Ana səhifə

Abstract legumes are commonly grown in the tropics under reduced solar

Yüklə 55.79 Kb.
ölçüsü55.79 Kb.


Effects of Solar Radiation Regimes on Growth and N2 Fixation of Soybean, Cowpea, and Bushbean1
F.I. Eriksen and A. S. Whitney2


Legumes are commonly grown in the tropics under reduced solar radiation due to dense cloud cover and shading from plantation or tall intercrops. This paper examines the growth and N2 fixation of several grain legumes common to the tropics on an Oxic Haplustoll in Hawaii. Plantings were made in April (warm season) and No­vember (cool season) of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) ‘Kahala’; Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata Walp.) ‘TVu 1190’ (April) and ‘TVu 4557 (Nov.); and bushbean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) ‘Burpee Ten­derpod’. Polypropylene netting was used to obtain 27, 45, 70, and 100% of the incoming solar radiation through the entire crop cycle. Consistent shading effects were with the three legumes during both warm and cool seasons even though absolute yields were lower in the cool season due to daylength and temperature sensitivity in soy­bean and cowpea. Nitrogen fixation parameters generally followed dry matter (DM) and seed yields. Total nodule activity (TNA) was very low in all the legumes at 27% sun. With the exception of bush­bean at 27% sun, shading caused an 34% average reduction in DM and grain yields, vs a 50% reduction in TNA, and a 76% reduction in nodule mass. Soybean TNA peaked 3 to 4 weeks after flowering, Cowpea (cool season) TNA peaked at flowering, and bushbean TNA peaked slightly before or at flowering. There was a tendency for a delay (≈ 2 weeks) at 70, 45, and 27% sun in the final stages of TNA, for summer and cool-season soybean and bushbean. These delays were not noted for cowpea or cool-season bushbean. Of the three legumes, cowpea was the least shade tolerant. It produced more DM at full sun than either soybean or bushbean, but at 27% sun, DM yields were similar for all three crops. The response of soybean to shade was intermediate with no reduction in DM and grain yield at 70% sun. Bushbean was the least affected by shading; in fact, maximum yields were obtained at 70% sun. At full sun, their leaves were yellow and seed weight was low; this problem could be corrected by N fertilization.
Additional index words. Shading, Nitrogen yield, Dry matter yield, Grain yield, Nodule weight, Acetylene reduction, Glycine max, Phas­eolus vulgaris, Vigna unguiculata.
THE dependence of plant growth on photosynthesis (and hence sunlight) is well established (Evans, 1972). Most plants adapt to changes in radiation re­gimes through both morphological and physiological changes. Shading of legumes generally causes elon­gated growth, reduced specific leaf weight (SLW), and increased leaf area per unit of plant weight (LAR) (Beuerlein and Pendleton, 1971; Bowes et al., 1972). Although shading affects growth and yield, only a few studies have been made on the effect of shading on N2 fixation. Chu and Robertson (1974) found that shading reduced both nodule number and size on white clover (Trifolium repens L.) and similar results have been reported for Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata Walp.) (Dart and Mercer, 1%5), lupin (Lupinus arboreus) (Sprent, 1973), soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]
Journal Series no. 2708 of the Hawaii Aprrc. Exp. Stn. This work is part of dissertation presented by the senior author in partial ful­fillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree in agronomy at the Univ. of Hawaii (Univ. Microfilm Pub. 78424) and was sup­ported jointly by the Hawaii Agric. Exp. Stn. and the USAID Con­tract ta-C-1207 (NifTAL Project, P.O. Box 0, Paia, Hawaii %779). Received 18 Oct. 1982. Published in Agron. J. 76:529-535.

2 Former research assistant and agronomist respectively, Dep. of Agronomy and Soil Science, Univ. of Hawaii, %822. Present ad­dress of senior author. Malling Agricultural College, 8340 Malling, Denmark.

(Yoshida, 1973; Lawn and Brun, 1974; Wahua and Miller, 1978; Trang and Giddens, 1980), and faba beans (Vicia faba L.) (Antoniw and Sprent, 1978).

The assessment of biological N2 fixation in the field by the acetylene-reduction technique (Hardy et al., 1973) has proved useful for measuring the effects of stress. Sprent (1973) found that shading of lupin de­creased the N2-fixation activity of the plant in pro­portion to the logarithm of relative irradiance. This was largely due to reduced nodule mass under shade, while the specific nodule activity was only slightly re­duced. Sprent and Bradford (1977) found that shading of faba beans prolonged total (TNA) nodule activity and delayed nodule senescence due in part to delayed senescence of the leaves in shaded plants.

Several studies have shown that symbiotic N2 fix­ation is dependent upon a daily continuous supply of photosynthesis (Virtanen et al., 1955; Lawn and Brun, 1974). Seasonal and diurnal variations in N2 fixation indicate that the process is quite sensitive to the supply of photosynthetic assimilates (Bergersen, 1970; Mague and Burris, 1972; Sloger et al., 1975).

Total plant acetylene-reduction activity of most leg­umes usually increases with plant age until the start of pod filling and then decreases markedly. However, differences among species and varieties have been re­ported (e.g., Hardy et al., 1%8; Harper and Hageman, 1972; Lawn and Brun, 1974; Sloger et al., 1975; Sprent and Bradford, 1977; Graham and Rosas, 1977). The decrease in N2 fixation during pod filling has been re­ported to result from an inadequate supply of assim­ilates from the shoot due to the sink strength of the developing pods (Lawn and Brun, 1974; Lawrie and Wheeler, 1975).

We studied the effect of various radiation regimes on the performance of several grain legumes in the field during the warm and cool seasons with respect to growth patterns (including yield and N2 fixation) in order to determine the relationship between these two characteristics under shaded conditions.
Three grain legumes were planted in April (summer) and November (cool season) on an Oxic Haplustoll near Paia, Hawaii, approximately 20º55'N156°22'W at about 100-m elevation. Phosphorus and K were applied 9 months prior to the April planting at a rate of 50 kg ha-' of P as treble superphosphate, and 180 kg ha -1 of K as muriate of potash. Lime was applied at 3400 kg ha-' to increase the pH to 6.3.

Bushbean ‘Burpee Tenderpod’ (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), soybean `Kahala', and cowpea selection TVu 1190 were planted 9 Apr. 1976 (summer). These varieties were planted again 4 Nov. 1976 (cool season) except that cowpea TVu 1190 was replaced by TVu 4557. Four different solar short­wave radiation regimes were established with polypropylene screening to provide 100, 70, 45, and 27% of full sun. The screening was stretched over the plots 1.9 m aboveground to allow air circulation and easy passage underneath. The sides facing east and west slanted down at a 45° angle to 1


m above the ground to shade the plants from morning and evening sun. Each shaded block measured 12.2 X 13.4 m. Three replicates of a split-plot arrangement in a com­pletely randomized block were used, with radiation regimes as whole plots and species as subplots. Each subplot con­sisted of six rows 2.9 m long and spaced 0.42 m apart. Plant populations of 365 000, 260 000, 180 000, and 130 400 plants ha-' were established with intrarow spacings of 65, 92, 132, and 183 mm for soybean, bushbean, cowpea TVu 1190, and cowpea TVu 4557, respectively. Prior to planting, seeds were scarified and inoculated with commercial Rhizobium cul­tures (Nitragin Co., Milwaukee, Wis.). The plots were watered as needed with impulse sprinklers. Each block was watered separately to compensate for less water use under reduced radiation.

Three plants were sampled at random from each plot at weekly intervals from 3 weeks after seeding to maturity for the April planting and at 1 to 3 week intervals for the No­vember planting. Plant height, acetylene-reduction activity, number and dry weight of nodules, and dry weights of roots, stems, leaves, and pods were determined at each sampling. Acetylene-reduction activity was determined by excavating three plants and gently shaking the roots free of soil. Each root system was cut from the tops and immediately placed in a 1000 ml plastic container with minimal agitation to avoid disloding the nodules from the roots. Acetylene (10% by volume) was introduced within 10 min of sampling. After incubation for 1.5 h, ethylene production was determined by gas chromatography. The roots, nodules, and top portions of each plant were dried at 55°C and individually weighed. The three plant samples were then combined for total N determination.

At maturity, the 3 m2 (including four of center rows of the six planted) were harvested, dried at 55°C, and total DM, total grain (seed) yield, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, and weight per seed were recorded. The N content of seeds at maturity, and combined (three replica­tions) root, nodule, and top samples at each sampling date were determined by Kjeldahl digestion (using CuSO4 and selenized Hengar granular catalyst) followed by measure­ment of NH4 by the diffusion process (modified Conway dishes) or an automatic NH4 analyzer.

A separate experiment was conducted in March 1977 to evaluate the N response of bush bean at 100 and 70% full sun. There were three replications, two radiation regimes (whole-plots), and two N levels (split-plots). Thirty kilo­grams ha-' of N as urea was applied to the plus-N treatments at planting and 40 kg ha-` 6 weeks later. All other manage­ment practices were the same as in the first experiment. At 4 weeks, specific leaf weight and leaf area ratio were mea­sured. At maturity, seed yield and components of yield were determined.


The average irradiance during the summer period was 26.8 MJ m-2 day-`, and during the cool season 17.6 MJ m-2 day-'. For the summer crop the average daily soil temperature at 50 mm depth in full sun in­creased linearly from 23.5°C at time of planting to 28°C at time of harvesting. For the cool-season crop the average soil temperature was 22°C for the duration of the experiment. The soil temperature under 27% of full sun was between 0.8°C (cool season) and 2.0°C (summer) lower than at full sun, with intermediate values for 70 and 45% full sun. Hereafter, radiation regimes will be designated as 100, 70, 45, and 27% sun.

Plant Growth Characteristics
The typical morphological changes associated with shading were observed; larger and thinner leaves, longer internodes, and a greater leaf area ratio. Shading did not affect plant heights of cowpea and bushbean except for some petiole elongation in bushbean. Soybean plant height increased linearly for the first 9 weeks after emergence for the summer crop, with the tallest plants occurring at 45% (600 mm) followed by 70 (560 mm), 27 (500 mm), and 100% (450 mm). During the cool season, the tallest plants were at 27% sun followed by 70, 45, and 100% sun. Heights were, respectively, 310, 270, 250, and 240 mm.

The TVu 1190 selection of cowpea had a viney habit, and did not flower during the summer. The TVu 4557 selection of cowpea was grown during the cool season only. It had a bushy habit in full sun, but at 70 and 45% sun about one-third of the plants were viney. At 27% sun growth was very retarded with no tendency toward viney growth.

Nodulation and N2 fixation
During the summer maximum nodulation for bush­bean was reached 3 weeks after emergence, but the maximum for soybean and cowpea occurred 6 to 9 weeks after emergence. Radiation regimes significantly influenced nodule dry weight (DW) in the summer crop of soybean, cowpea, and bushbean (Fig. 1). In soybean the effect of shading on nodule DW was sim­ilar during both seasons, although nodule DW in the cool season was only one-fourth of the summer values. Bushbean was less affected by season than soybean presumably because it was better adapted to cool weather. Our results are generally in agreement with others who have reported reductions in nodule mass due to shading of soybean (Sampaio and Dobereiner, 1%8; Bergersen, 1970; Yoshida, 1973; Lawn and Brutl, 1974; Kry, 1976; Wahua and Miller, 1978; Trang and Giddens, 1980), faba beans (Antoniw and Sprent, 1978), and cowpea (Dart and Mercer, 1%5).

Total nodule activity at different growth stages var­ied greatly between the three species tested (Fig. 2). At full sun, soybean TNA peaked at 3 to 4 weeks after flowering, cowpea (cool season only) peaked at flow-


ering, and bushbean peaked slightly before or at flow­ering. There was a tendency for a delay of about 2 weeks in the final stages of TNA at 70, 45, and 27% sun in summer soybean and bushbean, and 27% sun in the cool-season soybean. There was little or no effect on cowpea or cool-season bushbean. For the summer, soybean crop integrated values were not significantly affected by the three highest radiation regimes (Fig. 1). The first 5 to 6 weeks after emergence the TNA was

highest at full sun, due to delayed maturity at the other radiation regimes. Accordingly, soybean responded about the same as the faba beans studied by Sprent and Bradford (1977) (maximum 12.8 nmol plant-' s- '). Specific nodule activity (SNA) of soybean was not af­fected by shading at any sampling date. These results are contrary to the data of Wahua and Miller, (1978) who found that shading of soybean accelerated nodule senescence, reducing the SNA from 0.44 to 0.04 nmol


CZHZ (g nodule DW-') s-'. However, their plants were first shaded at the fourth trifoliate leaf stage, while in our experiment the plants were seeded beneath the shading material.

Total nodule activity for both cowpea varieties was highest at full sun for most sampling dates (Fig. 1). Plants grown at 70 and 45% sun had intermediate rates of TNA, and TNA was further reduced at 27% sun. The maximum average SNA of cowpea nodules ex­ceeded 53.9 nmol (g nodule DW-1) s-'; average for soybean was 32 nmol and bushbean was 28.9 nmol (g nodule DW)-' s-'.

Bushbean had the lowest TNA (Fig. 2), probably because it peaked at early bloom (only 4 weeks after emergence). By 5 weeks after emergence the activity had dropped to only half of that measured at 4 weeks, due mainly to reduced SNA [from approximately 33.3 to 16.7 nmol (g nodule DW') s-']. The DM yield of bushbean at the time of maximum TNA was only 8% of the total DM yield compared to 50% in soybean. Shading had no significant effect on TNA in bushbean in either season, except for the summer crop at 4 weeks, when full sun resulted in significantly higher than 27% sun.

Our results for bushbean were considerably lower than the maximum TNA of 5.6 to 8.3 nmol plant-'

s-' reported by Graham and Rosas (1977) for bush­bean and climbing bean. The fixation period reported by Graham and Rosas was also much longer, reaching a peak at 9 weeks after emergence, compared to 4 weeks in the present experiment. Apparently "Ten­derpod' bushbean has been selected under conditions of high N fertilization and has a very poor N2-fixation capacity. The data reported here correspond more closely to the 1.7 nmol CZHZ plant' s-' for dark red kidney beans (Janssen and Vitosh, 1974), who showed that TNA per plant was not different at light intensities of 4500 and 7000 lux.

In summer there was very little decrease in TNA for both bushbean and soybean until radiation was reduced below 45% sun, indicating that adequate pho­tosynthates were translocated to the roots to support near maximum NZ fixation. During the cool season however, irradiance was lower and TNA was reduced when radiation fell below 70%, was reduced more dur­ing the cool season than during the warm season (Fig. 2).

Dry Matter and Accumulation
Dry matter accumulation of roots, nodules, stems, leaves, and pods at different radiation regimes were season-dependent and species-dependent. However, the proportions of the different plant parts did not vary with season.

The maximum DM accumulation of soybean during the summer was 9 Mg ha-' (Table 1, Fig. 3 and 4), but during the cool season the maximum DM yield was only 2.5 Mg ha-1. The variety used was photo­period sensitive and began flowering 3.5 weeks after emergence in the cool season 10 days earlier than the summer crop. This restricted the formation of addi-


tional photosynthetic surface, thereby decreasing the supply of photosynthates to the nodules as the sink strength of the developing grain became more intense.

The total DM accumulation of both cowpea vari­eties was significantly reduced at 45 and 27% sun (Ta­ble 1, Fig. 3 and 4). The DM yield for both varieties at 27% sun was only one-fourth of the DM yield at 70% sun. This was a much greater yield reduction than that noted for soybean or bushbean. Hence, both va­rieties proved quite sensitive to shading; similar to the results obtained by Adedipe and Ormrod (1975) and Tarila et al. (1977).

Cool-season DM yields of bushbean averaged about 60% of the summer DM yields. This is about as ex­pected if temperature and daylength were to have no effect since average irradiance in the cool season was 61% of the summer irradiance. Dry matter accumu­

lation of bushbean in the summer at 100, 70, and 45% sun increased during the first 8 weeks to about 4 Mg ha' and at 27% sun to about 2.5 Mg ha-' (Fig. 3). After about 8 weeks no increase in DM yield took place in full sun and the leaves became yellow and senescent. This coincided with a significantly lower concentration of N in these plants: 2.5% N at 100% sun, 2.8% N at 70% sun, and 3.0% N at 45 and 27% sun. At maturity the total DM yields at full sun and 27% sun were only two-thirds of the yields at 70 and 45% (Fig. 3). The low DM yield in full sun could be due to rapid de­struction of chlorophyll which exceeded the rate of chlorophyll regeneration (as postulated for N deficient grasses by Eriksen and Whitney, 1981), and the earlier maturation (by 2 weeks) of plants grown at full sun. Dry matter accumulation of bushbean at full and 70% sun was increased significantly by adding 75 kg N ha-'


(Table 2), indicating that N was a major limiting factor for growth of bushbean (except when grown in dense shade). Similar yield responses to N fertilizer for bean plants were also reported by Sistachs (1970) and Al­meida et al., (1973).

The total growth period for soybean, bushbean, and cowpea during the cool season was about the same, but the proportion of the different plant parts at a given age differed markedly. Cowpea TVu 4557 first started flowering 7 to 8 weeks after emergence at which time 25 to 50% of the total pod DM of soybean and bush­bean had already been formed. At maturity (13 to 14 weeks after emergence) about half of the total DM in cowpea TVu 4557 was found in the seeds and pods compared to 85 to 89% for bushbean and soybean. Compared to soybean which had approximately the same yield, cowpea was less efficient in proportioning photosynthate between the grain and other plant parts. Cowpea had the residues N remaining per ha up to 13.8 kg ha-' at 70% declining to 10.1 at 45% and 4.7 at 27%. Thus, cowpea may be preferred for low input farming systems where feed for livetock and/or an N benefit to the following crop is an important consid­eration.

Nitrogen percentages in soybean DM ranged from 3.0 to 3.7 for the summer crop, were slightly higher for the cool-season crop and did not vary significantly with plant maturity or radiation regime. The N per­centage of cowpea TVu 4557 (cool season) decreased with increasing maturity from 3.5 to 1.8% at full sun and from 3.5 to 2.7% at 27% sun, but there was no effect for the summer (non-flowering) cowpea TVu 1190. For bushbean the N percentage (excluding fallen leaves) tended to be highest at 70% and lowest at 100%. At 70% average N percentage (over seasons) decreased from 3.8 to 2.4% during the period 3 to 8 weeks after emergence. The summer (non-flowering) crop of cow­pea had the highest total N yield: 350 kg N ha-1.

The top/root ratio of the three species was not of~ fected by radiation regime. These findings correspond with the findings by Dart and Mercer (1%5) for cow­pea, but differ from the data of McKee (1%2) and Sprent (1973), who reported that shading increased the top/root ratio of lupin and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus cor­niculatus L.). However the top/root (DM basis) dif­

fered significantly with species and maturity. For soy­bean the top/root ratio increased linearly from 4.6 at 4 weeks after emergence to 22 at maturity. Similar results were reported by Mayaki et al. (1976) and Si­vakumar et al. (1977). The top/root ratio of bushbean increased linearly from 6 at 4 weeks to 30 at 9 weeks, and remained constant thereafter. The top/root ratio of cowpea TVu 1190 (non-flowering) also increased with maturity (from 7 at 4 weeks to 16 at 13 weeks after emergence), but the top/root ratio of cowpea TVu 4557 increased only slightly with maturity. Thus, cow­pea again would be preferred for low input situations where an N benefit to the following crop is desired.
Grain Yield and Yield Components
Grain (seed) yields of the three legumes were sig­nificantly depressed at 27% in all cases and at 70 and 45% in the case of both crops of soybeans and cool­season cowpea (Fig. 3 and Table 1). Except for bush­bean at 100% sun, the main limiting component of yield was number of pods per plant. Shading decreased pods per plant, especially during the cool season. Wa­hua and Miller (1978) also found that number of pods per plant was the main component of yield in soybean altered by shading. Number of seeds per pod was un­affected by shading in all three species except during the cool season where 27% caused a significant de­crease in number of seeds per pod in cowpea and soy­bean. Shading had no effect on weight per seed in cow­pea (cool-season) and the summer soybean (Table 1). During the cool season, the weight per seed of soybean was significantly lower at 27%. Weight per seed was also generally lower during the cool season probably due to cold temperature stress on the soybean plants and earlier flowering during the cool season. Weight per seed of bushbean at full sun averaged about 80% of the seed weight at 70, 45, and 27% for the summer crop (74% for the cool-season crop).

The low weight per seed and total seed yield of bush­bean at full sun was probably due to an inadequate N supply. The bushbean fixed very little N and was there­fore almost entirely dependent on soil N. There was early leaf senescence in full sun, probably due also to inadequate N in the leaves. Thus, bushbean responded similarly to N-deficient grasses at full sun (Eriksen and Whitney, 1981).

In the bushbean N-fertilizer experiment it was shown that the low weight per seed and total seed yield in full sun was probably due to N deficiency (Table 2). Weight per seed was increased by 24% at full sun with the addition of 75 kg N ha-' but at the 70% level it was increased by only 12%. Weight per seed and the total grain yield were slightly higher at 70% than at 100%, indicating that the 75 kg N ha-' was not enough for maximum growth.

Shading reduced the yields of cowpea TVu 4557 more than soybean or bushbean (Table 1). At 27% sun the grain yield for cowpea was only 9% (91% reduction) of the grain yield at 100%. A severe decrease in grain yields of cowpea under shaded conditions was also reported by Ezedinma (1973) and Tarila et al., (1977).

There was no radiation effect on harvest index in the cool-season soybeans. Cool-season cowpea leaves



Graham, P.H., and J.C. Rosas. 1977. Growth and development of indeterminate bush and climbing cultivars of Phaseolus vulgaris L. inoculated with Rhizobium. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 88:503-508. Hardy, R.W.F., R.C. Bums, and R.D. Holsten. 1973. Applications of the acetylene-ethylene assay for measurement of nitrogen fix­ation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 5:57-81.

R.D. Holsten, E.K. Jackson, and R.C. Bums. 1%8. The acetylene-ethylene assay for N2 fixation; laboratory and field eval­uation. Plant Physiol. 43:1185-1207.

Harper, J.E., and R.H. Hageman. 1972. Canopy and seasonal pro­files of nitrate reductase in soybeans (Glycine mix L. Merr.). Plant Physiol. 49:146-154.

Janssen, K.A., and M.L. Vitosh. 1974. Effect of lime, sulphur and molybdenum and nitrogen fixation on yield in dark red kidney beans. Agron. J. 6:736-740.

Kry, T. 1976. The effect of shading and root temperature on growth, nodulation and symbiotic nitrogen fixation by soybeans. (Ph.D. Diss., Univ. of Georgia). 83 p.

Lawn, R.J., and W.A. Brun. 1974. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in soybeans. I. Effect of photosynthetic source-sink manipulations. Crop Sci. 14:11-16.

Lawrie, A.C., and C.T. Wheeler. 1975. Nitrogen fixation in the root nodules of Vicia faba L. in relation to the assimilation of carbon. New Phytol. 74:429-436.

Mague, T.H., and R.H. Bums. 1972. Reduction of acetylene and nitrogen by field-grown soybeans. New Phytol. 71:275-286. Mayaki, W.C., I.D. Teare, and L.R. Stone. 1976. Top and root growth of irrigated and non-irrigated soybeans. Crop Sci. 16:92-94. McKee, G.W. 1%2. Effects of shading and plant competition on seedling growth and nodulation in birdsfoot trefoil. Pa. Agro. Exp. Stn. Bull. No. 689. University Park, Pa.

Sampaio, I.B.M., and J. Dobereiner. 1%8. Efeito do sombreamento e caledrio na taxi relativa de fixacao de nitrogenio e na eficiencia dos nodules da soja (Glycine mix). (Shading and lime effects on rate of N-fixation and efficiency of soybean nodules). Pesq. Agro­pec. Brasil. 3:250-256.

Sistachs, E. 1970. Effects of N fertilization and inoculation on yield and N content of black beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Rev. Cubana Cienc. Agric. 4:227-230.

Sivakumar, M.V.K., H.M. Taylor, and R.H. Shaw. 1977. Top and root relations of field-grown soybeans. Agron. J. 69:470-473. Sloger, C., D. Bezdicek, R. Milberg, and N. Boonkerd. 1975. Sea­sonal and diumal variations in N2(C2H2)-fixing activity in field soybeans. p. 271-284. In W.D.P. Stewart (ed.) Nitrogen fixation by free-living micro-organisms. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Sprent, J.I. 1973. Growth and nitrogen fixation in Lupinus arboreus as affected by shading and water supply. New Phytol. 72:1005­1022.

. 1976. Nitrogen fixation by legume subjected to water and light stresses. p. 405-420. In P.S. Nutman (ed.) Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in plants. Cambridge University Press, New York.

and A.M. Bradford. 1977. Nitrogen fixation in field beans (Vicia faba) as affected by population density, shading and its relationship with soil moisture. J. Agnc. Sci. Camb. 88:303-310.

Tarila, A.G.I., D.P. Ormrod, and N.O. Adedipe. 1977. Effects of phosphorus and light intensity on growth, and development of the cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). Ann. Bot. 41:75-83.

Trang, K.M., and J. Giddens. 1980. Shading and temperature as environmental factors affecting growth, nodulation, and sym­biotic N2 fixation by soybeans. Agron. J. 72:305-308.

Virtanen, A.I., T. Moisio, and R.N. Burris. 1955. Fixation of nitro­gen by nodules excised from illuminated and darkened pea plants. Acta Chem. Scand. 9:184-186.

Wahua, T.A.T., and D.A. Miller. 1978. Effects of shading on the N2-fixation, yield, and plant composition of field-grown soybeans. Agron. J. 70:387-392.

Yoshida, S. 1973. The influence of shading on nodulation and ni­trogen fixation of soybean. Proc. Crop Sci. Soc. Jpn. 42:135-136.

and stems apparently required an increasing propor­tion of the N and other assimilates as light became more limiting; thus harvest index was severely reduced with decreased radiation. Bushbean harvest index de­clined slightly with decreasing radiation at the summer harvest.

Normally, high harvest index is associated with high grain yield. There was a positive correlation with yield in our experiment at 70, 45, and 27% in the cool sea­son; and at 45 and 27% in the warm season. This may be an important consideration in a multiple cropping situation where the legume may be shaded by the as­sociated crop, especially if an N benefit from vegeta­tive residues is desired in addition to the grain yield.


The legumes we tested all did poorly at 27% level of shade.

Cowpea was the most shade sensitive, soybean was intermediate, bushbean was least sensitive; seed yields were similar both summer and cool seasons (after ad­justing for solar radiation effects).

There were interactions between solar radiation, daylength, and temperature, particularly in soybean and cowpea.


The authors wish to thank Dr. K.R. Stockinger for his helpful discussions, also Corinne Holland for typing this manuscript.


Adedipe, N.O., and D.P. Ormrod. 1975. Effects of light intensity on growth, and on chlorophyll, carbohydrate and phosphorus con­tents of the cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). Biochem. Physiol. Pflanzen, 167:301-309.

Almeida, D.L., de, G.G. Pessanha, and A.F. Penteado. 1973. Efeito de calagem e da adubacao fosfatada e nitrogenada na nodulacao e producfio do feijoiero (Phaseolus vulgaris). Pesq. Agropec. Bras. Ser. Agron. 8:127-130.

Antoniw, L.D., and J.I. Sprent. 1978. Growth and nitrogen fixation of Phaseolus vul iris L. at two irradiances. II. Nitrogen fixation. Annals Bot. 42:99-410.

Bergersen, F.J. 1970. The quantitative relationship between nitrogen fixation and the acetylene-reduction assay. Austr. J. Biol. nitrogen 23:1015-1025.

Beuerlein, J.E., and J.W. Pendleton. 1971. Photosynthetic rates and light saturation curves of individual soybean leaves under field conditions. Crop Sci. 11:217-219.

Bowes, G., W.J. Ogren, and R.H. Hageman. 1972. Light saturation, photosynthesis rate, RuDP carboxylase activity and specific leaf weight in soybean grown under different light intensities. Crop Sci. 12:77-79.

Chu, A.C.P., and A.G. Robertson. 1974. The effects of shading and defoliation and nodulation and nitrogen fixation by white clover. Plant Soil 41:509-519.

Dart, P.J., and F.V. Mercer. 1%5. The effect of temperature, level of ammonium nitrate, and light intensity on the growth and mod­ulation ofcowpea (Vigna sinensis Endl. ex Hassk.).Austr. J. Agric. Res. 16:321-345.

Eriksen, F.I., and A.S. Whitney. 1981. The effects of light intensity on the growth of some tropical forage species. I. Interaction of light intensity and nitrogen fertilization on six forage grasses. Agron. J. 73:427-433.

Evans, G.C. 1972. The quantitative analysis of plant growth. Black­well Scientific Publ. Oxford.

Ezedinma, F.O. 1973. Seasonal variations in vegetative growth of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) in relation to insolation and ambient temperatures in South Nigeria. p. 138-153. Proc. 1st Int. Inst. Trop. Agric. Grain Legume Imp. Workshop. IITA, Iba­dan, Nigeria

Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur © 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət