Ana səhifə

Ucla economics Department 2012 Commencement Speaker Dr. Michael J. Burry


Yüklə 16.81 Kb.
tarix18.07.2016
ölçüsü16.81 Kb.
UCLA Economics Department 2012 Commencement Speaker

Dr. Michael J. Burry
PROFESSOR ROGER FARMER: Now it is with great honor that I introduce today’s keynote speaker Dr. Michael Bury. Michael is one of our own, an economics graduate of the class of 1993, and we are thrilled that he has comeback to campus to speak today. He is joined by his wife, Anti, and his sons, Michael and Nicholas, his brother-in-law, John and sister-in-law Anmin. Michael was an exceptional undergraduate here at UCLA. As if a full course load as an econ major wasn’t enough, he also managed to fulfill rigorous pre-med requirements. After leaving UCLA he preceded to earn his medical degree at Vanderbilt, but the drawer of the investment world soon overcame his desire to practice medicine. By the time he founded Scion Capital in 2000, Michael had already earned a stellar reputation as investor with extraordinary vision. Now about a year and a half after the financial crisis hit in 2008, Queen Elizabeth of England visited the London School of Economics, and she asked the distinguished faculty there why no one had predicted the financial crisis. She should’ve come to UCLA because Michael did. He used his vision to predict the collapse of America’s financial and real estate market’s. He foresaw the failure of companies such as AIG, Fanny Mae, Freddy Mac, Country Wide Financial, and Washington Mutual. You might recognize his story from his profile in Michael Lewis’s 2010 best selling book, “The Big Short.” Michael closed Scion Capital in 2008, and these days he funds startups and invests his own money. Michael will no doubt have some predictions for all of us in the audience today, and certainly some precedent words of advice for the class of 2012. I know we will all be inspired by his story and his vision. And now it gives me great pleasure to welcome the UCLA Economics Commencement Speaker for the class of 2012, Dr. Michael Burry.

(2:25) DR. MICHAEL BURRY: Thank you Professor Farmer. Class of 2012 congratulations, it’s quite an achievement to graduate from UCLA. You know it’s nice to be back in Westwood, I certainly have fond memories of my time here. In many ways the campus is much the same but in some ways I can see it’s different. I do know your campus life has been much different than mine. Twenty years ago I had no internet, no smart phone, no cell phone I don’t think, you know, but I did invest my summer earnings in stocks and futures and I remember being absolutely starved for information. I had to send away for financial statements, sometimes waiting weeks for a response and I would take a near daily trip to Westwood to pick up a Wallstreet Journal to check yesterday’s stock quotes. Today it’s much different. Information swarms us, it comforts us, it disrupts us. It’s an age of infinite distraction for those so willing. You are the generation that has had instant messaging, Facebook, Twitter, and Angry Birds nagging your fingertips at every moment. It’s been arguably as addictive as any drug throughout history and I do imagine it took some terrific willpower during your studies to study. Of course it’s not lost on anyone that you started your term at UCLA in the midst of a global financial panic, the consequences of which are far from settled. The fault is not your own, but the future it leaves certainly is. As a result of what happened while you were growing up, you now face a future that will feature either another great recession during your 20s or during your 40s, a US debt-to-GDP ratio exceeding 200%, and that’s not me, that is the Congressional Budget Office. Me, I think they are ignoring reflexivity and I think you face both. Now Greece was at 160% debt-to-GDP when the last of its dying life started running out. From my perspective this is all the more tragic because the financial meltdown was both predictable and preventable. This was no black swan and no other serendipitous excuse should be acceptable to anyone. Of late Europe’s convulsions are in the news. Even this should not be surprising. Back in 2006 when a bunch of us shorted Portugal, Italy, Greece, and Spain we called them “the Pigs” for a reason. I can explain it in one sentence: when the entitled elect themselves, the party accelerates, the brutal hangover is inevitable. Californians, and indeed all Americans, ought to take note. My career after UCLA arced in such a manner that I found myself right in the middle of the financial meltdown, profiting from it because I had predicted it. I had been a chicken little or a Cassandra, to some, especially in government … I am one lucky S.O.B. In truth, I was just trying to figure it all out.

From my earliest years I found that life, for all its amazing possibilities, very often does not make sense and, at least as often, is not fair. Today it is absolutely not fair, the world you are being dealt…. There are many ways to deal with an unfair world. One may tune out, drop out, run away. One may get angry, one may fight. One could do ultimately what I did: accept the world for what it is, work hard to exploit the opportunities it presents, and try to do so in as just a manner as possible. Now there are two kinds of working hard: you can work smart or you can work dumb. When I was in sixth grade my dad dumped a pile of bricks in the backyard and after school he had us, me and my brothers, move the bricks to the side yard. The next day he had us move them back to the backyard, next day back to the side yard, and so forth. This continued for quite awhile. I’m not sure what he intended by this but I did learn that work, hard work, for hard work’s sake alone would not do. Later, in observing the tenure system so endemic to academic ventures, I would think to myself, “Hey they are just moving a pile of bricks”. In fact I began to doubt traditional education. I committed myself to educating myself as opportunities arose. Still as I graduated from UCLA I headed to Vanderbilt Medical School. I had read by Liar’s Poker by Michael Lewis and it nearly convinced me that even if I could become a great money manager I shouldn’t. Besides, medicine appeared just. My interest in medicine would fade, however, as I studied economics and regulation of healthcare while in Chicago in 1994. The government payer would weigh far too heavily on that playing field and I did not think that it would be fair enough. So during medical school I put up a website, some ideas on stocks and markets. As I graduated medical school in 1997, Microsoft, out of the blue, offered me a dollar a word to write for the new MSN money website. Being wordy and being in debt naturally I said yes. So therefore, during my medicine internship I worked for Microsoft and ran my website. There were synergies between two of the three and I had unknowingly found a back door to Wallstreet. None of this was nearly as well planned as it seemed in retrospect. There were a number of crises including a divorce, and at one point I was so despondent over my direction that I even applied to law school. Again and again, I figured as long as I kept asking questions, working so hard to answer questions, I would eventually find my way.

As I turned 29, I ran out of reasons why I couldn’t or shouldn’t leave medicine to start an investment firm. At that point the decision came very easily. As perhaps should be the case more often than not, I simply weighed the paths before me without considering the path on which I had been. At Scion Capital, my job 24/7 was to ask questions and seek answers. I mostly examined stocks and bonds as long investments, but one day I came across a subprime, residential, mortgage-backed securitization and I wondered if I could figure out any of that. Other questions soon followed. Why are home prices diverging up and away from the household income trend line? Answer: if it’s not income, it’s leverage. What exactly are the incentives of lenders that make mortgages only to sell them on through to Wallstreet? Answer: volume at the expense of credit standards. When interest rates bottom, how far could lenders push mortgage terms in order to keep refinancings, home prices and loan volumes rising? The answer to this question would put a ticking timer on the boom and a date on the crash. Back in 2005 other questions stood out. How much is consumer spending dependent on cash-out refinancings? What percentages of jobs are dependent on the assumption of rising home prices? Won’t AIG have to start posting massive cash collateral for the first time if it were downgraded? Isn’t it worrisome that Fannie Mae cannot find term sheet that describe perfect hedges against its massive mortgage portfolio? Are the rating agencies so conflicted that they could be this blind? In my letters to investors I described a down turn that would be unprecedented with no counterpart in the modern era. Wallstreet’s risk models would fall all at once and every single CEO and every single politician would be disastrously wrong. I put my money with my mouth …was at its peak. I was short 8.4 billion dollars worth of subprime mortgages in certain financial companies. The most we could lose was less than 100 million dollars thanks to credit derivatives, and at first we did lose; it was a negative carry trade. Investors, business partners, and even employees questioned strategy; lawsuits were threatened, our distress was reported in the press, and Wallstreet looked to squeeze our short. Besides all this I had to stomach what I knew was coming, a tragic end to the follies. This was not fun; I did not tap dance to work. But the firm survived, we turned the tables on Wallstreet, and I became the one percent in a way I never imagined as I was sitting where you sit today. I had bet against America and won.



In 2010 I published an op-ed in the New York Times posting what I thought was a valid question of the Federal Reserve, Congress, and the President. I saw the crisis coming … why did not the Fed? Never did any member of Congress, any member of government for the matter, reach out to me for an open collegial discussion on what went wrong or what could be done. Rather, within two weeks, all six of my defunct funds were audited. The Congressional Financial Finance Inquiry Commission demanded all my emails and lists of people with whom I conversed going back to 2003, and a little later the FBI showed up. A million in legal and accounting costs and thousands of hours of time wasted - all because I asked questions. It seemed they would pump me at gun point or not at all. That summer the Federal Reserve put out a paper that concluded nothing in the field of economics or finance could have predicted what happened with regards to the housing bust and subsequent economic fallout. Ben Bernanke continues to backfill this logic and I fear that history is being written wrong yet again. The ignorance is willful. As we move forward as a country it is worth considering mainstream economics and finance in light of recent events. Our nation’s economic policies are born of a synthesis of theories on how to deal with Great Depression of the 1930s yet… seems unable to honestly examine the most recent one. Sadly at the highest levels of economic thought in government, questions are not tolerated. It is as if we are dealing with the binary judgment of a fundamentalist religion. Finance theory and practice fair no better. The continuing crisis makes a mockery of the principles which have guided credit policy and risk management since the 1960s. As it turns out information is not perfect, volatility does not define risk, markets are not efficient, the individual is adaptable. But the dark ages of finance allow no such light. Mainstream economists and finance practitioners, please check your premises. You have contradictions before you. Truthfully, I do not expect much to change; practically speaking, history has demonstrated the ability of sovereign nations to justify themselves and to postpone the moment of crisis. This will be even more true for the United States as the largest economy by far with the strongest central bank. As a result, over the course of your lives you will experience withering but stealthy attacks on your quality of life as government attempts to manage its faltering finances. You will see declines in the quality of healthcare, the quality of education, the quality of public safety, and the quality of our currency. Of course this is a false prophecy; I am simply describing what is already happening. Class of 2012, by graduating today you are taking a step, another step, on a path that is fairly well worn; a path that in and of itself defines little about your future. Many have started from where you start today and have done great and wonderful things, but many too have lived lives of another sort. Whatever you see as the next obvious step, consider whether you are being true to yourself, your strengths, your weaknesses, your needs before you take it.

The next decade or so before you have kids, before you get married, is the most flexible, most genius decade of your life. You ought consider stepping outside your paradigm for a fresh look now and again. If you are considering a career on Wallstreet or in Washington D.C. you should be aware of the social proof that operates there. This is that man, if not most people, will be doing questionable things that obviously make money and obviously earn respect from common peers. If you find yourself in such a place I would ask you to consider a rule I learned as a physician. First, do no harm. Besides life is not that short, life is well and long enough for you to come to regret any activity or habit involving exchange of long-term risk for short-term benefit. This is what many if not most Americans did during the refinancing and consumption boom of the last decade and it was what our government did in egging on the boom. This is also the gospel of drunk drivers and cheating spouses. Of course when you encounter the opposite, the short-term risk exchanged for long-term benefit, consider hitting that button again and again and again. Past may be prologue, but this is not true for the individual. The individual can think different and the individual can act different than those that got us all into this mess. No matter how the economic tides may sweep away the majority, an individual can stand clear. Each of your lives individually is an epic chance. You can leave here today and you can choose to never stop learning, never to stop asking questions. I must say it will not be without staggering difficulties. There will be times when you will stare at yourself in the mirror and wonder why, but faced with a setback, you will be most creative; under stress, you will think better and act stronger. So much so that looking back, it will seem as though it was all meant to be. Thank you and good luck.


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət