STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No.32-34, Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Sh. Rohit Sabharwal, President,
Council of RTI Activists (Regd.),
Kundan Bhavan, 126 Model Gram,
Ludhiana. …Appellant.
Versus
The Public Information Officer,
Office of the GLADA,
Puda Complex, Near Rajguru Nagar,
Ferozepur Road,
Ludhiana.
FAA: Office of the Chief Administrator,
GLADA, Puda Complex, Near Rajguru Nagar,
Ferozepur Road,
Ludhiana ….Respondent.
Appeal Case No.245 of 2014
Heard through Video Conference Facility
Present:- Ms.Sukhjinder Kaur, Advocate, on behalf of Shri Rohit Sabharwal,
appellant.
Shri Ravinder Kumar, APIO, GLADA, Ludhiana on behalf of the
respondent.
ORDER
The respondent has failed to file written reply as required in the notice of hearing dated 17.2.2014. The PIO is directed to be personally present at the next date of hearing. The PIO is also directed to file written reply within 10 days time and a copy of the same be also sent to the appellant.
To come up on 2.7.2014 at 11.00 AM through Video Conference Facility available in the office of the Deputy Commissioner, Ludhiana.
DATED:02.04.2014 (NARINDERJIT SINGH)
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No.32-34, Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Sh. Rohit Sabharwal, President,
Council of RTI Activists (Regd.),
Kundan Bhavan, 126 Model Gram,
Ludhiana. …Appellant.
Versus
The Public Information Officer,
Office of the Municipal Corporation,
Zone-D, Ludhiana.
FAA: Office of the Commissioner,
Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana.
.Respondent.
Appeal Case No.246 of 2014
Heard through Video Conference Facility
Present:- Ms.Sukhjinder Kaur, Advocate, on behalf of Shri Rohit Sabharwal,
appellant.
Shri K.P.Singh, Superintendent, House Tax, Municipal Corporation,
Ludhiana on behalf of the respondent.
ORDER
The respondent has failed to file written reply as required in the notice of hearing dated 17.2.2014. The PIO is directed to be personally present at the next date of hearing. The PIO is also directed to file written reply within 10 days time and a copy of the same be also sent to the appellant.
To come up on 2.7.2014 at 11.00 AM through Video Conference Facility available in the office of the Deputy Commissioner, Ludhiana.
DATED:02.04.2014 (NARINDERJIT SINGH)
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No.32-34, Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Sh. Parminder Singh Jagdeo,
10568/38, Street No. 2,
S.A.S.Nagar,
Ludhiana. …Appellant.
Versus
The Public Information Officer,
Office of the District Transport Officer,
Ludhiana
FAA: Office of the District Transport Officer,
Ludhiana.
….Respondent.
Appeal Case No.293 of 2014
Heard through Video Conference Facility
Date of hearing: 2.4.2014
Date of decision: 2.4.2014
Public Authority: District Transport Officer, Ludhiana.
Present:- None on behalf of the appellant.
Shri Jaspal Singh, Section Officer, on behalf of the respondent.
ORDER
The respondent submits that the information demanded by the appellant has already been provided to him. The appellant is not present. The respondent submits that the appellant has given in writing that he has received the information.
In view of the submission of the respondent, the case is disposed of and closed.
DATED:02.04.2014 (NARINDERJIT SINGH)
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No.32-34, Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Sh. Vipan Kumar S/O Krishan Kumar,
# 319, Ward No. 24,
New Abadi,
Khanna, Distt. Ludhiana. …Complainant.
Versus
The Public Information Officer,
Office of the Additional Deputy Commissioner,
Khanna,
District Ludhiana.
.
….Respondent.
Complaint Case No.181 of 2014
Heard through Video Conference Facility
Present:- Shri Vipan Kumar, complainant.
Shri Gurmit Singh, Naib Tehsildar, Khanna on behalf of the respondent.
ORDER
The respondent has filed written reply which is taken on record. The complainant states that he is not satisfied with the written reply as there is no PIO appointed in the office of ADC, Khanna. The Additional Deputy Commissioner, Khanna is directed to depute an officer in this Commission on the next date of hearing with his written response relating to the submission of the complainant.
Due to administrative reasons, this case shall now be heard in this Commission at Chandigarh.
To come up on 1.7.2014 at 11.00 A.M.
DATED:02.04.2014 (NARINDERJIT SINGH)
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No.32-34, Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Sh. Nazar Singh S/O Sh. Joginder Singh,
Vill: Gobindgarh, PO: Jugiana,
Distt. Ludhiana..
…Complainant.
Versus
The Public Information Officer,
Office of the Block & Development Officer-II,
Ludhiana..
….Respondent.
…
Complaint Case No.199 of 2014
Heard through Video Conference Facility
Present:- Shri Nazar Singh, complainant.
Shri Sarabjit Singh, Panchayat Secretary, on behalf of the respondent.
ORDER
The respondent has failed to file written reply as required in the notice of hearing dated 17.2.2014. The PIO Shri Dhanwant Singh, BDPO, Ludhiana-II is directed to be personally present at the next date of hearing. The PIO is also directed to file written reply within 10 days time and a copy of the same be also sent to the complainant. Due to administrative reasons, this case shall now be heard in this Commission at Chandigarh.
To come up on 1.7.2014 at 11.00 A.M.
DATED:02.04.2014 (NARINDERJIT SINGH)
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No.32-34, Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Sh. Nazar Singh S/O Sh. Joginder Singh,
Vill: Gobindgarh, PO: Jugiana,
Distt. Ludhiana..
…Complainant.
Versus
The Public Information Officer,
Office of the Block & Development Officer-II,
Ludhiana..
….Respondent.
…
Complaint Case No.200 of 2014
Heard through Video Conference Facility
Present:- Shri Nazar Singh, complainant.
Shri Sarabjit Singh, Panchayat Secretary, on behalf of the respondent.
ORDER
The respondent has failed to file written reply as required in the notice of hearing dated 17.2.2014. The PIO Shri Dhanwant Singh, BDPO, Ludhiana-II is directed to be personally present at the next date of hearing. The PIO is also directed to file written reply within 10 days time and a copy of the same be also sent to the complainant. Due to administrative reasons, this case shall now be heard in this Commission at Chandigarh.
To come up on 1.7.2014 at 11.00 A.M.
DATED:02.04.2014 (NARINDERJIT SINGH)
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No.32-34, Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Sh. Naib Singh S/O Sh. Mewa Singh,
Janta Colony, VPO: Gill,
Teh. & Distt. Ludhiana.
…Complainant.
Versus
The Public Information Officer,
Office of the Block & Development Officer-I,
Ludhiana..
….Respondent.
…
Complaint Case No.222 of 2014
Heard through Video Conference Facility
Present:- None on behalf of the complainant.
Shri Sarabjit Singh, Superintendent, office of BDPO Ludhiana-1 on behalf
of the respondent.
ORDER
The respondent has failed to file written reply as required in the notice of hearing dated 17.2.2014. The PIO is directed to be personally present at the next date of hearing. The PIO is also directed to file written reply within 10 days time and a copy of the same be also sent to the complainant. Due to administrative reasons, this case shall now be heard in this Commission at Chandigarh.
To come up on 1.7.2014 at 11.00 A.M.
DATED:02.04.2014 (NARINDERJIT SINGH)
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No.32-34, Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Sh. Shailendra Jain S/O
Sh. Gulshan Kumar Jain,
R/O: Opposite to House of J.K.Thakur,
Ex-116, Basant Vihar, Street No. 4,
Noorwala Road, Ludhiana.
…Complainant.
Versus
The Public Information Officer,
Office of the Tehsildar (West),
Mini Secretariat, Ludhiana.
….Respondent.
…
Complaint Case No.225 of 2014
Heard through Video Conference Facility
Present: - Shri Surinder Pal on behalf of Shri Shailendra Jain complainant at
Chandigarh.
Shri Pardeep Singh Bains, Tehsildar (West) on behalf of the respondent.
ORDER
The respondent has failed to file written reply as required in the notice of hearing dated 17.2.2014. The PIO is directed to be personally present at the next date of hearing. The PIO is also directed to file written reply within 10 days time and a copy of the same be also sent to the complainant. Due to administrative reasons, this case shall now be heard in this Commission at Chandigarh.
To come up on 1.7.2014 at 11.00 A.M.
DATED:02.04.2014 (NARINDERJIT SINGH)
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No.32-34, Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Sh. Nirmal Singh S/O Sh. Bir Singh,
VPO: Sarwali, Tehsil: Batala,
Distt. Gurdaspur. …Appellant..
Versus
The Public Information Officer,
Office of the Forest Range Officer,
Aliwal,
Distt. Gurdaspur.
FAA: Office of the District Forest Officer,
Gurdaspur..
….Respondent.
Appeal Case No.306 of 2014
Heard through Video Conference Facility at Ludhiana.
Present:- Shri Nirmal Singh, appellant.
Shri Jarnail Singh, Range Officer, Aliwal and Shri Jagbir Singh, Forest
Range Officer, Aliwal, on behalf of the respondent.
ORDER
The respondent has failed to file written reply as required in the notice of hearing dated 17.2.2014. The PIO is directed to file written reply within 10 days time and a copy of the same be also sent to the appellant. The appellant states that the PIO is asking him to deposit an amount of Rs. 24495/- whereas he feels that this figure has been worked out without any basis as the record is not too voluminous. The PIO is directed to be personally present at the next date of hearing along with complete record relating to the RTI request of the appellant. Due to administrative reasons, this case shall now be heard in this Commission at Chandigarh.
To come up on 1.7.2014 at 11.00 A.M.
DATED:02.04.2014 (NARINDERJIT SINGH)
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER |