Ana səhifə

Flood Plain Lower Ringarooma River Ramsar site Ecological Character Description March 2012 Blank page Citation


Yüklə 4.7 Mb.
səhifə2/22
tarix25.06.2016
ölçüsü4.7 Mb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   22

List of Abbreviations


AAS

Armstrong Agricultural Services

ANZECC

Australia and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council

ARMCANZ

Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand

BIS

Badcock Irrigation Services

CAMBA

China-Australia Migratory Birds Agreement

CBD

Convention on Biodiversity

CEPA

Community Education and Public Awareness

CMS

Bonn Convention on Migratory Species

DAFF

Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Commonwealth)

DEH

Department of the Environment and Heritage (Commonwealth)

DEWHA

Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (formerly DEH) (Commonwealth)

DoE

Department of the Environment (formerly SEWPaC)(Commonwealth)

DPIPWE

Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (Tasmania)

DPIW

Department of Primary Industries and Water (Tasmania)

DTAE

Department of Tourism, Arts and the Environment (Tasmania)

ECD

Ecological Character Description

EPBC

Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth)

IMCRA

Integrated Marine and Coastal Regionalisation of Australia

JAMBA

Japan-Australia Migratory Birds Agreement

LAC

Limits of Acceptable Change

MCFFA

Ministerial Council on Forestry, Fisheries and Aquaculture

NWC

National Water Commission

NRM

Natural Resource Management

PWS

Parks and Wildlife Service, Tasmania

RIS

Ramsar Information Sheet

ROKAMBA

Republic of Korea-Australia Migratory Birds Agreement

SEWPaC

Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (formerly DEWHA) (Commonwealth)

TSPA

Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 (Tasmania)

TSS

Threatened Species Section

Executive Summary


Background

Australia, as a contracting party to the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, must meet specified obligations in the maintenance of the ecological character of its Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar sites). An Ecological Character Description (ECD) is one of the management tools used in the protection of Ramsar sites.

An ECD of a Ramsar site must support the requirements of the Ramsar Convention to maintain ecological character of Ramsar sites, as well as provide site-specific objectives based on the intrinsic social, cultural and environmental features of the site. The preparation of an ECD assists management of the wetland, including information required to:


  • provide a benchmark for the wetland ecological character at the time of listing;

  • designing programs for monitoring its ecological character;

  • determining methods and approaches for assessing changes to its ecological character;

  • identifying potential threats and impacts, and evaluating risks;

  • devising efficient and appropriate management plans for the ongoing protection of the wetland; and

  • identifying critical gaps in knowledge and approaches/methods for addressing these gaps.

The process for preparing an ECD can also engage the relevant stakeholders, thereby laying the foundations for alignment of goals and agreed management outcomes.

The Flood Plain Lower Ringarooma River Ramsar site (‘the site’) was first listed in November 1982.



General Site Description

The site covers an area of 3519 hectares near the coast of north-eastern Tasmania, near the towns of Bridport and Gladstone. At its northern edge, the site includes the Boobyalla Inlet estuary and a mobile sand dune system. The site extends a distance of approximately eight kilometres to the south, encompassing a variety of habitats including a mosaic of freshwater wetlands which are significant to a number of species.

The ecological data available for the site are very limited with the exception of a detailed vegetation survey covering much of the Flood Plain vegetation, and some geomorphic examination of the landforming processes within the site. There are several documents that provide some qualitative information on the site’s ecological character. The available information was supplemented with a field inspection by the study team and steering committee, as well as a flight over the site to increase understanding of the site’s physical geography. Information gained from the site inspections was used with aerial photography and the vegetation survey of part of the site to produce a vegetation map of the whole site. This provided the only quantitative data available for the ECD.

The site can be separated into three zones – a coastal zone, an estuary zone and an aquatic (freshwater) zone. The coastal zone covers the entire coast of the site (three to four kilometres), including the combined mouth of the Boobyalla and Ringarooma Rivers and their delta. The Ramsar wetland types that occur within the coastal zone are: sandy shores (wetland type E); delta (wetland type F); and intertidal mud and sand flats (wetland type G). A number of beach nesting shorebirds have been recorded breeding on the beaches of the site, comprising the little tern (Sterna albifrons), hooded plover (Thinornis rubricollis), fairy tern (Sterna nereis), pied oystercatcher (Haematopus longirostris) and red-capped plover (Charadrius ruficapillus).

The estuary zone is wave dominated, with a flood tide delta. Wave dominated deltas are considered ‘mature’ in terms of evolution and tend to be morphologically stable (assuming stable sea levels). They often have a narrow entrance which can restrict marine flushing, although this is counter-balanced by high river flows that expel marine water and flush material from the delta. The short residence time for deposited material results in little processing or trapping of associated nutrients and contaminants. The Ramsar wetland types that occur within the estuary zone include estuarine waters (wetland type F); intertidal mud and sand flats (wetland type G); intertidal salt marshes (wetland type H); and coastal brackish/saline lagoons (wetland type J).

Typical of wave dominated delta estuaries, the Ringarooma estuary has a direct connection between river and sea, via a channel flanked by a low-lying vegetated Flood Plain. The channel is kept open by the relatively high river velocities and a dune barrier partially constricts the estuary entrance, preventing it from expanding into a large, open estuary. The ‘mature’ nature of wave dominated deltas means that they have been mostly filled by sediments. In the case of the Ringarooma estuary, this ‘maturation’ has probably been created prematurely through an increased rate of sediment yield from the catchment as a result of tin mining during the late 1800s and early 1900s.

The freshwater zone contains wetlands formed on a lowland Flood Plain that widens out downstream of a shallow and constricted valley. In the wider and flatter area of the Flood Plain, water from high flows sometimes leaves the channel and spreads out, filling in depressions in the landscape. As the water leaves the channel during high flows it quickly loses velocity and deposits the heavier sediment along the channel edge, forming natural levees. These natural levees impede the water from subsequently returning to the channel, leaving it to form a mosaic of seasonally-inundated and permanent water bodies. The Ramsar wetland types that occur within the freshwater zone include: seasonal waterways (wetland type N); permanent freshwater marshes, pools and ponds (below 8 hectares), with emergent vegetation (wetland type Tp); seasonal freshwater marshes and pools, including seasonally flooded meadows and sedge marshes (wetland type Ts); shrub-dominated wetlands (wetland type W); and freshwater, tree-dominated wetlands (freshwater swamp forest) (wetland type Xf).

The freshwater wetland complex is surface water dominated. Local groundwater appears to be controlled by river flows and floods, with the surface water generally recharging the local groundwater. The site’s hydrology is therefore dependent on the Ringarooma River and several small tributaries to the site. The wetlands are generally shallow and clear, providing ideal conditions for submerged and emergent macrophyte vegetation. The extent and period of inundation varies substantially across the site’s wetlands with corresponding variations in abundances and distributions of plant species. The water quality data from the Ringarooma River suggests that the wetlands’ water is of high quality for aquatic ecosystems, with low nutrients, low salinities and near-neutral pH.

The bulk of the wetland area is altered from its natural condition. This has resulted from large-scale sedimentation arising from mining operations in the late 1800s and early 1900s. However, the large trees on the site, as well as aerial photographs over several decades show that many of the current conditions have been established for decades and sediment movement is no longer as dynamic as it once was. Therefore, current condition of the site is likely to be indicative of the condition at the time of listing.

Areas that remain relatively unaffected by this mining-induced sedimentation include Bowlers Lagoon (a dune-barred lake in the sand sheet behind Boobyalla Beach) and some deflation hollows with associated lunettes.

The site is at significant potential risk from the disturbance of acid sulphate soils. Sources of sulphide include seawater and sediments derived from mining. While the sediments are identified as “potential”, there is a risk of increased acidification of the soil and of the drainage waters from these soils if any groundwater extraction or local drainage systems lead to a lowering of the groundwater table and exposure of the potential acid sulphate soils to oxidation.   

Criteria for Ramsar Listing of the Site

The site is currently listed against the following criteria:



Criterion one: A wetland should be considered internationally important if it contains a representative, rare, or unique example of a natural or near-natural wetland type found within the appropriate biogeographic region.

The Flood Plain Lower Ringarooma River Ramsar Site is rare within the bioregion (Tasmania Drainage Division, Commonwealth of Australia 2010; Bass Strait IMCRA Province, Commonwealth of Australia, 2006). The site contains good condition, regionally representative examples of wetland systems within a Flood Plain, with a mosaic of permanent and seasonal marshlands and a large river estuary (Boobyalla Inlet). Boobyalla Inlet is recognised as a Tasmanian estuary with high conservation significance (Edgar et al. 1999).

Wetland vegetation communities recognised as threatened under Tasmanian legislation (DPIW 2007) and the site contains various wetland types which support these communities (DPIW 2006). These include Ramsar wetland types:


  • Ts (equivalent DPIPWE classification is freshwater aquatic sedgeland and rushland - vulnerable in Tasmania; also Lacustrine herbland and Lowland grassy sedgeland);

  • Tp (equivalent DPIPWE classification is freshwater aquatic herbland - vulnerable in Tasmania);

  • Tp (equivalent DPIPWE classification is lacustrine herbland - vulnerable in Tasmania) ;

  • P and U (Undifferentiated wetland); and,

  • Xf (equivalent DPIPWE classification is Melaleuca ericifolia swamp forest - rare and endangered in Tasmania).

Criterion two: A wetland should be considered internationally important if it supports vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered species or threatened ecological communities.

The site supports six fauna species listed on the IUCN redlist or as nationally threatened under the EPBC Act, including four wetland-dependent species:



  • green and gold frog (Litoria raniformis) (Vulnerable, EPBC Act)

  • dwarf galaxias (Galaxiella pusilla) (Vulnerable, EPBC Act and IUCN Redlist)

  • fairy tern (Sterna nereis) (Vulnerable, IUCN Redlist)

  • Australian grayling (Prototroctes maraena) (Vulnerable, EPBC Act)

  • Australasian bittern(Botaurus poiciloptilus) (Endangered, EPBC Act and IUCN Redlist)

  • shiny grasstree (Xanthorrhoea bracteata) (Endangered, EPBC Act).

Criterion three: A wetland should be considered internationally important if it supports populations of plant and/or animal species important for maintaining the biological diversity of a particular biogeographic region.

This criterion includes consideration of the site’s regional biodiversity, including biodiversity ‘hotspot’ status and regional endemism. The site has been described as important due to its diverse invertebrate fauna (RIS 2005). The series of shallow freshwater lagoons at the site are an important feeding and nesting place for many species of waterbirds. Approximately three kilometres of beaches are included in the site, from which a number of shorebirds have been recorded, including the hooded plover (Thinornis rubricollis), red-capped plover (Charadrius ruficapillus), greenshank (Tringa nebularia), red-necked stint (Calidris ruficollis), ruddy turnstone (Arenaria interpres), curlew sandpiper (Calidris ferruginea), black-fronted dotterel (Elseyornis melanops) and fairy tern (Sterna nereis) (Sally Bryant, personal communication). Approximately forty species of wetland dependent plants have been recorded at the site.

Species considered rare or threatened in the bioregion contribute to the justification of this criterion. The site provides wetland habitat for two regionally threatened bird species and four regionally listed flora species considered to be at risk in the bioregion (Tasmania). These are:


  • little tern (Sterna albifrons, rare, TSPA)

  • white-bellied sea eagle (Haliaeetus leucogaster, vulnerable, TSPA)

  • purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria, vulnerable, TSPA), occurs in open areas in Melaleuca ericifolia swamp forest and in freshwater aquatic sedgeland and rushland wetlands in the site

  • ribbon weed (Vallisneria australis, rare, TSPA), occurs in freshwater aquatic herbland in the site

  • erect marshflower (Villarsia exaltata, rare, TSPA), for which the Chimneys is a key site

  • native gypsywort (Lycopus australis, endangered, TSPA), which was previously thought to be extinct in Tasmania, has recently been found at the site. It occurs in association with lacustrine herbland in the site. Observed at one location on the western edge of Shantys Lagoon

  • Persicaria subsessilis (endangered TPSA).

An assessment of the remaining Ramsar listing criteria was undertaken to determine whether the site meets any criteria beyond the original listing. The assessment determined that the site also meets criterion four.

Criterion four: A wetland should be considered internationally important if it supports plant and/or animal species at a critical stage in their life cycles, or provides refuge during adverse conditions.

A number of migratory birds have been recorded from the site, including eleven migratory birds listed in CAMBA, JAMBA, ROKAMBA and/or the CMS. The site also provides support for five nesting shorebirds at a critical stage of their life cycle: breeding, including the little tern (which has migratory listing as noted above), and the fairy tern (IUCN red listed, as noted above).

Tasmanian mudfish (Galaxias cleaveri), Tasmanian whitebait (Lovettia sealli) and Australian grayling (Prototroctes maraena) have been recorded in the Ringarooma River. These species all migrate between fresh and marine waters. These species highlight the importance of the estuarine habitat provided by the site and constitutes support for these species during a critical stage of their life cycles.

This criterion is therefore met by the site and should be added to the listing criteria.



Benefits and Services of the Site

Although the site performs a range of benefits and services, the critical benefits and services of the site were identified as:



  • maintenance of rare and representative wetland types for the bioregion

  • support for rare or threatened species

  • support populations important for regional biodiversity and/or at critical stages

Critical Components and Processes of the Site

Using SEWPaC recommended determinants, the following components and processes were identified as critical to the Flood Plain Lower Ringarooma River Ramsar Site:



  • wetland types (six identified Ramsar wetland types)

  • regionally listed plant species (four State-listed species)

  • nationally listed bird species (fairy tern)

  • regionally listed bird species (white-bellied sea eagle and little tern)

  • nationally listed fish species (dwarf galaxias and Australian grayling)

  • green and gold frog

  • nesting shorebirds (including the fairy tern)

  • listed migratory birds (11 JAMBA/CAMBA/ROKAMBA/CMS species)

  • migrating fish (Australian grayling, Tasmanian mudfish and Tasmanian whitebait)


Conceptual Models of the Site

The Flood Plain Lower Ringarooma Ramsar Site encompasses several integrated ecosystems, including at least eleven identified Ramsar wetland types encompassing the river/Flood Plain/wetland complex, estuary, coast, dunefields, terraces and sand plains. These features are displayed in Figure E1, below.





Figure E1: Broad ecological zones (and Ramsar wetland types) across the Flood Plain Lower Ringarooma Ramsar Site.

The key features of the landscape conceptual model include the river within its flood plain, surrounded by heathland and marshes, breaking out of its channel at some points and discharging into lagoons, before reaching the estuary near the dune barrier (Figure E2). Within the area of estuarine influence, the channel widens and is bounded by a saltmarsh on part of its northern bank before reaching a developing central basin and discharging over the delta into Ringarooma Bay.



Threats to the Site’s Ecological Character

Climate change was identified as the largest threat to the site’s coastal zone.

The major threats to the estuary zone were identified as:


  • damage to soil and sediment structure through direct stock access to the riparian zone

  • loss of threatened vegetation through direct stock access to the riparian zone

  • impacts of excess sediment deposition through past mining practices

  • declines in water quality through dairying impacts

  • changes to hydrology through water extraction

  • rising sea levels

Direct threats to the freshwater zone of the site include:

  • the impacts of sedimentation, particularly through the progression of the fine sands generated by past mining practices

  • damage to the wetland soil/sediment structure through stock trampling

  • inputs of excess nutrients through grazing and dairy wastes

  • loss of threatened vegetation communities (including weed invasions), via stock grazing and pasture management practices

  • changes to the hydrologic regime via:

    • local (water extraction)

    • regional/global (climate change) impacts; and/or

    • lowering of the stream bed



Figure E2: Natural processes, systems and impacts within the Ringarooma Ramsar Site

Limits of Acceptable Change

Limits of Acceptable Change (LACs) were derived for each of the critical components/processes and benefits and services identified. The LACs derived for each of the nine components/processes are:



  1. Not more than a 20 percent loss in area of any wetland type in nine out of 10 years.



  1. No less than 298 hectares of freshwater aquatic sedgeland and rushland should be present at the site (representing 80 percent of the current area) in nine out of 10 years.



  1. Presence of the following plant species in nine out of 10 years:

  • native gipsywort (Lycopus australis)

  • erect marshflower (Villarsia exaltata)

  • purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria)

  • ribbon weed (Vallisneria australis)



  1. Presence of the following fish species in nine out of 10 years:

  • Australian grayling (Prototroctes maraena)

  • dwarf galaxias (Galaxiella pusilla)



  1. Presence of the green and gold frog (Litoria raniformis) in nine out of 10 years.



  1. Presence in two out of three years of the following migratory bird species:

  • Latham’s snipe (Gallinago hardwickii)

  • curlew sandpiper (Calidris ferruginea)

  • red-necked stint (Calidris ruficollis)

  • ruddy turnstone (Arenaria interpres)

  • bar-tailed godwit (Limosa lapponica)

  • Caspian tern (Hydroprogne caspia)

  • little tern (Sterna albifrons)

  • greenshank (Tringa nebularia)

  • cattle egret (Ardea ibis)

  • great egret (Ardea modesta)

  • white-bellied sea eagle (Haliaeetus leucogaster)



  1. Presence in two out of three years of the following nesting shorebird species:

  • little tern (Sterna albifrons)

  • hooded plover (Thinornis rubricollis)

  • fairy tern (Sterna nereis)

  • pied oystercatcher (Haematopus longirostris)

  • red-capped plover(Charadrius ruficapillus)



  1. Presence in two out of three years of the following migratory fish species:

  • Tasmanian mudfish (Galaxias cleaveri)

  • Tasmanian whitebait (Lovettia sealli)

  • Australian grayling (Prototroctes maraena)

Explanatory Notes on LACs:

  1. Limits of Acceptable Change are a tool by which ecological change can be measured. However, Ecological Character Descriptions are not management plans and LACs do not constitute a management regime for the Ramsar site.

  2. Exceeding or not meeting LACs does not necessarily indicate that there has been a change in ecological character within the meaning of the Ramsar Convention. However, exceeding or not meeting LACs may require investigation to determine whether there has been a change in ecological character.

  3. While the best available information has been used to prepare this Ecological Character Description and define LACs for the site, a comprehensive understanding of site character may not be possible as in many cases only limited information and data is available for these purposes. The LACs may not accurately represent the variability of the critical components, processes, benefits or services under the management regime and natural conditions that prevailed at the time the site was listed as a Ramsar wetland.

  4. Users should exercise their own skill and care with respect to their use of the information in this Ecological Character Description and carefully evaluate the suitability of the information for their own purposes.

  5. LACs can be updated as new information becomes available to ensure they more accurately reflect the natural variability (or normal range for artificial sites) of critical components, processes, benefits or services of the Ramsar wetland.

Changes in Ecological Character since Listing

Although there have been changes to the site between listing and present day, it is difficult to argue that these are a change in ecological character of the site. The site features that supported its listing remain, apart from an increase in sedgeland/rushland. Further, the limits of acceptable change that have been derived are applicable to the site at the time of listing, except for the increased area requirement for the sedgeland/rushland.

Encroachment of irrigated pasture is a serious, on-going and expanding cause for concern for the ecological character of the site. This has occurred on land classed as ‘agricultural land’ that was previously dry-grazed. If not controlled, this activity may change the site’s ecological character by altering the vegetation communities through the introduction of pasture or weed species. The sedimentation from mining waste has also moved further into the site between listing and present day. Advances of sediment into Shantys Lagoon indicate that small areas of the wetland have been altered (to other wetland types) since listing. This process is ongoing and is likely to continue for several decades.

Knowledge Gaps

There is a general paucity of baseline data at the site, and for the ecological character to be defined in a quantitative way, there needs to be a more strategic collection of a baseline. Data should be gathered using standard methods that allow comparisons to future monitoring programs. The initial sampling strategy design must be cognisant of repeatability. The data should also be gathered using similar approaches and methods comparison with other Tasmanian data sets and the rest of Australia, to facilitate comparisons and assessment of communities.



Community Education and Public Awareness (CEPA)

The primary messages to be communicated to relevant stakeholders are:



  • An Ecological Character Description (ECD) of the Flood Plain Lower Ringarooma Ramsar Site has been commissioned to understand the ecological character at the time of listing in 1982.

  • The Flood Plain Lower Ringarooma Ramsar Site is listed against the following Ramsar criteria:

    • one (international significant wetland type)

    • two (supports threatened species)

    • three (a site of high biological diversity)

    • four (supports a species during a critical stage of its life cycle).

  • This site is a complex wetland, coastal and estuarine ecosystem which provides habitat for important and nationally threatened species. The ECD includes documented past and current conditions, determines approaches to assess changes in condition, identifies potential threats to the wetland’s condition, devises appropriate management actions, and identifies critical information gaps for management.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   22


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət