Indigenous engagement and land management are dealt with as a separate section under this strategic plan because communication and coordination with these groups is frequently overlooked, or dealt with in a substandard manner.
Large areas of land that are either prone to invasion by lantana or have existing infestations are managed by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island groups. Therefore, effective engagement and coordination practices must be used to promote strategic management of lantana in these regions in a culturally sensitive manner.
In addition, it is vital to ensure that Indigenous cultural heritage values are maintained on country managed by non-Indigenous land managers. All states and territories have legislation in place to protect areas and objects of significance to Indigenous people. Duty-of-care provisions require that people conducting activities in areas of significance must take all reasonable and practical measures to avoid harming cultural heritage.
As highlighted in the draft document ‘Principles for engaging Indigenous peoples in managing pest and disease incursions’ produced by the National Biosecurity Committee, Indigenous communities have both an interest and contribution to make in managing pest incursions on Country, and this should be recognised and respected. Further detail is provided in the document, but the overarching principles are:
-
relevant parties and their rights should be identified
-
mechanisms should be established to engage Indigenous peoples
-
values of all parties should be addressed
-
governments should promote an understanding of incursion management
-
capacity to manage disease and pest incursions needs to be considered
-
Indigenous peoples should be involved in preparedness, planning and response activities.
The WoNS Lantana Strategic Plan 2012–17 has been developed to provide a framework for coordinated management of lantana across the country. Complementary links can be found in a range of existing resource management initiatives at all jurisdictional levels, as shown in Table 2.
Table 2 Strategies and plans for the management of lantana
-
Scale
|
Natural resource management
|
Pest management
|
Weed species management
|
National
|
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
National Strategy for the Conservation of Australia’s Biological Diversity 2010
Native Vegetation Policy 2001
National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development 1992
|
The Australian Weeds Strategy 2007
Weeds of National Significance
Biological Control Act 1984
Caring for our Country Business Plan
|
Weeds of National Significance strategic plan
|
State
|
State biodiversity and natural resource management strategies
Forest policies
|
State agency pest management plans
|
New South Wales Lantana Biological Control Task Force
|
Regional
|
Regional natural resource management plans
|
Regional pest management strategies
|
Specific weed control plans (New South Wales)
|
Catchment
|
Catchment management strategies
|
Integrated crop management pest management strategies
|
|
Local
|
Landcare plans
Conservation corridor plans
Riparian vegetation management plans
Bushcare plans
|
Local government pest management plans (Queensland)
|
Local weed control plans (New South Wales)
|
Property
|
Property management plans
National parks management plans (Northern Territory)
|
Property pest management plans
National park weed management strategies
|
Property weed management plans
|
The strategic goals and objectives in this revised plan build on those of the original plan. These objectives include actions to maintain ongoing strategic programs and address critical management and research needs for the future.
Appropriate actions to achieve these goals and objectives are outlined in Sections 3.1–3.3. Many of the actions will enable progress towards multiple objectives. Thus, all activities should be undertaken in light of the overall program and should address all relevant goals when possible.
Containment lines and management priorities are illustrated on the National Lantana Management Map (Appendix 2).
A program logic diagram (see Section 5) was developed by the NLMG to show the relationship between the strategic actions and the objectives and goals they achieve.
A phase three monitoring, evaluation, reporting and improvement (MERI) table has been included (Section 5). This level of reporting will be required by the Australian Weeds Committee (AWC) to monitor the ongoing delivery of the plan.
|