Ana səhifə

Final Import Risk Analysis Report for Fresh Mango Fruit from India


Yüklə 1.63 Mb.
səhifə9/13
tarix26.06.2016
ölçüsü1.63 Mb.
1   ...   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13

4.4 Fruit flies [Diptera: Tephritidae] – mangoes as a preferred host


Fruit flies are considered to be among the most damaging pests to horticulture (White and Elson-Harris 1992; Peña et al. 1998). Fruit flies in the genus Bactrocera are one of four fruit fly genera that are of most global concern. Bactrocera species are an economically important and diverse genus of fruit flies, having in excess of 400 recognised species (White and Elson-Harris 1992). They have an ability to rapidly increase in population and a great ability to disperse successfully and therefore represent a significant threat to agriculture not only in their current global distribution but also by establishing in new countries (Fletcher 1989a; Fletcher 1989b). Bactrocera spp. attack a wide range of fruit including tropical, semitropical and temperate fruit in South-East Asia, Oceania, the subcontinent and parts of Africa.

Fruit flies are of concern because their larvae generally complete their feeding and development within the host fruit (Fletcher 1989a). Fruit with infestation normally show obvious signs of attack or tissue decay. However, infested fruit cannot always be distinguished from uninfested fruit (White and Elson-Harris 1992). The transportation of infested fruit is regarded as the major means of movement and dispersal of fruit flies (Baker et al. 2000; Iwaizumi 2004) and therefore deserves the most scrutiny in terms of pathways for introduction.



The fruit flies of quarantine concern associated with mango fruit are:

  • Bactrocera caryeae

  • Bactrocera correcta – guava fruit fly

  • Bactrocera dorsalis – Oriental fruit fly EP

  • Bactrocera invadens – Asian fruit fly

  • Bactrocera zonata – peach fruit fly

Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis has previously been assessed for the importation of mangoes from Taiwan and had an unrestricted risk of High. This existing policy is adopted for this fruit fly as the risks of importation and distribution are judged to be similar. Therefore, oriental fruit fly is not considered further in this policy.

Bactrocera caryeae, B. correcta, B. invadens and B. zonata considered in this assessment are recognised as pests of mango in India. Bactrocera zonata is similar to B. dorsalis in terms of its broad host range preferences. Bactrocera zonata may be a hybrid or intermediate form resulting from a cross of B. dorsalis and B. correcta (Gomes 2000). Bactrocera caryeae has a more restricted host range (White & Elson-Harris 1992) and Bactrocera invadens is morphologically very similar to B. dorsalis (Drew et al. 2005). This species appears to have recently invaded Africa from the Indian subcontinent where it is of significant economic importance (Drew et al. 2005). The biology of Bactrocera caryeae, B. correcta, B. invadens and B. zonata was considered sufficiently similar to justify combining them into a single assessment.

4.4.1 Probability of entry

Probability of importation

The likelihood that fruit flies will arrive in Australia with the importation of mango fruit from India is estimated to be: HIGH.

Association of the pest with the pathway at its origin

  • Bactrocera caryeae, B. correcta, B. invadens and B. zonata have been reported on mangoes in India (Peña et al. 1998; Kumar and Bhatt 2002; Drew and Raghu 2002; Hanna 2005).

  • In the mango production regions of India, adults of B. correcta and B. zonata occur throughout the year and abundance increases during mango ripening and harvest (Srivastava 1997; Peña et al. 1998). Up to 100% of fruit can be infested in unmanaged orchards (Stonehouse et al. 1998).

  • Bulleted, Wingdings (symbol), Left: 0 cm, Hanging: 4.2 chFruit fly larvae can survive in harvested fruit and may be present in fruits that are packed for export. As fruit fly eggs are laid internally, infested fruit may not be detected during sorting, packing and inspection procedures. Inspection procedures carried out in the packing houses are concerned primarily with quality standards of fruit with regard to blemishes, bruising or damage to the skin.

Ability of the pest to survive transport and storage

  • The optimum temperature for storage of mangoes is approximately 13-14oC, as storage below this temperature results in chilling injury to the fruit (Lederman et al. 1997; Nair and Singh 2004). At low temperatures, development times for fruit flies are extended significantly and mortality increases for all life stages (Duyck et al. 2004). Although development thresholds have not been reported for all species considered here, Duyck et al. (2004) reported that the lower development thresholds for B. zonata eggs, larvae and pupae are 12.7, 12.6 and 12.8°C respectively. Mohamed (2000, as cited in Duyck et al. 2004) calculated lower temperature thresholds of 10, 10 and 11.8°C for the egg, larval and pupal stages of B. zonata respectively. Therefore, immature stages could continue to develop at the optimum storage temperature of 13-14oC.

  • Bactrocera caryeae has been intercepted on mango from India in Japan (Iwaizumi 2004). Bactrocera correcta has been detected during surveillance in California and Florida in the USA (Weems 1987, Weems 2001). In commercial consignments of mango, B. zonata has been intercepted from Pakistan and B. invadens from Senegal in the United Kingdom (DEFRA 2008). This further supports that Bactrocera species can survive transport and storage and could be imported into Australia via the movement of fruit.

Ability of the pest to survive existing pest management procedures

  • Bactrocera species are typically managed in India by trapping, bait sprays and collection and deep burial of fallen fruit (DAC 2007). These methods will reduce but not necessarily eliminate populations.

The ability of fruit flies to survive management procedures, the difficulty of detecting them within fruit, their ability to survive transportation and storage temperatures and the history of their interceptions supports a probability of importation rating of 'high'.
Probability of distribution

The likelihood that fruit flies will be distributed within Australia in a viable state, as a result of the processing, sale or disposal of mango fruit from India is: HIGH.

Ability of the pest to move from the pathway to a suitable host

  • Fruit fly eggs or larvae infested fruit arriving in Australia would still need to develop into mature larvae and pupate. Fruit flies develop quickly, with a wide host range and excellent dispersal capabilities (Fletcher 1989a, 1989b).

  • Mango fruit from India would be imported during the winter months in Australia. At this time, the coastal regions of Australia north of Sydney may have suitable temperatures to allow the slow development of larvae and pupae (Duyck et al. 2004).

  • Most Bactrocera species have a wide host range including horticultural crops and ornamentals (Srivastava 1997; Allwood et al. 1999), and these hosts are widely distributed throughout Australia.

  • Fruit flies might enter the environment through:

  • eggs developing into larvae within stored fruit, fruit at the point of sale, or fruit that has been purchased. Larvae may then develop into adult flies which are able to move directly into the environment.

  • wholesalers, retailers or consumers discarding fruit with spoiled flesh or visible larvae. Infested fruit typically contains several larvae (Kumar and Bhatt 2002) which can complete larval development in discarded fruit, pupate in soil and adults can then transfer to suitable hosts (Fletcher 1987).

Distribution of the imported commodity in the PRA area

  • Mangoes would be distributed for sale to multiple destinations in Australia.

  • Eggs may develop into larvae within fruit throughout the distribution chain. Wholesalers, retailers or consumers could discard spoiled fruit containing eggs or larvae at multiple locations.

Risks from by-products and waste

  • The intended use of the commodity is human consumption but waste material would be generated. Larvae could complete development in waste material.

  • Newly emerged adults contain some energy reserves carried over from the larval stage, which enables them to survive for 1–2 days post-emergence if food is not available (Fletcher 1987).

  • Larvae develop into adult flies and are able to move directly from fruit into the environment to find a suitable host. Adult flies typically live for periods of months (Christenson and Foote 1960; Fletcher 1989b).

Their wide host-ranges, their ability to tolerate cold temperatures and their natural dispersal ability (strong flier) support a distribution rating of ‘high’.
Probability of entry (importation x distribution)

The overall probability of entry for fruit flies is determined by combining the probability of importation with the probability of distribution using the matrix of rules shown in Table 2.2. The overall probability of entry for fruit flies is estimated to be: HIGH.

4.4.2 Probability of establishment


The likelihood that fruit flies will establish within Australia, based on a comparison of factors in the source and destination areas considered pertinent to its survival and reproduction, is: HIGH.

Availability of suitable hosts, alternative hosts and vectors in the PRA area

  • These fruit flies are capable of surviving and reproducing on a wide host range, including citrus, mango, peach and several other subtropical fruits (White and Elson-Harris 1992; Allwood et al. 1999; Hanna 2005). These host species are widespread in cities, towns and horticultural production areas throughout Australia.

  • Bactrocera correcta has the potential to become a pest of citrus and peach, as well as several other subtropical fruits (Weems 1987; Allwood et al. 1999). Bactrocera invadens

has been recorded on citrus, mango, cashew, papaya, guava, pepper, and several wild host plants (Hanna 2005). Bactrocera caryeae has been recorded on mango, citrus and guava, while B. zonata has been recorded on a wide range of hosts (White and Elson-Harris 1992).

Suitability of the environment

  • The survival of these fruit flies in a wide range of climates suggests that regions of Australia are likely to be suitable for the establishment of these species (Espenshade 1990; Gomes 2000; Hanna 2005). Bactrocera species occur throughout the Indian subcontinent (White and Elson-Harris 1992), across climatic zones that are similar to areas in Australia (Espenshade 1990).

  • Bactrocera caryeae is distributed in the tropical climatic zone of southern India, and is active at higher altitudes (Allwood and Drew 1997). Bactrocera zonata is a tropical species endemic to India (Drew and Raghu 2002). Each has the potential to establish itself in similar environments in Australia.

  • Originally considered to be an exclusively tropical fruit fly, the establishment of B. zonata in Egypt in 2001 demonstrates that B. zonata can also thrive in a Mediterranean climate (Duyck et al. 2004). The B. zonata population in Egypt has demonstrated adaptation in a relatively short time frame (Iwahashi and Routhier 2001), proving its ability to establish and successfully compete in new environments.

  • Bactrocera invadens has expanded its distribution from the Indian-subcontinent to tropical Africa (Hanna 2005).

Cultural practices and control measures

  • As these fruit flies are internal pests of fruit, current insecticide spray regimes may not have any impact on their establishment in Australia.

  • Integrated pest management programs have been adopted for other fruit flies, including monitoring the emergence and dispersal of adults, using baits, male annihilation and sterile insect techniques (Kuba et al. 1996; CAB International 2007).

  • Trapping systems are routinely used in commercial orchards to detect fruit flies (Dominiak 2007). Currently, trapping measures are used in Australia implemented to effectively detect Bactrocera species in Australia.

The reproductive strategy and survival of the pest

  • Adults of Bactrocera species typically live for several months depending on the species and temperature, for example B. dorsalis can live up to 12 months in cool conditions (Christenson and Foote 1960; Gomes 2000; Dhillon et al. 2005).

  • Bactrocera species prefer warm, humid weather and abundance increases as mangoes ripen but the population declines during dry periods (Peña et al. 1998).

  • For most Bactrocera species, it is the adults that are best able to survive low temperatures, with a nominal torpor threshold of 7°C, dropping as low as 2°C in winter (OEPP/EPPO 2005). Bactrocera zonata overwinters in the larval or pupal stage (Gomes 2000; OEPP/EPPO 2005) and mating begins after the adults emerge, when the ambient temperature increases.

  • The average life span of the adult in the field will normally depend on the existence and presence of natural enemies, on the nature and abundance of available food and on climatic conditions (Gomes 2000).

  • The wide host ranges allow these fruit flies to breed actively in the field from the end of winter through to autumn and produce several generations per year. The life cycle is completed in 20 days under optimum conditions but is prolonged by cool temperatures (Gomes 2000).

Their wide host ranges, short generation times and the suitability of the environment support an establishment rating of ‘high’.

4.4.3. Probability of spread


The likelihood that fruit flies will spread within Australia, based on a comparison of those factors in the source and destination areas considered pertinent to the expansion of the geographic distribution of the pest, is: HIGH.

The suitability of the natural or managed environment for natural spread

  • These fruit flies have been reported from a variety of environments. For example Bactrocera correcta and B. zonata are widespread in the tropics (Gomes 2000; Weems 2001) and B. zonata has recently established in the Mediterranean climate of Egypt (Duyck et al. 2004). Bactrocera invadens has established in humid lowland regions of Africa (Hanna 2005). There are similarities in the natural and managed environments of these regions with many of those in Australia.

  • These species have a broad host range (Allwood et al. 1999), and the hosts are readily available in Australia.

  • The incursion of B. papayae in northern Australia in 1995 demonstrates the ability of introduced fruit fly species to spread. The fruit fly was detected near Cairns and the infested area was found to extend from Kennedy in the south to as far north as Cooktown, with the largest infestations around Mareeba and Cairns. The declared pest quarantine area included 78,000 km² of north Queensland, including urban areas, farms, riparian habitats, coastline and a large part of the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area before it was finally declared eradicated in 1999 (Cantrell et al. 2002). Bactrocera correcta and B. zonata would have a similar capacity to spread in Australia.

Presence of natural barriers

The presence of natural barriers such as deserts or mountain ranges may inhibit long-range natural spread of these fruit flies. The long distances between commercial host crops in Australia may reduce the potential for long-range natural spread of fruit flies.



  • Bactrocera species adults engage in extensive dispersive movements during the early adult phase prior to host-seeking and mating, and mature flies leave locations where hosts are dwindling in search of new hosts. During these periods, some individuals may move large distances in a few weeks. A dispersal distance of 25 km has been recorded for B. zonata (Gomes 2000). Should these fruit flies be introduced to major commercial production areas of Australia they are capable of short distance spread unaided.

  • Bactrocera zonata tends to remain in one area when adequate food and hosts are available (Gomes 2000).

Potential for movement with commodities or conveyances

  • The major means of dispersal to previously unaffected areas is transport of infested fruits (Baker et al. 2000). Adults and immature forms may spread undetected by this means.

  • There are restrictions in place in Australia on the movement of fruit to prevent the spread of fruit flies, including Mediterranean fruit fly, Queensland fruit fly and exotic species.

  • Following the incursion of B. papayae in northern Australia in 1995, fruit fly traps for exotic Bactrocera species are now located in Australia at each first port of call to attract and trap these fruit flies. These traps may limit the spread of these species by providing early warning of their presence that would lead to their successful eradication, as occurred with B. philippinensis in Darwin in 1999.

Their broad host-ranges, their ability to tolerate cold temperatures, their natural dispersal ability (strong flier) and their movement with commodities support a spread rating of ‘high’.

4.4.4 Overall probability of entry, establishment and spread


The probability of entry, establishment and spread is determined by combining the probabilities of entry, of establishment and of spread using the matrix of ‘rules’ for combining descriptive probabilities shown in Table 2.2.

The overall probability that fruit flies will be imported as a result of trade in mango fruit from India, be distributed in a viable state to a susceptible host, establish and spread within Australia, is: HIGH.


4.4.5 Consequences


The consequences of the entry, establishment and spread of fruit flies in Australia have been estimated according to the methods described in Table 2.3. The assessment of potential consequences is provided below:

Criterion

Estimate and rationale

Direct




Plant life or health

Impact score: E – Significant at the regional level.

  • Bactrocera caryeae has a narrow host range of which most are tropical fruits (Allwood et al. 1999).

  • Bactrocera correcta has a wide host range (Allwood et al. 1999) and has the potential to become a pest of citrus and peach as well as several other subtropical fruits (Weems 1987).

  • Bactrocera invadens is considered highly invasive and is known to infest a range of edible and wild fruit hosts (Drew et al. 2005).

  • Bactrocera zonata is a polyphagous species attacking some 40 species of fruit and vegetables and has also been recorded from wild host plants of the families Euphorbiaceae, Lecythidaceae and Rhamnaceae (Duyck et al. 2004).

Other aspects of the environment

Impact score: C – Significant at the local level. Fruit flies introduced into a new environment may compete for resources with native species.

Indirect




Eradication, control etc.

Impact score: F – Significant at the national level.

  • A control program would add considerably to the cost of production of the host fruit, costing between $A200-900 per ha depending on the variety of fruit produced and the time of harvest (HPC 1991).

  • In 1995, the B. papayae (papaya fruit fly) eradication program using male annihilation and protein bait spraying cost $A35 million (SPC 2002).

  • Recent research has highlighted the potential prevalence of insecticide resistance in Bactrocera species (Hsu et al. 2006; Skouras et al. 2007). Incursion of insecticide resistant populations of Bactrocera species would be more difficult to control or eradicate and add significantly to the costs of these programs.

Domestic trade

Impact score: E – Significant at the regional level. The presence of these fruit flies in commercial production areas may result in interstate trade restrictions on a wide range of commodities.




International trade

Impact score: E – Significant at the regional level. These fruit flies are regarded as major destructive pests of horticultural crops in various parts of the world. Although they can cause considerable yield losses in orchards and urban backyards, they also have consequences for Australian horticultural industries on gaining and maintaining export markets.

  • Due to the papaya fruit fly outbreak which occurred in north Queensland, Australia experienced trade restrictions that affected the whole country. In the first two months of the papaya fruit fly eradication campaign, about $A600,000 worth of exports were interrupted (Cantrell et al. 2002).

  • Within a week of the papaya fruit fly outbreak being declared, Japan ceased imports of mangoes at a cost of about $A570,000; New Zealand interrupted its $A30,000 banana trade and the Solomon Islands completely stopped importing fruit and vegetables from Queensland (Cantrell et al. 2002) until eradication was declared.

Environmental and non-commercial

Impact score: D – Significant at the district level. Broad-scale chemical control of fruit flies would have significant effects on fragile rainforest ecosystems (Cantrell et al.2002).

Based on the decision rules described in Table 2.4, where the consequences of a pest with respect to one or more criteria are ‘F’, the overall consequences are considered to be: HIGH.

4.4.6. Unrestricted risk estimate


Unrestricted risk is the result of combining the probability of entry, establishment and spread with the outcome of overall consequences. Probabilities and consequences are combined using the risk estimation matrix shown in Table 2.5.

Unrestricted risk estimate for fruit flies




Overall probability of entry, establishment and spread

High

Consequences

High

Unrestricted risk

High

As indicated, the unrestricted risk for fruit flies has been assessed as ‘high’, which is above Australia’s ALOP. Therefore, specific risk management measures are required for this pest.
1   ...   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət