Ana səhifə

Lantana (Lantana camara L.)


Yüklə 1.38 Mb.
səhifə10/10
tarix24.06.2016
ölçüsü1.38 Mb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10

5 Stakeholder responsibilities


Although landowners and managers have primary responsibility for the control of lantana on their land, relevant agencies share responsibility for the actions listed in Sections 3 and 4. The effective implementation of this strategy requires the involvement of a range of stakeholders. Stakeholders’ responsibilities may vary between jurisdictions: some actions may be optional while others are prescribed by legislation. The successful achievement of strategic actions relies on the development and maintenance of partnerships between community, industry and government, and recognition of the roles of each stakeholder. In particular, while the National Lantana Management Group provided oversight for the original strategy, future coordination arrangements will evolve to maintain and build on past achievements. The Australian Weeds Committee, at a national level, and various agencies at the state and territory level will continue to provide a leadership role. Suggested responsibilities for each group are listed below.

Australian Government


  • Ensure strategic lantana control is undertaken on all Commonwealth-owned and managed lands.

  • Prevent further imports of Lantana spp. through the Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service (now Biosecurity Australia).

  • Provide research support through the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Commonwealth Weeds Research Group.

  • Administer the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

  • Promote the status of lantana as a WoNS, its impacts and the importance of management.

Australian Weeds Committee


  • Provide a mechanism for identifying and resolving weed issues at a national level.

  • Provide advice to the National Biosecurity Committee on weeds issues.

  • Provide planning, coordination and monitoring of the implementation of the Australian Weeds Strategy.

  • Facilitate coordination between the Australian Government and state and territory governments on weed management policy and programs.

  • Provide governance processes for the effective delivery of the WoNS initiative.

  • Oversee the implementation of the activities described in the WoNS strategies.

  • Promote the importance and benefits of the WoNS initiative to all levels of government.

  • Collect and report the achievements of the WoNS initiative and recommended improvements to upper level government at state, territory and national levels.

State and territory agencies


  • Maintain appropriate legislation and policies to achieve state and territory-based objectives for managing lantana (e.g. a national ban on the sale of the plant).

  • Administer and enforce legislation where applicable.

  • Coordinate lantana control and management at a jurisdictional level to complement the management and delivery of the Lantana National Strategic Plan.

  • Undertake lantana management on state lands in line with agreed national priorities.

  • Work with natural resource management groups, local governments, communities and other stakeholders to prevent and minimise the impacts of lantana.

  • Identify strategic management areas and associated objectives.

  • Promote consistency with this strategy in jurisdictional pest management plans.

  • Facilitate the inclusion of strategic lantana management in pest management planning processes.

  • Contribute to priority weed research initiatives.

  • Source funding for strategic management programs and research.

  • Implement monitoring and reporting protocols in line with the monitoring, evaluation, reporting and improvement plan and provide relevant information the Australian Weeds Committee.

  • Develop and implement communication and extension tools, where appropriate.

  • Undertake any necessary planning and mapping, and contribute to national mapping initiatives.

  • Ensure, where appropriate, participation on the National Lantana Management Group or similar national WoNS taskforce.

  • Improve knowledge of the identification, impacts and best-practice management of lantana.

  • Identify lantana and other weeds threatening public lands.

  • Implement weed hygiene and other best-practice management to minimise spread of lantana.

Research institutions (e.g. CSIRO, universities, government agencies)


  • Undertake appropriate research to address priority national strategic requirements.

  • Identify research gaps and seek innovative solutions for the management of lantana.

  • Seek new and ongoing funding and support for research requirements.

Local governments


  • Incorporate Lantana Strategic Plan objectives in relevant pest management plans and monitor implementation.

  • Administer and enforce legislation where applicable.

  • Undertake surveying and mapping, particularly in relation to outlying lantana infestations.

  • Establish local management policies to contribute to strategic control, containment and/or asset protection objectives.

  • Improve community awareness of impacts and identification, and promote early detection.

  • Strategically control lantana on local government-managed or owned land

  • Facilitate the removal of urban plantings of lantana in strategically important areas.

  • Source funding and/or contribute to strategic control programs.

Natural resource management groups and catchment management authorities


  • Administer and enforce legislation where applicable (e.g. in South Australia).

  • Source funding and/or contribute to strategic control programs.

  • Improve regional awareness of impacts and identification, and promote early detection.

  • Contribute local and regional perspectives to lantana management.

  • Contribute to the development, implementation and/or review of local and regional pest management plans.

  • Incorporate lantana actions in relevant pest management plans and monitor implementation.

  • Promote and contribute to local and regional containment and/or management programs in partnership with relevant stakeholders.

  • Support and/or develop lantana projects consistent with national priorities and seek funding to implement projects.

  • Participate in local and regional mapping initiatives and contribute to state, territory and national map production.

  • Promote awareness and best-practice management through event coordination and product distribution.

Community, conservation and other interest groups


  • Contribute local and regional perspectives to lantana management, including community perspectives.

  • Contribute to the development, implementation and/or review of local and regional pest management plans.

  • Support and/or develop lantana projects consistent with national priorities and seek funding to implement projects.

  • Participate in local and regional mapping initiatives, and contribute to state, territory and national map production.

Industry


  • Promote and adopt best-practice management of lantana.

  • Contribute to research and development of management practices to support industry members.

  • Ensure awareness of sale and movement restrictions (this may differ between states) of lantana by industry members.

  • Improve community awareness of impacts and identification, promote early detection and hygiene protocols, and discourage use of lantana.

Private land owners


  • Manage and control lantana on private lands in accordance with state, territory or local government legislation and policy.

  • Improve knowledge of the identification, impacts and best-practice impacts of lantana.

  • Identify lantana and other weeds threatening the property.

  • Undertake any necessary planning and mapping.

  • Implement best-practice management.

  • Implement weed hygiene and other management practices to minimise spread of lantana.

Appendix 1 The Weeds of National Significance initiative and its phases1


In 2007, an independent review of the WoNS initiative concluded that the nationally strategic approach of WoNS was highly successful in leveraging consistent multijurisdictional activity on high-priority weed species. This initial review was followed by a detailed review of the inaugural WoNS species by the Australian Weeds Committee (AWC) in 2009–10. The AWC reviewed the implementation of the 20 WoNS national strategies and, in light of achievements for these 20 species, considered the capacity for national coordination of additional WoNS species.

Following the reviews, the Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council (Resolution 15.7, 21 May 2009) endorsed a three-phased approach to national management of WoNS species (Figure 4). This ‘phased approach’ aims to provide the most cost-effective use of limited ‘national coordination’ resources.





Figure 4 Australian Weed Committee diagrammatic representation of coordinator effort and resource use when implementing a Weeds of National Significance strategy

The phased approach recognises the need for reduced national coordination (‘phasing down’) of WoNS species that are under effective national management, and allows for further weed species to be nominated for consideration as additional WoNS. The AWC is implementing these reforms, and national coordination of the inaugural 20 WoNS species has already transitioned to phase 2 or 3, depending on the species. No species have yet been removed from the WoNS list. The AWC is developing a protocol to guide future decisions about when this should occur on a case-by-case basis.

In 2010, jurisdictions nominated additional candidate WoNS species. These species were independently assessed, and the AWC endorsed 12 additional ‘species’ to be listed as WoNS. The AWC Chairman, Dr Jim Thompson, announced these additional plant species as WoNS on 20 April 2012. Additional information on the selection of these species and the phased approach is available on www.weeds.org.au/WONS.

Appendix 2 National lantana distribution and management zone map, 2011


The priority management actions for lantana outlined in goals 1–3 of the strategic plan are reflected in the national weed spread and management map below.

Appendix 3 Program logic model for the lantana strategic plan

References


AECGroup 2007a, Economic impact of lantana on the Australian grazing industry, Department of Natural Resources and Water, Queensland.

AECGroup 2007b, Lantana survey analysis, Department of Natural Resources and Water, Brisbane, Queensland.

ARMCANZ (Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand), ANZECC (Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council) and Forestry Ministers, 2001, Weeds of National Significance Lantana (Lantana camara) Strategic Plan, National Weeds Strategy Executive Committee, Launceston.

Alcova, AP 1987, The effects of the presence of Lantana camara on local bird populations in Brisbane Forest Park, Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland.

Bailey, FM 1897, ‘On some of the introduced plants of Queensland’, Proceedings of the Linnaean Society of New South Wales, vol. 4, pp. 26–36.

Clark, A, van Oosterhout, E, Menzies, E, Haapakoski, H & Day, M 2004, ‘Lantana—at WoNS with the community?’, in BM Sindel & SB Johnson (eds), Proceedings of the 14th Australian Weeds Conference, Weed Society of New South Wales, Sydney, pp. 627–630.

Clemson, A 1985, Honey and pollen flora, Inkata Press, Melbourne.

Day, MD, Wiley, CJ, Playford, J & Zalucki, MP 2003, Lantana: current management status and future prospects, monograph no. 102, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra.

DERM (Department of Environment and Resource Management) 2010, Mapping lantana using Landsat: a remote sensing centre report, DERM, Queensland.

DPI (Victorian Department of Primary Industries) 2010, Invasive plants and animals policy framework, State Government of Victoria, Melbourne.

Dronamraju, KR 1958, ‘The visit of insects to different coloured flowers of Lantana camara L.’, Current Science, vol. 11, pp. 452–453.

Fensham, RJ, Fairfax, RJ & Cannell, RJ 1994, ‘The invasion of Lantana camara L. in Forty Mile Scrub National Park, north Queensland’, Australian Journal of Ecology, vol. 19, pp. 297–305.

Gentle, CB & Duggin, JA 1997a, ‘Lantana camara L. invasions in dry rainforest–open rainforest ecotones: the role of disturbances associated with fire and cattle grazing’, Australian Journal of Ecology, vol. 22, pp. 298–306.

Gentle, CB & Duggin, JA 1997b, ‘Allelopathy as a competitive strategy in persistent thickets of Lantana camara L. in three Australian forest communities’, Plant Ecology, vol. 132, pp. 85–95.

Gentle, CB & Duggin, JA 1998, ‘Interference of Choricarpia leptopetala by Lantana camara with nutrient enrichment in mesic forests on the Central Coast of NSW’, Plant Ecology, vol. 136, pp. 205–211.

Goulson, D & Derwent, LC 2004, ‘Synergistic interactions between an exotic honeybee and an exotic weed: pollination of Lantana camara in Australia’, Weed Research, vol. 44, pp. 195–202.

Graaff, JL 1987, ‘The seed fly Ophiomyia lantanae and other factors responsible for reducing germination in Lantana camara forms found in Natal’, South African Journal of Botany, vol. 53, pp. 104–107.

Hobbs, RJ & Humphries, SE, 1995, ‘An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions’, Conservation Biology, vol. 9, pp. 761–770.

Howard, RA 1969, ‘A checklist of cultivar names used in the genus Lantana’, Arnoldia, vol. 29, pp. 73–109.

Johnson, SB 2007, ‘Review of the declaration of Lantana species in New South Wales’, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Orange, New South Wales.

Lamb, R 1982, ‘Some effects of Lantana camara on community dynamics of eucalypt woodlands’, in M Davis (ed.), Proceedings of the 52nd ANZAAS Congress, Macquarie University, New South Wales, p. 304.

Mathur, G & Mohan Ram, HY 1986, ‘Flora biology and pollination of Lantana camara’, Phytomorphology, vol. 36, pp. 79–100.

McFadyen, R 2007, Invasive plants and climate change: Weeds CRC briefing notes, Cooperative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management, Adelaide.

Neal, J 1999, ‘Assessing the sterility of ornamental lantana varieties: Are we exacerbating the weed problem?’, Honours thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.

NLMG (National Lantana Management Group) 2010, Plan to protect Environmental assets from lantana, Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Yeerongpilly, Queensland.

NRMMC (Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council) 2007, Australian Weeds Strategy—a national strategy for weed management in Australia, Australian Government Department of the Environment and Water Resources, Canberra.

NSW DECC (New South Wales Department of Environment and Climate Change) & Macquarie University 2011, Modelling weed distribution under climate change, NSW DECC, Sydney, viewed 27 August 2012, .

Sanders, RW 2006, ‘Taxonomy of Lantana sect. Lantana (Verbenaceae): I. Correct application of Lantana camara and associated names’, Sida, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 381–421.

Schemske, DW 1976, ‘Pollinator specificity in Lantana camara and L. trifolia (Verbenaceae)’, Biotropica, vol. 8, pp. 260–264.

Sharma, GP, Raghubanshi, AS & Singh, JS 2005, ‘Lantana invasion: an overview’, Weed Biology and Management, vol. 5, pp. 157–165.

Sples, JJ & du Plessis, H 1987, ‘Sterile Lantana camara: fact or theory’, South African Journal of Plant Soil, vol. 4, pp. 171–174.

Stock, DH & Wild, CH 2006, ‘The dynamics of Lantana camara L. invasion of subtropical rainforest in south-east Queensland’, in C Preston, JH Watts & ND Crossman (eds), Proceedings of the 15th Australian Weeds Conference, R.G. and F.J. Richardson, Meredith, Victoria, pp. 247–250.

Stock, D, Johnson, KM, Clark, A & van Oosterhout, E 2009, Lantana best practice manual and decision support tool, Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Queensland.

Sutherst, RW 1995, ‘The potential advance of pests in natural ecosystems under climate change: implications for planning and management’, in JC Pernetta, R Leemans, D Elder & S Humphrey (eds), Impacts of climate change on ecosystems and species: terrestrial ecosystems, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, pp. 83–98.

Swarbrick, JT, Wilson, BW & Hannan-Jones, MA 1995, ‘The biology of Australian weeds: 25. Lantana camara L.’, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 10, pp. 82–95.

Swarbrick, J, Wilson, B & Hannan-Jones, M 1998, ‘Lantana camara’, in FD Panetta, RH Groves and RCH Shepherd (eds), The biology of Australian weeds, vol 2, RG and FJ Richardson, Meredith, Victoria, pp. 119–136.

Thaman, RR 1974, ‘Lantana camara: its introduction, dispersal and impact on islands of the tropical Pacific Ocean’, Micronesia, vol. 10, pp. 17–39.

Thomas, D & Kachenko, A 2009, National invasive plants survey: a report to Nursery & Garden Industry Australia, NGIA, Sydney.

van Oosterhout, E 2004, Lantana control manual: current management and control options for lantana (Lantana camara) in Australia, Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy, Queensland.

Vivian-Smith, G, Gosper, CG, Wilson, A & Hoad, K 2006, ‘Lantana camara and the fruit- and seed-damaging fly, Ophiomyia lantanae (Agromyzidae): seed predator, recruitment promoter or dispersal disrupter?’, Biological control, vol. 36, pp. 247–257.

Vivian-Smith, G & Panetta, D 2009, ‘Lantana (Lantana camara) seed bank dynamics: seedling emergence and seed survival’, Invasive Plant Science and Management, vol. 2, 141–150.

Walton, C 2005, Reclaiming lost provinces: a century of weed biological control in Queensland, Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Queensland.

Watts, R, Matheson, B & Lepschi, B 2009, Systematics of environmental weeds: assessing the origins and diversity of Lantana in Australia, Taxonomy Research & Information Network, Canberra, viewed 27 August 2012, .

Wells, CH 1984, ‘Management of lantana in forest plantations’, in Proceedings of the Woody Weed Control Workshop, The Weed Society of Queensland, Gympie, Queensland, pp. 138–141.

Westcott, DA 2009, ‘Using dispersal data to model invasive spread and management effectiveness’, Seminar proceedings—Modelling the potential distribution of weeds, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 3, p. 99..

Winder, JA 1980, ‘Factors affecting the growth of Lantana in Brazil’, PhD thesis, University of Reading, United Kingdom.



Zalucki, MP, Day MD & Playford, J 2007, ‘Will biological control of Lantana camara ever succeed? Patterns, processes and prospects’, Biological Control, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 251–261.

1Simulation modelling system developed by CSIRO

1Adapted from Thorp 2012, Additional list of Weeds of National Significance, <www.org.au/WoNS>.

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət