A collection of Law Review Articles Citing Legal Blogs

New York Civil Law (1)

1. 
   Alan J. Pierce, Survey of New York Law: Insurance Law, 55 Syracuse L. Rev. 1163 (2005)
   

URL: http://ninomania.blogspot.com

1. 
   David M. Wagner, Marriage: An Achievement of Centuries for the Protection of Women and Children, 38 New Eng.L. Rev. 683 (2004)
   

URL: http://circuit9.blogspot.com

1. 
   Steven G. Kalar et al, A Booker Advisory: Into the Breyer Patch, 29 Champion 8 (March, 2005)
   

2. 
   David L. McColgin & Brett G. Sweitzer, Grid & Bear It: Post-Booker Sentencing Litigation Strategies – Part 2, 29 Champion 42 (Dec., 2005)
   

URL: http://nominations.blogspot.com

1. 
   David Lane, Bush v. Gore, Vanity Fair, and a Supreme Court Law Clerk’s Duty of Confidentiality, 18 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 863 (Summer, 2005)
   

URL: http://thenonbillablehour.typepad.com

1. 
   Feature: Some War-Winning Law Blogs, 20 Maine Bar J. 107 (Spring 2005)
   

Current URL: http://www.opiniojuris.org

Former URL: http://lawofnations.blogspot.com

1. 
   Vicki C. Jackson, World Habeas Corpus, 91 Cornell L. Rev. 303 (Jan., 2006)
   

2. 
   Julian G. Ku, International Delegations and the New World Court Order, 81 Wash. L. Rev. 1 (Feb., 2006)
   

OrCon Law (1)

1. Briefs: Another Link for the Webroll, 65 Or. St. B. Bull. 7 (June, 2005)

Patently-O: Patent Law Blog (4)

URL: http://patentlaw.typepad.com

1. 
   Matthew Bye et al (panelists), Symposium: Do Overly Broad Patents Lead to Restrictions on Innovation and Competition?, 15 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 947 (Summer, 2005)
   

2. 
   Donald S. Chisum, Reforming Patent Law Reform, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 336 (Spring, 2005)
   

3. 
   John M. Eden, Unnecessary Indeterminacy: Process Patent Protection after Kinik v. ITC, 2006 Duke L. & Tech. Rev. 9 (2006)
   

4. 
   James G. McEwen, Is the Cure Worse Than the Disease? An Overview of the Patent Reform Act of 2005, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 55 (Fall 2005)
   

URL: http://williampatry.blogspot.com

1. 
   Laura R. Bradford, Parody and Perception: Using Cognitive Research to Expand Fair Use in Copyright, 46 B.C. L. Rev 705 (July, 2005)
   

PrawfsBlawg (2)

1. 
   Ethan J. Leib, On Collaboration, Organizations, and Conciliation in the General Theory of Contract, 24 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 1 (2005)
   

2. 
   Claire Tuck, Note: Policy Formulation at the NLRB: A Viable Alternative to Notice and Comment Rulemaking, 27 Cardozo L. Rev. 1117 (Nov., 2005)
   

ProfessorBainbridge.com (11)

1. 
   Stephen M. Bainbridge, The Case for Limited Shareholder Voting Rights, 53 UCLA L. Rev. 601 (Feb., 2006)
   

2. 
   Paul L. Caron & Rafael Gely, Book Review:What Law Schools Can Learn from Billy Beane and the Oakland Athletics, by Michael Lewis, 82 Tex. L. Rev. 1483 (May, 2004)
   

3. 
   Stuart P. Green, Uncovering the Cover-Up Crimes, 42 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 9 (Winter, 2005)
   

4. 
   Steven M. Haas, Note: Toward a Controlling Shareholder Safe Harbor, 90 Va. L. Rev. 2245 (Dec., 2004)
   

5. 
   M. Todd Henderson & James C. Spindler, Corporate Heroin: A Defense of Perks, Executive Loans, and Conspicuous Consumption, 93 Geo. L.J. 1835 (Aug., 2005)
   

6. 
   Renee M. Jones, Dynamic Federalism: Competition, Cooperation and Securities Enforcement, 11 Conn. Ins. L.J. 107 (Fall, 2004)
   

7. 
   Ian B. Lee, Is There a Cure for Corporate “Psychopathy”?, 42 Am. Bus. L.J. 65 (Winter/Spring, 2005)
   

8. 
   Drew D. Massey, Dueling Provisions: The 21^st Amendment’s Subjugation to the Dormant Commerce Clause Doctrine, 7 Transactions 71 (Fall, 2005)
   

9. 
   James E. Rogers, Comment: Going Too Far is Worse than Not Going Far Enough: Principle-Based Accounting Standards, International Harmonization, and the European Paradox, 27 Hous. J. Int’l L 429 (Winter, 2005)
   

10. 
    Guhan Subramanian, Bargaining in the Shadow of Takeover Defenses, 113 Yale L.J. 621 (Dec., 2003)
    

11. 
    Jared Wessel, Judicial Policy-Making at the International Criminal Court: An Institutional Guide to Analyzing International Adjudication, 44 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 377 (2006)
    

1. 
   William M. Richman, Women of the Courts Symposium: Dedication: Howard Friedman, 36 U. Tol. L. Rev. 813 (Summer, 2005)
   

URL: http://sheldman.blogspot.com

1. 
   Theodore W. Ruger et al, The Supreme Court Forecasting Project: Legal and Political Science Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decisionmaking, 104 Colum. L. Rev. 1150 (May, 2004)