Ana səhifə

Ecological Site Description Ecological Site Characteristics Site Identification


Yüklə 2.33 Mb.
səhifə8/9
tarix27.06.2016
ölçüsü2.33 Mb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9

ECOLOGICAL SITE INTERPRETATONS


Forest Site Productivity


Common Name


Scientific Name

Estimated Productivity

Site Index

Cubic Feet
(CMAI)

Other Units


Low

High

Low

High

Low

High

Unit

`ohi`a lehua

Metrosideros polymorpha

    

    

    

    

700

2800

cu. ft./ac

koa

Acacia koa













800

3100

cu.ft./ac


Animal Community

Animal Community – Wildlife Interpretations

This site provides habitat to a variety of small, medium-sized, and large introduced birds such as doves, wild turkey, ring-necked pheasant, Eurasian skylark, Erckel’s francolin, black francolin, and khalij pheasant. States that provide open grassland or savannah-like settings provide habitat for other important wildlife such as the Hawaiian hawk and the Hawaiian owl. This site can also provide habitat to the following native birds: Hawaii elepaio, omao, Hawaii amakihi, apapane, iiwi, Hawaiian crow, ou, Hawaii akepa, akiapolaau, as well as the Hawaiian hoary bat. Feral pigs, sheep, and cattle are very common; they provide hunting opportunities but are very destructive to the native vegetation.


Animal Community – Grazing Interpretations

The following table lists suggested initial stocking rates for cattle under the Forage Value Rating system for only State 2, Plant Community 2, Good Condition Pasture, with guinea grass. For kikuyugrass pastures on this ecological site, refer to grazing interpretations in Ecological site Description F161AY500HI, Transition Zone Ohia-Koa-Mamane Forest. The following are conservative estimates that should be used only as guidelines in the initial stages of the conservation planning process. Sometimes the current plant composition does not entirely match any particular plant community described in this ecological site description. Because of this, a field visit is recommended to document plant composition and production. More precise carrying capacity estimates should eventually be calculated using the following stocking rate information along with animal preference data, particularly when grazers other than cattle are involved. Under more intensive grazing management, improved harvest efficiencies may result in an increased stocking rate.


Forage Value Rating 1/ Acre/AUM 3/ AUM/Acre 3/


Very High 2/ 0.20 – 0.22 5.13 – 4.49

High 0.22 – 0.26 4.49 – 3.85

Moderate 0.26 –0.39 3.85 –2.56

Low 0.39 - + 2.56 - +


1/ The Forage Value Rating System is not an ecological evaluation of State 2, Plant Community 2, Good Condition Pasture. It is a utilitarian rating of the existing forage value for that specific plant community.

2/ Conservationists must use considerable judgment, because some pastures in the Very High forage class could be producing less than normal volumes of forage, and adjustments would need to be made in the initial stocking rate.

3/ Stocking rates vary in accordance with such factors as kind and class of livestock or wildlife, season of use, and fluctuations in climate. Figures shown are calculated assuming a 30% adjustment factor to account for harvest efficiency and the “take half – leave half” principle. Actual use records and on-site inventories for individual sites, together with a determination of the degree to which the sites have been grazed, offer the most reliable basis for developing initial stocking rates.
The Good Condition Pasture plant community on this site is suitable for grazing by all kinds and classes of livestock, at any season, particularly cattle. However, this site is best utilized for grazing during the major plant growth period described in the “Climate” section. This site is suited for grazing by both cow-calf operations and stocker operations. However, sheep can be grazed on this site as well. This site is poorly suited to continuous year-long use if the Good Condition Pasture plant community is to be maintained. Herbaceous forage can be deficient in protein during the drier months.
Plant Preference for Cattle

Common Name

Scientific Name

Plant Part

Forage Preferences

J

F

M

A

M

J

J

A

S

O

N

D

Guineagrass

Urochloa maxima

entire

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

Napier elephantgrass

Pennisetum purpureum

entire

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

Kikuyugrass

Pennisetum clandestinum

entire

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

Pangolagrass

Digitaria eriantha

entire

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

Smutgrass

Sporobolus indicus

entire

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Hilograss

Paspalum conjugatum

entire

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Broomsedge bluestem

Andropogon virginicus

entire

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Bushybeard bluestem

Schizachyrium condensatum

entire

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Yellow foxtail

Setaria firmula

entire

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Green kyllinga

Cyperus brevifolius

entire

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Vaseygrass

Paspalum urvillei

entire

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Glycine

Neonotonia wightii

entire

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

Three-flowered tickletrefoil

Desmodium triflorum

entire

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

Common sowthistle

Emilia sonchifolia

entire

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Spiny amaranth

Amaranthus spinosus

entire

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

Bull thistle

Cirsium vulgare

entire

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Sourbush

Pluchea carolinensis

entire

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Christmasberry

Schinus terebinthifolius

entire

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Thimbleberry

Rubus rosifolius

entire

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Poha

Physalis peruviana

entire

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Castor bean

Ricinum communis

entire

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Legend: P=Preferred, D=Desirable, U=Undesirable, N=Not Consumed, E=Emergency, T=Toxic, X=Used, but degree of utilization unknown.
Hydrology Functions

     
Recreation Uses

Hunting is the most common recreational use.


Wood Products

There is good potential for production of timber in this ecological site, including eucalyptus and high-value specialty woods such as koa. However, there has been very little utilization of the resource to date.


Other Products

     
Other Information

     
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət