Ana səhifə

Turkey Green Growth Policy Paper: Towards a Greener Economy


Yüklə 5.62 Mb.
səhifə15/22
tarix27.06.2016
ölçüsü5.62 Mb.
1   ...   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   ...   22

5.8 Policies for key strategic sectors

The strategic sectors covered in this policy note have a number of opportunities for greening, yet face a number of constraints – usually in the form of market, institutional or policy failure. Market failures can arise if the production of a good also creates some form of residual that is not ‘priced’ in the market. This is often the case with pollution – where the market does not reflect the true social cost of producing this good or service. In this case the rationale for government intervention is to internalize these environmental ‘externalities,’ which is viewed as correcting a market failure. An example of this is CO2 or PM10 emissions from the cement or iron & steel sectors. According to the ‘polluter-pays-principle’ the sector should be responsible for absorbing the additional costs of reducing pollution. Institutional failure is more difficult to define precisely, but can arise when there is a lack of government intervention or institutions to regulate certain behaviors. For example, the absence of a mechanism for water pricing in agriculture can be viewed as an institutional failure that leads to inefficient use. Policy failure is usually the circumstance where policy fails to achieve its intended objective. Many energy policies fall into this category, where subsidizing fossil fuels runs counter to efficiency objectives – resulting in over-consumption.

Re-incentivizing through policies is more complicated than it first appears, however the EU Directives offer some guiding principles that Turkey has to follow. Some examples of the major constraints faced, applicable EU Directives and some possible policy responses to guide the sector in its transition to a greener development path are presented in Table 5.3 below.

Table 5.3 Example policy responses among key strategic sectors

Sector

Greening potential

Major constraints

Major EU Directives and progress to date

Possible policy responses

Agriculture

Promoting soil conservation practices such as zero-tillage and pasture improvement


Lack of knowledge; resistance to change; limited availability of special equipment; and insufficient access to capital to finance the initial investment




Agri-environment schemes such as the Environmentally Based Agricultural Land Protection program (ÇATAK); Pilots sponsored through Priority Axis 2 of the IPARD program
Local education and promotional campaigns to raise awareness of conservation tillage

Irrigation water conservation

Inefficient use of water; leakages; nitrate pollution

Nitrate Directive

Public sector support for the diffusion of new knowledge through training and advice (extension) (e.g. support programs for nutrient reduction in meeting the Nitrate Directive)
Water pricing reflecting scarcity value coupled with technical assistance programs on water-saving technologies and drainage (a form of tax)

Automotive

Energy efficiency
Waste – recycling

Low-cost inputs leading to inefficient use
Product innovation with greater recycled content

End-of-Life Vehicles



Full- or social-cost of inputs used (a form of tax)
Producer responsibility – with take-back programs fed into secondary recycling markets; eco-labeling

Construction

(buildings)

Cement


Energy efficiency

Institutional arrangements and financing




Taxes on emissions/ output


CO2 emissions
Hazardous waste

Market-failure (CO2 not priced)

IPPC/ ETS
Hazardous Waste

Taxes on emissions/ output; with eventual participation in Emission Trading System (ETS)

Outright bans – restrictions; fines or penalties for violations



Electronics

Mercury, cadmium, lead and other toxic substances contained in e-waste

Short life-cycles leading to increasing volume; stakeholder coordination issues with the WEEE Directive

Hazardous Waste
WEEE Directive

Life-cycle regulations requiring safe disposal per the Hazardous Waste and WEEE Directives; creation of hazardous (e-)waste collection points

Iron and steel

CO2 and PM10 reductions


Blast furnace technology is dated and emissions-intensive

IPPC/ ETS

Taxes on emissions/ output; with eventual participation in Emission Trading System (ETS)

Reduction of emissions of dust, CO, heavy metals, Nitrous Oxides, Organic Gases and Steams, Dioxins and Furans

Importation of ‘dirty’ scrap requiring pre-treatment

Waste and Hazardous Waste Directives

Regulations on imported scrap; greater domestic recycling content to reduce reliance on imported scrap; eco-certified or labeled products

Machine industry

Handling of waste and e-waste

Institutional and market failure (absence of institutional structure for handling waste and the potential of recycling e-waste in secondary markets)

WEEE Directive

Waste management fees (both regular and hazardous); regulations on landfilling; eco-labeling

White goods

Handling of waste and e-waste

Institutional and market failure (absence of institutional structure for handling waste and the potential of recycling e-waste in secondary markets)

WEEE Directive

Waste management fees (both regular and hazardous; regulations on land-filling; eco-labeling

Note: The status of Directive harmonization and implementation is drawn from Turkey’s 2010 and 2011 Progress Reports, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2010-2011 and 2011-2012.

1   ...   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   ...   22


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət