Accession Numbers for Nuclear and Mitochondrial Genes
Order
|
Species
|
A2AB
|
IRBP
|
vWF
|
12S-16S
|
BRCA1
|
Carnivora
|
Cat, Felis catus
|
AJ251174
|
Z11811
|
U31613
|
U20753
|
AF284018
|
|
Dog, Canis familiaris
|
|
|
L76227
|
U96639
|
U50709
|
|
Fox, Vulpes velox
|
|
AF179293
|
|
|
|
|
Harbor seal, Phoca vitulina
|
AJ251176
|
|
|
|
|
Cetartiodactyla
|
Cow, Bos taurus
|
Y15944
|
J04441
|
AF004285
|
J01394
|
AF284013
|
|
Fin whale, Balaenoptera physalus
|
AJ251175
|
|
|
X61145
|
|
|
Hippo, Hippopotamus amphibius
|
AJ251178
|
AF108837
|
AF108832
|
AJ010957
|
AF284015
|
|
Humpback whale, Megaptera novaeangliae
|
|
|
AF226849
|
|
AF284017
|
|
Minke whale, Balaenoptera acutorostrata
|
|
U50820
|
|
|
|
|
Fin whale, Balaenoptera physalus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Llama, Lama glama
|
|
|
|
|
AF284012
|
|
Pig, Sus scrofa
|
AJ251177
|
U48588
|
S78431
|
AJ002189
|
AF284014
|
|
Sperm whale, Physeter catodon
|
|
|
|
|
AF284016
|
Chiroptera
|
Big eared bat, Macrotus californicus
|
AJ251180
|
|
|
|
|
|
False Vampire bat, Megaderma lyra
|
|
|
|
|
AF203749
|
|
Flying fox, Pteropus hypomelanus
|
|
Z11809
|
|
U93073,
AF069537
|
|
|
Flying fox, Pteropus rayneri
|
|
|
|
|
AF203751
|
|
Free-tailed bat,Tadarida brasiliensis
|
|
|
|
|
AF203747
|
|
Flying Fox, Cynopterus sphinx
|
AJ251181
|
|
|
|
AF203750
|
|
Fruit bat, Dobsonia moluccensis
|
|
|
U31609
|
|
|
|
Leaf-nosed bat, Hipposideros commersoni
|
|
|
|
|
AF203752
|
|
Little Brown bat,Myotis dobentoni
|
|
|
|
|
AF203746
|
|
Neotropical fruit bat, Artibeus jamaicensis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Round eared bat, Tonatia bidens
|
|
Z11810
|
U31622
|
AF179288
|
AF203745
|
|
Tomb bat, Taphozous sp.
|
|
|
|
|
AF203748
|
Dermoptera
|
Flying lemur, Cynocephalus volans
|
|
|
|
AF203726
|
|
|
Flying lemur, Cynocephalus variegatus
|
AJ251182
|
Z11807
|
U31606
|
AF038018
|
AF019081
|
Didelphimorphia
|
Large American Opossum,
Didelphis virginiana |
|
Z11814
|
AF226848
|
Z29573
|
|
|
Large American Opossum,
Didelphis marsupialis |
Y15943
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thick-tailed Opossum,
|
|
|
|
|
AF284032
|
Diprotodontia
|
Kangaroo, Macropus rufus
|
AJ251183
|
|
|
AF027985
|
AF284033
|
|
Kangaroo, Macropus giganteus
|
|
|
AJ224670
|
|
|
|
Wombat, Vombatus ursinus
|
|
AF025386
|
|
|
AF284031
|
Hyracoidea
|
Rock Hyrax, Procavia capensis
|
Y12523
|
U48586
|
U31619
|
U97335,
U60184
|
AF284023
|
|
Tree Hyrax, Dendrohyrax dorsalis
|
|
|
|
|
AF284024
|
Insectivora
|
Eastern mole, Scalopus aquaticus
|
|
|
AF076479
|
AF069539
|
AF284007
|
|
European mole, Talpa europaea
|
Y12520
|
|
|
|
|
|
Golden mole, Amblysomus hottentotus
|
Y12526
|
|
U97534
|
U97336
|
AF284027
|
|
Hedgehog, Erinaceus europaeus
|
Y12521
|
AF025390
|
U97536
|
X88898
|
AF284008
|
|
Madagascar hedgehog,
Echinops telfairi |
Y17692
|
|
AF076478
|
AF069540
|
AF284025
|
|
Shrew, Sorex palustris
|
|
U48587
|
|
|
|
|
Tenrec, Tenrec ecaudatus
|
|
|
|
|
AF284026
|
Lagomorpha
|
Rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus
|
Y15946
|
Z11812
|
U31618
|
AJ001588
|
|
|
Jackrabbit, Lepus capensis
|
|
|
|
|
AF284005
|
Macroscelidea
|
Long-eared Elephant shrew, Elephantulus rufescens
|
|
U48584
|
U31612
|
U97339
|
AF284028
|
|
Rond-eared Elephant shrew, Macroscelides proboscideus
|
Y12524
|
|
|
|
|
|
Giant Elephant shrew,
Rhynchocyon sp.
|
|
|
|
|
AF284029
|
Perissodactyla
|
Black Rhino, Diceros bicornis
|
AJ251184
|
|
|
|
AF284011
|
|
Donkey, Equus asinus
|
|
|
U31610
|
|
|
|
Horse, Equus caballus
|
Y15945
|
U48710
|
|
X79547
|
AF284010
|
|
Tapir, Tapirus pinchaque
|
|
AF179294
|
|
|
|
|
White Rhino, Ceratotherium simum
|
|
|
U31604
|
Y07726
|
|
Pholidota
|
Pangolin, Manis sp.
|
AJ251185
|
AF025389
|
U97535
|
U97340,
U61079
|
AF284009
|
Primates
|
Chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes
|
|
|
|
|
AF019075
|
|
Galago, Otolemur crassicaudatus
|
|
Z11805
|
AF061064
|
AF179289
|
AF019080
|
|
Gorilla,Gorilla gorilla
|
|
|
|
|
AF019076
|
|
Howler Monkey, Alouatta seniculus
|
|
|
|
|
AF019079
|
|
Human, Homo sapiens
|
M34041
|
J05253
|
M25851
|
J01415
|
U14680
|
|
Orangutan, Pongo pygmaeus
|
|
|
|
|
AF019077
|
|
Rhesus, Macaca mulatta
|
|
|
|
|
AF019078
|
|
Slow loris, Nycticebus coucang
|
AJ251186
|
|
|
|
|
Proboscidea
|
African elephant, Loxodonta africana
|
|
U48711
|
U31615
|
AF039436,
U60182
|
AF284021
|
|
Asian elephant, Elephas maximus
|
Y12525
|
|
|
|
AF284022
|
Rodentia
|
Agouti, Dasyprocta agouti
|
|
|
U31607
|
|
|
|
Capybara, Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris
|
|
|
|
U61081,
AF069533
|
|
|
Flying Squirrel, Glaucomys volans
|
|
|
|
|
AF284003
|
|
Guinea pig, Cavia porcellus
|
AJ271336
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mouse, Mus musculus
|
|
Z11813
|
|
|
U36475
|
|
North American Porcupine, Erethizon dorsatum
|
|
AF179292
|
|
|
|
|
Old Word Porcupine, Hystrix africaeaustralis
|
|
|
|
|
AF284004
|
|
Rat, Rattus norvegicus
|
M32061
|
|
U50044
|
X14848
|
AF036760
|
Scandentia
|
Tree shrew, Tupaia glis
|
|
Z11808
|
AF061063
|
|
|
|
Tree shrew, Tupaia tana
|
AJ251187
|
|
|
AF038021,
AF203727
|
AF284006
|
Sirenia
|
Dugong, Dugong dugon
|
Y15947
|
U48583
|
U31608
|
U60185,
AF179291
|
AF284019
|
|
Manatee, Trichechus manatus
|
|
|
|
|
AF284020
|
Tubulidentata
|
Aardvark, Orycteropus afer
|
Y12522
|
U48712
|
U31617
|
U97338
|
AF284030
|
Xenarthra
|
Anteater, Tamandua tetradactyla
|
|
|
|
|
AF284001
|
|
Hairy Armadillo,
Chaetophractus villosus
|
|
|
|
|
AF284000
|
|
Nine-banded Armadillo,
Dasypus novemcinctus |
|
|
|
|
AF283999
|
|
Three toed sloth, Bradypus tridactylus
|
AJ251179
|
U48708
|
U31603
|
AF069535,
AF038022
|
AF284002
|
Maximum Likelihood Tree for the 8655 bp Data Set
Bootstrap Support Values for Analyses with the 8655 bp Data Set
Node
|
Parsimony
|
Transversion Parsimony
|
Minimum Evolution with
Logdet Distances
|
Maximum Likelihood
|
Afrotheria
|
99
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
Laurasiatheria
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
Euarchonta + Glires
|
15
|
61
|
1
|
88
|
Bootstrap support values based on analyses with the 8655 bp data set. The outgroup was a chimaeric diprotodontian marsupial. The 26 placental taxa from the BRCA1 data set that were concatenated with the 5708 bp data set were as follows: sloth, dugong, African elephant, rock hyrax, aardvark, long-eared elephant shrew, mouse, Old World porcupine, jackrabbit, human, galago, flying lemur, tree shrew, flying fox, round-eared bat, horse, rhino, pig, cow, hippo, humpback whale, pangolin, cat, dog, mole, and hedgehog. The transition to transversion ratio used in maximum likelihood was 1.92. Levels of bootstrap support for Euarchonta + Glires were variable with different methods (e.g., 1% support with minimum evolution; 88% support with maximum likelihood). This variation resulted from differences in the position of the root. However, all methods provided robust bootstrap support (97 to 100%) for Euarchonta + Glires on unrooted trees. Also on unrooted trees, a branch separating Xenarthra + Afrotheria from Laurasiatheria + Euarchonta + Glires was supported at the 100% bootstrap level with all methods.
Results of Monte Carlo Simulations and Parsimony Trees for BRCA1
We assumed the tree in Figure 1b, as well as the shortest parsimony trees for the BRCA1 data set (see below), for purposes of Monte Carlo simulations to determine whether or not we should expect to see systematic rooting errors with parsimony and/or likelihood. Monte Carlo simulations, also known as parametric bootstrapping, use numerical simulation rather than resampling (nonparametric bootstrapping) to generate pseudoreplicate samples1. Monte Carlo simulations were performed using the program Seq-Gen2. Branch lengths for all trees were estimated using maximum likelihood following Hillis et al.1 and Huelsenbeck3. We used the HKY85 model of sequence evolution,with parameterizations (i.e., base frequencies, transition to transversion ratio) derived from the actual BRCA1 data set. 100 data sets were simulated for each tree. Data sets were the same size as the original (2947 nucleotides). Seq-Gen settings corresponding to the above were as follows: -mhky –t2.22 –n100 –l2947 –f0.365,0.188,0.218,0.229.
For the simulated data sets that were based on the parsimony trees, both parsimony and likelihood recovered the correct root (Old World porcupine) with high frequency (>95%) and there were no indications of systematic errors in rooting. However, analyses with the simulated data sets that assumed a root on branch c, as in Figure 1b, demonstrated systematic errors in rooting with parsimony. Likelihood recovered the correct root in 77% of the simulations and rooted on topologically adjacent branches (base of Afrotheria or base of Xenarthra) in the other 23% of the simulations. Parsimony never recovered the correct root. Instead, Monte Carlo results agreed with our nonparametric bootstrap results for the actual BRCA1 data set – parsimony rooted the tree on long branches within the Euarchonta-Glires group at high frequency (89%). Rooting on branch c (as in Figure 1b) required 8 to 48 additional steps in the simulations versus 35 steps for the actual data set. Based on the distribution of simulated values, the null hypothesis that parsimony will find an incorrect root that is at least 35 steps shorter than the correctly rooted tree could not be rejected (P = 0.16).
References
-
Hillis, D. M., Mable, B. K. & Moritz, C. in Molecular Systematics (eds Hillis, D. M., Moritz, C. & Mable, B. K.) 407-492 (Sinauer, Massachusetts, 1996).
-
Rambaut, A. & Grassly, N. C. Seq-Gen: An application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13, 303-306 (1997).
-
Huelsenbeck, J. P. Is the Felsenstein Zone a fly trap? Syst. Biol. 46, 69-74 (1997).
Molecular Divergence Estimates
We used the quartet dating method (QDATE) of Rambaut and Bromham1 with the 5708 and 2947 bp data sets. This method requires two pairs of sister taxa in conjunction with reliable divergence dates for each of these pairs. The method then estimates the timing of the split between these two groups. QDATE can be used to estimate dates under one- and two-rate models. The former model assumes the same rate over the entire quartet whereas the latter model allows different rates for each pair within the quartet. We used the two-rate model in all of our comparisons. A likelihood ratio test indicated that the two rate model was not significantly different from an unconstrained five-rate model for all of the comparisons that we report. QDATE will only return dates when likelihood scores for the one- or two-rate models are not significantly different from the unconstrained five-rate model. With the 5708 bp data set, we used elephant to hyrax at 60 million years years (Gheerbrant et al.2; McKenna and Bell3; Amrine and Springer4) within Afrotheria and hippomorph to ceratomorph at 55 million within Laurasiatheria (Waddell et al5). Because of rate variation in the 2947 data set, it was necessary to use elephant (Loxodonta) to dugong (at 60 million years) instead of elephant to hyrax when calculating the divergence between Afrotheria and Laurasiatheria. We used the HKY85 model of sequence evolution with transition to transversion ratios and shape parameters for the gamma distribution that were estimated from four-taxon trees with PAUP 4.0b26.
Based on the 5708 bp data set, we estimate that Afrotheria and Laurasiatheria diverged at approximately 111 million years; 95% confidence intervals on this estimate are 104 and 119 million years. Based on the 2947 bp data set, we estimate that Afrotheria and Laurasiatheria diverged at 118 million years, with 95% confidence intervals of 108 and 131 million years.
References
-
Rambaut, A. & Bromham, L. Estimating divergence dates from molecular sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 442-448 (1998).
-
Gheerbrant, E., Sudre, J. & Cappetta, H. A Palaeocene proboscidean from Morocco. Nature 383, 68-70 (1996).
-
McKenna, M. C. & Bell, S. K. Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1997).
-
Amrine, H. M. & Springer, M. S. Maximum likelihood analysis of the tethythere hypothesis based on a multigene data set and a comparison of different models of sequence evolution. J. Mammal. Evol. 6, 161-176 (1999).
-
Waddell, P. J., Cao, Y., Hasegawa, M. & Mindell, D. P. Assessing the Cretaceous superordinal divergence times within birds and placental mammals by using whole mitochondrial protein sequences and an extended statistical framework. Syst. Biol. 48, 119-137 (1999).
-
Swofford, D. L. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods). Version 4, (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 1998).
Statistical tests of a priori hypotheses
|
Parsimony-5708
|
Likelihood-5708
|
|
Parsimony-2947
|
Constraints
|
Length
|
|
|
KH-test
|
|
|
-ln L
|
|
|
KH-test
|
|
|
Length
|
|
|
KH-test
|
|
Best tree (28 and 52)
|
12477
|
|
|
|
|
|
66116.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
10867
|
|
|
|
|
Best tree (30)
|
13119
|
|
|
|
|
|
69175.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
W/o Afrotheria
|
12521
|
|
44
|
0.0411
|
*
|
|
66226.79
|
|
110.7
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
|
10885
|
#
|
18
|
0.3020-0.3204
|
|
W/o Cetartiodactyla
|
12534
|
|
57
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
|
66306.08
|
|
190.0
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
|
10907
|
#
|
40
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
W/o Eulipotyphla
|
12503
|
#
|
26
|
0.0755-0.2412
|
|
|
66164.53
|
|
48.4
|
0.0406
|
*
|
|
10892
|
#
|
25
|
0.1317-0.1496
|
|
W/o Glires
|
|
12484
|
|
7
|
0.7626
|
|
|
66127.68
|
|
11.6
|
0.7063
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
|
W/o Hippo + Whale
|
12489
|
|
12
|
0.3428
|
|
|
66146.22
|
|
30.1
|
0.1075
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
|
W/o Laurasiatheria
|
12501
|
|
24
|
0.0410
|
*
|
|
66185.09
|
|
69.9
|
0.0547
|
|
|
10888
|
#
|
21
|
0.0002-0.0054
|
*
|
W/o Paenungulata
|
12516
|
|
39
|
0.0001
|
*
|
|
66206.76
|
|
90.7
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
|
10888
|
#
|
21
|
0.0033-0.0153
|
*
|
W/ Altungulata
|
12642
|
|
165
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
|
66770.77
|
|
654.7
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
|
10986
|
#
|
119
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
W/ Anagalida
|
12603
|
|
126
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
|
66494.68
|
|
378.6
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
|
10994
|
|
127
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
W/ Archonta
|
12536
|
|
59
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
|
66346.50
|
|
230.4
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
|
10931
|
#
|
64
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
W/ Artiodactyla
|
12517
|
#
|
40
|
0.0086-0.0160
|
*
|
|
66213.54
|
|
97.4
|
<0.0021
|
*
|
|
10893
|
#
|
26
|
0.0001-0.0019
|
*
|
W/ Edentata
|
12526
|
|
49
|
0.0261
|
*
|
|
66204.94
|
|
88.8
|
0.0039
|
*
|
|
10925
|
#
|
58
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
W/ Glires
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
10892
|
#
|
25
|
0.1260-0.1469
|
|
W/ Hippo + Whale
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
10871
|
#
|
4
|
0.3174-0.5372
|
|
W/ Lipotyphla
|
13216
|
+
|
97
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
|
69574.66
|
+
|
399.4
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
|
10960
|
|
93
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
W/ Microchiroptera
|
NA
|
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
|
NA
|
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
|
10873
|
#
|
6
|
0.0578-0.3429
|
|
W/ Tethytheria
|
12489
|
|
12
|
0.1515
|
|
|
66125.12
|
|
9.0
|
0.5902
|
|
|
10874
|
|
7
|
0.1083
|
|
W/ Ungulata
|
12655
|
|
178
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
|
66702.79
|
|
586.7
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
|
10999
|
#
|
132
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
W/ Volitantia
|
12541
|
|
64
|
0.0007
|
*
|
|
66328.56
|
|
212.5
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
|
10929
|
#
|
62
|
<0.0001
|
*
|
All tests were performed with marsupial outgroups included (28 taxa for 5708 bp data set; 52 taxa for 2947 bp data set). Trees with different constraints were tested against the best parsimony and likelihood trees without these constraints. Lipotyphlan monophyly with the 5708 bp data set was evaluated with a 30 taxon data set that additionally included golden mole and tenrec. Asterisks denote significance at P < 0.05. W/o, without clade if relationship was present on best tree; W/, with clade if relationship was not present on the best tree; #, more than one equally most parsimonious tree; +, best tree with lipotyphlan monophyly and 30 taxa. |