Ana səhifə

Official Statistics Release


Yüklə 4.02 Mb.
səhifə7/7
tarix24.06.2016
ölçüsü4.02 Mb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7

Methodology


  1. The child-level placement data was collected for the purpose of informing inspection of local authority children’s services as well as to contribute to national debate on placing of, and commissioning for, children looked after.




  1. We asked all local authorities to complete a child-level data collection form on all children looked after placements as at 31 March 2013. The collection asks local authorities for similar information to that requested by the Department for Education (DfE) in their annual SSDA903 return. However, we did ask for information that is not requested by the DfE, in particular the name and address of the specific branch of commissioned organisations through which children and young people were placed.




  1. The request for additional information to that required by the DfE did cause some local authorities some difficulties. Local authority systems contain statutorily required information for each child, and although further information is recorded elsewhere, for many LAs the additional information requested required manual input of data. This affected the timescales in which LAs could complete the return and increased the likelihood of errors in these returns.




  1. This is experimental data and we are consulting with local authorities about the collection for 31 March 2014. Any comments on the content or format of this report would be welcome and can be sent to socialcaredata@ofsted.gov.uk.


Acknowledgements
Thanks to the following, for their contribution to this statistical release: Donna Neill, Claire Atkinson, Adam Bennell, Tania Corbin and Edward Jones.

List of tables and charts



List of tables

Table 1 Summary of placement codes before and after Ofsted quality assurance

Table 2 All active providers and whether children are placed with them, as at 31 March 2013

Table 3 Places in active providers, as at 31 March 2013


List of charts

Chart 1 Proportion of children looked after by placement type, as at 31 March 2013

Chart 2 Proportion of children looked after by placement type and most recent inspection judgement, as at 31 March 2013

Chart 3 Proportion of children looked after by length of time in placement, as at 31 March 2013

Chart 4 Proportion of children looked after placed in each region, as at 31 March 2013

Chart 5 Proportion of children looked after by placement type and distance from local authority boundary, as at 31 March 2013

Chart 6 Proportion of children looked after by placement type and level of deprivation in local area, as at 31 March 2013

Chart 7 Proportion of children looked after by placement type and level of crime in local area, as at 31 March 2013

Chart 8 Proportion of children looked after in independent living by region, as at 31 March 2013

Chart 9 Proportion of children looked after by placement type and sector, as at 31 March 2013


List of maps

Map 1 Proportion of children looked after placed outside their LA boundary, as at 31 March 2013

Map 2 Proportion of children looked after placed more than 20 miles from their LA boundary, as at 31 March 2013

Map 3 Proportion of children looked after placed in children's homes by level of local area deprivation, as at 31 March 2013

Map 4 Proportion of children looked after placed in children's homes by level of crime in the local area, as at 31 March 2013

Map 5 Proportion of children looked after that LAs placed using private or voluntary fostering services, as at 31 March 2013

Map 6 Proportion of children looked after that LAs placed in private or voluntary children's homes, as at 31 March 2013

Map 7 Proportion of children looked after that LAs placed using voluntary adoption agencies, as at 31 March 2013


Glossary



Adoption agencies

The focus of all adoption agencies is on placing children successfully into adoptive families who the agency recruits, assesses, prepares and supports, so they will meet the children’s needs and enable them to develop and achieve throughout their lives. The services maintained by local authorities are described in section 3(1) of the Adoption and Children Act 2002. Local authorities place children with adoptive families recruited and approved by themselves, by other local authorities or by voluntary adoption agencies who must register with Ofsted. Adoption agencies may also provide birth records, counselling and intermediary services to adoptees and birth relatives. There are three branches of voluntary adoption agencies in Wales which are inspected by Ofsted because their head offices are in England.


Adoption support agencies

Adoption support agencies are defined by section 8 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 and provide services to anyone touched by adoption and are registered with Ofsted. This includes counselling and help for children and adults to gain information about their adoption or to trace birth relatives. Adoption support agencies can be either organisations or individuals, and may be contracted by a local authority to provide support services.


Fostering services

Local authority fostering services are defined by section 4 of the Care Standards Act 2000. Local authority fostering services and independent fostering services recruit, prepare, assess, train and support foster carers. Independent fostering services (IFSs) are private companies or charities, which are registered with Ofsted and provide placements to children and young people with foster carers approved by them. IFSs work closely with local authorities to deliver these placements.


Children’s homes

A children’s home is defined in section 1 of the Care Standards Act 2000, and is an establishment that provides care and accommodation wholly or mainly for children. Children’s homes vary in size and nature. They fulfil a range of purposes designed to meet the different needs of those children and young people who are assessed as needing a residential care placement. Some homes, for example, provide short breaks which are needed to help support children and their family. Some residential special schools are registered as children’s homes because boarders are resident for more than 295 days per year.


Secure children’s homes

Secure children’s homes are defined by section 25 of the Children Act 1989. They accommodate children and young people who are remanded or have been sentenced for committing a criminal offence. They also accommodate children and young people who are placed there by a court because their behaviour is deemed to present a significant and immediate threat to their safety or the safety of others, unless they are placed in a secure environment. Ofsted inspections are conducted in accordance with the Care Standards Act 2000 and judgements in reports are made in relation to the outcomes for children set out in the Children Act 2004. The criteria are the same as those used to inspect non-secure children’s homes.


Boarding Schools

The majority of boarding schools are independent and belong to associations which are members of the Independent Schools Council. As both education and welfare in these schools are inspected by their own inspectorate, Ofsted does not inspect these schools and so they are not included in the data. The remainder are maintained boarding schools where both education and the welfare of boarders are the subject of Ofsted inspection and independent boarding schools which are members of the Bridge Schools Inspectorate or Schools Inspection Service and who receive their education inspections by these organisations and their welfare inspections by Ofsted.


Residential accommodation in further education colleges

The care provision of further education colleges that provide, or arrange, residential accommodation for one or more students under the age of 18 years. Ofsted inspects these colleges under section 87 of the children act 1989.


Residential family centres

Residential family centres are defined in section 4(2) of the Care Standards Act 2000 as establishments at which: a) accommodation is provided for children and their parents; b) the parents’ capacity to respond to the children’s needs and to safeguard their welfare is monitored and assessed; and c) the parents are given such advice, guidance and counselling is considered necessary.


Residential special schools

Residential special schools are defined in section 59 of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006. They vary in size and nature. The sector includes large non-maintained special schools which make provision for very specific needs and take children as full boarders from all over the country, to smaller more local providers catering for children with a range of different special needs and disabilities who may be resident at the school only during the week. Some residential special schools are registered as children’s homes because boarders are resident for more than 295 days per year. There are also a small number of independent residential special schools who also tend to cater for children with very specialist needs.


Secure Training Centres

Secure Training Centres are defined by section 43(1) (d) of the Prison Act 1952. Ofsted has the power to inspect under section 146 Education and Inspections Act 2006 and inspects both the care and educational provision for children in four secure training centres. They accommodate young people between the ages of 12 and 17 who have been remanded or sentenced by the courts. The centres are under contract to the Youth Justice Board, which monitors their compliance with requirements. Ofsted does not regulate secure training centres but has an agreement with the Youth Justice Board to inspect care twice a year and education once a year.




Sector

Sector refers to the type of provider that owns the children’s social care provision.



Local Authority

These are public bodies responsible for the children’s home.


Private

These are for-profit organisations mostly with limited company status. These can also, though, be individually owned children’s homes and run for profit.


Voluntary

These are mostly not-for-profit organisations, mainly with charitable status. These can also be individually owned children’s homes and run on a not-for-profit basis.


Health Authority

These are NHS Trust-run.


Placement codes

The children looked after placement data collection requested data on children’s placements that, for the most part, had already been validated as part of the process to submit the SSDA903 returns to the DfE. This DfE return requires local authorities to submit details of the placements where their children are, using placement codes.


The full list of placement codes and their meanings is as follows:


Placement Codes:

A3

Placed for adoption with parental/guardian consent with current foster carer

A4

Placed for adoption with parental/guardian consent not with current foster carer

A5

Placed for adoption with placement order with current foster carer

A6

Placed for adoption with placement order not with current foster carer

H5

Residential accommodation not subject to Children’s Homes Regulations

K1

Secure Unit

K2

Children’s Homes

M1

In Refuge (Section 51 of Children Act)

M2

Whereabouts known (not in Refuge)

M3

Whereabouts unknown

P1

Placed with own parents or other person with parental responsibility

P2

Independent living

P3

Residential employment

Q1

Foster placement with relative or friend

Q2

Placement with other foster carer

R1

Residential Care Home

R2

NHS/Health Trust or other establishment providing medical or nursing care

R3

Family Centre or Mother and Baby Unit

R5

Young Offender Institution or prison

S1

All Residential schools, except where dual-registered as a school and Children’s Home.

T0

All types of temporary move

T1

Temporary periods in hospital

T2

Temporary absences of the child on holiday

T3

Temporary accommodation whilst normal foster carer is on holiday

T4

Temporary accommodation of seven days or less, for any reason, not covered by codes T1 to T3

Z1

Other placements




Placement Provider Codes




PR0

Parents or other person with parental responsibility

PR1

Own provision (by the Local Authority)

PR2

Other Local Authority provision

PR3

Other public provision (e.g. by a PCT etc.)

PR4

Private provision

PR5

Voluntary/third sector provision




Placement Location Codes




IN

Inside local authority boundary

OUT

Outside local authority boundary


Aggregated placement codes
For the purposes of this release, we have aggregated some of the codes so that they are grouped with similar placements, for example all the adoption placement codes are grouped together. This helps increase the number of children in a particular type of placement and therefore the robustness of the data. The following aggregations of placement types have been used:
Foster placement Q1 - Q2

Children's Home K2

Placed for adoption A3 - A6

Placed with parents P1

Independent living and residential accommodation P2 and H5

Secure unit, Young offender institution or prison R5 and K1

Residential schools not registered as children's homes S1

Other placements M1 - M3, P3, R1 - R3, Z1


Further information

Ofsted publications

Children’s homes inspections and outcomes, Ofsted, 2013 (quarterly) available: http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/official-statistics-childrens-social-care-inspections-and-outcomes


Children’s social care providers and places, Ofsted, 2013 (six monthly) available: http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/official-statistics-childrens-social-care-providers-and-places
Other publications

Biehal, N., Ellison, S., Baker, C. & Sinclair, I. (2010) Belonging and Permanence: Outcomes in Long-term Foster Care and Adoption, London, BAAF


Department for Education (2014) Children’s homes data pack: updated June 2014 available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/childrens-homes-data-pack
Department for Education (2013) Children looked after in England, including adoption available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/children-looked-after-in-england-including-adoption
Department for Education (2010) Children missing from home or care: local authority self-evaluation scores of measure to monitor, respond to and address runaway cases in England – October 2008 – June 2010 available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/children-missing-from-home-or-care-local-authority-self-evaluation-scores-of-measures-to-monitor-respond-to-and-address-runaway-cases-in-england-o
Department for Education (2013) Improving permanence for looked after children available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/improving-permanence-for-looked-after-children-data-pack
Farmer, E. and Moyers, S. (2008) Fostering effective family and friends placements, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers
Hannon, C. et al (2010) In Loco Parentis, Demos available: http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/inlocoparentis
Pemberton, C. (2011) Third of councils no longer run children's homes. Community Care, 14 September 2001. Available: http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/14/09/2011/117438/third-of-councils-no-longer-run-or-own-childrens-homes.htm

1 Data are published annually through the www.gov.uk website. The latest release, for data as at 31 March 2013, can be found here.

2 The Commissioned Services placement data tool can be found here.

3 See Glossary for more detailed explanations of placement codes.

4 Throughout this report, children placed in children’s homes includes those in Residential Special Schools where they reside for more than 295 days of the year unless otherwise stated. This is because Ofsted regulates and inspects these provisions as children’s home provisions.

5 Percentages are rounded and may not add to exactly 100.

6 Other placements include: children in a refuge; adult residential care homes; medical establishments; family centres or mother and baby units; residential employment and children missing.

7 3,257 (43%) were children living with parents, for example, and 2,279 (30%) were children and young people in independent accommodation; placements not inspected by Ofsted. 669 children were living in placements through settings that had not yet been inspected (9%). 17% were children in all other placement types where the local authority could not readily provide the registration details of the service through which these children were placed. For example, one local authority could tell us which overall organisation they had placed children with, but could not give us the details of which individual registrations they had used. As a result, we were unable to match these placements to Ofsted judgements.

8 Percentages are rounded and may not add to exactly 100. All placement types includes only those settings inspected by Ofsted. For a breakdown of those placement types not inspected by Ofsted, see section below – Not inspected by Ofsted.

9 For full information on Ofsted social care inspection outcomes, see our Official Statistics release here.

10 For further information regarding placement duration see: Department for Education (2013) Children looked after in England, including adoption available here: Tables B3, D4 and D5. Please note that the data are not directly comparable as the DfE double-counts the same children who have been in different placement types throughout the year, as opposed to a snapshot as is given here.

11 There were 59 placements for which start dates were not provided. They have not been included in this analysis.

12 See: Department for Education (2014) Children’s homes data pack, September 2013 updated June 2014 here p.8. The data pack indicates that in 2012-13 52% of children’s home placements lasted less than three months. This data however, refers only to children who ceased to be looked after during the year aged 10 and over.

13 For the location of children’s homes in England see: See: Department for Education (2014) Children’s Homes Data Pack, September 2013 updated June 2014, p.14

14 This is a voluntary collection and some local authorities did not wish to disclose information about the location of potential adopters, children and young people living independently, or were placed with parents.

15 For further information on children living away from home, or outside of the local authority boundary, see: Ofsted (2013) From a Distance (insert link and correct reference). See also: Farmer, E. and Moyers, S. (2008) Fostering effective family and friends placements, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Their research shows that children who live with relatives or friends have more contact with extended family members, often on a daily basis. The fact that many of these children are placed close to where they are from facilitates this type of contact; though that is not to say that this contact is always desirable.

16 There were 3,685 children for whom we could not calculate distance from local authority boundary because not enough information about their location was provided. Many of these children were living with their parents, in independent living, or placed for adoption.

17 See: Department for Education (2014) Children’s Homes Data Pack, September 2013 p.10 for analysis of distance from boundary of placements for children in children’s homes at 31 March 2013. The figures cited here are different to those in the DfE Data pack as DFE calculated the distance children were from their home as opposed to their local authority boundary. We did not have information about children looked after and their parents addresses.

18 No local authorities placed all of their children looked after within the local authority boundary.

19 Only the City of London placed all of their children looked after outside of the boundary (11 children). Nine were placed within 10 miles, and two within 20 miles of the boundary.

20 See previous footnote.

21 This data excludes 7,167 children and young people for whom we do not have information about the urban/rural characteristics of where they are living.

22 There were 7,422 children for whom we could not identify the level of local area deprivation. Areas of deprivation are analysed in quartiles as defined by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Quartile 1 refers to the top 25% of the country in the least deprived areas, while quartile 4 refers to the bottom 25% of the country in the most deprived areas.

23 Residential accommodation includes hostels, supported living and foyers. These are not inspected by Ofsted.

24 Areas of deprivation by crime level are analysed in quartiles as defined by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Quartile 1 refers to the top 25% of the country in the lowest crime areas, by lower super output areas, while quartile 4 refers to the bottom 25% of the country in the highest crime areas.

25 This data refers to 60,464 of the 67,886 children placed as at 31 March 2013, as we do not have data on crime for 7,422 placements.

26 Young Offender Institutions are inspected by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons who are the lead inspectorate for this provision, although we do provide inspectors to assist.

27 There were a further 523 children living in placements that had either not yet been inspected, or where we were unable to identify the setting that the children had been placed with.


28 Children who have been missing from their placement for at least 24 hours.

29 The APPG for Runaway and Missing Children and Adults and the APPG for Looked After Children and Care Leavers (June 2012) Report from the Joint Inquiry into Children who Go Missing from Care available here.

30 The government has recognised the link between children missing from care and being at risk of sexual exploitation and trafficking with the joint enquiry into children who go missing from care. The DfE ran a consultation on statutory guidance for Local Authorities on the care of unaccompanied asylum seeking and trafficked children, seeking views on new proposed regulations and statutory guidance regarding the planning and provision of care for unaccompanied asylum seeking and trafficking children. The consultation closed on 25 March 2014 and responses were being analysed at the time of publication.

31 For further research on young people living in independent accommodation see: Hannon, C. et al (2010) In Loco Parentis, Demos. This research shows that of the 6,000 or so young people who leave care every year 21% are 16 years old, 17% are 17, and 61% are 18 (p.129). While we cannot verify the ages of the young people in independent living that local authorities supplied us with, they were asked for only those children and young people who are legally looked after. As such, we would expect that all of the young people in placed in independent living in this report are under 18.

32 We have excluded those children and young people living in residential accommodation, such as hostels and foyers, for the purposes of this section because those classed as independent living are more likely to be living on their own with less supervision.

33 Adoption Support Agencies are inspected by Ofsted, but do not look after children.

34 There were 509 children living in placements that are inspected by Ofsted but for which setting information was not supplied. Therefore, some registrations may have in fact had a child in placement that we have been unable to match.

35 Active registrations are those which are currently permitted to place children and young people. Some settings are registered, but have since resigned.

36 These refer to children’s homes only and do not include Residential Special Schools >295 days. The 6,141 children placed in children’s homes referred to throughout this report will include children in Residential Special Schools >295 days as these are regulated and inspected as children’s homes.

37 It should also be noted that the snapshot date of 31 March 2013 took place over the Easter holiday in that year, and so the number of Boarding Schools and Residential Special Schools with children in placement may well be higher, depending on how local authorities record these children’s placements during school holiday periods. Also, Adoption Support Agencies do not place children and young people, and have been included in the above table to illustrate the number of providers we inspect.

38 See: Department for Education (2013) Children’s Homes Data Pack, September 2013 p.11 for analysis of children’s homes according to their sector compared with whether children were living inside or outside their local authority boundary. The suggestion is that children placed within the local authority boundary are more likely to live in a local authority-run children’s home. This is likely to be as a result of local authorities almost exclusively owning children’s homes within their local authority boundary combined while at the same time nearly two thirds of children placed in children’s homes are placed in homes that are privately-run which will not have the same location restrictions.

39 This is due to the number of local authority-run children’s homes available, see Capacity and Volume below.

40 NB: City of London and Rutland are shaded white because they did not place any children in children’s homes.

1   2   3   4   5   6   7


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət