Mari Georges of ilog, France wrote: Statement

I regret to say that I find that the initiative is off on the wrong track, treating the symptom & not the cause.  This is at least partially reflected by the statement in

"The under-representation of women in all the relevant IST collectives – as project coordinators, external evaluators, or in the own DG INFSO structure - can be traced to the poor attractive that technological careers has had for women until the last years. Although this situation has changed, [...]"

The situation has only slightly evolved, & therein lies the problem.  Women are simply not massively nor even proportionally present in the IT & technological areas addressed by the Framework Programmes.  So of course they're not present as project coordinators, external evaluators, reviewers or even CEU 'responsibles'. :-(
The quote above goes on to say: "this explains especially the absence of women in decision-making senior positions. [...]"

Unfortunately, no. This does not explain the absence of women there.

The underlying problems are:

 - to attract women to the passionate areas of IT & technology

 - to remove the barriers ('glass ceilings') for those who are already there.

Both of these are cultural issues - & neither can be addressed at the level of Framework Programmes, rather at educational, governmental, cultural (cinematographic, literary, ...), marketing, etc. levels.