Ana səhifə

Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory


Yüklə 149 Kb.
səhifə4/4
tarix24.06.2016
ölçüsü149 Kb.
1   2   3   4

Mazmanian, M., Yates, J. and Orlikowski, W.J. 2006. “Ubiquitous Email: Individual Experiences and Organizational Consequences of BlackBerry Use,” Best Paper Proceedings of the 65th Academy of Management Meeting, Atlanta GA.

Mintzberg, H. 1978. “Patterns in Strategy Formation,” Management Science, 24, 9: 934-948.

Munir, K.A. and Phillips, N. 2005. “The Birth of the ‘Kodak Moment’: Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Adoption of New Technologies,” Organization Studies, 26, 11: 1665–1687.

Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.J. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Nicolini, Davide. Forthcoming. Practice as the site of knowing. Organization Science.

Nicolini, D., S. Gherardi, and D. Yanow (eds.) 2003. Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

Orlikowski, W.J. 1992. “The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations,” Organization Science, 3, 3: 398-427.

Orlikowski, W.J. 1996. “Improvising Organizational Transformation over Time: A Situated Change Perspective,” Information Systems Research, 7, 1: 63-92.

Orlikowski, W.J. 2000. “Using Technology and Constituting Structures.” Organization Science. 11, 4: 404–428.

Orlikowski, W.J. 2002. “Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing.” Organization Science, 13, 4: 249-273.

Orlikowski, W.J. 2007. “Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work,” Organization Studies, 28: 1435-1448.

Orlikowski, W.J. 2010. “Engaging Practice in Research: Phenomenon, Perspective, and Philosophy.” in Damon Golsorkhi, Linda Rouleau, David Seidl, and Eero Vaara (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook on Strategy as Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 23-33.

Orlikowski, W.J. and Yates, J. 1994. “Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 4: 541-574.

Orlikowski, W.J. and Scott, S.V. 2008. “Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization,” Annals of the Academy of Management, 2, 1: 433-474.

Ortner, S.B. 1984. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Study of Society and History, 26, 1: 126–166.

Ortner, S.B. 1989. High Religion: A Cultural and Political History of Sherpa Buddhism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Østerlund, C. and Carlile, P. 2005. “Relations in Practice: Sorting Through Practice Theories on Knowledge Sharing in Complex Organizations,” The Information Society, 21: 91-107.

Pentland, B.T. and Feldman, M.S. 2005. “Organizational routines as a unit of analysis.” Industrial and Corporate Change, 14: 793-815.

Pentland, B.T. and Feldman, M.S. 2007. “Narrative Networks: Patterns of Technology and Organization,” Organization Science, 18, 5: 781-795.

Pentland, B.T. and Feldman, M.S. 2008. “Designing Routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action.” Information and Organization, 18: 235–250.

Pentland, B. T. andRueter, H. H. (1994). Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 484–510.

Pickering, A. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Pinch, T. 2008. “Technology and Institutions: Living in a Material World,” Theory and Society, 37, 461-483.

Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J. (eds.). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Quinn, R. and Worline, M. 2008. “Enabling Courageous Collective Action: Conversations from United Airlines Flight 93,” Organization Science 19: 4: 497–516.

Reckwitz, A. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing,” European Journal of Social Theory, 5:2:243-263.

Rerup, Claus and Martha S. Feldman. Forthcoming. Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning Academy of Management Journal.

Schatzki, T.R. 2001. “Practice Theory.” In Schatzki T.R., Knorr Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E. (eds.) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory: London: Routledge: 1-14.

Schatzki, T.R. 2002. The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Schatki, T.R. 2005. “The Sites of Organizations,” Organization Studies, 26, 3:465-484.

Schatzki, T.R., Knorr Cetina, K. and Savigny, E. (eds.) 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.

Schultze, U. and Orlikowski, W.J. 2004. “A Practice Perspective on Technology-Mediated Network Relations: The Use of Internet-based Self-Serve Technologies,” Information Systems Research, 15, 1: 87-106.

Schutz, A. 1970. Reflections on the Problem of Relevance. (Edited by Richard M. Zaner). New Haven: Yale University Press.

Schutz, A. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World. (Translated by George Walsh and Frederick Lehnert.) Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Scott, W.R. 1995. Institutions and Organizations, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Scott, S.V. and Orlikowski, W.J. 2009. “Getting the Truth”: Exploring the Material Grounds of Institutional Dynamics in Social Media.” Paper presented at the 25th European Group for Organizational Studies Conference, Barcelona, Spain.

Seo, M., and Creed, W.E.D. 2002. “Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change.” Academy of Management Review 27, 2: 222-247.

Sevon, G. 1996. “Organizational imitation in identity transformation.” In Barbara Czarniawska & Guje Sevon (eds.), Translating Organizational Change: pp. 49-68. New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Sewell, W.H. Jr. 1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation,” American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1, 1-29.

Stark, D. 2009. The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Suchman, L.A. 2007. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. (2nd ed.) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, C. 1993. “To Follow a Rule ...” in Calhoun, C., LiPuma, E. and Postone M. (eds.) Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press: 45-60.

Tsoukas, H. 2005. Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Tsoukas, H. 2009. “A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations,” Organization Science, 20, 6: 941-957.

Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. 2002. On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13: 567-582.

Tushman, M., and E. Romanelli 1985. “Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation.” In L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (eds.), Research on Organizational Behavior, 7: 171–222. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Vaast, E., and Walsham, G. 2005. “Representations and Actions: The Transformation of Work Practices with IT Use.” Information and Organization, 15, 1: 65-89.

Wang, Dana. 2009. Constructing the life cycle of resources: resource artifacts and resources-in-use. Working paper.  Center for Work, Technology and Organization. School of Engineering.  Stanford University.

Weick, K.E. 1969. The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Weick, K. E. and K. Roberts. 1993. “Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 357-381

Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Whittington, R. 1992. “Putting Giddens into Action: Social Systems and Managerial Agency.” Journal of Management Studies, 29,6:693-712.

Whittington, R. 2006. “Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research,” Organization Studies, 27, 5: 613-634.

Wittgenstein, L. 1967. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Woolgar, S. 1991. “The Turn to Technology in Social Studies of Science,” Science, Technology & Human Values, 16, 1: 20-50.

Yates, J. and Orlikowski, W.J. 1992. “Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media,” Academy of Management Review, 17, 2: 299-326.

Yates, J. and Orlikowski, W.J. 2002. “Genre Systems: Structuring Interaction through Communicative Norms,” Journal of Business Communication, 39, 1: 13-35.

Yates, J. and Orlikowski, W.J. 2007. “The PowerPoint Presentation and its Corollaries: How Genres Shape Communicative Action in Organizations.” In Mark Zachry and Charlotte Thralls (eds.) The Cultural Turn: Communicative Practices in Workplaces and the Professions. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing: 67-91.

Yates, J., Orlikowski, W.J. and Okamura, K. 1999. “Explicit and Implicit Structuring of Genres: Electronic Communication in a Japanese R&D Organization,” Organization Science, 10, 1: 83-103.

Zilber, T.B. 2002. “Institutionalization as an Interplay between Actions, Meanings, and Actors: The Case of a Rape Crisis Center in Israel.” Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1: 234–54.





1The co-authors are equal collaborators in writing this article. We are grateful to Linda Argote, Beth Bechky, Rich Burton, Deborah Dougherty, Danielle Dunn, Samer Faraj, Sarah Kaplan, Ann Majchrzak, Willie Ocasio, Haridimos Tsoukas, and two reviewers for helpful comments.

1   2   3   4


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət