Radioactivity Neutralization Methods
|
|  Yüklə 12.18 Mb.
|
Conclusion In summation, I will continue my efforts of more than 22 years to bring the benefits of Brown's gas to humanity. In spite of obstacles and difficulties created by closed minds refusing to accept something that is "not in the books", I will continue to develop and modify the limitless applications of this amazing breakthrough – which makes it possible for the world to have a nonpolluting cheap source of energy ... (oil can be saved for plastic production) ... but the people will ultimately have the benefits of clean energy, clean air, and clean water as the uses of Brown's gas become evident. The earth needs to be remedied of the nuclear waste problem which proliferates all major countries. That is the NUMBER ONE PROBLEM facing humanity. The answer is here – not a theory – IT'S BROWN'S GAS. lt was discovered by a single man with limited fmancial resources – no billion dollar grants and laboratories. lt was just my commitment to find the truth... the truth of what secrets were locked in water and how to use the most abundant resource on the Earth for the benefit of all. After the nuclear waste problem is contained, then major steps can be put in place to solve other life threatening problems of air and water pollution. BROWN'S GAS is the answer for these cleanup problems as well. I urge you to get behind the efforts to see that Brown's gas technology is given the chance to stop the dismal decay that is bankrupting the world._YB WARNING--Attempts at applications made by unqualified people who do not know all of properties of the gas could be very dangerous and create extremely hazardous conditions leading to possibly an explosion. The Brown's Gas Generator/Welder machine is completely safe when used as a source of heat for welding. Experimentation is not to be attempted with the gas separate from the generator. _YB (End of report)
> Brown's gas has been experimentally demonstrated to reduce the radioactivity of cobalt-60, for example, by 96%. That's true. I have the video and report. Wiseman > When funded, further research is expected to show additional reduction of radioactivity beyond 96% by utilizing liquefied Brown's gas. First I've heard of it. Wiseman > This mixture, called Brown's gas after its inventor, can be used as a fuel source for welding.
Not so. They're pretty much the same except for the ExW. Visibly there is no difference and have a very similar performance when welding too. Wiseman > Brown's gas is so hot it can weld any solid substance to any other solid substance. That's a Myth for a couple of reasons. First, Brown’s gas isn't 'hot' in that it doesn't radiate much heat (I think it radiates in the 270°F range). It is a high-energy flame, but the energy can be thought of as 'electrical'. Second, Brown’s gas cannot weld any substance to any substance. Think of it as a 'super' torch fuel, (except for welding iron) it just does what every other torch fuel does, only faster and better. Wiseman > Brown's gas also has a very unusual effect which can be utilized for nuclear radiation disposal. After the special reaction which melts two different metals, the radiation cannot leave the molten material, but by implosion, it is pulled into the material. The material which remains has very little radiation and sometimes none at all. That's just weird bunk. The radiation is neutralized by the molecules reforming into another material that is 'balanced'. Materials are radioactive when their electron shell has been stripped and is not balanced with the inner protons and neutrons. The inner mass radiates particles trying to become balanced again. Brown’s gas just allows the protons, neutrons and electrons to come apart and back together again in a balanced (non-radioactive) form; forming a glasslike material. The two different metals are iron and aluminum, which when melted together make thermite. They may contribute some of the atomic material needed to help the radioactive material become neutral and they definitely provide the shock pulse needed to trigger the reaction when the thermite goes 'pop'. Wiseman
By George Wiseman, Thu, 2011-04-14 07:40 I'm getting a lot of questions from people and organizations that have heard that Brown’s gas can neutralize radioactive materials. Organizations are trying to help Japan neutralize their radioactivity at the source. People are usually concerned and wanting to prepare for or deal with nuclear fallout.
First, in my opinion, there is no real danger of serious (dangerous) widespread (worldwide) radioactive contamination. Most of my readers are in America, Europe and Australia; all these areas will not receive enough radiation (from meltdown of Japanese reactors) to be too concerned about. There are a lot of myths that have built up about radiation. Don't misunderstand me, it's a serious subject, but our bodies have evolved to be able to handle constant light doses which we get just by living on the planet.
There is radioactivity around us all the time. Everything that lives IS radioactive! Carbon absorbs and concentrates radioactivity from the sun. All the plants and animals we eat are radioactive. Living things start losing their radioactivity when they die... it's how scientists can 'carbon-date' how old bones are, by the 'lack' of radioactivity. In fact, it's against the law (in the USA at least) to sell non-radioactive alcohol. Alcohol can be made (much cheaper) from coal but that would affect the revenue of people who make alcohol from plants. Coal is carbon that's been in the ground long enough to lose most of its radioactivity. So by mandating a certain level of radioactivity, the government prevents the manufacture of coal based alcohol.
So while I think it's a really good idea to have potassium iodine in your emergency preparedness kit, I do not think you need to get it now when the people who sell it are marking up the price to people who are panicking. Put it on your TO DO list to get once the crisis is over, and the manufacturers reduce the price because of an over-supply due to producing for the current demand. It's good to be prepared because we do live in a world of CONCENTRATED radioactive 'accidents', and the American military seems to have no concern about dumping its nuclear waste as bullets on foreign soil.
Americans are largely unaware of the multiple nuclear accidents (and sometimes deliberate release of radioactivity for 'experimental' interest) that have occurred on or near their own continent. Large areas have been irradiated similar to what Japan is now experiencing and the public (because American news media is suppressed) are uninformed. I learn of these incidents when I travel to other countries. Also remember that Americans nuclear bombed Japan in the second world war and the Japanise recovered fast enough to put a lot of Americans out of work by selling electronics and cars of higher quality and less expensively than USA manufacturers. My advice is, don't panic. Do pay attention and prepare for CONCENTRATED radioactivity, which will happen from time to time in the world. There are several things you can do to prepare, see below.
To answer that you need to understand that the only effective radioactive neutralization protocol I currently know of, that uses Brown’s gas, is to mix the radioactive material with approximately equal quantities of iron and aluminum (by volume) and heat the whole mixture to liquid (using a Brown’s gas flame). When the mixture is hot enough it will explode... not like a bomb, more like a firecracker. Iron and aluminum make thermite (research thermite to learn the optimum quantities to use), and the Brown’s gas provides the special transmutation energy. Brown’s gas exhibits transmutative characteristics in other applications too, like processing ore.
Most materials are radioactive because the electrons have been stripped off the molecules; the nucleus then ejects particles of various kinds (radioactivity) to try to 'balance' the 'weight' (and transmute to a lighter, glasslike, material). Somehow, the molecules are able to use the special energy in the BG to complete this transmutation in seconds (instead of millennia), when the material is molten and given the shock of the thermite explosion. So it's impractical to use Brown’gas, as far as I know, on anything that you don't want to destroy. The Brown’s gas 'explodes' the material and does the neutralization during the explosion. You need to affect the material on an atomic level to neutralize the radioactivity. Also it's impractical to use Brown’s gas on any material that isn't concentrated radioactive. It takes electrical power to make the Brown’s gas, plus quantities of iron and aluminum to make the explosive reaction.
Thus, Brown’s gas works well to neutralize CONCENTRATED nuclear waste, like spent fuel rods or decommissioned warheads, but practically useless at remediation of radioactive materials that have dispersed into the general environment. Brown’s gas has been proven (Canada government certified tests) to be an extremely effective, practical and inexpensive method to neutralize the radioactivity of materials generally produced by nuclear powerplants. The neutralization can be done onsite, eliminating the need for transportation and storage of nuclear waste.
There is a Canaidan-based organization Planetary Association for Clean Energy (PACE) that has been lobbying for the Canadian government to use Brown’s gas to neutralize radioactive waste – with zero results. It seems that the nuclear industry does NOT want its waste neutralized. I think they see it as potentially useful to make small power sources (like nuclear batteries), bullets, etc. I have assembled a bunch of information, (including a video showing the testing being done at the Canadian research reactor at Chalk River Ontario), that documents what I've just told you. No need to buy it unless you want to be involved with using Brown’s gas to neutralize concentrated radioactive materials. http://www.eagle-research.com/cms/store/browns-gas
Not entirely correct. I do promote the use of Brown’s gas to clean up radioactive waste. I just think that the people who own the waste think of it as having a residual value (for low-level energy production and assorted radiation applications) so do not want to destroy it. Also, the people contracted to store it have very powerful lobbyists and pretty much squash any (and there are several) means of neutralizing radioactive waste. So the time is right to promote it, because it works and is needed – but I do not expect it to be implemented unless the People can put more force on their representatives than the lobbyists. You have gathered together material on cleaning up radioactive waste using Brown's gas (available on your website). You imply on your website that you and your company have done enough research to confirm this application of using Brown's gas works. Could you expand on what research you have performed to confirm that you can clean up radioactive waste using Brown's gas? I have done NO personal work with radioactive materials. All work that I report about neutralizing radioactivity with Brown's gas has been done by individuals and organizations that are trained and competent to handle radioactive materials. I merely build the Brown's gas electrolyzers that they can use. Our WaterTorches are one of the most practical and efficient designs on the planet. My research into using Brown's gas to clean up radioactive waste indicated that the process involved mixing or combining the radioactive material with other substances before applying a burning torch of Brown's gas to the combined material for a period of time. Could you explain your understanding of the protocol to use Brown's gas to clean up radioactive material? My understanding is to mix the radioactive material with roughly equal parts of aluminum and iron by volume... then heat the whole mixture into a molten mass using Brown’s gas. As it turns to liquid and heats up, the aluminum and iron will turn to thermite and pop. After the pop, the whole mass has 97% less radioactivity than it started with. The whole process takes only a few seconds. See the Chalk River video and data. http://www.eagle-research.com/cms/store/browns-gas My understanding of the protocol for using Brown's gas to clean up radioactive waste, imply that it is best used to clean up physical blocks of radioactive material, rather than radioactive particles in the atmosphere etc. What do you believe are best applications of using Brown's gas to clean up radioactive waste? As you stated, Brown’s gas works best on mass that has concentrated radioactivity. What further research do you believe is necessary to make using Brown’s gas an effective process to clean up radioactive waste? The 'batch' protocol exists and is both effective and practical. As far as I can see, there is no technical reason that prevents Brown’s gas from being used to neutralize concentrated radioactive materials. The bottlenecks for considering any type of neutralization are economic and political, as I explained above. The statements on your website indicate that promoting Brown's gas to clean up radioactive waste is currently too controversial. What do you believe must have to happen to make this application of using Brown's gas more acceptable? Convince the owners of the waste to let it go.
BTW, if you want to download anything from YouTube I highly recommend the "Easy YouTube Video Downloader 6.7" for FireFox et al – the free version is fine (http://www.bestvideodownloader.com/). New York State Assemblyman Dan Haley in 1993 or thereabouts discussing demonstration by Yull Brown; available from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqImZpjqIgM and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NWtX7IZYjM Mark Porringa neutralizing americium-241 with, I believe, one of your units: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1R5G5hTC7pc Interesting lecture by a handsome man: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-dca5fVLTM Tom Bearden's provisional patent application: http://www.cheniere.org/patent%20application/claim.htm#nuclear Various write-ups: http://www.lnhatom.com/radwaste.html http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=202659 http://www.svpvril.com/svpweb9.html http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Nuclear_Remediation http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/NuclearRemediation/Vesperman/ http://pacenet.homestead.com/Transmutation.html http://befreetech.com/techpage.htm
Do not depend on the Government to help you; they will be too late and use ineffective techniques. Do not depend on the medical services to help you; their training is restricted to the same archaic, abusive, ineffective and expensive techniques. Do your own research to find simple, inexpensive, effective and practical health solutions that are not taught to Doctors and are suppressed by the AMA, FDA and other organizations. Watch Japan, because they have experience dealing with radioactivity on the scale of a bomb. Of course help if you can; they are our neighbors on this small, fragile environment we call Earth. How To Make Sure Radioactivity Leaves Your Body As Quickly As Possible. THE LONGER IT STAYS IN YOUR BODY THE LONGER IT WILL DESTROY YOUR CELLS. THIS CAUSES CANCER IN SOME PEOPLE VERY QUICKLY. This includes normal, so called, background radiation which we all receive on a daily basis ( one of the reasons cancer has been rising very quickly – polonium, a daughter of radiation, is the culprit in all cancer patients tested by this Doctor.) The information below is very timely and helpful re: radiation which includes background radiation. This research from Hulda Clark is some of the best, if not the best, research in the world on the immune system and the effects of radiation on same. This shows you how to get rid of he radiation that is coming into your body on a daily basis no matter the source. This is worth your time in today’s world. Click on the link below to see two short videos. The second one gives you the meat of this information. http://zapperexperts.com/2011/04/can-the-hulda-clark-zapper-help-me-beat-radioactivity/ Source: http://www.eagle-research.com/cms/node/456 Combining Brown’s Gas with Bucking Magnetic Fields Inside a Plasma Ball Hans Becker has conceived of a method where spent nuclear fuel pellets are dropped into a magnetic bottle. The fuel pellets are then destroyed by a combination of Sonne Ward’s implosion machine, Brown’s gas, and the Keller catalytic process. Jana Dixon's “New Energy List” includes the following: • www.rense.com/RodinAerodynamics.htm • http://rodin.freelancepartnership.com/ • www.virtuescience.com/enneagram.html
Rodin Aerodynamics, Marko Rodin PO Box 7470. Hilo, Hawaii 96720. Telephone 1 (808) 935-1670. Email: rodinmath@gmail.com · www.rodinmath.com The Rodin Coil can be used to create geometries in plasma which will be able to tap zeropoint energy. Till then we can use his electronics to increase efficiency in our wiring. It could be used to change the magnetism of metal objects.
http://www.youtube.com/user/dwvand#p/a/u/6/_80ISFPryqc
Awesome Marko-Nassim videos...that explains the connection between the 9 and the singularity...between 9 and phi. This seems like a bottomless inquiry here. In a dream I surmised the Phi spiral wound toward singularity to be the secret of spiritual evolution. In that going with the Phi so to speak prevents consciousness (light) lost via standing wave issonance/incoherence. This is the same thing as the perfect Phi relaxation toward singularity (or the emanation point) that is represented in Marko Rodin's Mathematical Fingerprint of God which is based on the number 9. This is a cosmological exploration of the Name of God which when spoken takes us back to "center" – towards the superconduction of coherent light.
Rodin alternates the blue and red wires in the sequence of 9 to get a bucking magnetic field. This bucking magnetic field must have something to do with tapping zeropoint. If you were to wrap a sphere with a blue wire in the angle of phi surely it would cover the entire sphere and return to the starting point. Then you could wrap the sphere with a red wire in the angle of phi going in the opposite direction. Then if you run a current through the wires and spin the sphere, you should be able to contain a ball of free plasma in the middle.
A highly speculative idea. Three Anti-Gravity Spacecrafts for One-Way Trips Out of the Solar System “Space Travel Innovations" is linked at www.padrak.com/vesperman. The ebook includes three chapters on these anti-gravity spacecrafts: John Searl’s Magneto-Gravitational Converter (Searl Effect Generator) – The magneto-gravitational converter (Searl effect generator) apparently can create a strong anti-gravity field in addition to generating electricity. It comprises of three concentric magnetic rings with magnetic rollers rolling around the rings. Both the rollers and rings are comprised of four layers of titanium, iron, nylon, and neodymium. David Hamel’s Gravito Magnetic Device – The gravito magnetic device encloses opposing magnetic fields that have varying vector angles to produce a strong anti-gravity field. David Burns’ Anti-Gravity Flying Saucer – A four-foot model of a self-propelled flying saucer flies under remote radio control. Its anti-gravity field is produced by a circular mechanism inside its relatively thin body. Radioactive waste could conceivably be loaded into unmanned versions of these anti-gravity spacecrafts which are then launched from anywhere convenient on Planet Earth. They would never be seen again as they fly away from the sun – avoiding planets and asteroids on the way out of the solar system. Refresher-Regenerator By Gordon Ziegler Abstract A ‘Refresher-Regenerator’ machine has been theorized and costed that could reverse all radioactive isotopes to relatively safe uranium in situ in twelve days of machine time. This could be the ultimate solution to high and low-level radioactive wastes and contamination. The radioactive wastes would not need to be transported to, or stored inside Yucca Mountain for centuries. Positive side effects of the machine operation would be reverse aging adults to young adulthood, backing diseases out of existence, reversing all decay and pollution, providing a new means of food preservation, and disarmament in the active footprint of the machine in areas ranging by decades from 1.0 meter radius to over the radius of the earth orbit around the sun, etc. For $70 million or less, we could design and build a Refresher-Regenerator machine in one year or less that could reverse the order-to-disorder arrow in the second law of thermodynamics in a machine footprint the radius of 1.0 meter to over the radius of the earth orbit around the sun. (See Table 1.) We live in a ubiquitous sea of negative-order energy, causing all processes and energy transfers to go from more order to more disorder. Creating and operating a Refresher-Regenerator would be like creating a small or large island of positive-order energy in this sea of negative-order energy – causing all reactions and energy transfers on or in this island to go from more disorder to more order to the maximum state of order. In chemical or nuclear reactions, the direction of the reactions would be reversed. According to the author’s research, the processes involved would be perfectly safe—far safer than what we now experience. As seen above, the Refresher-Regenerator would have many positive uses, many not listed. It will be curious to find out which use will be the primary use of Refresher 1. Safely denaturing high-level radioactive wastes quickly and inexpensively could well be the first primary use of Refresher 1. The Refresher-Regenerator capitalizes on a new Grand Unification Theory (GUT) employing the Electrino Fusion Model of Elementary Particles and the Electrino Hypothesis that fractons come in ± e, ± e/2, ± e/4, and ± e/8 – not in ± 2e/3 and ± e/3 of the Quark Hypothesis. Unique to this theory is that electrinos can fuse, but every time they do so, they switch from matter to antimatter or vise versa. The Refresher-Regenerator fuses positrons (antimatter) into the core particles of protons and neutrons (matter) with positive order energy, reversing the order-to-disorder arrow in the second law of thermodynamics in the machine footprint to disorder-to-order direction. The control of the Refresher-Regenerator machine is through controlling the effective beam currents to the collision chamber of the positrons through the timed gating of beam peaks. (See Table 1.) For an area the size of r beam current A bed 1 m 100 pA House 10 m 10 pA 4 football fields 100 m 1.0 pA Community 1 km 100 fA City 10 km 10 fA Small nation 100 km 1.0 fA Large nation 1,000 km 0.1 fA Continent 10,000 km 0.01 fA World 100,000 km 0.001 fA Moon orbit 1,000,000 km 1.0-19 A Venus at times 1.010 m 1.0-20 A Short of earth orbit of Sun 1.011 m 1.0-21 A Over earth orbit of Sun 1.012 m .0-22 A |