK, Kokini K, Badylak SF, et al: Directional porosity of porcine small-intestinal submucosa. J Biomed Mater Res 27:1235, 1993. PUBMED Abstract

  47. Fick JL, Novo RE, Kirchhof N: Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs. Am J Vet Res 66:1975, 2005. PUBMED Abstract

  48. Foda M, Carlson MA: Enterocutaneous fistula associated with ePTFE mesh: case report and review of the literature. Hernia 13:323, 2009. PUBMED Abstract

  49. Ford HR, Jones P, Gaines B, et al: Intraoperative handling and wound healing: controlled clinical trial comparing coated VICRYL plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) with coated VICRYL suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture). Surg Infect (Larchmt) 6:313, 2005. PUBMED Abstract

  50. Freudenberg S, Rewerk S, Kaess M, et al: Biodegradation of absorbable sutures in body fluids and pH buffers. Eur Surg Res 36:376, 2004. PUBMED Abstract

  51. Frey TN, Hoelzler MG, Scavelli TD, et al: Risk factors for surgical site infection-inflammation in dogs undergoing surgery for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament: 902 cases (2005–2006). J Am Vet Med Assoc 236:88, 2010. PUBMED Abstract

  52. Fucci V, Newton JC, Hedlund CS, et al: Rectal surgery in the cat: comparison of suture versus staple technique through a dorsal approach. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 28:519, 1992.

  53. Gall TT, Santoni BG, Egger EL, et al: In vitro biomechanical comparison of polypropylene mesh, modified three-loop pulley suture pattern, and a combination for repair of distal canine Achilles’ tendon injuries. Vet Surg 38:845, 2009. PUBMED Abstract

  54. Gómez-Alonso A, García-Criado FJ, Parreño-Manchado FC, et al: Study of the efficacy of Coated VICRYL Plus(R) Antibacterial suture (coated Polyglactin 910 suture with Triclosan) in two animal models of general surgery. J Infect 54:82, 2007.PUBMED Abstract

  55. Graham DA, Jeffery JA, Bain D, et al: Staple vs. subcuticular Vicryl skin closure in knee replacement surgery: a spectrophotographic assessment of wound characteristics. Knee 7:239, 2000.PUBMED Abstract

  56. Greca FH, Souza-Filho ZA, Giovanini A, et al: The influence of porosity on the integration histology of two polypropylene meshes for the treatment of abdominal wall defects in dogs. Hernia 12:45, 2008. PUBMED Abstract

  57. Greenberg CB, Davidson EB, Bellmer DD, et al: Evaluation of the tensile strengths of four monofilament absorbable suture materials after immersion in canine urine with or without bacteria. Am J Vet Res 65:847, 2004. PUBMED Abstract

  58. Greenwald D, Shumway S, Albear P, et al: Mechanical comparison of 10 suture materials before and after in vivo incubation. J Surg Res 56:372, 1994. PUBMED Abstract

  59. Gumbs AA, Duffy AJ, Chandwani R, et al: Jejunojejunal anastomotic obstruction following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass due to non-absorbable suture: a report of seven cases. Obes Surg 16:12, 2006. PUBMED Abstract

  60. Hampel NL, Johnson RG, Pijanowski GJ: Effects of isobutyl-2-cyanoacrylate on skin healing. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 13:80, 1991.

  61. Hampel NL, Pijanowski GJ, Johnson RG: Effects of isobutyl-2-cyanoacrylate on bone healing. Am J Vet Res 47:1605, 1986. PUBMED Abstract

  62. Hardie RJ, Flanders JA, Schmidt P, et al: Biomechanical and histological evaluation of a laparoscopic stapled gastropexy technique in dogs. Vet Surg 25:127, 1996. PUBMED Abstract

  63. Hayes MJ, Lauren MD: Chemical stress relaxation of polyglycolic acid suture. J Appl Biomater 5:215, 1994. PUBMED Abstract

  64. Heath RJ, Rubin JR, Holland DR, et al: Mechanism of triclosan inhibition of bacterial fatty acid synthesis. J Biol Chem 274:11110, 1999. PUBMED Abstract

  65. Hess JL, DeYoung DW, Riley MGI, et al: Comparison of stainless steel staple and synthetic suture material on skin wound healing. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 14:501, 1979.

  66. Hightower D, March J, Ausband S, et al: Comparison of staples vs suturing for securing central venous catheters. Acad Emerg Med 3:1103, 1996. PUBMED Abstract

  67. Hodde JP, Record RD, Liang HA, et al: Vascular endothelial growth factor in porcine-derived extracellular matrix. Endothelium 8:11, 2001. PUBMED Abstract

  68. Houlton JEF, Dyce J: The use of polypropylene mesh for revision of failed repair of superficial digital flexor tendon luxation in three dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 6:129, 1993.

  69. Howes EL: Factors determining the loss of strength of catgut when embedded in tissue. JAMA 90:530, 1928.

  70. Hsu TC: Comparison of holding power of metal and absorbable hemostatic clips. Am J Surg 191:68, 2006. PUBMED Abstract

  71. Hunt GB, Hughes J: Outcomes after extrahepatic portosystemic shunt ligation in 49 dogs. Aust Vet J 77:303, 1999. PUBMED Abstract

  72. Justinger C, Moussavian MR, Schlueter C, et al: Antibiotic coating of abdominal closure sutures and wound infection. Surgery 145:330, 2009. PUBMED Abstract

  73. Kanegaye JT, McCaslin RI: Pediatric scalp laceration repair complicated by skin staple migration. Am J Emerg Med 17:157, 1999. PUBMED Abstract

  74. Kanegaye JT, Vance CW, Chan L, et al: Comparison of skin stapling devices and standard sutures for pediatric scalp lacerations: a randomized study of cost and time benefits. J Pediatr 130:808, 1997. PUBMED Abstract

  75. Kersey TL, Patel S, Thaller VT: Old habits tie hard: an in vitro comparison of first-throw tension holding in Polyglycolic acid (Dexon S) and Polyglactin 910 (Coated Vicryl). Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 34:152, 2006. PUBMED Abstract

  76. Kim BY, Choi BH, Huh JY, et al: Microvascular anastomosis using cyanoacrylate adhesives. J Reconstr Microsurg 20:317, 2004. PUBMED Abstract

  77. Kim JC, Lee YK, Lim BS, et al: Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures. J Mater Sci Mater Med 18:2363, 2007. PUBMED Abstract

  78. Klein A, Scotti S, Hidalgo A, et al: Rectovaginal fistula following colectomy with an end-to-end anastomosis stapler for a colorectal adenocarcinoma. J Small Anim Pract 47:751, 2006. PUBMED Abstract

  79. Kudisch M, Pavletic MM: Subtotal colectomy with surgical stapling instruments via a trans-cecal approach for treatment of acquired megacolon in cats. Vet Surg 22:457, 1993. PUBMED Abstract

  80. Kummeling A, Sluijs FJ: Closure of the rectus sheath with a continuous looped suture and the skin with staples in dogs: speed, safety, and costs compared to closure of the rectus sheath with interrupted sutures and the skin with a continuous subdermal suture. Vet Q 20:126, 1998. PUBMED Abstract

  81. Lai SY, Becker DG, Edlich RF: Sutures and needles. In Sclafani AP, editor: emedicine from WebMD. Vol 2009.

  82. Lamborn PB, Soloway HB, Matsumoto T, et al: Comparison of tensile strength of wounds closed by sutures and cyano acrylates. Am J Vet Res 31:125, 1970. PUBMED Abstract

  83. Lansdowne JL, Monnet E, Twedt DC, et al: Thoracoscopic lung lobectomy for treatment of lung tumors in dogs. Vet Surg 34:530, 2005. PUBMED Abstract

  84. Lee KH, Chu CC: The role of superoxide ions in the degradation of synthetic absorbable sutures. J Biomed Mater Res 49:25, 2000. PUBMED Abstract

  85. Leftwich MW, Carey DP: Cyanoacrylate adhesive for aural hematoma. Vet Med Small Anim Clin 76:1155, 1981. PUBMED Abstract

  86. Levionnois OL, Bergadano A, Schatzmann U: Accidental entrapment of an endo-bronchial blocker tip by a surgical stapler during selective ventilation for lung lobectomy in a dog. Vet Surg 35:82, 2006. PUBMED Abstract

  87. Li X, King M, MacDonald P: Comparative study of knot performance and ease of manipulation of monofilament and braided sutures for arthroscopic applications. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:448, 2004. PUBMED Abstract

  88. Lidbetter DA, Williams FA, Jr, Krahwinkel DJ, et al: Radical lateral body-wall resection for fibrosarcoma with reconstruction using polypropylene mesh and a caudal superficial epigastric axial pattern flap: a prospective clinical study of the technique and results in 6 cats. Vet Surg 31:57, 2002. PUBMED Abstract

  89. Liptak JM, Dernell WS, Rizzo SA, et al: Reconstruction of chest wall defects after rib tumor resection: a comparison of autogenous, prosthetic, and composite techniques in 44 dogs. Vet Surg 37:479, 2008. PUBMED Abstract

  90. Livesey C, Wylde V, Descamps S, et al: Skin closure after total hip replacement: a randomised controlled trial of skin adhesive versus surgical staples. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:725, 2009. PUBMED Abstract

  91. Lo IK, Burkhart SS, Athanasiou K: Abrasion resistance of two types of nonabsorbable braided suture. Arthroscopy 20:407, 2004. PUBMED Abstract

  92. Lo IK, Burkhart SS, Chan KC, et al: Arthroscopic knots: determining the optimal balance of loop security and knot security. Arthroscopy 20:489, 2004. PUBMED Abstract

  93. Marco F, Vallez R, Gonzalez P, et al: Study of the efficacy of coated Vicryl plus antibacterial suture in an animal model of orthopedic surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 8:359, 2000.

  94. Martinez SA, Hauptman J, Walshaw R: Comparing two techniques for onychectomy in cats and two adhesives for wound closure. Vet Med 88:516, 1993.

  95. Mathews KG, Wallace LJ, Redig PT, et al: Avian fracture healing following stabilization with intramedullary polyglycolic acid rods and cyanoacrylate adhesive vs. polypropylene rods and polymethylmethacrylate. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 7:158, 1994.

  96. Mattick A: Use of tissue adhesives in the management of paediatric lacerations. Emerg Med J 19:382, 2002. PUBMED Abstract

  97. Mayrose J, Jehle DV, Moscati R, et al: Comparison of staples versus sutures in the repair of penetrating cardiac wounds. J Trauma 46:441, 1999. PUBMED Abstract

  98. McEntee MC, Steffey M, Dykes NL: Use of surgical hemoclips in radiation treatment planning. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 49:395, 2008. PUBMED Abstract

  99. Miller ND, Williams DF: The in vivo and in vitro degradation of poly(glycolic acid) suture material as a function of applied strain. Biomaterials 5:365, 1984. PUBMED Abstract

  100. Mills IW, McDermott IM, Ratliff DA: Prospective randomized controlled trial to compare skin staples and polypropylene for securing the mesh in inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 85:790, 1998. PUBMED Abstract

  101. Ming X, Nichols M, Rothenburger S: In vivo antibacterial efficacy of MONOCRYL plus antibacterial suture (Poliglecaprone 25 with triclosan). Surg Infect (Larchmt) 8:209, 2007. PUBMED Abstract

  102. Ming X, Rothenburger S, Nichols MM: In vivo and in vitro antibacterial efficacy of PDS plus (polydioxanone with triclosan) suture. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 9:451, 2008. PUBMED Abstract

  103. Morrison S, Prostredny J, Roa D: Retrospective study of 28 cases of cholecystoduodenostomy performed using endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis stapling equipment. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 44:10, 2008. PUBMED Abstract

  104. Murtha AP, Kaplan AL, Paglia MJ, et al: Evaluation of a novel technique for wound closure using a barbed suture. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:1769, 2006. PUBMED Abstract

  105. Nash JM, Bellenger CR: Enteroplication in cats, using suture of N-butyl cyanoacrylate adhesive. Res Vet Sci 65:253, 1998. PUBMED Abstract

  106. Nichols S, Anderson DE: Breaking strength and elasticity of synthetic absorbable suture materials incubated in phosphate-buffered saline solution, milk, and milk contaminated with Streptococcus agalactiae. Am J Vet Res 68:441, 2007. PUBMED Abstract

  107. Obermair A, Crandon A, Perrin L, et al: Randomized trial of skin closure after laparotomy for gynaecological surgery. ANZ J Surg 77:460, 2007. PUBMED Abstract

  108. Orlinsky M, Goldberg RM, Chan L, et al: Cost analysis of stapling versus suturing for skin closure. Am J Emerg Med 13:77, 1995. PUBMED Abstract

  109. Osmond MH, Klassen TP, Quinn JV: Economic comparison of a tissue adhesive and suturing in the repair of pediatric facial lacerations. J Pediatr 126:892, 1995. PUBMED Abstract

  110. Ozawa S, Morikawa Y, Oguma J, et al: Development of a new flat needle and a reduced surface coating thread for endoscopic suturing. J Surg Res 145:266, 2008. PUBMED Abstract

  111. Pasternak B, Missios A, Askendal A, et al: Doxycycline-coated sutures improve the suture-holding capacity of the rat Achilles tendon. Acta Orthop 78:680, 2007. PUBMED Abstract

  112. Pasternak B, Rehn M, Andersen L, et al: Doxycycline-coated sutures improve mechanical strength of intestinal anastomoses. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:271, 2008. PUBMED Abstract

  113. Pavletic MM, Schartz A: Stapling instrumentation. In Pavletic M, editor: The veterinary clinics of North America, Philadelphia, 1994, WB Saunders, p 247.PUBMED Abstract

  114. Pelsue DH, Monnet E, Gaynor JS, et al: Closure of median sternotomy in dogs: suture versus wire. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 38:569, 2002. PUBMED Abstract

  115. Pineros-Fernandez A, Drake DB, Rodeheaver PA, et al: CAPROSYN*, another major advance in synthetic monofilament absorbable suture. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 14:359, 2004. PUBMED Abstract

  116. Quinn J, Maw J, Ramotar K, et al: Octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive versus suture wound repair in a contaminated wound model. Surgery 122:69, 1997. PUBMED Abstract

  117. Quinn JV, Osmond MH, Yurack JA, et al: N-2-butylcyanoacrylate: risk of bacterial contamination with an appraisal of its antimicrobial effects. J Emerg Med 13:581, 1995. PUBMED Abstract

  118. Ridgway DM, Mahmood F, Moore L, et al: A blinded, randomised, controlled trial of stapled versus tissue glue closure of neck surgery incisions. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89:242, 2007. PUBMED Abstract

  119. Robello GT, Aron DN, Foutz TL, et al: Replacement of the medial collateral ligament with polypropylene mesh or a polyester suture in dogs. Vet Surg 21:467, 1992. PUBMED Abstract

  120. Rodeheaver GT, Beltran KA, Green CW, et al: Biomechanical and clinical performance of a new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 6:181, 1996. PUBMED Abstract

  121. Rodeheaver GT, Nesbit WS, Edlich RF: Novafil: a dynamic suture for wound closure. Ann Surg 204:193, 1986. PUBMED Abstract

  122. Rodeheaver GT, Thacker JG, Edlich RF: Mechanical performance of polyglycolic acid and polyglactin 910 synthetic absorbable sutures. Surg Gynecol Obstet 153:835, 1981. PUBMED Abstract

  123. Rodeheaver GT, Thacker JG, Owen J, et al: Knotting and handling characteristics of coated synthetic absorbable sutures. J Surg Res 35:525, 1983. PUBMED Abstract

  124. Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, et al: A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:265e1, 2009.PUBMED Abstract

  125. Salci H, Bayram AS, Ozyigit O, et al: Comparison of different bronchial closure techniques following pneumonectomy in dogs. J Vet Sci 8:393, 2007. PUBMED Abstract

  126. Salthouse TN, Williams JA, Willigan DA: Relationship of cellular enzyme activity to catgut and collagen suture absorption. Surg Gynecol Obstet 129:691, 1969. PUBMED Abstract

  127. Sanni A, Dunning J: Staples or sutures for chest and leg wounds following cardiovascular surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 6:243, 2007. PUBMED Abstract

  128. Saunders RA, Helveston EM: Coated Vicryl (polyglactin 910) suture in extraocular muscle surgery. Ophthalmic Surg 10:13, 1979. PUBMED Abstract

  129. Sebeseri O, Keller U, Spreng P, et al: The physical properties of polyglycolic acid sutures (Dexon) in sterile and infected urine. Invest Urol 12:490, 1975. PUBMED Abstract

  130. Sereda CW, Adin CA: Methods of gradual vascular occlusion and their applications in treatment of congenital portosystemic shunts in dogs: a review. Vet Surg 34:83, 2005. PUBMED Abstract

  131. Sicard GK, Hayashi K, Manley PA: Evaluation of 5 types of fishing material, 2 sterilization methods, and a crimp-clamp system for extra-articular stabilization of the canine stifle joint. Vet Surg 31:78, 2002. PUBMED Abstract

  132. Sicard GK, Meinen J, Phillips T, et al: Comparison of fishing line for repair of the cruciate deficient stifle. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 12:138, 1999.

  133. Silvestri A, Brandi C, Grimaldi L, et al: Octyl-2-cyanoacrylate adhesive for skin closure and prevention of infection in plastic surgery. Aesthet Plast Surg 30:695, 2006.PUBMED Abstract

  134. Simões EA, Jatene FB, Stopiglia AJ, et al: Comparative study between mechanical and manual sutures in the bronchus after left pneumonectomy in the dogs (Canis familiaris): a pathological-anatomic evaluation. Uma Avaliação Anatomopatológica 42:357, 2005.

  135. Singer AJ, Quinn JV, Hollander JE: The cyanoacrylate topical skin adhesives. Am J Emerg Med 26:490, 2008. PUBMED Abstract

  136. Stamboulis A, Hench LL, Boccaccini AR: Mechanical properties of biodegradable polymer sutures coated with bioactive glass. J Mater Sci Mater Med 13:843, 2002. PUBMED Abstract

  137. Stillman RM, Marino CA, Seligman SJ: Skin staples in potentially contaminated wounds. Arch Surg 119:821, 1984. PUBMED Abstract

  138. Storch ML, Rothenburger SJ, Jacinto G: Experimental efficacy study of coated VICRYL plus antibacterial suture in guinea pigs challenged with Staphylococcus aureus. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 5:281, 2004. PUBMED Abstract

  139. Swiderski J, Fitch RB, Staatz A, et al: Sonographic assisted diagnosis and treatment of bilateral gastrocnemius tendon rupture in a Labrador retriever repaired with fascia lata and polypropylene mesh. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 18:258, 2005. PUBMED Abstract

  140. Szabo S, Wilkens B, Radasch RM: Use of polypropylene mesh in addition to internal obturator transposition: a review of 59 cases (2000–2004). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 43:136, 2007. PUBMED Abstract

  141. Than KD, Baird CJ, Olivi A: Polyethylene glycol hydrogel dural sealant may reduce incisional cerebrospinal fluid leak after posterior fossa surgery. Neurosurgery 63:ONS182, 2008. PUBMED Abstract

  142. Tobias KM: Surgical stapling devices in veterinary medicine: a review. Vet Surg 36:341, 2007. PUBMED Abstract

  143. Tobias KM, Cambridge A, Gavin P: Cyanoacrylate occlusion and resection of an arteriovenous fistula in a cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc 219:785, 2001. PUBMED Abstract

  144. Tomihata K, Suzuki M, Ikada Y: The pH dependence of monofilament sutures on hydrolytic degradation. J Biomed Mater Res 58:511, 2001. PUBMED Abstract

  145. Toombs JP, Clark KM: Basic operative techniques. In Slatter D, editor: Textbook of small animal surgery, ed 3, vol 1, Philadelphia, 2003, Saunders, p 199.

  146. Trimbos JB, Booster M, Peters AA: Mechanical knot performance of a new generation polydioxanone suture (PDS-2). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 70:157, 1991. PUBMED Abstract

  147. Trimbos JB, Klopper PJ: Knot security of synthetic absorbable suture material; a comparison of polyglycolic acid and polyglactin-910. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 19:183, 1985. PUBMED Abstract

  148. Trimbos JB, Niggebrugge A, Trimbos R, et al: Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl). Eur J Surg 161:319, 1995. PUBMED Abstract

  149. Trostle SS, Rosin E: Selection of prosthetic mesh implants. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 16:1147, 1994.

  150. Ullman SL, Pavletic MM, Clark GN: Open intestinal anastomosis with surgical stapling equipment in 24 dogs and cats. Vet Surg 20:385, 1991. PUBMED Abstract

  151. Van Vechten BJ, Komtebedde J, Koblik PD: Use of transcolonic portal scintigraphy to monitor blood flow and progressive postoperative attenuation of partially ligated single extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 204:1770, 1994. PUBMED Abstract

  152. Vasconcellos CHDC, Matera JM, Dagli MLZ: Clinical evaluation of random skin flaps based on the subdermal plexus secured with sutures or sutures and cyanoacrylate adhesive for reconstructive surgery in dogs. Vet Surg 34:59, 2005. PUBMED Abstract

  153. Voytik-Harbin SL, Brightman AO, Kraine MR, et al: Identification of extractable growth factors from small intestinal submucosa. J Cell Biochem 67:478, 1997. PUBMED Abstract

  154. Watté CM, Elks R, Moore DL, et al: Clinical experience with butyl-2-cyanoacrylate adhesive in the management of canine and feline corneal disease. Vet Ophthalmol 7:319, 2004.PUBMED Abstract

  155. Whitson BA, Cheng BC, Kokini K, et al: Multilaminate resorbable biomedical device under biaxial loading. J Biomed Mater Res 43:277, 1998. PUBMED Abstract

  156. Wilson LK, Sullivan S, Goodnight W, et al: The use of blunt needles does not reduce glove perforations during obstetrical laceration repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:641e1, 2008.PUBMED Abstract

  157. Wright PB, Budoff JE, Yeh ML, et al: Strength of damaged suture: an in vitro study. Arthroscopy 22:1270, 2006. PUBMED Abstract

  158. Wright PB, Kosmopoulos V, Cote RE, et al: FiberWire is superior in strength to stainless steel wire for tension band fixation of transverse patellar fractures. Injury 40:1200, 2009. PUBMED Abstract

  159. Wust DM, Meyer DC, Favre P, et al: Mechanical and handling properties of braided polyblend polyethylene sutures in comparison to braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures. Arthroscopy 22:1146, 2006. PUBMED Abstract

  160. Yao J, Korotkova T, Riboh J, et al: Bioactive sutures for tendon repair: assessment of a method of delivering pluripotential embryonic cells. J Hand Surg (Am) 33:1558, 2008. PUBMED Abstract

  161. Yin-Chao T, Yasuhiko T, Suong-Hyu H, et al: In vitro toxicity test of 2-cyanoacrylate polymers by cell culture method. J Biomed Mater Res 24:1355, 1990. PUBMED Abstract

  162. Yoo J, Chandarana S, Cosby R: Clinical application of tissue adhesives in soft-tissue surgery of the head and neck. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 16:312, 2008. PUBMED Abstract

  163. Youmans KR, Hunt GB: Experimental evaluation of four methods of progressive venous attenuation in dogs. Vet Surg 28:38, 1999. PUBMED Abstract

  164. Zurita R, Puiggali J, Rodriguez-Galan A: Loading and release of ibuprofen in multi- and monofilament surgical sutures. Macromol Biosci 6:767, 2006. PUBMED Abstract
1   ...   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   ...   55

Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur © 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət