Ana səhifə

Local plan for sustainable development for tulcea county


Yüklə 1.49 Mb.
səhifə6/17
tarix24.06.2016
ölçüsü1.49 Mb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   17

42.

TOPOLOG

 

 

 

 

5039

 

Topolog

HG 577/1997 +SAPARD

OUG No.7/2006



 

PIF 2004


Project phase

-

-

2519

 

Calfa

-

-

-

-

178

 

Cerbu

-

-

-

-

325

 

Fagarasu Nou

-

-

-

-

742

 

Luminita

-

-

-

-

316

 

Magurele

HG 577/1997

 

-

-

316

 

Sambata Noua

HG 577/1997

PIF 2002

-

-

643

43.

TURCOAIA

 

 

 

 

3695

 

Turcoaia

HG 577/1997 +SAPARD

 

OUG No.7/2006

Project phase

3695

PIF 2005

44.

VALEA NUCARILOR

 

 

 

 

3976

 

Valea Nucarilor

Local budget

 

-

-

1144

 

Agighiol

Local budget+ HG 687/1997

Project phase

-

-

1865

 

Iazurile

Local budget

 

-

-

967

45.

VALEA TEILOR

 

 

 

 

1567

 

Valea Teilor

HG 577/1997

PIF -2001

-

-

1567

46.

VACARENI

 

 

 

 

2357

 

Vacareni

PDR

OUG No.7/2006



PIF

Project phase



-

-

2357




Natural gas distribution is implemented only in Jijila, Măcin (partially) and in Tulcea Municipality (in only approximately 10 %).
Thermal energy distribution through a centralised system is only implemented in Tulcea Municipality and in the town of Măcin. In Tulcea, the main consumers of thermal energy live in apartment buildings and are connected to the CET heat distribution system within S.C. ALUM S.A.(alumina factory), managed by S.C. ACET S.A., which for the last year has functioned on natural gas. Approximately 5% of the population of Tulcea Municipality is not yet connected to neighbourhood networks, managed by S.C. DALKIA ROMANIA SRL, which partially functions on the combustion of light liquid, and which has started to be replaced by natural gas. After the city started to be supplied by natural gas, many of those connected to centralised thermal energy distribution systems have disconnected their heaters, and have installed their own heating systems for each apartment. In Măcin, only several apartment buildings are supplied by the centralised thermal energy distribution system.
I.1.7. TRANSPORTATION
Air transportation functions through the “Delta Dunării” Airport, located 14km from Tulcea Municipality, on the road to Constanţa and under the management of the County Council. For now, this airport does not have regular flights, only charter flights. There have been important investments here in recent years, such as: restoration and extension of the runway, to be 2,000m, fuel deposit, light buoy, surroundings of the airport. These allow for the landing / take-off of airplanes as large as a Boeing 737 (200-230 tonnes), under completely safe conditions. A feasibility study for the modernisation of the existing airport is under way, also for the expansion of the airplane docking area from 2 to 7 planes, the upgrading of the light buoy, equipment for passenger embankment, baggage conveyor belts, a second metal detector gate, etc. The implementation of this technical document will allow for the scheduling of regular internal flights, which were stopped in 2003, and even for the use of the airport in international flights by attracting low-cost airlines. This will be especially important as the Tulcea airport will need to take a part of the commercial flights which currently land at the “Mihail Kogălniceanu” airport in Constanţa, which has partially become a military airport.
Rail transportation currently takes place on a network of only 68km of simple railways, which allow only for local trains. Even the “Săgeata Albastră”, a modern high-speed train which connected Bucharest and Tulcea in less than 4 hours, would slow down to the speed of local trains on the Medgidia-Tulcea railway section. Due to competition from mini bus passenger transportation, which is cheaper and faster, but with decreased levels of safety for passengers, the “Săgeata Albastră” trains were suspended in 2005.
Passenger road transportation is carried out through mini busses with 17 seats, busses with 48 seats, which are old and overused, and some modern busses which belong to commercial entities, and to authorised individuals. The routes are established by popular demand.
Water transport for passengers and for cargo is extremely important in the county’s economy, as more than half of the county’s surface is made up of the Danube Delta, which is especially important from a tourist perspective. Unfortunately, the majority of ships which operate in the county are old and overused, as they were built in the 1970s and use high amounts of fuel (“BANAT”, “VRANCEA”, “MOLDOVA” and “MEHEDINŢI”, each with a capacity of 300 passengers, “MIRCEŞTI” and “MARAMUREŞ”, each with a capacity of 150 passengers, “COTNARI”, with a capacity of 60 passengers, and “FIENI” with a capacity of 30 passengers) and with reduced speeds and manoeuvrability. These belong to S.C. NAVROM Tulcea S.A., which has recently acquired two modern catamarans, each with a capacity of 200 passengers, which travel on the Tulcea-Sulina, Tulcea – Chilia, Tulcea - Periprava and Tulcea- Sfântu Gheorghe routes, every two days. In addition, there are several motor boats with a capacity of approximately 60 passengers, which travel daily to Sulina, Chilia and Sfântu Gheorghe, which belong to three commercial entities: S.C. BASNAV TUR SRL, S.C. TOTAL SRL and S.C. DIANA SHIPPING SRL.

I.1.8. COMMUNICATIONS
A. Landline Telephones

  

Romtelecom has held a monopoly over landline telephone systems until 1 January 2003, after which point the market was open to free competition, in accordance with EU legislation.


At the end of 2004, there were 33,382 persons subscribed to Romtelecom in Tulcea County, which represents a 4.2% drop compared to the number of subscriptions at the end of 2003. The total number of telephone conversations carried out throughout 2004 were of 112,104 thousand minutes, 20.8% less than in 2003, of which 98.8% were national telephone calls, and the rest were international calls. Telephone calls carried out via the landline telephone system decreased by over 50% in 2004 compared to 2003, mostly due to the replacement of manual telephone exchanges with automated ones.
After 1 January 2003, new commercial entities began to provide landline telephone services:

- USB (ex-Astral) launched landline telephone services– Astral Telefix – on 2 December 2003, and it was the first alternative landline telephone operator to sign contracts with Romtelecom and with GSM operators Connex (Vodafone) and Orange. 

- RCS&RDS Group launched its first landline telephone services – RDS.TEL – on 6 April 2004. At the level of Tulcea County, this distributor works in partnership with Electron M.BIT, and has a total number of 895 subscribers.

  

A large number of commercial entities entered the market for distribution of international pre-paid cards, such as: PCNET, Astral.



 

B. Mobile Telephones 

  

In Tulcea County, Orange has about 80% of the market, and Vodafone nearly 20%, with an insignificant number of subscribers with other mobile telephone companies. Where there is a mobile coverage of about 85-90% for the population at national level, the total number of users (either subscribed, or pay-as-you-go) in the county is roughly 218,000-230,000.


C. Transmission of Data and Internet Services

 

The sector for data transmission is especially dynamic. At the end of 2000, there were operating licences for 16 national operators for data transmission, and 111 operating licences were given for the installation and operation of a digital radio-communication network.



 

The main provider of services of this kind in Tulcea is TOTAL INTER MEDIA (TIMnet), a private commercial entity, which specialises in the distribution of Internet services, established in January 1999. The coverage of the TIMnet network is of approximately 70% in Tulcea Municipality, and is concentrated in areas with residential apartment buildings.


Other providers of such services are: EXTREME COMPUTERS, on the Tulcea market for 7 years, SOCIETATEA DE SERVICII INFORMATICE SA, ELECTRON M-BIT S.A., ASTRAL S.A. , Click Net, and the internet service offered by ROMTELECOM S.A. and CONY SAT SA.
D. CATV Market

 

In Tulcea county there are the following providers: CONY SAT SA, ELECTRON M-BIT and ASTRAL TELECOM.


I.1.9. FINANCIAL SERVICES
In Tulcea County, there are 21 branches of 12 commercial banks: Romanian Commercial Bank (Tulcea branch and 4 agencies: Tulcea Delta, Grigore Moisil, Măcin , Sulina), Raiffeisen Bank (Tulcea branch and 2 agencies: Babadag and Danube), BRD – Group Societe Generale (Tulcea branch and Delta agency), Unicredit (Tulcea branch), Banc Post (Tulcea branch), Credit Europe Bank (Tulcea branch), Transilvania Bank (Tulcea branch and 2 agencies: Danubius and Măcin), Romextera Bank (Tulcea branch), Piraeus Bank (Tulcea agency), House of Savings and Records (Tulcea branch), “Carpatica” Commercial Bank(Tulcea branch), Volksbank (Tulcea branch) .
The financial behaviour of the population and of the economic entities in the county (according to the BNR presentation of January 2007), is given by the loans and deposits of clients, as follows:


  • Loans in ROL – total loans given by banks in Tulcea County: 402 million ROL, of which 400 million ROL are existing loans, and 2 million ROL are overdue loans. The distribution of these loans is as follows: 67% are loans to the population (namely 271 million ROL) and 33% of the total, are given to economic entities (131 million ROL).

  • Loans in foreign currency – total of 160 million ROL. This is also mostly made up of loans to the population, namely: 61%, or 97 million ROL, and loans to economic entities represented 39%, namely 62.5 million ROL.


In terms of the economy in ROL, the structure varies depending on the category analysed, namely available funds or deposits in ROL and in foreign currency.


  • Available funds are of 132 million ROL, of which in current accounts of economic entities – 81 million ROL, and current accounts of the population – 46 million ROL, with the difference of 5 million ROL located in accounts of other categories.

  • Savings are of 208 million ROL, of which economic entities have 41 million ROL, population - 165 million ROL and others – 2 million ROL.


In terms of the economy in foreign currency, the situation is as follows:


  • Available funds – 44 million ROL, of which – economic entities – 20 million ROL, population – 24 million ROL

  • Savings – 65 million ROL, of which – economic entities -14 million ROL and the population 51 million ROL.


I.1.10 GENERAL SWOT ANALYSIS


Strengths

Weaknesses

  • Tourism is expanding;

  • The reception infrastructure is increasing significantly;

  • Food industry entities (meant processing, fish, milk) which meet EU standards;

  • Important renewable resources to be explored;

  • Important stone resources for construction;

  • Strong potential for the implementation of solar and wind energy;

  • Modern airport;

  • Strong naval construction industry;

  • Agricultural lands with strong potential;

  • Important vineyards in the county (Niculiţel, Babadag);

  • Competitive banking system;

  • Strongly developing construction sector;

  • Highly qualified work force for the industry sector;

  • Important museums, and strong cultural and archaeological heritage;

  • Large number of sheep.




  • Poor access infrastructure;

  • Environmental infrastructure (water distribution, sewage - purification) lacking in many localities;

  • Industrial entities with high energy consumption and high pollution, in need of new equipment;

  • Large number of textile companies using the lohn system;

  • Low number of commercial centres;

  • Low capitalisation of traditional crafts;

  • Reduced forested areas;

  • Poorly explored beaches from a tourism perspective;

  • Old water transportation systems;

  • Poorly performing wine making and bottling system;

  • Low number of animal farming complexes;

  • Insufficient work force, which is poorly educated and qualified in tourism services.

Opportunities

Threats

  • Available non-reimbursable EU funding;

  • Construction of a bridge over the Danube between Brăila and Tulcea;

  • Inclusion of the “Delta Dunării” airport into the international circuit;

  • Changing structure of agriculture to meet market demands;

  • Concentration of agricultural lands in highly performing farms;

  • Extension of trans-border economic cooperation with Ukraine;

  • Construction of new tourism structures;

  • Development of fishing and related activities.



  • Reduced economic activity due to the inclusion of some important county territories into the “Natura 2000” programme;

  • Decline in the use of the lohn system in the textile industry;

  • Market entry of competitive products from other EU countries;

  • Emigration of the qualified work force.



I.1.11 SWOT ANALYSIS BY SECTOR


INDUSTRY

Strengths

Weaknesses

  1. Economic growth in recent years, primarily due to the replacement of large entities, which had high energy consumption, were pollutant, and with low productivity – by flexible SMEs which efficiently employ the local workforce and local resources.

  2. Increased development of the naval production industry.

  3. Qualified work force.

  4. Low work force costs.

  5. Important investors present in Tulcea County (AKER BRAATVAAG, CAMPOFRIO, MARCO GROUP INTERNATIONAL).

  6. Strong food industry at county level, especially in the meat processing sector (the two producers, CARNIPROD S.A. and TABCO CAMPOFRIO S.A. placing the county among the top producers in the sector).

  7. Development of industrial fishing.

  8. Extraction industry is mostly represented by stone extraction for constructions, with some of the best stone quarries in Romania being located in Tulcea County.

  1. Industrial arms with high energy consumption.

  2. Mono-industrial or multi-industrial areas in decline.

  3. Low competitiveness of industrial sectors.

  4. Poor management in some enterprises.

  5. Lack of technological parks.

  6. Poorly developed entrepreneurial network.

  7. Real estate crisis – expensive land and buildings, and high rents

  8. Collapse of the lohn production system in the textile industry.

  9. Insufficient market information.

  10. Insufficient capital for new technology and equipment.

  11. Old equipment and technology.

  12. Poorly represented industrial sectors with high value added (telecommunications, IT).

  13. Insufficient individual and foreign investments;

  14. Poor infrastructure, lack of water distribution, sewage, poor state of local roads and of some county roads, which allows access to some localities in the county.

Opportunities

Threats

  1. Establishment of industrial parks on the old industrial platforms, and establishment of green field industrial parks.

  2. Attraction of strategic investors, internationally renowned large companies, after entry into the European Union.

  3. Development of partnerships between local enterprises and foreign ones.

  4. Establishment of public-private partnerships

  5. Development of the SME sector.

  1. Low EU demand for products and services.

  2. Pressure of EU products on the internal market.

  3. Lack of commercial outlets.

  4. Reduced interest in the introduction of new technologies.

  5. Bankruptcy of a large number of firms which will not face competition after integration.



AGRICULTURE

Strengths

Weaknesses




  1. Good climatic conditions for cereal farming (wheat, barley, corn, sunflower) and for plants for technical use.

2. Areas well known for their vineyards: Sarica Niculiţel and Babadag.

3. Good conditions for the development of animal farming (cattle, sheep, pigs, birds, horses).

4. Fishing is a strong point in Tulcea’s economy due to large water surfaces.

5. Well organised institutional system (Agricultural Department, APIA, County Office for Agricultural Consultancy etc.).







  1. Old agricultural technology (equipment and storage of crops).

  2. Small irrigated surface.

  3. Poor access to finances for agriculture (internal or external).

  4. Old traditional capitalisation system, with no production contracts, lack of an agricultural exchange.

  5. Small agricultural territories.

  6. Poor professional qualification of those working the land.

  7. Ageing work force in the sector.

  8. Poorly represented producers’ associations.




Opportunities

Threats




  1. Improving pedological and agricultural works on existing soils.

  2. Channelling of capital into renewing agricultural technology: cars and agricultural equipment for field crops and animal farming, and storage of agricultural products.

  3. Facilities to obtain production loans and investments.

  4. Establishment of an agricultural market and exchange.

  5. Demand for organic products.

  6. Increased demand for plants for technical use, especially for bio-fuel.

  7. Establishment of intensive education courses for agricultural workers.

  8. Concentration of agricultural areas by ensuring profitable vineyards.







  1. De-population of some agricultural areas

  2. Loss of traditional plants

  3. Loss of some animal species because of lack of implementation of new technologies to meet EU standards and requirements

  4. Restrictions imposed by the inclusion of approximately 80% of the county’s area into the Natura 2000 network of protected spaces.





TOURISM

Strengths

Weaknesses

  1. Unique and diverse natural environment in the Danube Delta and Măcinului Mountains.

  2. Untouched beaches on the shore of the Black Sea (Sulina, Sf. Gheorghe).

  3. Cultural and historic heritage, which includes varied objectives and which have a strong tourism value: Enisala fortresses, Halmyris, Dinogeţia etc., “triangle of Tulcea Orthodox monasteries” - Celic-Dere, Saon and Cocoş, the Paleo-Christian basilica at Niculiţel – historical and artistic monuments, traditions and customs of various nationalities (Lipovens, Ukrainians, Turks, Tatars, Aromanians), ethnographic and archaeological sites, churches, museums.

  4. Diverse flora and fauna, both on land and aquatic, and potential for different types of tourism: landscapes, scientific, bird watching, hunting, and fishing.

  5. Traditional gastronomy specific to the area.

  6. Diversity of multi-ethnic cultural traditions.

  7. Opportunity for tourism throughout the year.




  1. Small number of tourist information centres.

  2. Short tourist season.

  3. Lack of tourist guides in many areas of the county.

  4. Small number of organisations to promote tourism.

  5. Reduced presence of tourism operators from Tulcea County at national and international tourism conventions.

  6. Poor conditions for loans for tourism projects.

  7. Poor access infrastructure.

  8. Reduced degree of management knowledge, of understanding the legislation, and poor knowledge of foreign languages of those involved in tourism.

  9. Reduced offer of complex tourist packages.

  10. Lack of development strategy for tourism.

  11. Lack of marketing studies specific for tourist areas.

  12. Lack of specialised emergency services in tourist areas (ambulances, fire fighters).

  13. Low degree of professional qualification for tourism services.

  14. Low accommodation occupancy at low season.

Opportunities

Threats

  1. Reimplementation of regular national and international flights from the Delta Dunării airport, by attracting low-cost airlines.

  2. Establishment of tourist mini-ports.

  3. Maintenance of beaches.

  4. Interest of the public administration to develop tourism.

  5. Establishment of public-private partnerships in order to promote sustainable tourism

  6. Local and central initiatives to develop the tourism infrastructure.

  7. Establishment of new tourist information centres in townships throughout the county with strong tourism potential .

  8. Restoration of cultural, historical, and architectural monuments throughout Tulcea County.

  9. Use of EU funding programmes, and other programmes initialised by local or national authorities.

  10. Inclusion of approximately 80% of the county’s area into the Natura 2000 network of protected areas.




  1. Reduction or elimination of some fiscal facilities.

  2. Poor management of the natural and cultural heritage.

  3. Insufficient capitalisation of opportunities for rural tourism.

  4. Underestimation of the importance of specialised education in tourism.

  5. Strong competition from neighbouring countries in terms of tourism.

  6. Appearance of epidemics or epizootics (avian influenza, anthrax, cholera etc.).




INFRASTRUCTURE




Strengths

Weaknesses

  1. European road E87, national roads DN 22, DN 22a and DN 22d, railroad network for passenger and cargo transportation.

  2. “Delta Dunării” airport.

  3. Existing network for the distribution of electrical energy to all townships.

  4. Modern telecommunications equipment (digital) in most areas of the county.

  5. Nearly full county coverage for mobile telephone services.




    1. Poor technical shape of the road network.

    2. Railroad network which is not modernised (lack of electricity, and on only one way of access).

    3. Poor port and docking infrastructure.

    4. Townships with no drinking water distribution systems.

    5. Lack of sewage and purification networks in rural areas.

    6. Natural gas distribution networks only in Tulcea, Macin, Isaccea and Jijila.

    7. Damaged road infrastructure due to heavy vehicles.

    8. Lack of a modern waste management system.

    9. Decreased commercial traffic at the Tulcea – Izmail international border point, on the border with Ukraine.

    10. Lack of property managed tourist ports.

    11. Lack of a bridge over the Danube between Tulcea and Brăila leads to high traffic for passengers and cargo.




Opportunities

Threats

  1. Construction of a bridge over the Danube between Tulcea and Brăila.

  2. European Union community programmes to help the development of the rural infrastructure through structural funds.

  3. Establishment of a new border point between Isaccea (Romania) and Orlovca (Ukraine), funded by the Common Operational Programme Romania –Ukraine – Moldova 2007-2013.

  4. Governmental programmes to encourage local initiatives.

  5. Establishment of tourist mini-ports within the Regional Operational Programme and/ or the Transport Sector Operational Programme.

  6. Use of structural funds (Transport Sector Operational Programme) to modernise the Tulcea – Medgidia railway.

  7. County programmes for the modernisation of the road infrastructure.

  1. Insufficient funds for the development of the infrastructure.

  2. Restrictions imposed by the inclusion of nearly 80% of the county’s area into the Natura 2000 network of protected areas.

  3. Stopped use of the Medgidia – Tulcea railway section due to reduced number of passengers.




I.1.12 OBJECTIVES
STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS IN THE ECONOMIC SECTOR


  • Development of tourism

  • Modernisation of agriculture to help the production of organic products

  • Modernisation of the basic infrastructure and population access to this infrastructure

  • Connect Tulcea County to European and national communication channels

  • Development of the services sector

  • Capitalisation of non-conventional energy potential

  • Development of non-polluting industries


SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES


  • Development of agricultural tourism, ecotourism, scientific, religious, cultural, gastronomic, cultural, business, and leisure tourism;

  • Attract major international tourism operators;

  • Support the establishment of producers’ associations;

  • Development of associative forms of agriculture;

  • Increase the irrigated agricultural areas;

  • Increase and promote local brands;

  • Stimulate the development of some weakly represented services;

  • Provide access to drinking water and sewage and purification in all townships;

  • Ongoing modernisation of the airport;

  • Construction of a bridge over the Danube between Brăila and Tulcea;

  • Modernisation of the road infrastructure;

  • Construction of tourist ports;

  • Modernisation / restoration of drinking water distribution and sewage systems;

  • Extension of the natural gas distribution network;

  • Modernisation of the electrical energy transportation network;

  • Renewal of the naval transport park;

  • Attract investments for the exploitation of renewable energy sources;

  • Development of SMEs which work with local resources;

  • Development of traditional craft work and traditional arts.

I.2. EVALUATION OF THE NATURAL CAPITAL




I.2.1. GENERAL OVERVIEW OF TULCEA COUNTY
Physical Geographical Characterisation
Tulcea county is located in the northern part of the Dobrogea region, in south-eastern Romania. The parallel at 45° northern latitude passes through the county near the township of Rândunica. The town of Sulina, located at 29°41’24” eastern latitude, is the easternmost point in the county and the country.
The county has a surface area of 8,499 km2, which represents 3.5% of the total area of the country, making Tulcea one of the largest counties in the country (ranking third after Timiş and Suceava). The Danube Delta is an important characteristic, as is the Razim-Sinoie lagoon complex; together they have a surface area of 4,340 km2, which represents roughly 51% of the county’s total surface area.
Another important characteristic is the large variety of geographical relief forms, setting Tulcea apart from other counties in the country: here you have the oldest geological formations in Europe (mountains, plains and hills, Pre-Cambrian formations in the Hercinici Mountains, and depressions), next to the youngest geomorphic formations (Danube Delta and the Razim – Sinoie Complex).
The main geological formations are: Măcinului Mountains, Niculiţel Plateau, Tulcei Mounds, Babadag Plateau, Casimcei Plateau.
Tulcea County is surrounded on three sides by water: the Danube to the north and to the west, the Black Sea and the Razim – Sinoie Lagoon complex to the east.
The interior hydrographical network includes brooks, with short flows and a non-regulated water debits: Taiţa (longest flow – 47 km), Teliţa (41 km), Slava (41 km), Ceamurlia, Topolog, Casimcea. The Danube borders the county over 276 km .
The most important lakes located in the Danube meadow are: Carcaliu, Jijila, Crapina in the northwest and Rotund, Telincea, Saun, Parcheş and Somova in the north.
The youngest geomorphologic unit in the county and in the country is the Danube Delta, which includes the three arms of the Danube:


  • Chilia, to the north, with a length of 116 km

  • Sfântu Gheorghe, to the south, with a length of 109 km

  • Sulina, in the middle, with a length of 63 km

South of the Sf. Gheorghe arm, there is the Razim-Sinoie lagoon complex, which includes Lake Razim, Lake Babadag, Lake Golovita, Lake Zmeica, Lake Sinoie, characterised by large surface areas and shallow depths.


I.2.2. WATER RESOURCES
Water resources with potential and technical uses in Tulcea County include subterranean water (insufficiently explored and capitalised), and surface waters, mostly dominated by the Danube River. Other streams in the county are of little importance, as they are Danube tributaries, small in number and with a reduced flow capacity, or tributaries into the Black Sea, with longer lengths and larger flows. All streams in the county are grafted into rainwater freshets.

Main Rivers and Streams in Tulcea County


No.

Name

Length ( km )

Annual flow

m3/sec

Hydrographical basin

1.

Teliţa

48

0.06

Black Sea

2.

Taiţa

57

0.33

Black Sea

3.

Tabana

9

0.50

Black Sea

4.

Slava

38

0.01

Black Sea

5.

Hamangia

33

0.02

Black Sea

6.

Lodzova

15

0.01

Black Sea

7.

Tăiţa

17

0.01

Black Sea

8.

Casimcea

22 (of 69 km)

0.02

Black Sea

9.

Ciucurova

24

0.01

Black Sea

10

Valea Tulcii

14

0.01

Danube

11

Topolog

26 (of 50 km)

0.01

Danube




County lakes include the lakes along the Danube, those in the Danube Delta, and on the banks of the Black Sea. Of the lakes in the Danube’s meadow, the most important ones are Jijila, Rotund, Saon, Somova, Parcheş. In the Danube Delta there is not a significant number of lakes, usually with large surface areas and shallow depths. The Razim-Sinoie complex is the most important lake area in the country, with a total surface area of 60,000 ha.
I.2.3. MINERAL RESOURCES
Dobrogea has been an important source for construction stone, granite, porphyry, ornamental limestone of various ages, gritstone, china clay, etc. Aside from construction stone, mineral deposits have also been mined (copper pyrite, iron copper sulphate, sulphates, Bologna spar, etc.). But at present, mining of these substances has ceased due to an inefficient economy.
Industrial and construction limestone is mined in Tulcea Municipality (Bididia), Zebil (Dealul Congaz), Mahmudia (Cearacul Mare, and Dealul Hârtop), Babadag (Codru), Nufăru (Dealul Malcoci), Dorobanţu, Ciucurova, Baia, Nalbant.
In the areas of Cerna, Măcin, Greci and Baia, granite, granidiorite, and rhyolite are mined. In the area of Turcoaia, porphyry is mined; diabase is mined in the Isaccea area, gritstone is mined in the Nalbant area, and amphibolite is mined in the area of Jijila.

Around the perimeter of the Danube Delta Biosphere Conservation Area, various non-renewable natural resources have been identified: cleansing sand for ferrous metallurgy, mines of heavy metals in beach sands, peat, etc.


The sands from river-sea banks have been mined, those from Caraorman (cleansing sand – 90.8 % SiO) to be used for glass production and in the technological process at the Ferrous Metallurgy Plant in Galaţi. After the declaration of the Danube Delta as a protected biosphere, all mining was stopped and the constructions and equipment were abandoned. These currently do not integrate into the Delta landscape, and should be demolished.
The sands from sea banks have been mined for the extraction of heavy metals. The industrial extraction and processing of heavy metals from sands from Chituc stopped in the ‘90s, due to the incompatibility of such activities with the protection of the Delta.
I.2.4. RENEWABLE NATURAL RESOURCES

Wild plant species (medicinal and aromatic spontaneous flora) and wild animal species are important renewable natural resources for economic capitalisation. Of the wild flora, the following are capitalised: reed (Phragmites australis), which covers a total surface area of approximately 170,000 ha and has a production potential of around 50,000 tonnes / year, bulrush (Typha angustifolia), lime tree flowers (Tilia tomentosa,T. cordata), roughly 50 tonnes/year, hawthorn flowers, fruit and leaves (Crataegus monogyna), roughly 5.7 tonnes / year, elder tree flowers (Sambucus nigra), around 0.4 tonnes / year, St. John’s Wort (Hypericum perforatum), around 0.72 tonnes / year, Dog Rose flowers (Rosa canina), around 2.5 tonnes/ year, yarrow plants (Achillea millefolium), around 0.8 tonnes/ year, locust tree flowers (Robinia pseudocacia), walnut leaves (Juglans regia), wormwood (Artemisia absinthium), chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla), mulberry leaves (Morus alba), wormwood leaves (Artemisia absinthum), Sheppard’s purse (Capsella bursa pastoris), dandelion (Taraxiscum officinale). The medicinal plants listed above are only some of the 95 species in the area.


It is also a known fact that Tulcea County is an important melliferous area, with spontaneous wild plants including 64 species.

Of the wild animals in the country, fish is an important resource. Of the 133 recorded fish species in the waters of the Danube, the Danube Delta, and on the coast of the Black Sea, 30 species are capitalised in the economy. Around 3,000 – 4,000 tonnes of fish are caught annually, both freshwater and sea species, supporting a strong local and traditional economic activity. Some mammal and bird species make up an important synergic aspect of the wild fauna. In the Danube Delta, 15 hunting clubs are organized, and throughout the rest of the county, there are 30 hunting groups (13 hunting groups managed by RNP and 17 by AJVPS), over a total surface area of 129,258 ha.

Renewable energy resources are very important, and Tulcea County was evaluated as having an important energy potential. Of the forms of renewable energy, the most important is wind energy, as Dobrogea is an area with the highest potential in this area in Romania.
I.2.5. SOIL RESOURCES
The agricultural area of Tulcea County is of 362,860 ha of which: arable surface of 290,839 ha, natural meadows covering 60,741 ha, orchards covering 1,608 ha and vineyards over 9,612 ha.

The distribution of land areas by use falls within the activity objectives of O.J.S.P.A. Tulcea. However, as the program for development and renewal of the pedagogical and agro-chemical studies for 2003-2011 has only started (a study for the administrative territory of a city hall took two calendar years to be completed, according to the methodology), OJSPA Tulcea does not have any conclusive observations regarding the distribution of the land areas by use, crops, as many of the archived studies are no longer valid after 10 years.


In Tulcea County there is a total area of 97,648 ha of degraded land, due to: excessive humidity (10,805 ha), salt (15,253 ha), sand (3,000 ha), erosion (48,546 ha), surface erosions (18,339 ha), depth erosions (1,072) or for other reasons (419 ha).
The soils in Tulcea County are affected by natural and anthropic pedo-genetic factors on rocks, which have been intensely transformed to retain water and nutritional elements which are increasingly made available to plants. In general, for the majority of cases, the parental rock is the loess-rock, which led to degradation and alteration. The inorganic material which contributed to the paedogenesis was produced by the meadow vegetation which, due to the micro-flora, produced the humidity – though in a small percentage. The diversification of the types of resulting soil are due to the soil here being some of the oldest in Europe (from the Hercinic chain), as well as some of the youngest in the country (Danube Delta). The main types of soil in Tulcea County are:
Chernozems, are mostly located on the Northern Dobrogea Plateau. The soil conditions in the steppe are important from both a climatic and a vegetation perspective. In the Danube Delta, these soils are not widely spread, in the southern part of the Chilia area, where the Chilia loess meadow ends. The surface area covered by chernozems is primarily used for grazing; only a small part is used by fishing farms. From an ecological perspective, there is a danger that the salt levels in the soil might increase, due to increased phreatic water levels, as a result of nearby fishing farms, which have degraded the natural balance in the area.

Alluvial soils are very young soils, characterised mostly in the Danube meadow and in the Danube’s western river banks, which continually revive fresh deposits. These banks are sufficiently tall (2-5 mrMN) to be regularly drained and aired, at least in the upper portion of the soil (after floods, the phreatic water level drops to depths of 2-3m). Approximately 35,000 ha of alluvial soil areas in the Danube Delta have dams and are cultivated. If these soils are well managed, they are productive for a large array of crops specific to dry areas, but due to a dry climate and a lack of irrigation, productivity is low. Barley, alfalfa, sunflower, and autumn corn are the most appropriate crops. In natural ecosystems, alluvial soils have relatively low proportions covered with vegetation, and these are mostly meso-xenophyle steppes at high altitudes, or meso-phyle meadows and areas on humid banks. These soils, however, are very well suited for poplar tree forests.

The limno layer includes the deposits at the bottom of lakes and lagoons. These sediments are mostly made up of mineral suspensions brought by the Danube’s waters, and of suspensions from chemical and biological processes which took place in the water and between the sediments. The biological functions of the limno layer within aquatic ecosystems are similar with those in land ecosystems, and they play a role in:

  • Providing a growth environment for aquatic vegetation;

  • Habitat for the betonite fauna;

  • Stocking and marginalisation of heavy metals brought by the river’s water flow;

  • Filtration, helping to protect lake water and phreatic water against chemical pollution, but with an impact on lake water through the production of volatile organic carbon (CH4 - CO2) and H2S emissions.


Gley soils represent the main component of the characteristic soil envelope for relief types between 0.0 and 0.5mrMN. These are developed on alluvial deposits, but some have been formed on loess deposits (Câmpia Chiliei). If they are not drained and cultivated, gley soils are predominantly covered with thicket, reeds, and sedges. On river banks, these can be found as Salix alba and Salix fragilis forests, and meadows with Agrostis stolonifera and Carex sp.
Psamo-pelitic soil and sands are associated with the riverbanks and sand dunes in the maritime delta, and in the Razim-Sinoie lagoon complex. Psamo-pelitic soils are defined by their sandy texture, and their weakly developed soil profile. The general fertility level of psamo-pelitic soils is very low. They are primarily used for meadows and poplar tree plantations. Only on very small areas, in household yards and near villages, these soils may be cultivated with corn, potatoes, rye, barley.
Aquisalids include all types of soil which have the upper limit of salt horizon in the first 20cm from the ground surface. Aquisalids support a weak plant life, which includes inferior meadows for cattle feeding. By their nature, these soils have a low level of biodiversity. For agriculture (excluding extensive grazing), it is impossible to use these soils without artificial drainage and washing of the salt. A special problem for sandy aquisalids, which have once been drained, is the fact that they represent a high risk level of wind erosion.
White soils are characteristic, by definition, in steppe areas with a dry continental climate, and are the only regional soils in the Danube Delta. The largest part of these soils is used as arable land by the inhabitants of the Chilia Veche village. Others form meadows. The soils at Stipoc were included in fishing farms.

Although these soils are good from a physical perspective, they have a moderate fertility level due to the low levels of organic materials, N and P. However, the main reason for low productivity is the lack of humidity in the soil. This is why irrigation is always necessary to obtain good crops on arable lands.


Histosols make up the main component of the paedeological level at DDBCA. According to SRCS, soils that fall under this classification contain an organic layer that is more than 50cm thick, with the upper limit within the first 25cm of the ground’s surface.

Use. In their natural form, histosols are a basic support for humid ecosystems: thicket, water vegetation, underwater vegetation. Large surfaces are used in agriculture and in managed areas.
Anthrosols and non-soils are the result of various human activities. They are mostly represented by lots of earth or other materials resulting from the digging of canals for drainage from agricultural areas and for navigation routes (e.g. Caraorman and Mila 23), and canals for the improvement of water circulation to isolated parts of the delta. Anthrosols are made up of alluvial deposits, sometimes mixed with organic materials. Small surfaces – approximately 500 ha – are used by inhabitants to grow vegetables, melons, and other food. Larger surfaces have been covered by grass, and are used as meadows for grazing.
I.2.6. BIODIVERSITY AND PROTECTED AREAS
I.1.6.1. Natural Habitats
Tulcea County has an outstanding biological diversity due to the climate specific to the Northern Dobrogea region (excessive continental) which has favoured the development of numerous types of habitats and ecosystems. The surface of the county is covered in proportion of 60% by natural and semi-natural ecosystems, and 24 types of natural habitats have been identified, including: steppes, forested meadows, rocky areas, grottos, rivers, lakes, freshwater, coastal vegetation, thicket, peateries, canals and lagoons, sand dunes, agricultural areas, swamps, and sandy beaches.
The Danube Delta is particular due to the major influence of the Danube’s water and of its tributaries; it has sedimented habitats which are unique on the Romanian sea coast. The beauty and richness of the area stands out, and has a variety of biotopes and resources, which are unique not only in Europe, but in all delta ecosystems in the world. This site houses important protected species, but especially, special types of habitats. According to existing data, 29 types of protected habitats have been identified, 5 protected species of mammals and reptiles, 14 protected species of fish, 8 protected species of invertebrates, and 5 protected species of plants. The sea area of the Danube Delta hosts 3 protected types of habitats, 2 protected species of mammals, 2 protected species of fish, and 1 protected species of invertebrates.
I.2.6.2. Wild Flora and Fauna
The rich diversity of natural habitats in the Northern Dobrogea area allows for the existence of a large number of species of wild flora and fauna. Many of them are rare, vulnerable, or endangered. The Dobrogea flora includes 1770 plant species in the province, which represents 52% of all Romanian flora and nearly 19 % of European flora. Subsequent statistics show that Dobrogea has 1911 species, which means that the flora of this province is very rich, and is comparable with the Mediterranean islands of Crete and Corsica. The natural protected areas are representative of the county’s biodiversity, especially the Danube Delta Biosphere Conservation Area and the Munţii Măcinului National Park.
The outstanding ecological value of the Măcin Mountains is evidenced through the discovery of 72 phytotaxa to date, representing 5% of endangered species, included in the Red List of superior plants in Romania. The specificity of these taxa, compared to other concentration areas of rare plans in Romania, consists of the domination of Pontic – Balkan species (26.4%) and Pontic species (16.7%), followed by Eurasian species (12.5%), Balkan species (11.1%), Mediterranean (8.3%), Mediterranean-Pontic (6.9%), with other less important ones. Of these taxa, 5 are included in the European Red List, in the vulnerable category: Campanula romanica (bell flower), Galanthus plicatus (snowdrop), Moehringia grisebachii, M. jancae, Dianthus nardiformis, and according to IUCN categories, 45 are endemic, and 6.9% sub-endemic. Also, 1.4% of these taxa fall in the “disappeared” category (Ex), 2.8% in the “vulnerable” category (V), 13.9% in the “vulnerable and rare” category (V/R), and 81.9% in the “rare” category (R).
From a fauna perspective, there is an important number of insect species in the Măcin Mountain area which have been new observations in the Romanian fauna, many of which have only been found in this area so far. These species include: Menaccarus arenicola and Nabis provencalis (among heteroptera), Hypantopa segnelle, previously only found in the Alps region, Bryotropha tachyptilella, found in forested steppe areas in Hungary, Slovakia, Italy, Bulgaria, and Ukraine; Bryotropha domestica, adapted to thicket habitats, Caryocolum alsinella found in sandy areas; Caryocolum mucronatella found in only some countries in southern and central Europe; Anacampsis timidella and Dyspessa salicicola, both found in Greece and in the Pricopan hills; Exophila rectangularis found throughout Asia Minor and the eastern Mediterranean region, and Cuculia dracunculi was found for the first time in our country in the Pricopan hills.
Among amphibians, the species of the highest scientific importance are: Bufo bufo (European toad) glacial leftover in the Măcin area, and Rana dalmatina, also a leftover which illustrates the old age of the forests in the area. Among reptiles, we mention Testudo graeca (Golden Greek tortoise), Ablepharus kitaibelii, Lacerta trilineata (Balkan green lizard), Lacerta viridis (green lizard), Elaphe quatorlineata (four-lined snake), Elaphe longissima, Coronella austriaca and Vypera ammodytes ssp. montandoni.
Bird species are many and varied in the area of the Măcin mountains. Many of the species are protected, as they are considered rare or vulnerable. These include: Apus apus, (common swift), Caprimulgus europaeus (European nightjar), Coracias garrulus (European roller), Lanius senator (woodchat shrike), Merops apiaster (European bee-eater), Monticola saxistilis (Rufous-tailed Rock Thrush), Oenanthe isabellina (Isabelline Wheatear), Oenanthe pleschanka (Pied Wheatear), Passer hispaniolensis (Spanish sparrow). These are all species of high scientific interest, especially because they are rare on Romanian territory, they are adapted to life in special habitats, or reach the limit of this region. Of all mammal species, the protected ones are: Citellus citellus (European ground squirrel), Felis silvestris (wild cat), Putorius eversmanii (masked polecat), Martes foina (beech marten) etc.
The surface of the Danube Delta Biosphere Conservation hosts in the 30 types of ecosystems 5,380 flora and fauna species, of these, there are 1,839 flora species, including 678 planktonic algae species, 107 lichen species, 38 macromycete species and 1,016 vascular plant species.
There are 3,541 fauna species, including 3,061 invertebrate species (Rotifers – 182, Worms – 253, Mollusks – 91, Crustaceans – 115, Spiders – 168, Diplopods – 8 and Insects– 2,244) and 480 species of vertebrates (Fish – 86 species, Amphibians – 10 species, Reptiles – 11 species, Birds – 331 species, Mammals – 42 species). Of these, 1,382 new species and subspecies were identified (285 plant species and 1,097 animal species) including 294 new species for Romania (35 plant species and 260 animal species) and 39 species new to science (2 plant species and 37 animal species).

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   17


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət