Ana səhifə

San Luis Valley Regional Habitat Conservation Plan Draft for Public Review


Yüklə 4.45 Mb.
səhifə1/30
tarix25.06.2016
ölçüsü4.45 Mb.
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   30


San Luis Valley Regional Habitat Conservation Plan
Draft for Public Review


Prepared for—
Rio Grande Water Conservation District

10900 Highway 160 East

Alamosa, Colorado 81101


Prepared by—
ERO Resources Corporation

1842 Clarkson Street

Denver, Colorado 80218

(303) 830-1188


July 2012



Contents

1.0 Project Description and Background 1

1.1 Introduction 1

1.2 Purpose and Need 2

1.3 HCP Scope 5

1.4 Goals and Objectives of the HCP 8

1.5 Benefits to the Covered Species 10

1.6 Benefits to the Communities 10

1.7 Description of Applicants and Beneficiaries 11

1.8 Federal Activities 13

1.9 Rationale for 30-year Permit Term 13

1.10 Public Involvement 14

2.0 HCP Setting 16

2.1 Covered Species 16

2.2 Riparian Vegetation Communities 24

2.3 Water Resources and Administration 35

2.4 Socioeconomic Setting 38

2.5 Land Ownership and Management 40

2.6 Existing Local Land Use Policies 45

2.7 Existing Conservation Efforts 45



3.0 Covered Activities and Impacts 54

3.1 Methods and Definitions 54

3.2 Routine Agriculture 57

3.3 Community Infrastructure 69

3.4 Riparian Conservation and Restoration 75

3.5 Impact Contingencies 77

3.6 Related Activities with No Impacts 78

4.0 Summary of Impacts 80

4.1 Summary of Estimated Impacts 80

4.2 Routine Agriculture 81

4.3 Community Infrastructure 82

4.4 Riparian Conservation and Restoration 83

4.5 Relationship of Habitat Impacts to Potential Flycatcher Territories 83



5.0 HCP Implementation 85

5.1 Rationale for this Implementation Approach 85

5.2 Impact Mitigation Tools 87

5.3 Impact and Mitigation Tracking 93

5.4 Core Habitat Conservation 96

5.5 Education and Outreach 96

5.6 HCP Administration 98

5.7 Additional Conservation Measures 101

5.8 Summary of Implementation Responsibilities 103

6.0 Monitoring and Adaptive Management 104

6.1 Monitoring 104

6.2 Adaptive Management 108

7.0 Funding and Implementation 112

7.1 Funding Assurances 112

7.2 Implementation 116

7.3 HCP Participation 117

7.4 Additional Assurances, and Changed or Unforeseen Circumstances 117

7.5 Permit Enforcement, Suspension, and Revocation 121

7.6 Revisions, Substitutions, and Amendments to the HCP 123

8.0 Relationship of HCP to
ESA Requirements and Recovery Plan 125

8.1 Relationship to ESA Permit Issuance Criteria 125

8.2 Relationship to the Flycatcher Recovery Plan 127

9.0 References 131



Appendices

Appendix A – Estimated Impact Calculations

Appendix B – Sample Landowner Cooperative Agreement

Appendix C – Sample Habitat Management Agreement

Appendix D – Education and Outreach Framework

Appendix E – Model County HCP Enabling Ordinance

Appendix F – Draft Steering Committee Charter

Appendix G – Habitat Quality Index Monitoring Approach

Appendix H – Proposed Permit Terms and Conditions

Appendix I – Draft Implementing Agreement



Tables

Table 1. Riparian habitat mapping elements. 33

Table 2. Socioeconomic and demographic statistics in the San Luis Valley. 39

Table 3. Existing habitat totals by land ownership type. 40

Table 4. Existing conservation easements by county (October 2011). 50

Table 5. Existing conservation easements by drainage (October 2011). 52

Table 6. Summary of impacts. 80

Table 7. Anticipated impacts of routine agriculture. 81

Table 8. Anticipated impacts of community infrastructure. 82

Table 9. Anticipated impacts of conservation and restoration. 83

Table 10. HCP implementation measures. 86

Table 11. Mitigation Ratios. 94

Table 12. Sample mitigation tracking worksheet. 95

Table 13. Estimated implementation costs, years 1 – 10. 114



Figures

Figure 1. HCP Location 4

Figure 2. Known Flycatcher and Cuckoo Detections 22

Figure 3. Land Cover 26

Figure 4. Core and Buffer Habitat Concept 28

Figure 5. Riparian Habitat 34

Figure 6. Water Resources 37

Figure 7. Land Ownership 41

Figure 8. Land Ownership Detail 42

Figure 9. Existing Conservation Easements 51

Figure 10. Rotating Matrix Concept 55

Figure 11. Impact Analysis Data 56

Figure 12. Alamosa Floodway 72


Acronyms and Abbreviations Used in This Document
Applicants Alamosa, Rio Grande, Conejos, Costilla, Mineral, and Saguache Counties, the State of Colorado Department of Natural Resources; and the municipalities of Alamosa, Monte Vista, Del Norte, and South Fork; the holders of the incidental take permit(s) supported by the HCP

BLM Bureau of Land Management

BMPs Best Management Practices

CCP Comprehensive Conservation Plan (for National Wildlife Refuges)

CPW Colorado Parks and Wildlife

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CNHP Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Cuckoo Yellow-billed cuckoo, western U.S. distinct population segment (Coccyzus americanus)

CRS Colorado Revised Statutes

CWCD Conejos Water Conservancy District

District Rio Grande Water Conservation District

DNR State of Colorado Department of Natural Resources

ERO ERO Resources Corporation

ESA Endangered Species Act

Flycatcher Southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus)

FR Federal Register

GIS Geographic Information System

GOCO Great Outdoors Colorado trust fund

HCP Habitat Conservation Plan

HQI Habitat Quality Index

ITP Incidental Take Permit

LPP Land Protection Plan

NEPA National Environmental Policy Act

NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service

NWR National Wildlife Refuge

Permit Incidental Take Permit

PFW Partners for Fish and Wildlife

Reclamation U.S. Bureau of Reclamation

Recovery Plan Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Recovery Plan

RiGHT Rio Grande Headwaters Land Trust

Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

State State of Colorado

SWA State Wildlife Area

U.S. United States

USC United States Code

USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture

USFS U.S. Forest Service

USGS U.S. Geological Survey

Valley San Luis Valley

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   30


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət