Ana səhifə

Project Document The gef small Grants Programme Fourth Operational Phase (gef-4) July 2007 – June 2010 The gef small Grants Programme Fourth Operational Phase (gef-4) Table of Contents


Yüklə 1.99 Mb.
səhifə9/16
tarix25.06.2016
ölçüsü1.99 Mb.
1   ...   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   ...   16


Geographic and Thematic Focus of CC Mitigation Portfolio for GEF-4

Geographic areas

Implementation mechanisms

Thematic Area focus

Participating Countries of SGP

Asia, Africa, Europe, Latin America

Partnerships with governments, local authorities, the private sector and development partners

Environmentally sustainable transport as it relates to bicycle pathways, pedestrian walkways, bus- rapid transport, electric three wheelers, biofuel as it relates to transport policy

Nepal, Lithuania, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Egypt, India, Chile, Kyrgyzstan, Cambodia, Egypt, India, Jordan, , Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Iran, Thailand, Tunisia, Mozambique, Barbados, Papua New Guinea, Mali, Tanzania, Kenya, Ghana. All other SGP Country Programmes with interest in sustainable transport thematic area.

West African LDC countries and SGP country programmes with group allocation of climate change RAF resources

Partnership with GEF Implementing & Executing agencies and other development partners

Promoting the mainstreaming, up scaling and replication of renewable energy, energy efficiency approaches and models for expanding energy access

Senegal, Mali, Burkina Faso, Benin, Chad, Mauritania, Cote d’Ivoire, Gambia and SGP country programmes with group allocation of climate change RAF resources

All mature SGP Country Programmes and SGP country programmes with individual allocation of climate change RAF resources

Partnerships with the private sector, local authorities, Governments and development partners

Promoting of mainstreaming, up scaling, or replication of models/ approaches for expanding access to renewable energy, energy efficiency and environmentally sustainable transport.

SGP mature countries that includes:- Bolivia, Chile, India, Indonesia, Iran, , Ghana, Kenya, Mali, Papua New Guinea, Uganda, Tanzania, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic , Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Egypt, Vietnam, Jordan, Lithuania, Indonesia, Philippines, Malaysia, India, Bhutan, Nepal, Thailand, Mauritius, Zimbabwe, Botswana, Tunisia, Morocco, Guatemala, Palestinian Authority, Trinidad and Tobago and all SGP Country Programmes with Individual allocation of climate change RAF resources.




CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION


Strategy

Indicator

Baseline

Target

Means of verification

Assumption

Outcome 4:
Community-Based Adaptation (CBA) practices promoted and incorporated in national development priorities

Number of countries implementing Community Based Adaptation projects
Number of countries incorporating CBA activities using different financial resources

No tested community based adaptation methodology/approach at the GEF level

At least 10 countries using the universal methodology and/or approach developed for implementation of CBA activities representing SIDs, mountain areas, drought and flood prone ecosystems
New countries (over and above the ten initial CBA countries) implementing CBA activities from non-GEF resources



End of project report



The impact of climate change on the local community and the importance of their participation in adaptation activities is recognized

Outputs

Activities

4.1 Strengthened involvement of local communities in national adaptation interventions.

  1. Launch the CBA global programme in partnership with UNDP GEF.

  2. Initiate activities in at least 10 countries (initially in Bangladesh, Vietnam, Kazakhstan, Samoa, Niger, Morocco, Namibia, Jamaica, Guatemala, Bolivia)

  3. Engage Governments to incorporate CBA activities in National Adaptation Plans

  4. Work with IAs/EAs and other development partners to incorporate community based approach in full-scale and medium sized adaptation projects and also in non-GEF projects.

  5. Support a portfolio of more than 80 CBA projects in at least ten countries

  6. Monitor and document focused lessons in ten countries

  7. Participate in capacity building activities, information exchange and sharing in at least one international CBA network

  8. Document and share lessons internationally

Geographic and Thematic Focus of CC Mitigation Portfolio for GEF-4


Geographic areas

Implementation mechanisms

Thematic Area focus

Participating Countries of SGP

Representation of mountain ecosystems, dry and flood prone areas and SIDS

Partnership between UNDP GEF & SGP Community based adaptation Project (CBA)

Adaptation under the Strategic Priority on Adaptation of GEF

Kazakhstan, Vietnam, Samoa, Bangladesh, Niger, Morocco, Namibia, Jamaica, Bolivia, Guatemala

All other ecosystems including the above

Partnership with Implementing and Executing Agencies to implement components of LDCF supported projects or SCCF projects (MSPs & FSPs)

Community based adaptation interventions

LDC countries, Pacific SIDS, Barbados and OECS , Belize, Comoros Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Mauritius



INTERNATIONAL WATERS


Project Strategy

Objectively verifiable indicators

Sources of verification

Assumptions




Indicator

Baseline

Target







Outcome 5:
Demonstration of community-based approaches for the implementation of SAPs, and models replicated, upscaled and mainstreamed

Number of NGOs and communities involved in SAP implementation, its governance structure and process
Number of SGP country programs supporting the implementation of SAP priorities at the community level.



Partnerships initiated with PEMSEA, Mediterranean Sea Action Plan, and framework partnership with UNEP in possible collaboration with regional seas projects
SGP assisting the implementation of Nile Basin Project, and Niger River project


At least three regional networks among NGOs established or strengthened in the East Asian Seas/South China Sea, the Mediterranean Sea, and Nile River.
At least 68 countries undertaking actions to support the implementation of SAPs at the community level, with thematic focus outlined in the following table.

Project proposals developed
Project progress reports
Peer reviews by regional IW projects and programs
IW Program Study


Mainstreaming of SGP into IW regional projects and programs fully supported by IAs and EAs.


Outputs

Activities

5.1 SGP IW community-based projects are fully integrated into global IW activities

  1. Establish and strengthen partnerships with identified regional and global initiatives and networks;

  2. Foster regional networks among NGOs with a shared interest in a transboundary waterbody, particularly in East Asian Seas/South China Sea, the Mediterranean Sea, the Wider Caribbean, and Nile River;

  3. Develop guidelines to undertake community-based actions to support the implementation of SAPs, including M&E indicators;

  4. Promote community-based activities on fishery management, coastal habitat management, land-based pollution control, and water resource uses, in alignment with regional SAP priorities and GEF IV priorities ;

  5. In collaboration with UNDP Water Governance Team, conduct a study on the small grants components of GEF IW FSPs/MSPs, in comparison with SGP;

  6. Consolidate experiences and lessons learnt, and facilitate learning and exchanges on community-based IW projects, through global and regional networks, including the GEF IW: LEARN network, regional mechanisms/networks, and UNDP Waterwiki network.



Geographic and Thematic Focus of SGP IW Portfolio during GEF-4

Geographic Areas

Regional Mechanisms

Focused Thematic Areas

Participating Countries of SGP5

First Priority Groups

Land-based pollution hotspots, critical habitats, and fishery spawning grounds in the East Asian Seas/South China Sea large marine ecosystem (LME)

PEMSEA and UNEP-GEF South China Sea

Land-based pollution, coastal habitats (mangroves, coral reef, seagrass, and wetlands), and fisheries

Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam

Biodiversity spots, degraded land areas, and water sources/use areas in the Nile River Basin

World-Bank GEF Nile Basin Project

Conflicts on the uses of water resource, integrated watershed management and biodiversity

Burundi, Democratic Republic of Congo, Egypt, Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda

Sources of nutrients, coastal habitats and fishing grounds in the Mediterranean Sea LME

UNEP Regional Seas Programme/UNEP-GEF SAP projects

Nutrients, habitats, fisheries

Algeria, Albania, Bulgaria6, Egypt, Lebanon, Morocco, Tunisia, Turkey

Second Priority Groups

Critical wetlands, areas of unsustainable use of water, degraded land areas, water sources in Mekong River Basin

Mekong River Commission and UNDP Transboundary Community Dialogue

Water uses, wetland biodiversity, fisheries, land degradation, integrated watershed management

Cambodia, Thailand, and Viet Nam

Land and water degradation areas and biodiversity spots in the Niger River Basin

World Bank-GEF Niger River Project

 Land and water degradation and protection of globally important biodiversity

Benin, Guinea, Mali, Nigeria, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Cote d'Ivoire, Niger

Critical habitats, biodiversity spots, sources of chemicals, pesticides and toxic substances, areas of intensive uses of water in Lake Victoria Basin

UNDP SAP Implementation Project in Lake Victoria

Fisheries, water uses, biodiversity, phosphorus, toxic substances, persistent chemicals, pesticide residues, blue-green algae, nitrogen, and land use

Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda


Degraded coastal areas, sources of land-based pollution, and marine biodiversity areas in the Caribbean LME

UNEP Wider Caribbean Regional Seas Programme and GEF projects in the region

Coastal area management and biodiversity; land based sources of pollution; climate change adaptation

Barbados, Belize, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, Venezuela

Sources of land-based pollution, fishery grounds and critical habitats in the Agulhas Somali Current LME

Nairobi Convention/UNEP-GEF Wio-Lab Project and UNDP-GEF Agulhas and Somali Current Project

Land-based pollution, fisheries and habitats

Comoros, Kenya, Madagascar, Mauritius, Mozambique, Seychelles, South Africa, Tanzania

Habitats, fishing grounds and sources of land-based pollution in the Pacific

South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission (SOPAC), SPREP, and SIDS IWCAM project.

Habitats, fisheries, and land-based pollution

Cook Islands, Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru, Niue, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, Vanuatu



LAND DEGRADATION


Project Strategy

Objectively Verifiable Indicators

Sources of Verification

Assumptions




Indicator

Baseline

Target







Outcome 6:
Innovative and adaptive community-based approaches demonstrated, piloted, and integrated into global efforts to address unsustainable agricultural practices, rangeland and forestry management, while promoting local livelihoods


Number of countries generating models and good practices for sustainable agricultural practices, rangeland and forestry management
Number of national and global networks which knowledge and practices of SGP are transferred to.


Initial demonstrations in sustainable agriculture, rangeland and forestry management
Partnership established with GM and WFP, and initial collaboration with GEF WISP.



Country programs outline in the following table having demonstrated and piloted community-based land management models targeting specific thematic areas.
SGP knowledge, experiences, and best practices shared with national and global networks, including GM, UNFF, ICRAF, and CIFOR.

Project documents
Thematic reviews
Portfolio reviews

Partnerships at the global and local levels secured

Output

Activities

Output 6.1 Experiences and models on community-based land management are consolidated and shared among global networks

  1. Develop guidelines for community-based sustainable agriculture, rangeland, and forestry, including M&E indicators;

  2. Establish partnerships with national and global networks to spread out SGP models and experiences;

  3. Conduct portfolio reviews to provide inputs for the updating of the guidelines on community-based sustainable agriculture, rangeland and forestry management;

  4. Conduct thematic studies and identify good cases on community-based sustainable agricultural practices, rangeland management and forestry management;

  5. Support projects with collaboration and partnerships with governments, private sectors, and other stakeholders for replication, upscaling and mainstreaming of community-based land management experiences;

  6. Support projects which incorporate traditional knowledge of land use practices and disseminate best practices in sustainable land management.

Geographic and Thematic Focus of SGP LD Portfolio during GEF-4

Geographic areas

Focused Thematic Areas

Participating Countries of SGP7

Sub Saharan States

Sustainable agriculture with special focus on sustainable use of rainwater, groundwater recharge and strategic use of groundwater resources;

Sustainable rangeland management;

Sustainable forest and woodland management;

Climate change adaptation.



Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Cote d’Ivoire, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissaau, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Seychelles, South Africa, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe

South Asia, Southeast Asia/ Greater Mekong

Sustainable tropical forest and woodland management, including agro-forestry, particularly on deforestation and forest degradation.

Bhutan, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Iran, Malaysia, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Vietnam

Latin America & the Caribbean and the Pacific

Sustainable tropical forest and woodland management;

Agroforestry

Sustainable agriculture, with a focus on practices to improve soil fertility management as alternatives to shifting agriculture, and methods that have minimal impacts on soil structure and that improve soil and water conservation.


Argentina, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, and Uruguay
Fiji

CIS & Europe Countries, Central Asia and Arab States

Sustainable grazing in temperate zones;

Sustainable dryland management;

Restoration and sustainable management of peatlands & wetlands;

Sustainable agriculture/agroforestry



Belarus, Bulgaria, Lithuania, Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia, and Yemen




PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS


Project Strategy

Objectively verifiable indicators

Sources of verification

Assumptions




Indicator

Baseline

Target







Outcome 7:
Community-based approaches demonstrated on waste management to prevent open burning and POPs pesticide management related to health issues, with good experiences disseminated to support the implementation of National Implementation Plans (NIPs)

Number of SGP countries undertaking community-based activities to support the implementation of NIPs in regard to POPs pesticide and waste burning.



37 SGP country programs approved 77 POPs projects in OP3 focusing on awareness raising and capacity building activities, but lessons learned still to be systematically integrated in implementation of NIPs.



17 priority SGP countries implementing NIPs at the community level, on waste management (particularly preventing waste burning) and the reduction and control of POPs pesticide, focusing on POPs alternatives addressing health risks caused by POPs (Category I.A countries); selected piloting of prevention of waste burning and POPs pesticide management in countries of category I.B. (See the following table).



Project documents
Thematic reviews
Portfolio reviews

Community stakeholders’ capacity and willingness to implement NIPs.
NIPs are open for updates and improvements.



Outputs

Activities

7.1 Enhanced capacity at the community level to implement the Stockholm Convention, with knowledge/good practices shared with global networks and non-party states/authorities of the Convention

  1. Develop an online training module to strengthen the capacity of SGP network and its stakeholders in addressing POPs;

  2. Develop a guidelines on community waste management and POPs reduction, including M&E indicators;

  3. Strengthen collaboration with IPEN and other POPs networks to reach out to NGOs and exchange information and knowledge;

  4. Facilitate the transfer of knowledge and experiences in implementing the Stockholm Convention through SGP network, from party states/authorities (Category I) to non-party states/authorities (Category II and III) through IPEN and other NGOs networks;

  5. Test and promote models to control malaria without the use of DDT; and alternatives to the use of the POPs pesticides – e.g. chlordane, mirex, dieldrin – for controlling termites and ants, in collaboration with GEF IAs and EAs;

  6. Test and promote models on community-based waste management, particularly to prevent waste burning;

  7. Develop and strengthen partnerships with public, private and civil society sectors to promote programs aimed at addressing proper storage and ultimate disposal of decommissioned POPs.
1   ...   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   ...   16


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət