Re- Notification Amendment C142 – Summary of submissions
|
Submission Number
|
Submitter Details
|
Affected Property
|
Submission Type
|
Summary of Submission
|
Key Issue
|
Response to submission
|
Recommendation
|
1
|
Housing Industry Association Ltd
Mike Hermon
Assistant Director
Planning and Environment Vic
GPO Box 1614
MELBOURNE VIC 3001
|
N/A
|
Object
|
Standards for higher density development across Melbourne should be consistent.
Extensive and rigorous consultation before introducing any new policies in this area.
|
State issue
Further consultation needed
|
Minister has indicated standards for higher density development will not proceed at this stage.
HIA will be invited to make submission to Panel.
|
Refer to Panel
|
2
|
Stonington City Council
Manager City Strategy
Susan Price
PO Box 21
PRAHRAN VIC 3181
|
N/A
|
Support
|
Support of Moreland’s approach in the absence of State planning regulations for design standards for high density housing
|
State issue
|
Minister has indicated standards for higher density development will not proceed at this stage.
|
Noted
|
3
|
Property Council of Australia
Jennifer Cunich
Victorian Executive Director
Level 7
136 Exhibition Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
|
N/A
|
Object
|
Amendment is premature.
Implications on affordability and housing choice must be carefully assessed prior to implementation.
Standards for higher density development across Melbourne should be consistent.
Extensive and rigorous consultation before introducing any new policies in this area.
|
State issue
Further consultation needed
|
Minister has indicated standards for higher density development will not proceed at this stage.
Impact on affordability mitigated by higher quality accommodation and reduced energy bills (refer to Testing be Design outcomes)
Panel process provides further opportunity for consultation
|
Refer to Panel
|
4
|
SJB Planning on behalf of 362-366 Lygon Street, Brunswick East.
Sarah Watts
Planner
Level 1, Building D
80 Dorcas Street
Southbank VIC 3006
|
362-366 Lygon Street, Brunswick East.
|
Object
|
Lack of strategic justification and contrary to Plan Melbourne, SPPF and LPPF
Conflict with ResCode and GHDRD
MADC and its application of Standards and design guidelines is unnecessarily prescriptive and in some instances conflicts with existing provisions in the planning scheme.
ESD, daylight, natural ventilation and bicycle parking provisions too onerous
Building separation requirements have adverse impact on equitable development
|
Lack of justification
Policy duplication
Poorly drafted
Too prescriptive
|
MADC is needed because lack of adequate State guidelines
ResCode and does not address building typologies for apartment style development
GHDRD out-of-date and does not adequately address apartment style development
Language in MADC to be amended to replace ‘must’ with ‘should’ for discretionary provisions
ESD, daylight, natural ventilation provisions essential to achieve liveability
Review bicycle provisions in light of expert evidence to C123 Panel
Review car parking provisions in light of higher requirements for bicycle requirements
Building separation standards based on NSW standards and essential to ensure access to daylight and sunlight
|
Refer to Panel
|
5
|
SJB Planning on behalf of 269 Steward Street Brunswick East.
Sarah Watts
Planner
Level 1, Building D
80 Dorcas Street
Southbank VIC 3006
|
269 Steward Street and, Brunswick East
|
Object
|
Lack of strategic justification and contrary to Plan Melbourne, SPPF and LPPF
MADC and its application of Standards and design guidelines is unnecessarily prescriptive and in some instances conflicts with existing provisions in the planning scheme.
ESD, daylight, natural ventilation and bicycle parking provisions too onerous
Amendment documentation does not provide adequate justification for departure from accepted best planning practices.
|
Policy duplication
Poorly drafted
Too prescriptive
|
MADC is needed because lack of adequate State guidelines
Language in MADC to be amended to replace ‘must’ with ‘should’ for discretionary provisions
ESD, daylight, natural ventilation provisions essential to achieve liveability
Review bicycle provisions in light of expert evidence to C123 Panel
Review car parking provisions in light of higher requirements for bicycle requirements
|
Refer to Panel
|
6
|
SJB Planning on behalf of 119a-121 Lygon Street and 193 Edward Street, Brunswick.
Sarah Watts
Planner
Level 1, Building D
80 Dorcas Street
Southbank VIC 3006
|
119a-121 Lygon Street and 193 Edward Street, Brunswick
|
Object
|
Lack of strategic justification and contrary to Plan Melbourne, SPPF and LPPF
MADC and its application of Standards and design guidelines is unnecessarily prescriptive and in some instances conflicts with existing provisions in the planning scheme.
ESD, daylight, natural ventilation and bicycle parking provisions too onerous
Amendment documentation does not provide adequate justification for departure from accepted best planning practices.
|
Policy duplication
Poorly drafted
Too prescriptive
|
MADC is needed because lack of adequate State guidelines
Language in MADC to be amended to replace ‘must’ with ‘should’ for discretionary provisions
ESD, daylight, natural ventilation provisions essential to achieve liveability
Review bicycle provisions in light of expert evidence to C123 Panel
Review car parking provisions in light of higher requirements for bicycle requirements
|
Refer to Panel
|
7
|
Norton Rose Fulbright on behalf of Shayher Properties Pty Ltd.
Tamara Brezzi
Partner
Level 15
RACV Tower
485 Bourke Street
MELBOURNE VIC 3000
|
Valad Pentridge Nos 1 to 6
|
Object
(Maintains submission 18 to Amendment C142 exhibition on behalf of Valad Pentridge No 1,2,3,4,5,6.
|
Future planning permit applications within the Pentridge precinct should be exempt from having to be assessed against the HDDC because a detailed set of design guidelines and a masterplan for the land already exist
|
Pentridge has existing specific controls.
|
Pentridge masterpplan and design guidelines do not adequately address concerns with apartment style development in terms of passive design, internal amenity and facilities and external amenity impacts.
|
Refer to Panel
|
8
|
Boroondara City Council
Liam Wilkinson
Strategic Planner
Private Bag 1
CAMBERWELL VIC 3124
|
N/A
|
Support
|
Supports the work undertaken by Council to prepare and revise an Apartment Design Code.
Reiterates the importance of greater coordination and leadership to deliver consistent standards throughout Victoria.
|
State issue
|
Minister has indicated standards for higher density development will not proceed at this stage.
|
Noted
|
9
|
Best Hooper Solicitors on behalf of Sedmap Investments Pty Ltd.
John Cicero
563 Little Collins Street
MELBOURNE VIC 3000
|
267 Lygon Street, Brunswick
|
Object
|
Amendment is premature and lacks strategic justification.
Standards across Melbourne should be consistent.
Impact on housing diversity or housing affordability has not been considered.
Amendment should not proceed until outcomes of State Government Apartment Design Code are known.
Introduction of the MADC as an incorporated document is not an appropriate mechanism.
Mandatory requirements throughout the document are problematic.
Mandatory standards are contrary to the operation section of the document (pg 3-4).
|
State issue
Policy duplication
Poorly drafted
Too prescriptive
|
Minister has indicated standards for higher density development will not proceed at this stage.
MADC seeks to promote more diversity by encouraging development to have a range of bedroom numbers
Impact on affordability mitigated by higher quality accommodation and reduced energy bills (refer to Testing be Design outcomes)
As an Incorporated Document, MADC will have more statutory weight
Language in MADC to be amended to replace ‘must’ with ‘should’ for discretionary provisions
|
|
10
|
VicRoads
Frank Deserio
Snr Structure Planning Engineer
499 Ballarat Road
SUNSHINE VIC 3020
|
N/A
|
Modify
|
Vehicle entries within the public realm interface should be regulated through MADC.
Modify MACD to include under vehicle entry recommendations under Section D.3.
|
Specific changes recommended.
|
Amend MADC to include VicRoads’ suggestions
|
Advise VicRoads Council accepts VicRoad’s suggestion.
|
11
|
Planning and Property Partners Pty Ltd
Mark Naughton
Duckboard House
Level 2
91-93 Flinders Lane
MELBOURNE VIC 3000
On behalf of Tallow Group Pty Ltd and Alocor Pty Ltd
|
Various multi-dwelling proposals within Brunswick Activity Centre
|
Objection
|
Current planning policies and strategies already provide an appropriate platform to guide higher density residential development in the municipality.
Such policy would be more appropriate if implemented at a State level.
Proposed requirements are excessively restrictive.
Bicycle and car parking requirements are contrary or repeat from Clause 52.06 and 52.34.
A blanket approach to the form and internal layout of multi-dwelling development will discourage site responsive and innovative design solutions.
MADC is poorly drafted; widespread use of mandatory language is applied to a large number of discretionary requirements and standards.
|
Too prescriptive
State issue
Policy duplication
Poorly drafted
|
MADC is needed because lack of adequate State guidelines
Minister has indicated standards for higher density development will not proceed at this stage.
Provisions are not excessively restrictive. They reflect NSW standards and are required to ensure a reasonable standard of development for residents in apartments.
Language in MADC to be amended to replace ‘must’ with ‘should’ for discretionary provisions
|
Refer to Panel
|
12
|
Yarra City Council
Sherry Hopkins
Coordinator Strategic Planning
PO Box 168
RICHMOND VIC 3121
|
N/A
|
Do not wish to submit
|
|
|
|
Noted
|
13
|
Pamela Morgan
42A Ross Street
COBURG VIC 3058
|
N/A
|
Modify
|
Heat island effect is mentioned in Section D 2.8 Open Space and Landscape Design. The whole section should be strengthen to require a report that assess the impact that every new apartment block has on the heat island effect and mitigation strategies that can be employed should be incorporated in this section.
|
Specific changes recommended
|
Council is preparing strategies on the heat island effect through its Zero Carbon Evolution Strategy which include policies to encourage more vegetation in urban areas and within sites
|
Refer to Panel
|
Yüklə 57.5 Kb.