Case synopsis
|
|  Yüklə 156 Kb.
|
- (July 29, 2014; 2:00 PM) - Public Policy domain case ...: CASE SYNOPSIS. Date Dear Counselor: “CASE SYNOPSIS” below should facilitate understanding/comprehending our case. Despite its possible seeming complexity, it is really very simple, straightforward and easy.(*) In the end, if there are still some/any residual questions, please let us address same in specific and pointed fashion. Including, as necessary, by doing so in person! CASE SYNOPSIS Cause(s) of Action: (A) Rx Pertinent I. Phone based plus physical stalking and harassment: May 6, 2007 phone stalking by Rx (son of Tn prominent Kx and a former town mayor) to “extort”, using tactics even seedy debt collectors would not access (see: Letter of May 10, 2014 to Deputy Chief Tx of the TnPD in Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)). Physical stalking of Nisha at her work, May 7, 2014 to June 20, 2014 (when Nisha finished her regular session for the year)! 10 incidents copiously recorded (including May 6, 2014 phone stalking incident) (see: Letter of May 10, 2014 to Deputy Chief Tx of the TnPD plus ADDENDUMS 1-8 in Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)). Nisha-Chander, in consultation with Deputy Chief Tx and out of respect-concern for Rx’s mother Kx, refrained from filing formal complaint against Rx. However, Tn (who administers the program, through TnPD, in which Nisha works) had an independent responsibility to provide Nisha with a safe and harassment free environment, failed duty owed by doing nothing at all about/to stop Rx’s persistent harassment. On the contrary, through the TnPD, joined Rx’s nefarious pursuits in conspiracy to subject Nisha(-Chander) to heightened and criminal harassment (see: “(B) Tn-TnPD-Mayot Mx et al. Pertinent” below) for purposes of extending the “extortion” racked initiated by Rx. (see: July 2, 2014 letter to Deputy Chief Tx Lname (1) RE.doc (202 KB)). Nisha-Chander met with Mayor Mx (a licensed, admitted and practicing attorney in private life) specifically, on the issue of Rx’s stalking, promptly on May 7, 2014. Mx pointedly undertook, in the discussion that took place, to “track Rx down” and “”straighten him out”, but actually seems to have done nothing! In fact, his TnPD was to later join in the “extortion” harassment (see: “(B) Tn-TnPD-Mayot Mx et al. Pertinent” below). Nisha-Chander had told Deputy Chief Tx (see: Letter of May 10, 2014 to Deputy Chief Tx of the TnPD in Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)) about this meeting with Mayor Mx and in their e-mail to Mayor Mx also of May 10, 2014 had told the Mayor of their being in contact with Deputy Chief Tx on the subject (see: May 10, 2014 e-mail to Mayor Mx in Part II Case e-mails (1) RE.doc (260 KB). It would, therefore, be quite safe to assume Mayor Mx had full knowledge of TnPD’s “extortion” motivated harassment of Nisha-Chander, inherited from Rx in conspiracy and predicated upon his-his mother Kx’s prominence in town, begun on June 24, 2014 (see: ADDENDUM 10 Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)) where Rx’s own last recorded stalking episode occurred on June 16, 2014 (see: ADDENDUM 8 Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)). For all the correspondence with Mayor Mx, see: Part II Case e-mails (1) RE.doc (260 KB). Rx has never been able to file or filed any formal complaint ever pertaining to transactions (between Kx and Nisha-Chander, in connection with work done by the former for the latter) over which he first advanced his own, self-help, harassment/“extortion” and later enrolled TnPD to pursue on his behalf. While all this heavy duty harassment, by Rx and then the TnPD switched full blast on, Kx herself repeatedly calling Nisha-Chander apologizing for Rx’s … conduct and implying no monies owed her(see: ADDENDUMs 9, 11 and 14 Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)). Between May 7, 2014-June 20, 2014, Chander has had to be, near full time, around Nisha’s place of work to protect her from Rx’s stalking harassment. Since July 1, 2014, when Nisha went back to work for the summer session, he has had to continue doing so, now to safeguard her also from TnPD’s stalking and harassment. This fact made known to Mx (see: May 10, 2014 e-mail to Mayor Mx in Part II Case e-mails (1) RE.doc (260 KB) and Deputy Chief Tx (see: Letter of May 10, 2014 to Deputy Chief Tx of the TnPD in Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)), yet they allowed TnPD to assume ownership of Rx’s “extortion” racket in its own nefarious undertaking. Far from any justification for enclosed “extortion”, by Rx and then TnPD on Kx-Rx’s behalf, Kx owes Nisha-Chander thousands of dollars for work done for her. Even Mayor Mx referred to same , in his meeting with Nisha-Chander of May 7, 2014, as “Kx probably owes them $50,000 for all the work they have done …” (speaking to Tn councilman Mmx on the phone in Nisha’s presence on that day). NB: Nisha-Chander are in the process of typing out detailed transcripts of topical conversation(s) they have had with Rx, Mayor Mx, Deputy Chief Tx, … II. Defamation: In the May 7, 2014 episode at Nisha’s post/work place, Rx made a public scene, falsely calling Nisha-Chander “embezzlers”, “scammers”, “thieves”, … to passing school teachers (known to Nisha) of Elementary School # X, her neighbors (for Nisha-Chander live very close by), general public ... (see: May 10, 2014 e-mail to Mayor Mx in Part II Case e-mails (1) RE.doc (260 KB and letter of May 10, 2014 to Deputy Chief Tx of the TnPD in Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)). On June 9, 2014 he falsely told Jx “… they owe us money.” (see: ADDENDUM 4 Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)). Made a false and insufficiently pleaded, parol, complaint to TnPD, relying solely on his family’s prominence and connection around Tn, causing the TnPD to unleash a campaign of terrorizing harassment on Nisha(-Chander), unlawful in TnPd’s own right too. To-date, beyond Rx’s insufficient parol pleadings obvious from TnPD’s bizarre and patently out-of-line prosecution of Nisha(-Chander), no written complaint has ever been filed. Indeed, Kx stated she “… will keep [Rx] away [from Nisha-Chander].” (see: ADDENDUM 14 Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)). III. Threats of physical and financial harm: On May 7, 2014 he said ominously said to Nisha “I know where you live!”, then proceeded to slow recite her and Chander’s full home address for full effect. No mistaking what he was trying to convey, in none too subtle and veiled terms; threat(s) of physical harm (see: May 10, 2014 e-mail to Mayor Mx in Part II Case e-mails (1) RE.doc (260 KB and letter of May 10, 2014 to Deputy Chief Tx of the TnPD in Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)). On the same May 7, 2014, Rx also threatened to cause financial harm to Nisha-Chander, stating he was going to make sure they had no home to live in and were pushed out on to the streets (paraphrased, words to that effect). NB: Nisha-Chander are in the process of typing out a detailed transcripts of this, topical, “conversation” with Rx, as direct evidence different from indirect coverage of this, May 7, 2014, incident via May 10, 2014 e-mail to Mayor Mx in Part II Case e-mails (1) RE.doc (260 KB and letter of May 10, 2014 to Deputy Chief Tx of the TnPD in Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB). IV. Blackmail, framing & extortion: Rx(-Kx) never had any viable and sufficient complaint of monies owed by Nisha-Chander to Kx. Besides underlying payments being for work done by Nisha-Chander for Kx, where latter has not even paid anywhere close in full, check(s) in question carry no “loan” or any notation on them. As such, if they were not payments for work (which they were), they could only be interpreted, taken as straight-line gifts! Otherwise, Rx’s desperate attempts to make these transactions look like “embezzlement” or “larceny, spontaneously pathetic, an exercise in “blackmail”, “falsely framing”, … Nisha-Chander, with a view to purely “extort” upon personal avarice one would suspect. Far from thin beef predicated, standing on NO beef at all! His claims of “Kx taken advantage of” no recitation of any statutory wrongdoing, absent recitation of surrounding facts pleaded make for no sufficient pleadings in law. His claims that Kx “old” and “naive” belied by fact(s) she holds senior executive title(s) (ranging to “Vice-Chairmanships” et al. in multiple settings and organizations and including finance related responsibilities), … patently bogus. Besides Kx, through it all, as ever continues to remain favorably disposed towards Nisha-Chander, even implying no monies are owed her by them(see: ADDENDUMs 9, 11 and 14 Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)). V. Violation(s) of privacy: Kx reports Rx “got into/saw my checkbook”, while she was stricken down with a hip fracture! Rx, on a seedy, indefensible and unlawful mission, procured Nisha-Chander’s phone #, home address, who Nisha working for and her precise work location, … God knows what other private information, … without lawful cause or justification. Further, proceeded to use it, nefariously! He stated on May 7, 2014 (see: May 10, 2014 e-mail to Mayor Mx in Part II Case e-mails (1) RE.doc (260 KB) and letter of May 10, 2014 to Deputy Chief Tx of the TnPD in Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)) that Gx and Px, in the TnPA (Kx associated with which too) had told him that Nisha-Chander were given to “mooching off Kx”. It is suspected Gx and/or Px supplied Rx with such private information pertaining to Nisha-Chander. It is also possible Rx may have extracted same, upon crowbar tactics and means applied, from Kx! Rx also got his hands on the broad details of Nisha-Chander’s household’s financial vulnerabilities, which were obvious inputs into his calculations that they were susceptible to coercion. Easy and soft targets for his reign of terror and oppression intended. Such information he could fully receive only from Kx (Deputy Chief Tx, a friend, the other one familiar with the full dimensions of Nisha-Chander’s current difficult financial circumstances), who remains an enigma behind the scenes with her son Rx. … VI. Wrongful prosecution: Rx not only proceeded on false information as to Nisha-Chander owing Kx anything, but in using tactics that even the most despicable “debt collector/collecting agency” would shrink from is guilty so of “wrongful prosecution” on two counts. Fact that self-help to the point of final collection by nefarious means is readily prohibited by law, why courts must be interjected/inserted if final collections requires anything beyond prescribed means, Rx culpable and liable in a very serious way for “wrongful prosecution”. Rx further, once again knowingly (he may have seemingly posed as an attorney, for not having any current legal license, but is still minimally a Law School graduate) caused a false, insufficient, …, parol, complaint to be made to the TnPD, which resulted in a vicious campaign of harassment unleashed by it on Nisha(-Chander). Rx must bear responsibility for such advanced abuse by TnPD of Nisha-Chander. Especially, when Rx relied, both in his personal harassment and harassment through TnPD of Nisha-Chander, on nothing more fundamental than expecting to get away with all his wrongdoing, either on Nisha-Chander’s innocence simply caving in helplessly and/or based on family’s prominence in Tn. Otherwise, excessive and brutal police conduct seems to be on the rise in contemporary America (DISTURBING VIDEO: 'Gentle Giant' Dies After Cop Puts Him In Chokehold - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/18/nypd-chokehold-death_n_5599252.html; RAW Footage: Cops Dogpile Man And Kill Him After ... - http://www.westernjournalism.com/nypd-kills-gentle-giant-putting-chokehold/; New Raw Video Surfaces In NYPD Chokehold Death (GRAPHIC) - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/19/eric-garner-chokehold-death_n_5602443.html; ). NYC Mayor Postpones Vacation Amid Outrage Over Police Killing - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/19/mayor-de-blasio-chokehold-response_n_5602183.html; NYPD's Long History Of Killing Unarmed Black Men... - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/18/killed-by-the-nypd-black-men_n_5600045.html). Police Departments in America are increasingly becoming militarized and using paramilitary operational means, methods routinely (Bill Maher Slams Militarized Police Culture In America - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/19/bill-maher-militarized-police-culture_n_5602105.html). Imagine all our military residual and surplus, from Iraq and Afghanistan being distributed to police forces all across the country!?! VII. Conspiracy: There was an obvious [criminal] conspiracy bridging Rx and TnPD, it seems with Mayor Mx’s knowledge. Rx able to “persuade” TnPD harass, victimize, … Nisha(-Chander), … violate their rights, …, upon nothing more fundamental than belonging to a prominent Tn family, being well-connected therein, … without even actually living in town. Move TnPD even without possessing any true, legally sufficient complaint, … get this TnPD to open an investigation and pursuit, conduct a leading, entrapping, shakedown, … interrogation of Nisha (see: ADDENDUM 10 Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)), before and after Nisha standing on her rights refused to come in for any meeting with the TnPD at the station screws endeavored to be applied requiring her to do so, first the crowbar of job termination applied, then Officer Dx endeavored to take her in near forcibly (therefore forcibly; see: July 2, 2014 letter to Deputy Chief Tx Lname (1) RE.doc (202 KB)), still thereon the so-called Officer Anonymous suggesting Chander “confess” so Nisha could still keep her job (see: ADDENDUM 13 Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)), … all elements of due process failure on the face and violation of Nisha(-Chander’s) core rights. TnPD, resting on unlawful motives and means, endeavoring to carve out a “final adjudication” itself acting as “final arbiter”, usurping the court’s domain!?! There was a slice of racism in Rx’s nefarious pursuits too: Rx had even provided, revealed a racial component and profile to his harassment, telling Nisha on May 7, 2014 “I have been to India and I know what Indians are like.” To which, Nisha had dead-pan replied “You are going to teach me about India!?!” Rx remaining adamant, resigning only to the academic reality, came back with “I guess not!” … VIII. …: (B) Tn-TnPD-Mayot Mx et al. Pertinent I. Harassment: See appropriately in previous section, entitled “(A) Rx Pertinent”. In inheriting and taking over from Rx, from where he left off, …, TnPD not merely poised and ready to execute the former’s, known, nefarious brief, but in planning to “nail” Nisha(-Chander) had also designed to provide some kind of counter-poise, somehow perhaps in their minds even total mitigation, for Rx’s [criminal] pursuits discharged in “(A) Rx Pertinent”. As such, somehow get Tx “off the hook” so! TnPD, in this strain and role, comprehensively watching out for Rx, catering to Kx. TnPD’s harassment of Nisha(-Chander) began on June 24, 2014, with Officer Kkkx’s loaded call, leading and endeavoring to “entrap”, “shakedown”, … “extort” summarily (see: ADDENDUM 10 Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)). Element of the violation of Nisha(-Chander)’s core rights! On that day Officer Kkkx never read Nisha her “Miranda Rights” (see: ADDENDUM 10 Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB))! Element of the violation of Nisha(-Chander)’s core rights! On that day Officer Kkkx, in response to Nisha’s repeated demands for “Who filed a complaint with you?” skirted answering until he simply tried to mislead saying “Kx wants her money back.”, seeming to suggest and convey that it was Kx herself who had made the day's parol complaint to him and it was her who would be filing the "... complaints ... coming" (see: June 25th, 2014 e-mail to Deputy Chief Tx Case e-mails (1) RE.doc (260 KB) and ADDENDUM 10 Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)). Elements of “wrongful prosecution” and violation of Nisha(-Chander)’s core, due process, rights! On that day officer Kkkx, in response to Nisha’s repeated demands for “Who filed a complaint with you?” skirted answering until he indirect disclosed “… If you do not tell me when you are going to start making payments, filed complaints are coming.” Deliberately hiding that not even any formal complaint had been filed to that point (now, despite contemporaneous threats “complaints … coming:, none have ever come (see: June 24th, 2014 e-mail to Deputy Chief Tx Case e-mails (1) RE.doc (260 KB) and ADDENDUM 10 Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB))! Elements of “wrongful prosecution” and violation of Nisha(-Chander)’s core, due process, rights! On that day officer Kkkx opened with “This is regarding money owed to you–know-who.” Besides endeavoring to “entrap”, deliberately suppressing Nisha’s right to know all details clearly, without any equivocation, holdback, suppression, … (see: June 24th, 2014 e-mail to Deputy Chief Tx Case e-mails (1) RE.doc (260 KB) and ADDENDUM 10 Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)). Elements of “wrongful prosecution” and violation of Nisha(-Chander)’s core, due process, rights! On that day officer Kkkx expressed interest in “All I want to know is when will you start repaying?” and “There is nothing to discuss!” without any sufficient complaint in hand whatsoever. Otherwise, connectedly, issuing undeserved threats, as “… If you do not tell me when you are going to start making payments, filed complaints are coming” (see: June 24th, 2014 e-mail to Deputy Chief Tx Case e-mails (1) RE.doc (260 KB) and ADDENDUM 10 Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)). To-date no sufficient complaint ever filed, on the contrary Kx stated, July 13th, 2014, on the record, she “… will keep [Rx] away [from Nisha-Chander]” (see: ADDENDUM 14 Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)). Elements of “wrongful prosecution” and violation of Nisha(-Chander)’s core, due process, rights! On that day Officer Kkkx verbatim recited Rx’s insufficient language of “Kx was taken advantage of ...", otherwise too TnPD adopted Rx’s untenable and nefarious brief, together with coercive tactics, in toto” (see: June 24th, 2014, July 1st, 2014, July 6th, 2014 e-mail(s) to Deputy Chief Tx Case e-mails (1) RE.doc (260 KB), ADDENDUM 10, 13 Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB), July 2, 2014 letter to Deputy Chief Tx Lname (1) RE.doc (202 KB) and …)! Elements of “wrongful prosecution” and violation of Nisha(-Chander)’s core, due process, rights! On that day, July 1st, 2014, July 2nd, 2014, July 11, 2014, despite Nisha standing on her rights not to speak, meet, … and demanding service of a verified/sufficient complaint, various TnPD personnel sought to coerce her to meet with Officer Kkkx at the station (see: June 24th, 2014, July 1st, 2014, July 6th, 2014 e-mail(s) to Deputy Chief Tx Case e-mails (1) RE.doc (260 KB), ADDENDUM 10, 13 Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB), July 2, 2014 letter to Deputy Chief Tx Lname (1) RE.doc (202 KB) and …). Elements of “wrongful prosecution” and violation of Nisha(-Chander)’s core, due process, rights! On July 2nd, 2014 in particular, Officer Dx sought to take Nisha near forcibly, as such forcibly to meet with Officer Kkkx at the RnPD station (see: July 6th, 2014 e-mail to Deputy Chief Tx Case e-mails (1) RE.doc (260 KB) and July 2, 2014 letter to Deputy Chief Tx Lname (1) RE.doc (202 KB) and …). Elements of “wrongful prosecution” and violation of Nisha(-Chander)’s core, due process, civil, and all other, … rights! Tn-TnPD(-Mayor Mx) repeatedly deployed the crowbar of Nisha’s job placed to jeopardy, to get her to bend to their will in a highly nefarious conspiracy and ensuing campaign/mission, oppressively, tyrannically, … executed. On June 24th, 2014, Officer Kkkkx said in veiled fashion “You work as a crossing guard. …” (see: ADDENDUM 10 Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)).On July 1st, 2014, Deputy Chief Tx speaking from North Carolina said :Your job could be in jeopardy, if you do not cooperate, … go in and see Officer Kkkx”, a conversation memorialized in e-mail of same date Case e-mails (1) RE.doc (260 KB)). On July 11th, 2014, Officer Anonymous said (to Nisha) “… but you stand to lose by way of losing your job. Since Chander has nothing to lose, he should take the rap, saying it was him.” (and minutes later to Chander) “I just want to say, if Nisha loses her job, it would be because of you. You are the one stopping her from seeing Officer Kkkx” (see: ADDENDUM 13 Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB))! Otherwise, TnPD’s entire, heavy-duty and ungloved, coercive demeanor/performance reflected they were counting on Nisha to cave in abjectly, calculating on their knowledge of the vulnerabilities of Nisha-Chander’s precarious financial standing to so deliver the goods for them like a ripe fruit dropping from the tree. Rx himself, similarly informed and motivated, had on May 7, 2014 threatened to eject Nisha-Chander from home and hearth onto the bare street. Tn-TnPD-Mayor Mx were supposed to inescapably provide Nisha with a safe and harassment free environment, protect her impeccably as an employee, … and/but here they were leading the charge with their own predatory underwriting. Inherited albeit from Rx, now, front and center, slashing away now clearly on their own dime! II. Threats of employment harm: See appropriately in previous section, entitled “(A) Rx Pertinent”. See appropriately above/supra within this section, entitled “(B) Tn-TnPD-Mayot Mx et al. Pertinent” itself at “I. Harassment”. III. Entrapment, shakedown, blackmail, framing, extortion: See appropriately in previous section, entitled “(A) Rx Pertinent”. See appropriately above/supra within this section, entitled “(B) Tn-TnPD-Mayot Mx et al. Pertinent” itself at “I. Harassment”. IV. Violations of privacy: See appropriately in previous section, entitled “(A) Rx Pertinent”. See appropriately above/supra within this section, entitled “(B) Tn-TnPD-Mayot Mx et al. Pertinent” itself at “I. Harassment”. V. Wrongful prosecution: See appropriately in previous section, entitled “(A) Rx Pertinent”. See appropriately above/supra within this section, entitled “(B) Tn-TnPD-Mayot Mx et al. Pertinent” itself at “I. Harassment”. VI. Violation of rights: See appropriately in previous section, entitled “(A) Rx Pertinent”. See appropriately above/supra within this section, entitled “(B) Tn-TnPD-Mayot Mx et al. Pertinent” itself at “I. Harassment”. VII. Conspiracy: See appropriately in previous section, entitled “(A) Rx Pertinent”. See appropriately above/supra within this section, entitled “(B) Tn-TnPD-Mayot Mx et al. Pertinent” itself at “I. Harassment”. VIII. …: NB: Reattached the other files (4), some UPDATED. ADDENDUMs (see: Rx Lname incident (1) RE.doc (263 KB)) all prepared contemporaneously, so authenticated by placing contents in e-mails sent self on the same date. All other, topical, material (as in July 2, 2014 letter to Deputy Chief Tx Lname (1) RE.doc (202 KB), Case e-mails (1) RE.doc (260 KB)) similarly authenticated by way of having been actually sent out to parties via e-mail. __________________________________ (*) We are in possession of a snippet, which speaks volumes on opposing parties being nervous, worried, cognizant of the wrong they have done, aware they have poor defenses in response, … We cannot reveal this writing, but can and will share it orally at any opportune point ahead. This case has all the aspects of a first rate town scandal, of deep concern to the opposition, who in our considered opinion should be willing to deal without dragging this matter through court … ALL DISCLOSURES, CONTENT, SUBMISSIONS, … SENT YOU, IN CONNECTION WITH THE ENCLOSED “PUBLIC POLICY DOMAIN CASE …” CONSULTATION UNDERWAY, SUBJECT TO ALL THE CONFIDENTIALITIES AND LAWS APPLICABLE TO SUCH A PROCEEDING, PROCEEDINGS. E&OE. We did not have time to proof read and edit this presentation, please forgive those shortcomings, if any, as well. Once again, to reiterate for emphasis and clarity, we enclose a strong, valid and viable case on the merits! Best Regards. Sincerely, Nisha (& Chander) Sud(s) Counselor XYZ Esq. - Address - Town, State Zip Phone: Fax: Email: |