Ana səhifə

Biodiversity management plan for the western leopard toad amietophrynus pantherinus


Yüklə 1.74 Mb.
səhifə2/7
tarix24.06.2016
ölçüsü1.74 Mb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7

Habitat – foraging:

Map 2. The distribution of the Western Leopard Toad in Cape Town based on its foraging habitat (all known georeferenced records and sightings). Roads, contours and vegetation types on the background. The 1 km (mauve), 2 km (light green) and 5 km (green) surrounds to all sightings are shown.
The Western Leopard Toad is mainly associated with sandy coastal lowlands but, in places, can also be found in valleys and on the lower mountain slopes and hills near the coast. Most of its range is tied to Cape Flats and Hangklip Sand Fynbos and ecotonal areas to Cape Flats Strandveld.

A wide-ranging species that, although it seems to spend most of its time away from water, is usually found in the general vicinity of wetland habitats such as rivers, coastal lakes, vleis and pans. It is not known how far adults forage from breeding sites: ranges of 1-2km are accepted, but anecdotal evidence and other toads with similar breeding systems may range as far as 5km from breeding sites. Although unproven, it is widely believed that adults are highly site specific and return to their previous foraging sites and even sleeping holes each year (if so, it is the only toad known to exhibit such behaviour). Toads translocated from their foraging sites have been reported to return within a few days covering several km. Most movement and feeding is done at night.


Table: Vegetation types of foraging habitat and breeding ponds, ranked by 1 km areas.




Vegetation type

Proportion of total area within
distance to known sightings


Proportion of total area within
distance to 2010 breeding sites





1 km

2 km

5 km

1 km

2 km

5 km

Cape Flats Sand Fynbos

28%

15%

7%










Peninsula Sandstone Fynbos

18%

17%

15%










Cape Flats Dune Strandveld

16%

10%

8%










Peninsula Granite Fynbos

12%

7%

4%










Hangklip Sand Fynbos

10%

2%

0%










Agulhas Limestone Fynbos

5%

4%

9%










Peninsula Shale Renosterveld

4%

1%

1%










Overberg Dune Strandveld

2%

2%

4%










Cape Lowland Freshwater Wetlands

2%

1%

0%










Overberg Sandstone Fynbos

1%

1%

4%










Elim Ferricrete Fynbos

1%

1%

3%










Agulhas Sand Fynbos

1%

1%

1%










Cape Winelands Shale Fynbos

1%

2%

0%










Southern Coastal Forest

1%

0%

0%










Cape Coastal Lagoons

0%

0%

0%










Cape Estuarine Salt Marshes

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Cape Seashore Vegetation

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Southern Afrotemperate Forest

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Western Coastal Shale Band Vegetation

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

TOTAL AREA:

12 909 ha

35 610 ha

84 300 ha

5 824 ha

18 133 ha

62 129 ha

It inhabits the Fynbos and Thicket biomes where it is found predominately (5 km of recorded sites) in the following vegetation types: Sandstone Fynbos (15%), Limestone Fynbos (9%), Dune Strandveld (8%) and Sand Fynbos (8%), although at 1km radius Sand Fynbos comprises 39% of the area.

However, the species is not restricted to pristine natural habitats and is often found in modified habitats such as farmlands, urban open spaces and suburban gardens. Breeding has also been recorded in wetlands with a degree of pollution and eutrophication.


Habitat – breeding:

This species generally breeds in permanent water bodies but also in seasonal wetlands that retain their water well into the summer months. Breeding habitat includes coastal lakes, vleis, pans, dams, ponds and sluggish, meandering rivers that have stretches of relatively deep, still water. Typical breeding sites have standing open water deeper than 0.5m, with scattered patches of aquatic plants and beds of emergent vegetation such as bulrushes Typha capensis. Alien invasive species do not seem to restrict breeding as long as open water remains available.

Breeding sites occur (as calculated for 5 km surrounding breeding records) in Fynbos and Thicket biomes in the following vegetation types: Strandveld (15%), Sandstone Fynbos (15%), Sand Fynbos (14%), and Limestone Fynbos (12%), although at 1 km surrounding areas Sand Fynbos comprises 43% of the area.

It is assumed that toads show the same specificity to breeding sites as they show to foraging sites, but it has been assumed that translocated animals will not readily use alternative sites for breeding when these exist.



Map 3. The distribution of the Western Leopard Toad breeding sites on the Peninsula. The grey areas are transformed by urbanization and agriculture. The circles around the breeding sites are the 1 km (yellow), 2 km (light green) and 5 km (green) surrounds. REDO


Map 4. The distribution of all known current (with breeding within the last 10 years) Western Leopard Toad breeding sites. Solid dots are confirmed breeding sites and stars are non-breeding records. The circles around the breeding sites are the 1 km (yellow), 2 km (light green) and 5 km (green) surrounds. Contour lines are shown for relief.



Life history

The Western Leopard Toad is an explosive breeder with a short, defined breeding season largely confined to August (Cherry 1992), but with records from the end of July to early in September. At the commencement of the breeding season, large numbers of adults emerge and converge on localized breeding sites. For example, after dark on 23 July 1978, 66 adults were counted within 20 minutes on a 3 km stretch of road near Noordhoek on the Cape Peninsula.

At prime breeding sites, advertisement calls of males can be heard in choruses of up to 30 individuals (rarely up to 200), but in urban environments far fewer individuals are usually heard. At Die Oog (Bergvliet) several hundred males call annually and continuously (day and night) for around a week. The noise has been likened by residents to a jet aeroplane taking off (Measy, pers. obs). Calling is most intense at night but is sometimes heard during the day. Males call from stands of emergent vegetation (e.g. bulrushes), but at night, areas of open water are also utilized. The males have a habit of calling from a floating position with limbs outstretched.

Amplexing pairs may utilize areas of open water for spawning (Cherry 1992), although they seem to prefer vegetation for spawning.

The females deposit thousands of eggs in gelatinous strings. On one occasion a female was reported to have produced 24 476 eggs (Rose 1929). Metamorphosis is fairly slow, taking over 10 weeks. The relatively small, dark, benthic tadpoles develop into tiny 11mm long toadlets that leave the water in October–December in their thousands.

Relatively few of the offspring – typically less than 1% - develop into adults: most fall victim to a variety of predators (including their own kind) and other hazards. Toads breed at 2 years of age (Cherry & Vieiliot, 1992).



Adults appear to aestivate over summer, although in moist gardens they are probably active throughout the year. Adults live for 1.9 years (males) to 3.2 years (females), and specimens of 3 years (males) and 6 years (females) have been recorded (Cherry & Vieiliot, 1992).

  1. Any ex situ populations and their status;

No viable ex situ populations are known.

  1. Species’ role in the ecosystem e.g. umbrella, keystone, flagship, mutualisms and dependencies;

Apart from tadpoles that live in wetlands for 2-4 months, most of the adults live in urban and suburban areas. In these gardens they are major consumers of garden pests. Apart from their dependence on wetlands for breeding, they are quite catholic in their requirements.

  • As a flagship species this is unparalleled on the urban-rural interface, bringing nature from the wilds into the urban garden, and creating an awareness of the threatened nature of Cape ecosystems, and the City of Cape Town as a Biodiversity Megadisaster area.

  • As an umbrella species it can assist in the protection of the following species within the City of Cape Town:

  • Amblysomus corriae Fynbos Golden Mole - Near Threatened;

  • Breviceps gibbosus Cape Rain Frog – NT LC?;

  • Cacosternum capense Cape Caco –NT LC;

  • Capensebufo rosei Roses Mountain Toad – Vulnerable (overlapping at Silvermine);

  • Microbatrachella capensis Micro Frog - Critically Endangered;

  • Xenopus gillii Cape Platanna - Endangered;

In addition, it will serve to highlight the conservation of the following NEMBA threatened ecosystems:

  • Cape Flats Sand Fynbos – Critically Endangered (breeding and foraging habitat), with over 50 endemic plant species and 108 threatened Red List plant species;

  • Cape Flats Strandveld – Near threatened (foraging habitat);

  • Peninsula Granite Fynbos – Endangered (foraging habitat);

Cape Flats Wetlands - ??

  1. Known diseases;

The Western Leopard Toad Flatworm Eupolystoma anterorchis was found by Tinsley (1978) in the bladders of specimens imported to UK from Noordhoek: The genus is adapted to explosive breeders, but does not appear to harm the toad. Most Eupolystoma species are toad specific, so this species is probably confined to the Western Leopard Toad. During 2007 Delport and du Preez (pers. comm.) sampled 108 road casualties and found no E. anterorchis. If this species is confined to the Western Leopard Toad then it may well be a threatened species. At this stage it should be regarded as Data Deficient.

  1. Population statistics and trends;

The distribution and conservation status of A. pantherinus is monitored by the Western Cape Nature Conservation Board (De Villiers 1997a).

Table: Current known breeding sites and population estimates of the Western Leopard Toad



#

Locality

Meta population

Peak size of breeding population

Last recorded breeding




1

Varsvlei

Pen. North

Uncertain

Current




2

Hout Bay/Disa River

Pen. West

10s

Current




3

Nooitgedacht

Pen. East

Uncertain 10s/100s/1000s/10000s

Current




4

Ottery: The Woods

Pen. East

Uncertain 10s/100s/1000s/10000s

Current




5

Clovelly Country Club

Pen. Fish Hoek

Uncertain 10s/100s/1000s/10000s

Current




6

Dassenberg

Pen. Fish Hoek

Uncertain 10s/100s/1000s/10000s

Current




7

De Goode hoop

Pen. Fish Hoek

Uncertain 10s/100s/1000s/10000s

Current




8

Hazelwood Park

Pen. Fish Hoek

100s

Current




9

Bergvliet

Pen. Main

100s

Current




10

Crest Way

Pen. Main

Uncertain 10s/100s/1000s/10000s

Current




11

Lakeside

Pen. Main

10s

Current




12

Louwsvlei

Pen. Main

Uncertain 10s/100s/1000s/10000s

Current




13

Raapekraal

Pen. Main

10s

Current




14

Rondevlei Bird Sanctuary

Pen. Main

10s

Current




15

Sandvlei

Pen. Main

100s

Current




16

Sandvlei Station

Pen. Main

100s

Current




17

Wessex

Pen. Main

Uncertain 10s/100s/1000s/10000s

Current




18

Kleinmond

Hangklip

Extinct

1978?




19

Pringle Bay

Hangklip

Extinct

1978?




20

Stanford

Stanford

10s

Current




21

Chris Carsten

Gansbaai

10s

Current




22

Grootbos

Gansbaai

10s

Current




23

Byeneskraans

Gansbaai

Uncertain 10s/100s/1000s/10000s

Current




24

Baardskeerdersbos

Gansbaai

100s

Current

























ANY OTHERS

Flower Valley


Overstrand



10s

Current








UPDATE 113 PONDS: 69 sites
















  1. Threats;

There appears to be no obvious decline in the extent of occurrence of A pantherinus within the Cape Peninsula (despite assertions in the literature based on assumptions of wetland destruction), but east of False Bay certain populations appear to be in decline, with two recorded breeding populations extinct. However, urban development has resulted in permanent loss of habitat and the fragmentation of populations, especially on the Cape Peninsula and Cape Flats, although it is possible that gardens are more benign than the summer-arid Sand Fynbos. In other areas, habitat degradation has affected habitat quality and probably led to a decline in population numbers.

The IUCN Red List status of Endangered (Harrison et al. 2001) is based on an extent of occurrence of 1963 km2, an area of occupancy ?

<500 km2, a severely fragmented habitat and inferred or suspected (but not confirmed) continuing decline in the extent of occurrence, area of occupancy, extent and quality of habitat and the number of locations/subpopulations and mature individuals.

The Western Leopard Toad is threatened throughout most of its range by general development and habitat degradation. While breeding generally takes place in larger, more secure wetlands, urban development poses an obvious threat around these wetlands by causing habitat fragmentation and restricting the foraging area and movement of toads. This may result in reduced population size and restricted or completely interrupt gene flow between populations, but genetic data do not support such a view (Ref).

In the urban environment, toads are forced to negotiate roads and barriers (e.g., walls, embankments, canals) while foraging and migrating to and from breeding sites. Expanding urban development and increased road traffic results in the death of hundreds of toads each year, especially during the breeding season. Artificial water bodies with steep vertical sides, such as canalized rivers and swimming pools, represent additional deathtraps that pose a threat to local populations. For example, over 3000 newly metamorphosed toadlets were rescued from a Bergvliet domestic swimming pool over a 10-day period, and many more died in the same pool in December 199? (J.A. Harrison and C.D. Gray pers. comm.).

At certain breeding sites on the Cape Peninsula and the Cape Flats, specific threats include pollutants, introduced predatory fish (e.g. barbel), and invasive floating plants that eliminate breeding habitat (e.g. water hyacinth). The effect of pollutants and introduced predatory fish on the development of eggs and tadpoles requires further investigation. Barbel may decimate an entire year’s population of tadpoles (Gibbs 19??, Measey, pers. obs.)

In 1999, a well-meaning member of the public “rescued” several specimens of A. pardalis and A. rangeri from roads near Grahamstown in the Eastern Cape, and released them in Constantia, Cape Peninsula (M. Burger pers. comm.). This misguided act may have brought about hybridization between A. pardalis and A. pantherinus, thereby undermining genetic differences between the two taxa. Such translocations may be common occurrences and pose a real threat to the conservation of genetic diversity. Where identified these hybrid populations must be eradicated as a matter of priority.

The attractiveness of A. pantherinus and its threatened status may warrant inclusion on the CITES list to protect the species against possible illicit trade. However, it breeds easily and the large number of toadlets would result in easy propagation of large numbers of hand-reared specimens, thus negating its rarity value and resulting in low demand. The situation should be monitored.


  1. Utilization:

In the past the species has been used for dissection and experimental purposes, with exports to the UK known. However, this was discontinued in the 1970s.

Although the Western Leopard Toad occurs in some of the protected nature areas within its range, these generally lack suitable breeding habitat. In fact, most of the protected areas in the southwestern Western Cape Province are located in montane Sandstone areas, while 62% of A. pantherinus breeding habitat and 57% of its foraging habitat (at 1 km surrounds) occurs lower down in unprotected Sand Fynbos (<1% conserved) and Strandveld (13%). Zandvlei Nature Reserve (including the adjoining Westlake Wetland Conservation Area) is one protected area with good breeding habitat, but this area has insufficient foraging areas within the boundaries of the reserve, and is stocked with predatory Barbel. Other statutory conservation areas that provide breeding habitat include Rondevlei and Zeekoevlei nature reserves and Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve (unconfirmed), but the quality of this habitat is unknown.

In the municipal areas of the Cape Peninsula and Cape Flats, the Western Leopard Toad is known to breed in certain public open space and green-belt areas and is often encountered in surrounding gardens. These are important sanctuaries, but with increasing development, road traffic and associated threats, the survival of local populations could be threatened.

The species is legally protected by the Nature Conservation Ordinance 19 of 1974, but is not listed by NEMBA or CITES.


    1. Socio-economic:

    • Use value of the species:

None known. Was used for dissections during the 1970s in the UK.

    • Public awareness and knowledge:

A charismatic species, well known among interested locals. Several hundred volunteers participate annually in the rescue of migrating toads from potential road death. This is potentially a flagship species that could be known by every scholar and homeowner within the City of Cape Town.

    • Ecosystem goods and services:

A significant pest controller, eating grubs, slugs, snails, caterpillars, earthworms and even mice – in fact anything that moves and is smaller than it. A must for any ecofriendly garden within its natural distribution range.

    • Community benefits:

Can be used as a job creation scheme for upgrading roads and stormwater systems to make them toad friendly.

Already is a focus for hundreds of volunteers who give up their time and labour to help the toads and toadlets across the roads and who monitor toad mortality.



    • Cost analyses:

  • During 2010 about 100? volunteers manned road verges carrying frogs across roads, amounting to xx manhours of intervention. .




    1. Research inventory and summary.

(See section 11.)

John and Atherton: references please!



4.3: Role players and planning methodology:

  1. All role players and organizations involved in development and implementation

see 4.1.1 and 9

  1. Processes followed in drawing up the BMP-S;

A preliminary meeting (of invited stakeholders) took place on 4 June 2007 to discuss Western Leopard Toad distribution ahead of the SANBI molecular study.

Following an obvious need during the 2007 mating season, a first stakeholders meeting was called in October 2007 for a briefing meeting held in 7 November 2007. Some 42 participants (with 28 apologies), representing 6 NGOs, 2 National Conservation Agencies (SANBI, SANParks), 2 Provincial Agencies (DEADP, CapeNature), and 1 local Agency (CoCT & Overstrand Municipality) and 8 conservation scientists attended. At the meeting existing knowledge and actions were compiled and summarized, additional Interested and Affected Parties were identified, threats were prioritized and discussed, and a steering committee appointed. Plans for a website and fundraising applications were made, and the Biodiversity Managemant Action Plan initiated.

WLT-CC regular meetings & final stakeholder meeting April 2011?


  1. All stakeholders;



  1. Outline of process followed for stakeholder consultation;

A preliminary meeting (of invited stakeholders) took place on 4 June 2007 to discuss Western Leopard Toad distribution ahead of the SANBI molecular study.

Following an obvious need during the 2007 mating season, a first stakeholders meeting was called in October 2007 for a briefing meeting held in 7 November 2007. From this a steering committee was elected, who compiled and edited the first draft of the Management plan.

TO DO: During March 2011 the proposed Management Action Plan was circulated for comment. Notice of the proposed plan and a second stakeholders meeting in April were advertised in local newspapers and on the web,. Comments were compiled and circulated to all interest and affected parties.


  1. Nature of agreements that will need to be/have been developed with implementers of the BMP-S; and,



  1. Reference to all relevant documents, agreements and policies, which will be appended to the BMP-S (as appendix 1);



5: Aim of the plan.
Cape Town Metropole:

At this stage knowledge of the Western Leopard Toad is largely confined to the greater Cape Town area.

The plan aims to achieve the following:


  • Immediately identify the known and largest Breeding sites (by December 2008) for immediate action by volunteers by June 2009. This has been accomplished. Ongoing work to identify additional sites where they occur in private gardens and cryptic localities.

  • Map the known and projected foraging area of leopard toads by June 2009. Using a 1000 m buffer zone around breeding areas.

  • Survey, secure and legally protect all major Breeding sites by 2012.

  • For minor sites sign up property owners to ‘stewardship’ agreements. City of Cape Town Biodiversity Stewardship agreement/award/badge of recognition. How many gardens?

  • Promote safe foraging habitat and make 90% of the foraging area toad friendly within 1km of Breeding sites in urban and suburban Cape Town by 2015.

  • Identify blackspots were undesirably high mortality rates occur on roads by 2009 and reduce mortality to acceptable levels by 2011 through volunteer participation and by 2015 by toad-friendly road design.

  • Identify and contact all private land-owners with major breeding sites on their property. Promote dispersal within and to and from these sites with assured safeguarding from land-owners by 2010. This has been accomplished.

  • Ensure that toad-friendly alien water weed -, road verge - and open space - maintenance are in place by 2009 and are being effectively practiced by 2010.

  • Ensure that canals, stormwater systems and drains are toad-friendly by 2020. Unrealistic – maybe we should say that prioritise sites that need to be connected and facilitate toad-friendly connections/corridors.

  • Ensure that every citizen in the Cape Metropole is aware of the plight of threatened toads and wild animals and plants within the City of Cape Town by 2015 and is aware of what he or she can do to help save them.

A central issue identified is the fragmentary nature of the available data and surveys. It is crucial to amalgamate this date into a single accessible database. It has been proposed that SANBI would do this within the SIBIS database.
Eastern subpopulations:

At this stage the action plan will only undertake research into the status of the populations at Pringle Bay, Betties Bay, Kleinmond, Hermanus, Stanford, Gansbaai, Baardskeerdersbos and Pringle Bay.

For these populations the distribution was mapped, breeding sites ascertained, and the size of the breeding populations estimated. This was done during 2009 (Report), but will be ongoing as more landowners become aware of the toads.

Pending the outcome of this research, the local Red Data List status and threats will be ascertained by June 2013.

The plan for this area is the initiation of stewardship agreements to be done by 2011. This will include the four largest breeding populations, excluding the single known population within the Agulhas National Park, which is considered safe.
Eastern outliers:

The odd records of populations east of Agulhas will be followed up and investigated. Where viable populations are found they will be included in surveys mentioned for the Eastern subpopulations. However, it is likely that these may well be transitional populations with the Eastern Leopard Toad, or isolated incidents of toads accidentally transported from Cape Town. Detailed genetic work will be undertaken before including these subpopulations in the Western Leopard Toad action plan, unless these subpopulations are found to be highly threatened.



6: Threats and problems adversely affecting the Western Leopard Toad.


Threat

IUCN Code

Description

Magnitude

Rank

Traffic on roads

4.1 Roads & railroads

Road mortality is very localized in space to near the Breeding sites and localized in time to adult movement to and from Breeding sites, and toadlet emergence from the pools. Major roads need to be handled differently from minor roads.

By far the major known cause of deaths of adult toads. Also a significant cause of toadlet death.

1

Predation by exotic fish & birds

8.1 Invasive Alien species

Barbel and Carp have become major predators in some of the biggest breeding areas. These are known to eat the tadpoles mid-way through their development. The threat of other exotic fish must still be assessed (e.g. Banded Tilapia). Exotic water fowl are also a known problem for tadpoles & eggs.

Although localized, this threat affects all major breeding wetland sites and is likely to be a recurrent threat as fish are introduced by the public

2

Wetland destruction

1.1 Housing and Urban Areas &
7.2 Dams and Water Management/Use

The destruction of Breeding sites by filling in and draining wetlands, converting rivers to canals, and channeling of stormwater into wetlands.

Relatively controlled and stable on the Cape Flats. A major threat in eastern populations.

3

Walls and tall barriers

1.1 Housing and Urban Areas

Solid barriers prevent toads and toadlets moving between Breeding sites and gardens.

The magnitude of this problem is strongly linked to adjacency to the Breeding sites.

4

Habitat destruction




Most of the range of this species has been lost to housing since the 1930’s. Housing and light industrial developments continue to be a major direct threat to this species as well as introducing many of the other threats mentioned herein.

Has already made major impacts on the population, but could still cause significant changes to particular populations.

5

Mowing

1.1 Housing and Urban Areas

Mowing has two aspects. Mowing in the migration period results in massive mortality. Mowing – especially with weedeaters - in safe-microsites (corners, drains, edgings) kills adults all year round.

Potentially as major a cause of deaths as traffic, but relatively easily mitigated.

6

Drains & canals

1.1 Housing and Urban Areas

Steep sided culverts, drains and canals act as one way traps funneling toads and toadlets to certain wetlands and preventing access to others.

Adult toads have a high site fidelity and return to sites. Trapped toads may have to make major round trips to get back to the area that they fell into the system. Toadlets washed into stormwater systems may experience high mortality

7

Culverts

1.1 Housing and Urban Areas

Curb stones prevent toads and toadlets from crossing roads and often channel them away from Breeding sites.

Very localized as a major threat to adjacent the Breeding sites. A relatively minor threat in residential areas where driveways provide access points.

8

Eutrophication & Water quality

9.1 Household Sewage & Urban Waste Water &
9.3 Agricultural and Forestry Effluents

Pollution, sediments, fertilizers, sewage and other runoff increase nutrient levels in rivers and wetlands, resulting in invasion of Typha and other invading species reducing the area of deep water required by toads for breeding. Changes in pH, siltation and poisons

A relatively minor problem as it affects toads only during the breeding season. Toads appear quite resilient to these influences.

However, major sewage spills into breeding sites (e.g. following the 2006 power cuts) may have a significant effect.



9

Swimming pools

1.1 Housing and Urban Areas

Pools, including ornamental pools, usually have steep sides that prevent toads and toadlets from escaping

A relatively minor cause of mortality easily mitigated, but requiring extensive public education and buy in.

10

Unfriendly gardens

1.1 Housing and Urban Areas

Pesticides, cats and dogs cause mortality. Paving, concreting, house enlargement and densification destroys habitat. Insecticides and pesticides destroy food sources and poison toads. Lack of cover increases desiccation and exposure to predators.

Insidious as it destroys habitat without much evidence of mortality.

11

Aquatic Weed Management

8.1 Invasive Alien species

Dredging and scooping of aquatic alien and indigenous growth in river and canal courses. This is localized in time to the period between breeding and toadlet emergence.

Dredging during the tadpole period can eliminate entire generations from Breeding sites and canals. Fortunately very easily mitigated.

12

Electric Fences

1.1 Housing and Urban Areas

Often erected at entry and exit points – associated with drainage were undesirable animals (otters, mongeese) access fisheries and birding areas. Toads use these preferentially for access to breeding sites. Sufficient height is needed to allow clearance for pairs in amplexis.

Locally significant, but restricted to a few sites. Relatively easy to mitigate.

13

Lack of knowledge

?

Much crucial information for management is unknown (i.e. how far do toads move from breeding sites?). Some of this information (e.g. longevity, population and breeding fluctuations) will require long time series to be of any use.

A major restriction on management, but best tackled as a long-term project, using data collected annually by volunteers participating in the action plan.

14
1   2   3   4   5   6   7


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©atelim.com 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət